Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Non-existant.
VERY helpful info Navy ... thx
1. If current Admin is going forward with "a plan" do they not need to raisie capital?
2. If new shares are to be offered, does this not necessitate that shares be listed on the NYSE?
3. Is it correct that shares need to have a $4.00 PPS to be listed on the NYSE?
4. Barring a reverse split, does that not suggest a floor somewhere north of where we are now?
I am genuinely asking here. If I'm missing something, I'm all ears.
My point in mentioning AIG was that the government sold the shares from the warrants at an incredibly low prices and only until they got their money back. They asserted that they were not in it to make money, but just to get their money back. My point in mentioning AIG is that if the government maintains that same attitude, well, they already have their money back and then some. That would suggest that the warrants would be retired.
Key word there being "AFTER" ... or perhaps "IF"? What did the Gove do about warrants in the AIG case?
I'm not being a jackass, and fomenting a common vs JPS fight, but why would the JPS get back dividends if the JPS were not cumulative shares?
Man, I'm trying to keep my expectations low ($7 to $9) so as not to be disappointed, but if I can sell my tiny position at $25 to $30 ... there will be a celebration and Jose Cuervo will be in attendance.
You are correct. It is a debt because the Periodic Commitment Fee is not being paid at this time.
You KEPT saying, "It's Coming", over and over again and you ended up right. Now, if we could just have Patswil be right on what THEY have kept saying over and over again!!
[Stands and applauds]
Do people not read ENGLISH?!?!? I said Ackman could buy in. Reading people ... reading! It helps!!
$18 with Warrants
$53 without warrants
I've seen you quote a count of 1.8 billion commons in many posts. My understanding is that there are currently 1.16 billion common shares. Perhaps you can clear me up on this little discrepancy?
And the relief sought would do what?
It would benefit all common shareholders if treated as a class action suit. The WF case isn't logical to go forward with unless certain things happen, that now appear to be on the brink of happening.
Until someone with deep pockets could be certain these things would happen, and until the WF plaintiffs had access to the discovery from Sweeny's case, it wasn't practical.
Things have changed markedly !!
... but the Washington Federal case is just dangling out there WAITING for someone like Ackma to buy into it and make it a class action suit.
Navycmdr, you often show level 2 displays, so I assume you have L2 available. I not that TDAmeritrade sows HOD as 3.27, but they don't show it on the daily chart. Does your Broker show 3.27? Does L2 show 3.27 orders?
I have never made a "By Friday" prediction. I will make my maiden prediction for this Friday ... we find $4.00 or more as a HOD by Friday. I'm not saying we HOLD it, just that we touch it.
All I'm going to say, is that you are trying to perform mathematical slight of hand by removing the value of each share from the equation. I have worked it out and I can see it. I'm just not sure if you are not seeing it, or intentionally trying to execute a bit of misdirection. You are not confusing me. I hope you aren't confusing anyone who is watching.
Prepare to enter the Three-osphere!
Gasparino should raise his unsavory head again soon.
...
Yes ... well, I'd say Howard speaks from a position of knowledge.
As I recall, it was noted that ...
A. The GSE's only backed a small portion of each mortgage
and
B. Banks carried some OTHER risks that were not applicable to the GSEs
There are three possibilities each trading day ... up, down, and unchanged. Of those three, I prefer up, and will modestly celebrate up!
I'm going from admittedly flawed memory, but if my recall is correct, Tim Howard suggested that 2.4% was appropriate.
Yes.
Ackman: "Hey there Secretary Mnuchin. How's it going?"
Mnuchin: "Not so great."
Ackman: "You knoooooooow ... I'm a MAJOR shareholder over at Sears. I own a lot of COMMON shares.
Mnuchin: "... And?"
Ackman: "If I began to get the idea that you had an appreciation and respect ... I mean a REAL respect, for common shareholders in general ... holders of common shares of stock in ALL companies ... I bet I could make your name just FALL right off of that Sears lawsuit" [smile]
Does Ackman still own a noteworthy chunk of Sears? "You help ME out ... I help YOU out!"
I'm not experienced at any of this. I'm learning on the fly. Seems like we saw a 3.6 mil buy earlier and now a 3.0 mil sell. Are they for the same stock. What if I wanted to control the price AND acquire 600k shares. Could I buy the 3.6 mil and put the 3.0 mil out there at a $2.72 ask to be sure the ask stays low?
I may be WAY off base, but we learn by asking!!
Wonder if Power Hour will be truly powerful today.