Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeh yeh...
Berman!
Johnny C... Fame beckons!
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.225086/gov.uscourts.dcd.225086.18.0.pdf
Anyway ... Hi Keith...? I see you're still looking in!
I am guessing that failed post hoc 'data dredging' exercise from the last desperate pump wasn't created by a CLIA certified lab, was it?
(Didn't think so!)
Q. was it the virus that created the impedance response you measured, or was it the 'viral removal agent' you added to spike the samples with, Hmmm!? I wonder!?
(well...How would you know?)
There is as yet not a single instance of any Covid 19 diagnosis being correctly identified or confirmed using any Genviro test system. Not one! Contrived invitro samples do not count!
He's at it again!
https://d8ccec82-173b-45c8-9555-3c83975556ba.filesusr.com/ugd/7681dc_6d3749a2689a469785bcc890a538c20b.pdf
There are some ...erm errors in the notes on 'Earnings per share'...
p43/51
A few question marks there for sure! (quite literally!)
Redacted profannities is what it looks like to me, but thats only a guess (tongue in cheek!)!
Page 3 section D
Looking at the cash flow statement, net cash raised from financing activities was $2m.
But financing costs was £26m.
In other words, for every dime his financiers advanced to Berman, he slipped them over a dollar back the other way. Paid for by DECN retail shareholders!
SOMEONE was getting very rich out of DECN. But it wasn't by buying their shares on OTC!
Cash burn rate is #$1m a year and they had %500K left EOY2020.
Safe to say they won't make it through 21 without additional financing and its hard to see where that is coming from! - Even at the 1000%+ APRs that Berman has been forking over to his vulture capitalist buddies thus far!
Its game over. Thanks for playing!
"Technically" <ahem> Defaulted on 5 of their loans
But its not that they are boracic. No siree!
Its just that all those bags of cold hard cash that they are being inundated with off the back of genviro sales have been too heavy for them to lift so as they couldn't get them to the bank in order to effect a transfer to the lenders. That'll be what's happened here No?. Obvious when you think about it!
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/278845/content
Page 3/63
omg... You have to LAUGH at the desperation here!
https://www.pedima.international/?lang=en
They quote a SPECIFITY of "over 98%!"
Let me translate that for you:
You test 100 samples... NONE OF WHICH HAVE COVID!
This test will WRONGLY diagnose 2 people WITH covid who don't have it!
Q. What does that mean?
Nothing at all!
Why?
Because quoting specificity without quoting corresponding sensitivity at the same time is completely meaningless! If you set the trigger point threshhold to infinity then the test will always return a negative result. The sensitivity will be zero, but the specificity will be 100%
So you can say Wow my (sotto voce hopeless random number generator) test has a 100% specificity while mumbling/ glossing over the fact that it has zero sensitivity!
Conversely you can set the trigger point to zero and the (useless) test will always return a positive result. You can then say my senitivity is 100% and gloss over the fact that this time the specificity is zero.
To know if a test is any good, you need to see BOTH specificity AND sensitivity quoted SIMULTANEOUSLY from the same set of test samples.
Quoting either/Or in isolation is truly pathetic and desperate! Contrived to be misleading, nothing less!!
This optimum point will usually lie in the top left corner of something called "The receiver operator characteristic" or ROC curve.
Here is how you construct that curve based on where you set the detection threshhold:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Receiver_operating_characteristic
On this curve, a sensitive detector (useful) looks like a near right angled line approaching the top left corner of the graph.
And a 'coin flip' (useless random number generator test) like Genviro will look like a diagonal line. You can see from this that if you set the threshhold in the right place, the random number generator (diagonal line) will give a specificity of >98% too!
This flaw is SO obvious to anyone remotely technical that this must be another BLATANT pump, to sucker the unwary. But no one with even the most basic grasp of Bayesian statistics will be remotely fooled by it! Not for a second![/b]