Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It seems not. In SEC v AZNT, at the very end there're docket entries for transcripts for every day of the trial. But when you try to download them, you only get the cover sheet. I don't know whether this is an error by Pacer or not.
In addition, Pacer is different for all the federal courts.
You'll find plenty, if you just read all the posts instead of chatting with us.
i realized that I was not going to find what I was looking for here yesterday.
LOLOLOLOLISSIMO!!
Uh-huh.
I can only assume client was approached by someone asking client to invest, or buy into All Pro Auto Group...
If you really do want some background on the company, all you have to do is read the posts here. Start at the beginning. Ten posts at a time, it shouldn't take you very long.
Right.
however, also apparent (from my reading between the lines) is your client isn't interested in partial ownership of all pro via the runaway dilutionary pcbm.
I think Mr Diddy Esq's purpose here is to plant the rumor of a buyout. As we know, many of the True Longs read this board, and on some level recognize that it's more credible than the Zoo.
Why would your client have assumed that All-Pro, a rather small used car lot, was a publicly traded company?
Client did not know about PCBM (I think) until my research revealed connection...Again, I do not know what brought client to All Pro...client inquired only as to All Pro, so I believe this was extent of client's knowledge...But, you are right, the PCBM connection should halt any further inquiry.
And who does this phrase remind us of???
...so I had an obvious typo..
Seriously, I think you should archive ALL of Paulie's pix there. They're the best thing about PCBM.
It's so empty now!!!
Maybe you should hire Paulie as an assistant so we can have some pictures to look at?
lol, I doubt that Mr Lobster knows that "bashers never bash a bad stock".
A COO (oh wait! He's not an officer of the company!) hiring a bunch of guys to slam his own company??!!
lol, and if we went away, they'd think of some reason why THAT was a good sign.
it seems to me that so many are still believers only because
the bashers are there 24/7. The Alan's, Prosper's, Gate's, etc.
all post that PCBM is alive and well because the bashers are
very active...
This bunch is stubbornly resistant to common sense in any form.
By: nite_raider0
23 Jun 2003, 06:57 PM EDT
Msg. 35565 of 35568
(This msg. is a reply to 35564 by hozameen.)
Jump to msg. #
hozameen..
The rally was far from what we expected. Many from the boards who had identified that they would be in there appear to have changed their minds. We had others who are not on these boards do the same. Some press came to find out what was going on including Forbes, Bloomberg, NY 1, and NBC and we will see what they do with the material.
Bottom line, I am disappointed today but will be back to my campaign again tomorrow. It is clear that some want others to do the work for them while others step up to the plate to work for what they get and todays attendance started the seperation.
Something to think about:
When stocks are transferred to DTC custody, the identity of their account type, i.e., Cash, Excess
Margin, Erisa, Margin is lost when these securities are pooled.
DTC is not supposed to lend securities that are fully paid for, or that are in excess margin
accounts, Erisa accounts, etc.
In fact, that is not even a consideration to DTC.
Larry Kudlow in the Weekend highlights featured an interview with a lawyer on the Martha Stewart
case. Just in case you don't think they are paying attention to short positions:
"Why are they going after Martha Stewart for a 3,948 share trade, when Imclone had short positions
of over 7.7 Million shares before she sold her stock? Logic would dictate to me that Imclone didn't
have 7.7 million shares available for loan. How was the short allowed to get this big?
Again, these sales were not sales of long holders or of people shorting against the box, the latter
now virtually impossible to do with traditional brokers. He definitely feels that there is no
proper basis for a prosecution of her for the reported foundations, and that further, it is a waste
of limited resources for little reason.
Were these shares shorted settled within T+3 or did we have massive settlement failures that simply manipulated the stock through the introduction of naked shorts. Maybe a company with such high visibility because of the SEC investigation into Martha Stewart will attract a higher level of involvement into stock manipulations. On the other hand, it does appear that the SEC and Senate are afraid to look into the data because of what they might actually find. Trade settlement failures are across all boards and they are used as a mechanism for Stock Manipulation.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=JGMHA&read=35565
The stuff about Imclone is absurd. They have plenty of stock that could be shorted.
Can he possibly believe this nonsense about par value? Or is he just hoping that someone else will?
THIS IS A PLACE WE KNEW WE WOULD BE, AND JUST A CRIMINAL ILLUSION, WHEN THERE IS A PAR VALUE ASSIGNED TO THE SECURITY!!!
Where oh where are the Counterfeit Shareholders?
LOLOLOLOLISSIMO!!
Yup. And it did go up bigtime yesterday, but on thin volume with a huge spread.
The former GAAY was run by Frank Olson/Olsen, a convicted felon. He sold the shell without even telling GAAY shareholders.
fwiw, CFPR (down 30% today) used to be GAAY. A real stinker.
lol, Bumblebee Bob never misses a post.
I think you're right, but it's hard to separate the lying greedheads from the genuine dummies.
The Investrend people, who run FinancialWire, must be awfully stupid. You wouldn't think they'd want to publicize companies like AZNT and MDMN as members of the GetShorty Club.
Grub!! Where's Susie today?
lol, that's true. And after Mr Lobster, they believe in those idiotic FinancialWire stories.
It strikes me that the burgeoning list of small, unsuccessful companies joining the GetShorty campaign might well serve the SEC as a guide to which microcaps they should investigate next.
Yes. Worse yet, people like the True Longs are incapable of evaluating the reliability of sources.
LOL!! Can't quite bring it up, but some particularly slimy scam turned into somebody's Family Products....
Moe and a number of others discuss their trades on the old BMII thread. That's probably what he means.
I think that rubbish is from the folks at ecclesia.org. They're a bunch of extreme right-wing "Christian" whackjobs.
Coffaro Family Products rings a faint bell. Does anyone know what that shell was called in its last incarnation?
I doubt that, since the number of repeats varies. But all you have to do is hit "back" once the post "takes" and then hit "submit" again. Hit it a bunch of times all at once and you'll get a bunch of posts.
Thanks, Huck. A truly pathetic story...
LOLOLOLOLOLISSIMO!! 20 billion o/s!!
Relatives of Ed?
lol, I wonder how he manages not to get caught by the spambot.
Though as I said, if the Crustacean is fed up with all those calls, he can liberate himself by doing, say, a 1:100,000.
That makes sense to me.
I think it'll be at least 1:1000, and probably bigger than that. Depends on how many current stockholders Mr Lobster wants to get rid of.
Yup. That's done all the time.
Waaayyyy too much preferred. Wonder how much, if any, of it has been issued.
What they hold probably started out as Reg S stock dumped in Belgium by a syndicate. Anyone remember Eddie De Pauw? I think he was part of it.
lol...
Every day, Sandi posts all these law suits and legal findings on companies or MM's or someone getting caught doing something illegal.
The stuff Sandi spams falls into about three categories:
1) Routine NASD enforcement actions against brokerages.
2) SEC actions against companies and promoters, either for touting or for selling unregistered stock.
3) Big FBI/SEC sweeps.
None of it has anything to do with what the True Longs think is happening with PCBM. Either she doesn't read them, or doesn't understand what she's reading.
I think that was me. I tossed it as soon as it popped up.
Boris is on the ball though.....message was already deleted!
Of course he was probably spamming other boards as well.
I know. The numbers don't make any sense at all. Unless, of course, management gifted themselves with a bunch of Corbel shares that they didn't tell anyone about.
Janice, That's why the numbers don't jive. The Corbel spin was announced before the lawsuit. The lawsuit said 2B. So there would be no reason to increase Corbel's A/S. it sounds like the company is cooking again.