is...retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, of course. All traders should understand how that works. If you don't, you should learn.
45 days after any quarterly, 90 days after any annual. That is for ALL public companies. To learn what is next, visit OTCMarkets and find out when their fiscal year ends.
Folks, The bashers are not here to save anyone. They make shit up JUST to provoke responses from you all. Put them on ignore so you don't see their posts. But most of all, QUIT RESPONDING TO THEM. THAT is their GAME. They aren't shareholders, and will never become shareholders. They DON'T WANT STOCK at all. I know some of these same names from years ago - they are still doing the same thing. I could look up their posts on stocks I left years ago. Like BVTK. Now caveat emptor. You can check that for yourselves - click on their handle, go read their posts, go back a few years and you will learn about them. They either bash or pump, they NEVER own shares in any these companies.
We are shareholders and want to see the company succeed. They are not shareholders and don't give a rip about the company - they want YOUR RESPONSES. They KNOW they are making shit up, but it is to GOAD YOU into responding. When you respond, you are simply playing their game. They could care less what you say, as long as you say SOMETHING. So QUIT IT! Use that ignore button, and don't read ANY of their spew. It is ONLY because so many of you try to reason with them that this board is so infested with them. At least one is even a moderator, and will probably delete this message. But that's fine, at least some of you will read it first.
Omni is the customer that is buying the avgas. That is a purchase order.
That is precisely why they have not disclosed the name. They don't want a bunch of idiots bugging 3rd parties.
You are really stupid. Now ignored, because it is obvious you don't even understand how this market works. You continue to assert that there are people who are acting as MM's in a market that has no actual people at all. JESUS CRIST MAN, GET A CLUE!!!
When you accuse MM's of being traders, you are simply showing your ignorance.
You obviously have no clue what MM's actually do.
You apparently don't even understand that the OTC is completely automated. That means there are no 'people' Mm's involved at all. It is all computers.
Every single tranche (part of a trade) is recorded for all time. It shows who sold, who bought, and at what price, when, and what MM was involved. It also shows the profit the MM made in the transaction. It is an AUDIT TRAIL, which means ANY COMPUTER could run a quick analysis and SEE IMMEDIATEDLY any illegal trade.
MM's are not traders. They are more like cashiers than anything, but buying or selling shares at the trader's will.
They CAN'T trade. It is TOTALLY ILLEGAL for them to trade stocks, EXCEPT when there is no buying or selling going on. That is the ONLY time they buy/sell, and it is the ONLY TIME they don't want to - they are market makers, which means they step up trading when everyone else quits.
Now, I will stop short of calling you stupid, but I shouldn't. This is SEC rules, which anyone can go read. They are POSTED.
But continuing to blame MM's for trading issue IS simply stupid. They are NOT TRADERS. Don't you GET THAT?
It is TRADERS that screw up the share price, and DON'T FORGET IT.
You might as well be blaming WITCHES for share price manipulations.
Well, I guess I will say it. You are STUPID. MM's have absolutely NOTHING to do with share price. Traders do that.
Anyone that sells at market drops the price immediately. All MM's meet 'market', which is why when you sell at market, all shares sell immediately. But the price drops right along with it, because they only have to meet their posted quantity before they drop the bid. That price has a hard time recovering, if demand isn't present.
Sorry, MM's facilitate trades, and that is all. They don't buy and they don't sell, UNLESS the market goes illiquid. And that's why they are called market makers.
If you really think MM's are trading against us, you really need to get an education about how the system works. Most importantly, it is TRADERS that cause price inflections, up and down, period.
So, why would an MM give a rats ass what the share price is? They aren't traders. They fulfill OUR orders and take a cut in their spread. They get two - one from the seller and one from the buyer.
It is groups of TRADERS that hire the bashers and pumpers.
It is nonsense. It just so happens that stinky pinkies go up and down, and if there is a gap, it is likely to be filled eventually. Consider if there were a gap at $0.0003...think spooz has to get back to that price JUST to close the gap? It isn't even superstition, it is simply a statistical event that sometimes happens, and sometimes doesn't. If you look at the 10,000 companies that make up the OTC, you could find gaps all over the place.
That is stupid. If they are for sale at any price, MM's can borrow them in trades, then replace them later. That's how they operate.
Sterling, the only thing I disagree with you about is the role of bashers.
They are NOT trying to 'help' shareholders.
They are NOT ex-shareholders wanting to punish the company. (Yeah, how would that work?)
They are NOT shareholders, at all.
They do NOT intend to buy at a lower price, else any holdings they already have would also be beat down. That makes no sense.
They do NOT try to justify their comments, ever.
It is NOT a debate. It is one sided bashing and actual shareholders trying to 'protect' the company. (Hint: it doesn't need protection.)
They DO always make statements that any casual observer can see is totally false.
As you know, they hang on and bash no matter what the stock does. It is their JOB to do so.
