Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Also Paige,
This "nanodrop" fluormeter has a library of spectral fingerprints that are typically used in the bio research field.
They sell each spectral fingerprint package as a separate module.
If CDEX ever starts marketing Valimed I'll bet (sorry Scared) they'll make more money on selling the spectral fingerprint library then they will the unit itself. I wouldn't dream that they'd be giving that away for free with each unit. And just like any analytical instrument, it has to be calibrated on a yearly or bi-yearly basis.
Maintenance of our XRF costs thousands per year. I just got quoted on a new spectral fingerprint package- $1,050.00
BTW Paige, I never commented about your story, if you say it's true then I guess it's true.
So your client likes small eh?
Here's a fluormeter (that's what Valimed is) that is actually licensed DuPont technology that is custom designed to target the bio research community with ease of use and simplicity.
They use an optical technology that allows the liquid sample to be as small as a microliter (that's very, very small Paige).
http://www.nanodrop.com
How about this Paige:
Sandia demonstrated that UVF could detect as little as 1 PPM concentration of a chemical species from 500 meters away with 95% accuracy (see below).
That was in the field, using broadband techiques (remmeber Lonnie Wilson's white paper) with innovative software.
And that was 10 years ago! Do you have any idea how far laser and optics technology has progressed in that time!!!!! Think how far our telecommunications (e.g. cell phones) have come along in that time.
Now what is Valimed doing? Valimed uses UVF to detect bulk meds "within an inch" stand-off under pristine laboratory conditions. And even then it's taking 30 seconds!
Please tell me what makes it revolutionary? I want to believe.
Lasers, Optics & Vision
Multispectral Ultraviolet Fluorescence Lidar System Identifies
Chemical Mixtures in Field Tests
by P. J. Hargis, Jr., G. C. Tisone, T. D. Raymond, J. G. Taylor, J. S. Wagner, I. S. Shokair,
R. D. Mead, J. D. Daniels, T. J. Sobering, M. S. Johnson, M. W. Trahan,
B. F. Clark, C. Wakefiled-Reyes, and F. R. Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motivation
Highly sensitive ultraviolet (UV) measurements are generally thought to be of limited use in lidar systems designed to detect chemical species in the atmosphere. Recent work at Sandia National Laboratories has changed this perception and led to the development of a new multispectral UV fluorescence lidar system designed for remote chemical analysis. Briefly, a broadly tunable UV laser is used to transmit multiple laser wavelengths, some of which are selectively absorbed and subsequently excite fluorescence in specific chemical species. The resulting fluorescence spectra at each excitation wavelength are compared to a database of fluorescence spectra from individual species to determine species concentrations. The com-parison is carried out using a unique multivariate analysis algorithm developed at Sandia to determine species concentrations from multi-spectral UV fluorescence measurements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accomplishment
Sandia’s multispectral UV fluorescence lidar system was tested in July 1995 at the Nevada Test Site. Measurements were made on vapor plumes consisting of mixtures of benzene, m-xylene, p-xylene, and toluene ranging in concentration from 1 to 500 ppm. All measurements were made at a standoff distance of 0.5 km. Atmospheric attenuation coefficients derived from elastic backscatter measurements were used in the multivariate analysis algorithm to correct measured fluorescence spectra for distortions due to transmission of the fluorescence radiation through the atmosphere. The analysis algorithm was then used to determine species concentrations and time-dependent concentration profiles. Almost 95% accuracy was achieved in identifying species in chemical plumes containing up to four species. Fluorescence detection limits for individual species ranged from about 5 to 10 ppm-m for all measured species. Highlights of the field test results include the first multivariate analysis of multispectral absorption and fluorescence data and the capability of UV fluorescence lidar measurements to map species concentrations in chemical plumes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Significance
Data obtained at the July 1995 field test demonstrates the potential of multispectral UV fluorescence measurements to detect nuclear, chemical, and biological proliferation activities. Other areas of national importance that benefit from the new technology are counterterrorism, drug interdiction, environmental monitoring, and global climate change.
"we centered in on only one thing that this tech could do..and in the area of major redtape to boot.."
You're talking about the ELF/EM-1 which is allegedly based on XRF.
