iis...(put something here)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
rocket18: This filing was before the NEOM default. It means nothing anymore. YA through NM, LLC now has it all and NEOM has nothing.
It's checked off as a Rule 13d-1(c) filing. A beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of an outstanding class of equity securities of an issuer is required, pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, to file either a Schedule 13D or 13G with the SEC.
Be: The "purpose" is clear. It's checked off as a Rule 13d-1(c) filing. A beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of an outstanding class of equity securities of an issuer is required, pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, to file either a Schedule 13D or 13G with the SEC.
NEOM IS STILL ON THE CHILL LIST - PROOF!
A Chill List is published infrequently at Clearstream who create a "Master List".
Lists published at the DTCC report on those companies that have a Chill Placed (Suspension of DTC Services) or Lifted (Resumption of DTC Services.)
This is the LAST published Deposit Chills List - March 2017.
http://www.clearstream.com/blob/65974/38feef0141cf7663539d1e30970a8f35/dtcc-deposit-chills-pdf-data.pdf
According to definitions provided by DTCC - Securities subject to a Deposit Chill are locked from any deposit activity in the Depository Trust Company (DTC).
The following link is the first of several pages of Operations Notices SINCE the DTCC Deposit Chill March 2017 List including new Suspensions and Resumptions. Navigation at the bottom of the page link you to the previous set of notices (and so on.)
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
NONE OF THESE DTCC NOTICES SINCE MARCH LIST NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (NEOM) AS HAVING THEIR CHILL LIFTED.
..and for those who do not understand DTC Chill.
For good reason, many traders don't want to buy stocks that are chilled. Their problem is finding out what's chilled and what's not. DTC purposely does not offer a handy list. This is why Clearstream creates a "Master List" and I had to point everyone to the individual Suspension/Resumption notices.
For investors and traders, DTCC and DTC are mysterious entities, secretive and remote. They DO NOT welcome inquires about anything at all from what they call “non-participants.” They see themselves as business-to-business companies, and provide very little useful information to the general public.
DTC is NOT a believer in information-sharing. At the SEC's Roundtable on Microcap Securities in the fall of 2011, a DTC panelist said flatly that she didn't want to tell companies why they weren't DTC eligible, or had been chilled, because if they were able to fix it, they'd just find a new way to get around the rules. The SEC didn't fully agree with that policy, and eventually compelled them to create a way for issuers to appeal.
As a consequence of this reluctance to impart information, there's a good deal of confusion about what chills and global locks (or “freezes”) are, when they may be invoked, what they mean for a stock you may own, and when they may be lifted.
A chill is a restriction placed by DTC on one or more of its services. DTC will issue a notice on its website announcing the event, but will not explain further. It may limit a participant's ability to make a deposit or withdrawal of its stock at DTC. A chill can last for an extended period. Global locks are scarier: ALL DTC services will be suspended, except, in many cases, for custody.
When a chill or lock is imposed, DTC will not only issue a notice at its website, but will also inform participants. Those would include brokers, who are expected to restrict trading, or, in the case of a freeze, to block it altogether. Until around 2005 or 2006, brokerages, especially those that self-cleared, didn't always pay attention to DTC edicts quickly, but that has changed.
If a stock you own has been chilled, the chill may or may not make a significant difference to your ability to trade it, depending on what services have been restricted. A freeze is different. Once brokerages have become aware of a global lock, the stock will stop trading entirely. Accordingly, once a companies management has come to understand what a global lock means, it probably won't bother to keep up with its SEC filings. Sound familiar?
It's best always to keep an eye out for DTC. Chills are problematic, and global locks are deadly.
lesnshawn: Did you not read my posts? Stocks can still trade while on the Chill List. If NEOM was off the Chill List they 1.) would have needed to get caught up on their missing filings and 2.) there would be a notice that they were removed. Both have clearly not happened. I'll place my faith in the facts and DTC documentation not a scanned "letter" by a person posting anonymously. The real question is why do you continue to pimp this worthless sticker with no income or assets? Hopes of a RM? That only makes money for the people that own the shell and the company acquiring the shell. The shareholders of a PINK RM normally get reversed out to dust. All the fantasies over the years of what will happen with NEOM, each one never materializes. Schemes that rip off the public are what "bother" me.
...and for those who do not understand DTC Chill.
For good reason, many traders don't want to buy stocks that are chilled. Their problem is finding out what's chilled and what's not. DTC purposely does not offer a handy list. This is why Clearstream creates a "Master List" and I had to point everyone to the individual Suspension/Resumption notices.
