Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You are blinded by your own ignorance. Just remember, you'll get no quick greed fix here.
I realize that without an audit, big carriers and/or huge subscription numbers won't increase the pps. Obviously this makes for a very weak source of income for Frank. So hopefully he'll do something about this in the near future. Buyback?...if the L2's could only tell.
We’ve learned Frank has been in legal trouble in the past. He has pending lawsuits against him now. But thankfully these matters have not yet hindered QTN/TMM’s growth. At least it doesn’t look like it as of yet.
Think about this for a minute….if we combine .0001-.0002, the angry investors and the popularity of this phenomenal growing stock….then how could Frank benefit by doing a r/s if after the r/s he still refuses to report/release TMM’s current and official numbers? If the r/s is suppose to attract new investors and increase visibility, then Frank should see it as an oxymoron.
So with that said, I'll continue to believe that Frank’s reasons for not having released an audit yet, are because of the complexities of having to accurately generate and document TMM’s correct information that "should be" contractually expected and required of Frank by T/W, Cox Cable and the like. After all, their revenues and expenditures have to match.
I say we continue to be patient. Good things will come. jmo
Good luck Sam.
I'm looking to take a much fatter position as soon as my tax refund comes in.
You know.....maybe if you would have waited for TMM to become a fully reporting company, you wouldn't have to publicly sweat that $230,000.000 you invested into this non-reporting pink.
Itesprit's postings were merely redundant speculation?
And by the way, what kind of person would spend $230,000.00 on TMM stock on?
Why?....are you one of those that would take the information and determine whether or not to sell or buy more TMM stock?
If your answer is yes, well then go look in a mirror and tell yourself what a .....
Even if they had disclosed every thing they learned, would the information, good or bad, constitute an execution to buy or sell being "unofficial"?
Again, without numbers officially documented, the GG will do nothing to increase the value of our personal investment.
But Q ....Q will benefit without a doubt.
Just curious here, but to those certain persistent individuals who seem unnerved as to why some or all of the information gathered by Doc and Imak, is not being disclosed, I ask this question…Even if they had disclosed every thing they learned, would the information, good or bad, constitute an execution to buy or sell being "unofficial"?
"Not getting my hopes up BUT Qbid may
turn out to be one of the most compelling
plays of '06."
In time Triangle Multi Media will be our all-time Cinderella story! :)
Hey Fly you are missing all the nice weather back here at home. 60+ yesterday...mid January at that. Crazy huh? :)
"This is all speculation."
aahhh....my favorite song.
Could you play it again Firefly :)
"One small step for SEC...one giant leap for stockholders."
WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 - Outlining the details of his first major initiative, Christopher Cox, the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said that next week the agency would propose the most extensive overhaul since 1992 of the way companies disclose compensation to senior executives and directors.
"The marketplace for executive compensation has proceeded apace in the intervening decade and a half and the results have been an increasing amount of executive compensation that is escaping disclosure," Mr. Cox told a group of reporters over lunch at the agency's headquarters.
Once adopted, the new rules would provide considerable assistance to investors, who are often unable to glean from corporate filings the total compensation of top executives. But the rules would still fall far short of the ambitious corporate democracy proposals made for many years by stockholders and some lawmakers, including one proposal that would give the investors some say in setting pay scales.
Those proposals have gained little political traction in Washington, even as a growing body of evidence has emerged to suggest that at many companies there is no correlation between executive pay and company performance....
Yes, I understand that Mr. G, but my point was that if she wanted to buy more, she would have to wait longer due to the recent increase.
It's only fair to give this accurate explaination...just read it and you'll see what I mean. It's from the same website.
The basic premise behind volume indicators, including the Accumulation/Distribution Line, is that volume precedes price. Volume reflects the amount of shares traded in a particular stock, and is a direct reflection of the money flowing into and out of a stock. Many times before a stock advances, there will be period of increased volume just prior to the move. Most volume or money flow indicators are designed to identify early increases in positive or negative volume flow to gain an edge before the price moves. (Note: the terms "money flow" and "volume flow" are essentially interchangeable.)
Well if you plan on loading up at .0001 and have not placed your order yet, then you might want to take a look at the recent accum/dist.
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=QBID,uu[h,a]daclyyay[db][pb50!b200][vc60][iUc20!Lf]&....