Regardless of positive press releases, and filings, they repeat what they've said before.
They repeat it BECAUSE it generates responses from people like you (but not me, because I put them on ignore.)
When you realize what they are NOT, you should be able to figure out what they ARE. They have their own agenda. They make money by doing what they do. And every time someone responds, they make more money.
I know you don't agree with this assessment, but I've been around the block a few times also. But I have NEVER used my ignore button more than now. My right index finder can soon lift 100 lbs all by itself!
The only reason I see bashes is when people like you respond to them. IHUB has an option for that where you can ignore any responses to them too. I choose not to use that one, because it concerns me that we have so many of them feeding here - more than I've ever seen on any other board. IT MUST BE PROFITABLE!!!
Would YOU spend months doing the same thing, over and over, and not realize any profit from it? Of course not. None of our shareholders would do that, because they own shares to MAKE money That is the opposite viewpoint from bashers. I hope you can reconsider, and not feed them any more.
One last thing: If you click on a poster's name, you will be taken to their home page. There, you can see the last 50 comments they have made, and where they have made them. You'll find all your common names there, and what they post on various boards. You will find them very prolific, with 10's of thousands of posts. You will also usually find a stock they favor and one they don't. Then you can read the whole dialog and understand how it applies to what we see here.
You cannot dialog with a basher - they will win every time. Ever see one quit because they saw the logic of your response? No, I didn't think so.
No. They are not shareholders and they are not looking to become shareholders. They do it for other reasons. They will NEVER become shareholders in the company they are dissing. But they make money, especially every time someone answers them.
Those that call it a scam have a motive you don't know about. They have a REASON for saying that, and that reason usually makes them money.
Anyone that buys or sells based on stock board gossip deserves to lose money.
No, it is not mm to mm. they only do that when trading stops. Today, you have profit taking...sellers. MM's are forced to buy if they sell at market, and if the share price is going down, someone IS selling at market.
The information is vague because it is not ready to be said publicly. It is illegal for a public company to pump itself. Filings and public releases are used to identify valid changes in a public company's status or business plan.
When a business activity warrants, a PR or filing will follow shortly after. If nothing is being said, it is because it is not READY to be said.
The information is vague because it is not ready to be said publicly. It is illegal for a public company to pump itself. Filings and public releases are used to identify valid changes in a public company's status or business plan.
When a business activity warrants, a PR or filing will follow shortly after. If nothing is being said, it is because it is not READY to be said.
Thanks to the absolutely stupid posts on this and zpiz, I have strengthened my 'ignore' finger.
Hint: Talk about the stock, not about other people.
Moderators, if there is even ONE that understands how to moderate, get these fools back on the subject, please, or get rid of them. This is NOT facebook.
For another viewpoint, I bought 18M shares, and still have them. I'm up $127,329.47 at this point. I won't be buying or selling any until we see where it goes.
This stock has the best potential I've ever seen in the pinks, in 15 years of trading them.
MM's have nothing to do with the share price. It is TRADERS that do that. All MM's do is execute the trades. MMs collect their share on each buy and sell, they don't care what the share price is, or which direction it is going.
In short, THEY ARE NOT TRADERS, NOR COMPETITORS WITH TRADERS.
My partner and I have acquired 28M shares. Now, we are simply waiting to see what happens. I don't think I've seen a more promising pinky ever.
As a previous director in a public company, it is clear to me that this company intends to follow through on its most reasonable business plan. That's all it takes for me. I bought in cheap. It's already up over 200%...I do expect that to exceed 1000% within a month or two, when I'll sell enough to get into free share area. Then we'll simply wait some more to see where it goes.
Why would you suggest that? JP left for spooze a month ago and ttey are off and running. Might want to keep up...
He drives his car by looking at the rear view mirrors, too...he obviously knows how to get where he's going by looking at where he's been. SMH~~
Use your ignore button. I have hundreds on ignore. I don't need to read BS.
I don't usually respond to bashers, but this one is an exception.
One: JP intends to uplist which changes everything. It means that any 'detritus' left over from the old spooz will be replaced with current information.
Two: Share structure is from the old spooz. Meaningless at this point, it is just what came with the reverse merger.
Three: Shell risk: Again, from the old spooz. It has been that way for years.
Four: (you forgot four). Share structure. JP has already stated no RS. The only other way to reduce the OS is by buying shares. The projected profit should enable that.
Five: Website - what do you expect in 30 days?
Six: Again, you have no clue what JP has going. He just TOOK OVER spooz less than 30 days ago, and there are many details to clean up.
Seven: Either JP has done the things his resume says he has done, or he has not. I tend to believe that he is a successful businessman, as his record reflects, any way you look at it.
I think you are already on my ignore list, but in case you're not, you are now.
You would only post this bash if you had an agenda that would profit you in some way. I probably already know what that agenda is, because there would be no reason to make the post in the first place unless there WAS an agenda. That makes you the doo-doo on the OTC.