Not enough red tape to prevent the Army and Navy from having a look see. If it was truly revolutionary there is NO WAY it would have been rejected, then put on the backburner by MP.
If it could have done what the Loch Harris PR's claimed it could do, the B-Boyz (TM- blkhoc) wouldn't be the only ones that got rich.
Now we have the UVF technolgy, a different animal altogether.
Can you tell me what makes it revolutionary? Tell me what it can do that other UVF instruments cannot.
Any manufacturewr that adds an application-specific software package onto a UVF instrument can have the same thing IMO.
Tell me what makes Valimed revolutionary- It's that simple.
I agree lmorovan, after reading Pookie's posts it reminded me exactly like the old Loch Harris board hype.
Amazing!! A few years pass by and it's back to the very same hyping game.
The technology is "revolutionary"...
Nobody's can do it like ours....
The world needs it to solve an ever growing problem...
Once word gets out everyone will need one...
Can we make them fast enough.....
Does the blueprint look familiar???
Buzzzz words:
Medical Devices, Institutional Buyers, Sophisticated Private Investors, Business Development and Partnering Executives....
http://www.rodmanandrenshaw.com/rodman.asp?link=Conferences7/ConferenceMain&bgcolor=wht
Skitahoe,
Until such time as MP is successful at launching a major marketing campaign for Valimed I don't beleive that an IPO is in the forecast.
At least for now it appears that CDEX has Griffin making some welcomed changes.
Look under the Waterville technology section:
They profile the following clients:
SHLP .39
RYOB 0.000
MXDY.OB 0.001
ECUI.OB symbol not valid
NXCN .022
Viking, make your own decision about how good it is to have this company promoting CDEX.
Waterville appears to specialize in promoting penny stocks.
Their service:
" Waterville Investment Research provides fundamental Wall Street investment data and research on Small-Cap public companies.
· For Client companies we help potential investors get the info they need to make informed decisions;
· For Investors we provide the research you need to find new opportunities"
For the paying client company Waterville helps potential investors get information which does not appear to be accurate and errors heavily in favor of the paying customer.
They also provide an in-depth research service to investors, but if they can't even read a SEC filing who's going to pay them to do research?
Geez, maybe they should hire Ontheedge to help answer questions from confused investors about the discrepancy between their information and the SEC filings.
We've all read how well he can answer those type questions.
Q: "Onthedge, answer yes or no, does the SEC filing show that Mari Stassi sold all her PP shares?"
A (or should I say reply): "But how many shares does it show that I sold?"
Q: "Ontheedge, are you saying that the SEC filing is not accurate"
A: "But how many shares does it show that I sold"
LOL!!!!!!
Re: Group action,
I have been tied up the last few days. For those that have called me or emailed me I will be responding in the next couple days with more information.
I will say nothing further regarding the issue on this or any other public board.
If you have any questions please contact me by email.
Thank you.
diddy
Ontheedge,
Let's get the crooks. Will you help with cash?
You can contribute it into an escrow fund.
Are you in ?
Capnmike,
If you are supportive of honest shareholders your testimony about the "quarter" used to calibrate the ELF will be a key testimony.
Please contact me at diddy@lycos.com
Thank you Sir.
Group Action:
For those who want further information in an action against Loch Harris please contact me by email at diddy@lycos.com.
Your release of liability under the Settlement Ageement is NOT as factor!!!
Yep, crooks need to be put in prison!
"Well, could you post the stated Comment from MP?"
Edge, ask lmorovan for that information. I don't think it was a formal statement, but rather in a email or a telecon.
MP allegedly said that they needed to improve the foorprint and integration time and until they do, "it would be put on the backburner in the short term."
That is what I remember. You don't remember this?
Ontheedge,
"Who said anything about your street address or your initials?
Guess who, it was you, know one else, it was just you blabbing all that info out, just you who drew attention to what others had no idea, and probably could care less."
I really don't care whether readers know my street name or initials. And you're probably right, if I hadn't called attention to the fact that you were posting the information very few would have known what the posts meant.
However, it was well worth pointing it out to show readers the twisted little games you play. The sole purpose was an attempt to agitate and/or intimidate me.
