Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stupid and scared is terrible combination. It's still kind of funny to watch though.
LMAO+++
Amazing how scared they are of the FACTS posted here. It's almost like they don't believe the BS they post in the boiler room.
LMAO+++
The next list of soon-to-be failed predictions:
I'm deep in L. Ron Vida's head today. He made a rule that it's a violation of the TOS to repost my posts there. Now he's doing it with a post that totally shows global warming for the scam it is. Not the first time not reading before posting proves embarrassing for them.
LMAO+++
883 things blamed on global warming - the vast majority of which have been proven false: https://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
I can see L. Ron Vida likes global warming so much. No mater how many incorrect predictions you make, you never admit you're wrong and just keep on going. Definitely his MO.
LMAO+++
Just like his QMC posts - no FACTS:
Despite breathless climate reporting about ever-increasing fires
— Bjorn Lomborg (@BjornLomborg) July 14, 2021
US fires burn much less today
Even with extreme warming, area burned will stay about same across century
Climate does increase burned area,
but zoning and forest management much more important
Thread for refs pic.twitter.com/cZODwWSO7t
My list of questions QMC needs to answer is still burning L. Ron Vida....
Poor L. Ron Vida doesn't know the difference between weather and climate - or that the fires are generally the result of poor forest management. 230 medical journals - woop-de-friggin'-do. Notice how LRV tried to spin medical journals to be "scientific journals." Just like he does with QMC - take a tiny bit of truth and spin it up into something it isn't.
FACT - the warmunists predictive record on global warming is only slightly better than LRV's predictive ability when it come to QMC.
ROTFLMAO+++
The only think faker than L. Ron Vida's posts is the global warmings scam. Here you get both.
LMAO+++
The Marketing Comedians are policing this site hard today and reporting any reposting of the personal attacks they post at the boiler room.
Anyone who really doesn't want QMC to succeed would welcome the return of Ando. You'd think L. Ron Vida would want them to hire someone who could actually close a deal???
L. Ron Vida works hard to make QMC look like a scam. Maybe he really doesn't want them to succeed???
Hummmm....
It's the perfect match for a company with financial executives that don't file financials.
And if not next week?
Serious question.
Any bets on if/when a proxy will arrive?
Correct. Consistent thickness is critically important.
The other, much bigger problem is that consistent film thickness (QD film - not the substrate) is critical to cell efficiency. The technology needed to print suitably consistent QD film layers doesn't exist. Note that all of these articles talk about spin coating which works great in a lab for thumbnail sized cells, but by it's nature can't be scaled up.
Ted - there are no 2nd generation QDSC. All QDSC are considered 3rd generation solar cells. "Generation" is term of art that broadly refers to:
1st gen - elemental semiconductor
2nd gen - compound semiconductor (generally thin film)
3rd gen - emerging technology - nanocrystal, organic, hybrid, etc.
I don't dispute any of that. Still it remains that nobody with money has ever said publicly that they were ready to build a plant. Nobody has ever said publicly that the technology exists outside of a lab much less been demonstrated.
I find it very hard to believe that they leapfrogged the the entire scientific community and chose to keep it a secret - to this very day.
That's not exactly an accurate or complete assessment. We have no idea whatsoever what "India" was "ready" to do in 2019. All we have is a cut-and-paste contract with Amtronics CC that obviously wasn't worth spending money on lawyers to review. There is no reason to believe that Amtronics ever secured the $20M to execute the contract, and they in fact defaulted on it almost immediately. To this date, has the second half of the license fee even been paid?
When faced with the choice of assumptions to make, one can make a single, simple assumption that they funding wasn't there because the technology was not demonstrated, or one can make a complex set of assumptions on how QMC somehow, with near zero R&D expense, developed a technology that every journal article says doesn't exist and is/was 3-5 years away?, on what high-speed printing equipment did the demonstrate it?, who made the test panels?, why none of this was ever mentioned by the company?, etc.
It may be fun to believe the latter is the case, but doing so defies all logic and common sense.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315219002055/ex10-1.htm
DRX - can you point us to anything from the company that says that they have either (i) a commercially viable QDSC design and manufacturing process, or (ii) a 2nd generation proprietary perovskite quantum dot solar cell technology. (BTW - "3rd generation" is a term of art, not a reference to QMC's past progress).
For that matter, can you point us to any reliable source that states such technology has been demonstrated anywhere on a commercial scale?
Olive branches not withstanding, this has to be the most absurd post ever.
Summarizing,
QMC's registration was revoked because of a multi-year breakdown of financial control, yet there should be no blame.
Suggesting that there should be accountability or concern is an attack on the character of those responsible.
We should be comfortable that such a breakdown will never happen again because of the movie Groundhog Day and Maya Angelou's poetry.
Seriously?
It's been claimed many times in these pages that they had a commercially viable design and manufacturing process. The paragraph you cited doesn't address that - rather it would be a new technology as I read it.
From my research, the technology to high-speed print QDSC doesn't currently exist anywhere. I don't think QMC has ever said that they do have it, but it would be nice to have some clarity given how many times the claim has been made here that they already have the technology to start making QDSC in India.
I'm starting to believe that it is just a very unfortunate mix of willful blindness and simple ignorance.
Not a bad idea. Now we just need the company to answer the questions I posed so we can complete the filing.
Fair enough.
