Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Still No RS listed on FINRA;) If it doesn't show up anytime soon then ICLD will take off and give you all your money back.
No RS...Holy Volume!!!
Don't believe the rumor ICLD is rolling out 5g contracts.
If nobody's buying now than who bough the 460 mil? Why stop when so close?
Does that AR include divisions sold off? As in where there company products sold off that are responsible for the debt to income ratio for that quarter?
If they are doing it for dilution it's going down.
Keep watch for ICLD on http://otce.finra.org/DailyList If RS shows get out.
Where are those supposed hurricane contracts?
Wells Notice = No RS approval anytime soon?
AS maxed out matters much more than Wells Notice.
Source?
Legal stuff takes forever. Hold on for the maxed out AS and sell the pop. Then who knows.
Wells allegations often beatable.
"But the Wells Notice is not the beginning of the end. It just, as we lawyers say, sets forth the allegations against the Subject and allows that Subject to “join issue” by submitting a response. Are those allegations beatable? Often times, yes!
Because this article is generally read by brokers/registered representatives, it will focus on the FINRA Wells Notice. Similar rules apply to the SEC Wells Notice. The main exception is that when it comes to the SEC, it brings an action in federal court, not before a FINRA arbitration panel."
http://www.wealthmanagement.com/blog/finra-s-present-wells-notice-it-beatable
"Wells the beginning of the end? Far from it! While there is certainly mail one would rather receive, a Wells Notice is simply a letter that FINRA or the SEC sends to individuals or firms (the “Subject”) when it intends to commence an enforcement action. The Notice states that FINRA or the SEC has made a determination that it will commence a litigation/arbitration against that Subject. Specifically, a Wells Notice from FINRA, means that FINRA will be bringing a disciplinary proceeding a/k/a an enforcement arbitration. The Wells Notice provides the Subject the opportunity to explain why, through the facts and the law, the enforcement action should not be brought. While the Notice is not mandatory, it is the custom of both the SEC and FINRA to send one."
http://www.wealthmanagement.com/blog/finra-s-present-wells-notice-it-beatable
13 (A) provide such information to the Commission as the
Commission may by rule or regulation prescribe as necessary
or appropriate, identifying such large trader and all
accounts in or through which such large trader effects such
transactions;
10 (b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or
sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange
or any security not so registered, or any securitiesbased
swap agreement[32] any manipulative or deceptive device
or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations
as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate
in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
SEC. 9. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly,
by the use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of
interstate commerce, or of any facility of any national securities exchange,
or for any member of a national securities exchange—
(1) For the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance
of active trading in any security other than a government security,
or a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market
for any such security, (A) to effect any transaction in such security
which involves no change in the beneficial ownership thereof,
or (B) to enter an order or orders for the purchase of such security
with the knowledge that an order or orders of substantially the
same size, at substantially the same time, and at substantially the
same price, for the sale of any such security, has been or will be
entered by or for the same or different parties, or (C) to enter any
order or orders for the sale of any such security with the knowledge
that an order or orders of substantially the same size, at substantially
the same time, and at substantially the same price, for the
Sec. 9 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 86
purchase of such security, has been or will be entered by or for the
same or different parties.
(2) To effect, alone or with 1 or more other persons, a series
of transactions in any security other than a government security,
any security not so registered, or in connection with any securitybased
swap or security-based swap agreement with respect to such
security creating actual or apparent active trading in such security,
or raising or depressing the price of such security, for the purpose
of inducing the purchase or sale of such security by others.
(3) If a dealer, broker, security-based swap dealer, major security-based
swap participant, or other person selling or offering for
sale or purchasing or offering to purchase the security, a securitybased
swap, or a security-based swap agreement with respect to
such security, to induce the purchase or sale of any security other
than a government security, any security not so registered, any security-based
swap, or any security-based swap agreement with respect
to such security by the circulation or dissemination in the ordinary
course of business of information to the effect that the price
of any such security will or is likely to rise or fall because of market
operations of any 1 or more persons conducted for the purpose
of raising or depressing the price of such security.