The answer is simple. They have an agenda. You just don't recognize what it is. If you spent more time figuring it out instead of replying to them, you would be futher ahead and they would be less likely to be here. They post foolishness to get you to respond. THAT is their agenda. And you and others are helping them make this one of the most profitable message boards for them.
Good summary. I'd only add that there should be an actual business plan that you can believe in. In JP's case, there is a plan that I find reasonable. Now we wait to see what he can pull off.
I didn't say what the float was. I said what OTCMarkets SAYS it is. And I said we will find out when JP reports fins for the first time. What is on OTCMarkets right now is mostly what is left from the old spooz. We don't know, and we won't find out until either the TA tells us or it is reported by JP.
And I've been doing this since 2008. I've done well enough to be able to live on my SS and dividends the rest of my life. I have zero debt. The $5k I get in dividends per month is a result of doing well with another stock just like this one, selling half of it and investing in dividend stocks and other stocks, like this one. Altogether, right now, I still hold about 200M shares of various stocks. Some are still pinks, others not. This is purely a hobby now.
"There is documented illegal naked shorting"
If it's documented, SHOW THE FING DOCUMENTATION!!!
Claims mean absolutely nothing with nothing to back them up.
And don't trot out some 2008 issue that was dealt with by the SEC 15 years ago.
PROVE IT or STFU about it.
You are a perfect example of what is wrong in the OTC. You make outrageous claims, and claim there is proof, but you can NEVER prove any of it or show any actual proof.
The problem with that is that the inexperienced traders BELIEVE you, then they REPEAT it as if it was true. It is a belief system with ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF TO BACK IT UP.
If there WAS proof, the SEC would be interested in it. But they are not. So there is no proof. And that makes your claims just a lot of hot air, meant to distract others that are gullible enough to believe it. I am not one of them. I know how the system works. I studied it. I learned it. There is no way to naked short OTC stocks today.
You need to learn a little about how the system works, today.
There are none. And if you think otherwise, you need to get edumacated on how the OTC works. SMH!!! Idiots that believe anything, even things that cannot possibly be true. Sorry, Peeved, you are now on ignore, since I ignore ignorant posters.
I didn't say otherwise. I said it needs to be explained.
The float is the tradeable shares of a public company. Normally, it is the OS minus any restricted shares. I suspect there is something in spooz's history that is probably no longer the case. We won't know until JP's first financial filing. I do know that all preferred shares were returned, except those that JP controls, which is why he is actually CEO. I find it unreasonable that billions of common shares are still restricted. There will have to be an explanation of that, if it is still true. In the meantime, if it is really true, the float is under 1B and it can react quickly, which we have seen.
He has no common shares. He holds the voting majority in preferred shares. Those cannot be converted to common shares.
Why would you say that? He has publicly stated he owns NO shares.
To know the float, log into spooz on otc markets. I can't believe how many people argue over something that is posted for anyone to see at OTCMarkets.
Float
576,841,527
12/01/2023
If that is wrong, then it will eventually be corrected.
Container ships transport a combination of two standardized container sizes known as 20- or 40-feet equivalent units, abbreviated to TEUs and FEUs.
Container ships have grown significantly in size in over the last 20 years, in 2002 a large container ship would be able to carry approximately 6,500 TEU, today the largest container ships can now transport nearly 24,000 TEU.
So....how many years would it take to ship 33,000 containers? Uh...might want to keep up with the industry. Sucks to be shown wrong so easily.
Not at all. The share price goes down when people sell at market. We've already heard from some that did that. The INSTANT you sell at market, your first tranch will be filled, the MM's will adjust their price down and that repeats until they are all sold. I have proved it in the past, by selling 10M shares at market, while TELLING the group that I was going to do it, and then the share price dropped 10% JUST from my trade. I can still bring up my old transactions and show exactly what happened. Each tranche I received (that's the quantity that MMs include with their spread) was lower than the previous one.
Thank your stupid buddies, not some fictitious non-existent group of smart people. Smart people would have sold at a limit and the share price would have been unaffected.
You seriously think people in the stinky pinkies use stop losses? Think again - that would be a virtual guarantee of loss. They aren't called volatile stocks for nothing.
He STILL has to BUY the goods, and ship them, and pay all the taxes and fees. What is left after all expenses are taken out, INCLUDING the cost of the goods, is the net. Ships don't hang out like taxis, waiting for a load - they are ordered up, and THAT also costs money.
Somebody has to give the seller their asking price. Someone has to pay the shipping company, their crew, the longshoremen and everyone else in the supply chain BEFORE a penny is received from the buyer. Then, everyone gets paid. All an LC does is provide a guarantee that they will be paid.
Soon, there will be completed orders, and we will all see what the actual cost and net profit is. It will be made public. Those dreaming of hundreds of millions in profit are going to be sorely disappointed. It isn't like chicken paws and sugar are a brand new product - there is competition. Competition is what levels the market.