Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Are they connected? I.e does one have to have the preferred shares to get the warrants?
Is she a native english-speaker? "exchange" could be stock exchange
If only SIAF had paid the dividend instead... Might turn out to have been cheaper?
So what you are trying to say is that we are screwed? Better sell now while we can then
Lying? No, but do I believe that Solomon will be able/willing to deliver what he says - and in the given timeline? No
We did get the dividend policies though, although the mess-up with those made even more harm... The questions remains whether Solomon knew that they would fall apart, or if he actually though he would be able to follow-through. If he though he would be able to follow-through then these aren't lies, if Solomon knew that he wouldn't follow-through then they are (from Solomon that is)
Ah, I though you meant that Merkur BLOCKED the stock distribution. Yes, Oslo Børs should be rather upset with that.
I don't agree that it is absurd that Oslo Børs would disapprove of Solomon changing his compensation, and backwards in time, from a reasonable x shares/year to a toxic compensation that goes against shareholders interests.
snow; if TRW is able to sell the pre-IPO shares for 3.4$ then it can repay all the debt with that money
So the amount due was reduced with 29 625$? Typo, difference in forex between the dates, or some other reason? (sorry, I haven't bothered to read the report this time)
The PPS did not explode when the ex date for that exact thing was announced last autumn... However, it did continue to implode after the ex date passed and Solomon failed once again.
If the PPS does explode next time the ex date is announced, that would be a sure sign of inside-information being spread.
Sounds like capex to me
If? *confused*
If I have to choose then my bet is SIAF, but the answer might very well be neither (at least in the next few years).
2.1M shares at the current PPS would be peanuts for him, but it might not be too easy to buy that amount of shares on the open market without pushing the PPS (although he might have plenty of time to do so before we have news that propels the stock).
If only Solomon could do the equivalent as Garret, i.e with his compensation scam. Solomon might feel that he needs to have the posibility to screw us all until the whole issue with ECAB has been settled, but I believe that is one of the major reasons why SIAF now has applied ("applied"?) to be delisted from Merkur.
Well, TRW still owes SIAF money - is it only AF4 that owes us money? I think there is some fine print that Solomon is hiding from us where TRW is not obliged to repay until (pre)IPO.
Is there any comments on the default-letter from ECAB? Any other company would have adressed it, especially when we can find proof that SIAF hasn't been repaying and - unless there is an agreement about postponing the repayment - hence are in default.
And to imagine that the savage managed to book a PROFIT from the ECAB restructuring... The nerve of the Savage one
Still not a single word why TRW isn't repaying SIAF? There must be a hidden clause in the carve-out that TRW is not obliged to repay its debt until (after) the (pre)IPO. Maximizing the price (for TRW) for the owners.
Does this mean that SIAF has repaid part of what it owes Garret?
I too noticed that he had checked "no" this time while he the last year(s) he has checked "yes". If true, I guess that is sort of good news.
Has Solomon started the buybacks already? Is he getting collateral shares back? Being able to repay part of the legacy debt and getting some shares back? Did the filing say anything about an decrease in OS? (I believe we've had a decrease once before?)