It would be easier to get along if certain folks could admit when they are wrong rather than doubling down on it. Acknowledging when others are right wouldn't hurt either.
Can someone give me an example of when he was right about anything related to this stock? Am I wrong when I say he has never been right?
This guy can't even get it right when it takes mere seconds to check the answer. SMH.
Not a moderator here and never have been.
There has been a lot of talk in the boiler room recently about being part of the solution and not part of the problem.
Can someone explain to me how their being wrong about literally everything they post is being part of the solution?
Seriously, how does that make any sense? Should we all be focused on facts not wishful thinking?
One thing the die-hard supporter of this stock just don't get at all is the importance of the Company's board. If there is weak leadership by the CEO, it's not the CEO's fault, it's the board's fault.
We haven't voted on directors in years despite the right to vote for them at the required annual meeting that they company has not held. We don't even know who the directors of the company are.
How can someone who wants the company to be successful think this is OK - let alone get upset when the question is asked?
There really is only one answer and that's that they are scared of the answer.
Thank you. I was pleased to see that you posted it at the other place. Still a bit surprised they let it stand. Of course rather than consider the questions, they attack the author. As I commented in the response below that the iron-fisted censors there will surely delete, the future of QMC depends on these questions having the right answers.
The abject fear that these sorts of questions creates can have only one meaning. Since the stock price can't be affected, the fear of the questions, let alone the answers must stem from a belief that the answers aren't the right answers.
There is also selling of imagine to bring in new opportunities.
There are various from of selling isn't there?
QMC's bylaws require annual meetings with the election of directors. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000140865107000104/ex3-2.htm
It's been years since either has happened. Maybe there is no option other than to increase the A/S. The same is not true for the slate of directors proposed. If the proxy doesn't include the election of directors, shareholders have the right to demand one, and there are a lot of questions that need answers before directors are elected.
Some questions that I think should be answered before voting on any proposed directors:
- Who are the current directors of the company (including bios and all equity ownership details)?
- If new directors are proposed, what is their relevant experience and how will they be compensated?
- Who are the current elected officers of the company (including all equity ownership and compensation details)?
- Are there any agreements with Amtron or other partners in India that have not been disclosed, and if so, can/will they be disclosed now?
- If there are other agreements in India, is the one with Amtronics CC that was disclosed still in effect? Are any parts of it overridden by other agreements, if so which parts?
- Have the reactors that were sent to India been set-up, and if so, have they produced any commercially viable product, and if so, have they produced any sales?
- Can the agreements with Les Paull and QMVT be disclosed? If so, will the company disclose them now?
- What is the status of the agreements with Les Paul and QMVT? Are there any current defaults with QMC that would ordinarily be disclosed in a 10-K or Q? If so, what?
- Who are the directors of QMVT? Are there any shareholder agreements or other agreements that involve the directors or officers of QMC?
- Where is the company exactly in the process of preparing and auditing it's financial statements? What has been accomplished and what remains?
- The auditors have been blamed, at least in part, for the late financials. What exactly did they do/not to and how exactly did those fault(s) contribute?
- What is the expected timeline to completion of the outstanding financials? If no timeline can be given, what is the source of the uncertainty?
- Will the company give updates that includes the delinquent financials as they are completed?
- If an S-1 is filed, will it register all the shares or only certain shares? If only certain shares, whose and, what is the plan for shareholders not covered by the S-1?
- What is a realistic date for re-registration of the company's shares?
- What changes have been made to assure that the company will stay current in it's filings after re-registration?
- What is the status with the previously disclosed agreements with Pasaca? How much, if any, money was funded? How many shares are owed to Pasaca?
- Does the company have a demonstrated, commercially viable QDSC design and manufacturing process?
- What is a realistic scenario for POCT commercialization? Do any/all of the products currently being developed require FDA approval?
- How many patent applications have been filed that have yet to be published on the USPTO website?
- How many shares is the company currently over the A/S, including options, warrants, and convertibles outstanding?
- Are there any disclosures that would be required in a 10-K that are not covered by these questions? If so, what?
I'm sure there are others.
So do you believe that without QMC HealthID Pasaca/innova would hsve known and be working QMC.
Do you believe that without QMC HealthID Pasaca/Innova would have still invested 4.5 million dollars in QMC.
Do you believe that the QMVT group would have still invested 2 million dollars into QMC without the QMC HealthID?
Quote:
suppose if you think 20M shares for nothing is a good investment.
Do you believe 6.5 million dollars is nothing.
Do you believe other than Pasaca/Innova and the QMVT group at the financial state the company was in, without the QMC HealthID and with QMC facing the L2 lawsuit they would invested or loan QMC anything?
Then the question become without buying paying 20 million shares and BUYING the technology could they have gotten Jat Williams?
Jay Williams deigned and created the QMC HealthID.
The QMC HealthID drew the attention of Pasaca/Innova
they
Pasaca/Innova looked at QMC at after their DD thought QMC was worth investing in.
Not only investing in QMC, Pasaca/Innova saw so much potential in QMC that they want to OWN it.
Say what you want IMHO it was 20 million shares well spent.
Posted On: 08/27/2021 4:32:41 PM
"I think the shareholders should take the opportunity while approval for a major dilution is being sought to demand straight answers from Squires, withholding any approval until he agrees to conduct a shareholder meeting, in-person in Austin and simulcast on Zoom, where questions are answered to our satisfaction."