Too bad it backfired on you.
Pigscanfly,
What allegations are you talking about?
"I don't know diddy seemed to think that you were an expert..so I thought you were one too."
Come on Paige, you're not that easy are you?
The only one that thinks he's an expert around here is Edgy. An expert on all subjects, from government contracting to physical chemistry to group insurance plans! LOL
Paige,
"And if you know all about this please explain to diddy...or Myself that the Flouresence is an inch or so away...and the XRF...is used for long distances...I think that is what I got out of reading all these years...I don't know I am not a scientist...far from it but That is what I have gathered..."
What I have gathered is that the UVF stand-off distance is "within an inch" and requires "about 30 seconds". The XRF stand-off distance was stated by RB poster wpoteet (presumed to be Wade Poteet) to be 34 inches with a corresponding integration time of about 12 seconds.
The 78 inch (2 meter) stand-off distance touted by Loch Harris and by poster p4316 on the RB message boards reportedly required a 300 second integration time which can hardly be considered real-time.
To my knowledge, Loch/CDEx has never stated the corresponding XRF scan footprints. This data is critical to evaluate detection performance and I believe MP stated it was the reason the U.S. Army rejected the tech.
"You can tell that crap to your potential pp buyers and maybe sell it. But not here."
Is Ontheedge telling his tall tales again? Bad boy Edgy, I hope your not telling that to potential PP investors. That would not be honest to say the least.
Who would have guessed, Paige and Edge, two PP investors both believe the Navy contract is not dead.
And suddenly Edgy is a contracting expert!
Just like he became an expert on the history of Poteet and his alleged law suit against the Arizona Daily Star for the mere mention of his name being associated with Henry Balir way back in 1995. Yet 5 years later in 2000 Poteet was quoted as being lucky to be working for the Blair team at Loch Harris!
Now does that make sense?
If only he knew how silly he sounds making up all his stories. LMAO!!
Unreal.
lmorovan, anyone would become a PP investor if offered discounted shares, that's money in the bank.
Demmo says that once the contracting officers have established an interest they can no longer be directly involved with the company in contracting matters. That's to be expected.
Pushing buttons and pulling strings may be a different matter.
Of course, that would still be unethical IMO.
LOL!!! Bad boy ontheedge,
"miwi, I think you ought to just figure out if you are a real truth sayer, or from the dark side.""
How dare you use my initials on a public message board! Wow, you're really a sharp one! How'd you figure it out!
Too funny, but what's up with you? Is that suppose to be intimidating or something? What exactly is the purpose?
You continue to play the same little games you always have.
Honest folks don't have to do that.
Thanks demmo. eom
"I guess that is why the officers involved..bought into our company as pp share holders or what not...Doris Elliot...Roger Broughton..."
Demo, what do you make of that from a professional standpoint.
If I'm correct, Paige is saying that the contracting officers involed in Phase I of the Navy contract with CDEx have become PP investors.
Her argument appears to be why would they invest if CDEx's technology wasn't worthy of a Phase II contact?
Is that a good argument. Something sounds a little unethical about this situation IMO.
I beleive that if the tech was worthy of a Phase II contact they simply would have received it. Plain and simple. There would be no need for speculation based (once again) on who has become a PP investor or who is on the BOD.
And Edgy talks about grasping at straws. Unreal.
Edgy, stop with your 50K New York challenge nonsense. Good grief, be original, you remind me of Henry Blair's land mine field challenge.
It's a good thing no one took him up on that offer huh? LOL
"You have accused me of a multitude of Loch stuff, SA stuff, and CDEX stuff."
No, I have stated what myself and many others (including many CDEx Longs) believe to be the truth based on the facts.
Gid Dai mate
Yes Sassy,
I'm happy too.
There's a show coming up in Vegas December 5-8. Maybe CDEx will ink a deal and announce it on Friday.
That would be a nice present wouldn't it?
Maybe you're right INET, I can't remember exactly what was written in the SB-2 and it's not worth arguing over.
I think what lmorovan meant was we shouldn't call people stupid since we all have aliases here.