(4) If a dealer, broker, security-based swap dealer, major security-based
swap participant, or other person selling or offering for
sale or purchasing or offering to purchase the security, a securitybased
swap, or security-based swap agreement with respect to such
security, to make, regarding any security other than a government
security, any security not so registered, any security-based swap, or
any security-based swap agreement with respect to such security,
for the purpose of inducing the purchase or sale of such security,
such security-based swap, or such security-based swap agreement
any statement which was at the time and in the light of the circumstances
under which it was made, false or misleading with respect
to any material fact, and which that person knew or had reasonable
ground to believe was so false or misleading.
(5) For a consideration, received directly or indirectly from a
broker, dealer, security-based swap dealer, major security-based
swap participant, or other person selling or offering for sale or purchasing
or offering to purchase the security, a security-based swap,
or security-based swap agreement with respect to such security, to
induce the purchase of any security other than a government security,
any security not so registered, any security-based swap, or any
security-based swap agreement with respect to such security by the
circulation or dissemination of information to the effect that the
price of any such security will or is likely to rise or fall because of
the market operations of any 1 or more persons conducted for the
purpose of raising or depressing the price of such security.
(6) To effect either alone or with one or more other persons any
series of transactions for the purchase and/or sale of any security
other than a government security for the purpose of pegging, fixing,
or stabilizing the price of such security in contravention of such
rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary
or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of
investors.
SEC. 17. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person in the offer or
sale of any securities (including security-based swaps) or any security-based
swap agreement (as defined in section 3(a)(78) of the Securities
Exchange Act) by the use of any means or instruments of
transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use
of the mails, directly or indirectly—
(1) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, or
(2) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue
statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material
fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(3) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business
which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon
the purchaser.
5 (c) It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly,
to make use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication
in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell
or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise
any security, unless a registration statement has been filed
as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject
of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date
of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination
under section 8.
Item 8.01 Other Events.
In the annual reports of InterCloud Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for each of the fiscal years ended 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Company disclosed that it had previously received a subpoena as part of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) known as “In the Matter of Certain Stock Promotions.” On December 15, 2017, the Company received a written “Wells Notice” from the SEC related to that same investigation indicating the SEC Staff’s preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an action against the Company in connection with such investigation.
A Wells Notice is neither a formal allegation of wrongdoing nor a finding that the Company violated any law. Rather, it provides the Company with an opportunity to respond to issues raised by the SEC Staff and offer its perspective prior to any SEC decision or formal allegation being made.
The Wells notice issued to the Company states that the proposed action against the Company would allege violations of Sections 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 9(a), 10(b), and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The Wells Notice states that the Staff’s recommendation may involve a civil injunctive action, public administrative proceeding, and/or cease-and-desist proceeding, and may seek remedies that include an injunction, a cease-and-desist order, disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, and civil money penalties.
The Company will continue to cooperate with the SEC’s inquiry and intends to make a submission to the SEC Staff setting forth why no action should be commenced against it. The Company does not believe that a resolution of this matter will have a material impact on its operations.
It's that time of the month again. ICLD bleeds but it's linings will soon become thick and ready to host amazing PPS conception. It might take nine months.
It's going to happen over the next three weeks. Awesome Pumnp...Sell....Don't get dumped..
Off Subject and you can't be serious. ICLD will pop crazy.
Usually no T's on Friday
Maybe this is the final Friday Dump! Dilute...Dilute...Dilute!
Volume going crazy. Maybe I'll add more if drops to low 3s. Going to be high volume day to max out shares.
Wow Volume getting us to our goal today.
Give it 5 days and it will go crazy! I'm not going to avg down anymore as I'm in recoup mode however This is perfect if the diluted shares get maxed. Wish I was entering right now.
Don't you understand they are diluting? That is what makes the cheapies and not retail sales. We eat these up and then get to play the pump game for a few days.
Probably not because PPS didn't go nuts.
It should be done by end of next week. Especially if any good news.
They will RS soon if PPS isn't high enough for this exchange...Correct?
Magic 8 Ball Says 300% up is likely today.
Thought about selling and then realized this has all happened before.
BOB is based off of messages and ICLD shit posts could get us to the top.
How do I dilute my own shares?
Which parts of ICLD are responsible for losses? Have they sold them?
RS is to get back to NASDAQ. They have one year to get their SP up and then RS back to NASDAQ Levels. I believe Munimi use to state this. Munro recently said they are interested in increasing share holder value. I hope this is the case and things are about to get interesting.