Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The fan club posts promoting this stock don't help it succeed. Rather they make it look like a scam. A little honesty and a lot less denial by the fan club would go a long way.
You certainly have the right to believe things that belie all common sense, however, pretending it's not "bull" is, in itself, "bull."
What a heaping pile of BS. Why do the marketing comedians have the incessant need to make stuff up where they have zero knowledge and to take every opportunity and promote it beyond anything remotely realistic?
This is yet another perfect example of whey they are always wrong on every prediction.
An interesting admission from L. Ron Vida:
Here's a plan:
Let's listen to the guy who has demonstrated that he doesn't understand the technology, doesn't understand finance, and has been wrong about literally everything he has predicted about this stock for more than the past decade.
LMAO+++
BS piled on more BS piled on still more BS...
Most of us are used to no words from QMC, but we hardly feel lucky.
LMAO+++
This is some L. Ron Vida Church of Quantumology grade BS.
Keep dreaming. You do your best work with your eyes wide closed.
LMAO+++
That's just rebranding of the same tired old zero-common-sense nonsense that has been debunked over and over since the beginning.
The folks peddling that BS have been proven wrong 100% since day 1. That's a FACT.
One big pile of nonsense.
L. Ron Vida writes this about me:
The simple fact: L. Ron Vida has a near 100% rate of being wrong on anything he posts, and his latest is no exception.
LMAO+++
It's just too easy to get inside L. Ron Vida's head and make him break his own arbitrary rules and post dumb things.
LMAO+++
Too bad that's all meaningless when it comes to QTMM.
LMAO+++
More abject BS from L. Ron Vida:
This L. Ron Vida dude is clueless.
No worries.
Wow just wow.
NRS 78.207 Change in number of authorized shares of class or series: Resolution by board of directors; approval by stockholders; rights of stockholders.
1. Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, a corporation that desires to change the number of shares of a class or series, if any, of its authorized stock by increasing or decreasing the number of authorized shares of the class or series and correspondingly increasing or decreasing the number of issued and outstanding shares of the same class or series held by each stockholder of record at the effective date and time of the change, may, except as otherwise provided in subsections 2 and 3, do so by a resolution adopted by the board of directors, without obtaining the approval of the stockholders. The resolution may also provide for a change of the par value, if any, of the same class or series of the shares increased or decreased. After the effective date and time of the change, the corporation may issue its stock in accordance therewith.
https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-078.html#NRS078Sec207
R/S on the O/S only = vote required
Proportional R/S on O/S and A/S = no vote required
Funny. Same thing I thought when I read your post. LOL.
If your point is that my post is correct, then yes, I agree.
What is your point? That a company has to keep the A/S the same after a R/S? If so, that's not accurate. They can reverse the A/S along with the O/S, and if you do it that way, I don't think it requires a vote as a general rule because a shareholder's % of the A/S doesn't change.
A reverse without proportionally reducing the A/S requires shareholder approval. If the A/S is proportionally reduced, I don't believe a vote is required.
It's possible. LMAO+++
Tee up the Marketing Comedians to explain to us how it's really a good thing that Pasaca and Innova are out of the picture.
LMAO+++
Questions we should have answers to before voting. Voting yes may make sense, but if we do, we will have no leverage to get the answers. Answers now. Blank check for the company later!
-Is the Pasaca deal still alive?
- Who are the current directors of the company (including bios and all equity ownership details)?
- If new directors are proposed, what is their relevant experience and how will they be compensated?
- Who are the current elected officers of the company (including all equity ownership and compensation details)?
- Are there any agreements with Amtron or other partners in India that have not been disclosed, and if so, can/will they be disclosed now?
- If there are other agreements in India, is the one with Amtronics CC that was disclosed still in effect? Are any parts of it overridden by other agreements, if so which parts?
- Have the reactors that were sent to India been set-up, and if so, have they produced any commercially viable product, and if so, have they produced any sales?
- Can the agreements with Les Paull and QMVT be disclosed? If so, will the company disclose them now?
- What is the status of the agreements with Les Paul and QMVT? Are there any current defaults with QMC that would ordinarily be disclosed in a 10-K or Q? If so, what?
- Who are the directors of QMVT? Are there any shareholder agreements or other agreements that involve the directors or officers of QMC?
- Where is the company exactly in the process of preparing and auditing it's financial statements? What has been accomplished and what remains?
- The auditors have been blamed, at least in part, for the late financials. What exactly did they do/not to and how exactly did those fault(s) contribute?
- What is the expected timeline to completion of the outstanding financials? If no timeline can be given, what is the source of the uncertainty?
- Will the company give updates that includes the delinquent financials as they are completed?
- If an S-1 is filed, will it register all the shares or only certain shares? If only certain shares, whose and, what is the plan for shareholders not covered by the S-1?
- What is a realistic date for re-registration of the company's shares?
- What changes have been made to assure that the company will stay current in it's filings after re-registration?
- What is the status with the previously disclosed agreements with Pasaca? How much, if any, money was funded? How many shares are owed to Pasaca?
- Does the company have a demonstrated, commercially viable QDSC design and manufacturing process?
- What is a realistic scenario for POCT commercialization? Do any/all of the products currently being developed require FDA approval?
- How many patent applications have been filed that have yet to be published on the USPTO website?
- How many shares is the company currently over the A/S, including options, warrants, and convertibles outstanding?
- Are there any disclosures that would be required in a 10-K that are not covered by these questions? If so, what?
I'm sure there are others.