You should say, "you're stupid diddy". LOL
Hello Sassy Frasse,
Are you happy?
"And that is why the Univesity of Michigan on the 12 of October said they are gung ho using it. No insurance mentioned.
Idiots insist this insurance is required on the ValiMed unit."
I believe MP mentioned in a SB-2 that product liability insurance had not been obtained yet which would imply that they are seeking it.
Is MP an idiot?
Ontheedge,
Sorry for calling you MP's faithful servant boy. After all, you aren't really faithful are you? You follow the money. You were a true-blue, Baker-boy while those Loch PP sales were hot. Then you became a key player on the message boards during the Loch Harris rorganization/cover-up. Now, you have publicly denounced the hand that used to feed you and have become MP's li'l servant boy! Anything for money, some people are like that.
Now tell me, what is this suppose to mean?:
{i]"This part was left out, Owensmouth, LOL"{/i}
I work On Ownensmouth Avenue. So you know that, you know my name and you know my occupation- big deal, I could care less!! LOL
You're acting like you just solved a big mystery.
Actually that was pretty childish of you, especially since I already identified myself and what I do years ago.
You see Edge, when you're not a crook working penny stock scams you have nothing to hide.
So it's OK to post information about you?
FaTaLBerT, I thought Chicago made number 5. Where's th 5th?
INET6,
I'm not trying to figure out MP- calm down.
MP stated that he would step down after the first products have been released. Remember?
And why would MP be screwing (as you put it) the other 13 employees if he steps down? I believe that as long as the other principals remain, the corporation will have continuity of life.
If the Valimed product launch turns out to be successful, I'm sure MP would not find the option of retiring the stupidest scenario thinkable.
And if you don't believe it just try me. I can think of much stupider scenarios than that one! LOL!!
Now CALM DOWN, you're not all knowing like Ontheedge. There can't be two of you on the same board... there just can't!!!
GEEZ, take it easy INET6, I think it was a joke. Stop trying to be Mother Hen.
Yep, it would appear that Griffin seizes opportunities at hand. A newly appointed VP position is of no concern to him if the cow's already been milked IMO.
My guess is that there will be no big movement until after the March 26, 2006 SOL has pasted and MP resigns his position from CDEx. I believe MP stated he would step down after the first products emerge.
Nice set-up. Resign, take the resignation bonus you assigned yourself, then let the new golden boy you hired do his thing while you sit back clean as a whistle selling on the pump.
Squeaky clean.
Of course, that is just one of many possible scenarios but one in which I'm sure INET would not agree.
As for MP's faithful servant boy, Edgy..... who cares!
"Purchased" vs "selected for use" It doesn't seem as if it was a purchase at this time. I'll guess that if it meets the the hospital's needs (or "contract requirements") it will be purchased down the road.
Maybe it will even give CDEx the opportunity to document more signatures. The bigger the library, the easier the sale. That's what my momma always use to say.
At least it's a positive PR. Better than nothing at all.
Right Sassy???
P.S. Mari shouldn't have sold all her PP shares, looks like Griffin might create some activity. Short term anyway(s) (TM- smartypants).
Edge, trying to smooth talk and get all buddy-buddy with Closer ain't going to make him start believing you.
But if he could only see that smile of yours, then he'd believe you! LOL!!
Edge, when you were hawking PP shares for Boone and Baker did you have the new vestor make the check out to Boone or Baker?
Just curious.
Oh... one more question, do you find the honest investors to be more gullible?
How about the religious ones? (OK, so that was two more questions- big deal)
Wow. that's a tough question to answer Dubyah. It was a question wasn't it?
"blah, blah, blah...why question the belief of all those who don't know that Investors Hub even exits."
Firstly, I am not questioning anyone's belief, I'm only expressing my opinion about an unbelievable story and the numerous aggravating circumstances surrounding that story which make it so difficult to believe.
Secondly, the people spinning the Loch/CDEx cover-up story all know this board exists.
Now, off for a buck and a quick back nine!
Well Dubyah,
I think the new COO will have the key to the men's executive bathroom in short order.
Hmmmm....
Dallas
Salt Lake City
Madison
and now Phoenix.
Sleeper cell territory! LOL