For investors and traders, DTCC and DTC are mysterious entities, secretive and remote. They DO NOT welcome inquires about anything at all from what they call “non-participants.” They see themselves as business-to-business companies, and provide very little useful information to the general public.
DTC is NOT a believer in information-sharing. At the SEC's Roundtable on Microcap Securities in the fall of 2011, a DTC panelist said flatly that she didn't want to tell companies why they weren't DTC eligible, or had been chilled, because if they were able to fix it, they'd just find a new way to get around the rules. The SEC didn't fully agree with that policy, and eventually compelled them to create a way for issuers to appeal.
As a consequence of this reluctance to impart information, there's a good deal of confusion about what chills and global locks (or “freezes”) are, when they may be invoked, what they mean for a stock you may own, and when they may be lifted.
A chill is a restriction placed by DTC on one or more of its services. DTC will issue a notice on its website announcing the event, but will not explain further. It may limit a participant's ability to make a deposit or withdrawal of its stock at DTC. A chill can last for an extended period. Global locks are scarier: ALL DTC services will be suspended, except, in many cases, for custody.
When a chill or lock is imposed, DTC will not only issue a notice at its website, but will also inform participants. Those would include brokers, who are expected to restrict trading, or, in the case of a freeze, to block it altogether. Until around 2005 or 2006, brokerages, especially those that self-cleared, didn't always pay attention to DTC edicts quickly, but that has changed.
If a stock you own has been chilled, the chill may or may not make a significant difference to your ability to trade it, depending on what services have been restricted. A freeze is different. Once brokerages have become aware of a global lock, the stock will stop trading entirely. Accordingly, once a companies management has come to understand what a global lock means, it probably won't bother to keep up with its SEC filings. Sound familiar?
It's best always to keep an eye out for DTC. Chills are problematic, and global locks are deadly.
PROOF THAT THE DTC CHILL ON NEOM HAS NOT BEEN LIFTED. REMOVE THE LESNSHAWN STICKY NOW.
A Chill List is published infrequently at Clearstream who create a "Master List".
Lists published at the DTCC report on those companies that have a Chill Placed (Suspension of DTC Services) or Lifted (Resumption of DTC Services.)
This is the LAST published Deposit Chills as published by Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) - March 2017. According to definitions provided by DTCC - Securities subject to a Deposit Chill are locked from any deposit activity in the Depository Trust Company (DTC).
http://www.clearstream.com/blob/65974/38feef0141cf7663539d1e30970a8f35/dtcc-deposit-chills-pdf-data.pdf
The following link is the first of several pages of Operations reports SINCE the DTCC Deposit Chill March 2017 List including new Suspensions and Resumptions. Navigation at the bottom of the page link you to the previous set of reports (and so on.)
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
NONE OF THESE OPERATIONS REPORTS SINCE MARCH LIST NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (NEOM) AS HAVING THEIR CHILL LIFTED.
rocket18: The date used for determining the expiration of a patent is the Priority date. Patents expire 20 years from the priority date NOT the filing or publication date.
rocket18: The patent you reference states, "This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 12/827,814 filed on Jun. 30, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,597 issued Mar. 6, 2012; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 11/765,887 filed on Jun. 20, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,126 issued Jul. 27, 2010; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/768,991, filed on Jan. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,383,209 issued Jun. 3, 2008; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 09/633,932, filed on Aug. 8, 2000, now abandoned; which is a continuation application of Ser. No. 09/232,908, filed on Jan. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,048 issued on Mar. 6, 2001; which is divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/538,365, filed on Oct. 3, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,773 issued on Nov. 2, 1999; which claims the benefit of provisional Application Ser. No. 60/000,442, filed on Jun. 20, 1995, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Interfacing with Remote Computers” (hereinafter, “our copending application”), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety." - https://www.google.com/patents/US8805728
The 20 year life span of a patent (and all continuations) are based on the earliest date the patent claims benefit. In the case of patent you reference that date is Jun. 20, 1995. Sometimes a few months (only) are added due to administrative delays. The patent you referenced has expired. ANYONE who understand patent basics understands this.
be: It is my STRONG view that the alternate reality I see shared on this board extends beyond NEOM to people as well.
be: "All of the above is what I have constituted from my own due diligence. I suggest a careful read of all patents by anyone seeking to validate my interpretation. I am not an expert in patents, but I believe fully in the vast due diligence I have put forth over the years." - Yet you do not understand that NEOM no longer owns the patents. Pretty vast.
rocket18: That's ridiculous. The US Patent filings clearly show that the owner of the patents is NM, LLC.
phoenix69: Businesses and the market in general stopped using "Indirect" codes years and years ago. Once that happened, NEOM started trolling companies using "Direct" codes that used a shortened URL with standard 301 redirect. That didn't work out for them.
pop: Amazingly, it appears that the patents formally owned by NEOM can be applied to nearly everything. How wonderful for the new patent owners.
rocket18: NM, LLC. owns the patents. That link proves it. Those assignments detail that after NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. assigned the patents to NM, LLC., YA GLOBALINVESTMENTS, L.P. released NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. from the Security Interest.