Better bring your lunch. :)
Skunks were you already in line before the drop to .0001 last week?
Not here for your judgement Z....but if it makes you feel better, and not being contradictive to my prior statement by the way...I do think he's a dumbass.
Thanks Doc.
Color it what you may....it's still speculation.
Doc I couldn't agree with you more. In fact, I will go as far to say that I am grateful for Frank. His productive achievements that have benefited QTN/TMM to date have been nothing less than impressive.
Don't get me wrong, I too believe in this product. It's that when I was reading over the iHub "User Agreement", I didn't see where I had to put up with posters that post ridiculously speculative statements.
People need to post either something factually beneficial and/or share a positive statement. And sure, it's ok for someone to disagree, so long as they don't become a drama queen or whine for hind tit.
"KK, what athletes for the Gay Games have been porfiled on QTV? I don't believe that I have read one report on these profiles. Thanks."
Now who's calling the kettle black Sputnik?
"Prescience mike, prescience. I am correct and time will prove me so, as it has in the past."
...you mean
"Speculation Mike, speculation...."
Here you go again!...please show us proof of this claim.
"Don't you think it is plausible for Frank to be withholding the financials on this company because the subs and revenue numbers are in the mud?"
When did you witness the sub count and revenue docs?
Your asking me for proof? Proof of what? I have'nt made a claim either way. I don't have to counter Sputnik's speculation! For what?!!! I have expectations...and I don't need proof for those expectations.
Sputnik's claim is nothing but bullsh*t speculation and both of you know that.
Like most, I have been waiting and will continue to wait for official documented proof. I suggest you and the space cowboy do the same.
Again, ....you said that Q has no revenues, can you share proof of that or provide a link to the documentation.
May I make a suggestion?...how about you take a trip to Uranus, you may find it there.
Hi,
Thanks for writing.
Q television will be unscrambling their signal during the week of the games, so the service will be free. You will have to check to see if you get Q in your area. If it is not yet available, it may be soon. Q is moving into new markets every week.
Thanks
Brenda
Brenda Schumacher
Marketing and Public Relations
Gay Games VII
4753 N. Broadway, Suite 602
Chicago, IL 60640
phone: 773-907-2006
fax: 773-453-8014
********************************
Michael,
Great question – yes, you most certainly will be able to view Gay Games VII on Q Television. Q is our major broadcast sponsor and is running Gay Games programming even now, profiling athletes training for Gay Games, organizations who support Gay Games and special features about the plans for the July event. Look for details on our website and on Q Television for the amount of coverage during the week of Gay Games.
Thanks for your question and let us know if you have any others! – JQS
James Q. Simmons
Sports & Events Marketing Manager
james.simmons@gaygameschicago.org
773-433-8004
*******************************************
Yes, Q will be televising Gay Games VII.
Ken
Ken Angermeier
773-433-8017
GAY GAMES VII
Chicago, USA
July 15-22, 2006
I did!!!...and the unusually warm weather we had through the holidays made it even more enjoyable.
Hey Rich you might try either Rod, Doc or MT
Hey Firefly...hows my neighbor? Hope you and the family had a wonderful time over the holidays.
You said that Q has no revenues....wow, can you share proof of that or provide a link to the documentation. Thanks
Sounds like DT's to me.
Still looking for that instant greed fix huh? :)
Okay...I'm lighting up the peace pipe here :)....I agree with you here.
Besides, desperate measures are not needed at Q anyway. Hell, they have only just begun. And off to a FAT start if I might add.
Took you that long to find one of your many stocks worthy enough to mention?
Obviously as is your investment mind.
This is a long play correct?
Paranoia ring a bell?
aha...yes I know. Just wrote it out too fast, sorry. :)
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
Mike is a bad boy.
As the “New Year” approaches, we just might find out how much we really appreciate Frank. I think it's fair to say that we will end this year with 94 press releases. That’s 94 press releases that reflect success. Now I don’t know about you guys, but that many PR’s has proved to be a very busy year. To date, Q’s growth has been nothing less than exciting. Personally, as I look back at Frank’s/TMM’s achievements, I can honestly say that 2005 has come to a satisfying end on a mostly impressive year. And as for 2006, I believe it is off to a good start. Obviously patients are key on this investment so you’ll find no instant greed fix here.