REWRITTEN: The key patents used in past lawsuits have expired, the App is nowhere a popular App on the App Stores, and NM, LLC is operating a QR Code Platform with a level of business such that when NEOM operated the business NEOM could not service their debt, office, team, or costs to remain a reporting public company - eventually leading to default and loss of it's assets.
Say there was a reverse merger and NM, LLC rolled back into the shell. For what purpose? The whole reason YA called in the debt in the first place was because there was not enough income from the patents and it' operations to make a go of it. Besides the death spiral funding model is dying.
Based on public records, NM, LLC. is picking up some cash from a small number of lawsuits around their their key BUT expired patents. That winds down over the next several as you can only look back 6 years once a patent has expired.
IMHO any notion that there is a future for NEOM is misguided.
neomania: There is no doubt. All public records prove your statements are false.
lesnshawn: Besides that account if you look at the @ name and URL is the old account of for NEOM that they took over e.g. @neomediainc, https://mobile.twitter.com/neomediainc
They need to shut is down as not to confuse NM, LLC with the old NEOM from the perspective of a corporate entity.
lesnshawn. Regarding, "NM, LLC @neomediainc Follow us at @GetNeoReader.?? This account is inactive - Odd. Why would YA do that?"
Not odd at all. It's makes sense from a branding perspective. NM, LLC. acquired the patents and other assets including the NeoReader App as a result of the default and foreclosure. It makes sense that NM, LLC. wants to push the account of the App for which they wish to encourage downloads rather then the generic sounding LLC (that is initiating patent lawsuits.)
rocket18: What is your source for this ridiculous statement and fake new?.
Personalizit: If you have any any patent attorney review the Microsoft agreement they will tell you the same thing as Pop. This was a one time payment by Microsoft to Neomedia for a CNTS. Microsoft and their affiliates can use these patents without paying any additional royalties. Try again.
Be: The patents were NOT reinstated to NEOM.
neomania: fuhgeddaboudit. yeah. find out soon. that has been the case for years. big news any day now.
Personalizit: Of course, it works and exists - to the shame of the market. Bank robbers and embezzlers also exist. I wrote that the model is dying - scams being shutdown, changing regulations.
Personalizit: Yes, talk but no evidence. Caveat Emptor.
lesnshawn: Give it up. You go on and on like this shell is some big deal. Shells are inexpensive, a dime a dozen, many without the baggage that NEOM includes. The whole "model" of WHY a company without a real business (or with some business) reverses into a shell has been dying for several years. Company wants to pay executive salaries, investor wants to double their investment by dumping shares on the public. This death spiral funding that NEOM practiced for years does not work anymore. The SEC has clamped down these companies that create stock, sell to an investor at a discount, and the "investor" making money on the difference between the price they acquired the stock and what it is trading. Sure some day traders get lucky but on the most part the "outsiders" - the investing public - the believers of these stocks - get screwed. The pinks is littered with these stories. You think after all these years NEOM or whoever owns the patents is a unicorn company in waiting. YA, NEOM, NM, LLC. is not like UBER, Airbnb, Shopify, WeWork and others that build huge market opportunity, raise huge amounts of money, put 100s and 1000s of people to work, make significant revenue, etc. etc. Give it up.
pop: Does it really have to continue? LOL. Yeah, I guess it does.
Personalizit: rocket18 misunderstands what a security release is. This is not a reassignment of patents from Yorkville back to Neomedia.
pop: it's clear that people either do not read through the actual documents or they do not understand the basics of various assignments.
pop: I think you meant to write that there are no assignments from NM, LLC. to NeoMedia. None.
lesnshawn: You misunderstand the various types of "assignments". The "RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS)." did not return patents to NEOM. The assignment that transfered control was the 'ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS)." NM, LLC has all the patents. NEOM has nothing. This page shows the patents assigned by NEOM to NM, LLC. https://assignment.uspto.gov/patent/index.html#/patent/search/resultAssignment?id=39622-662
rocket18: I provided the USPTO link to the end result - the assignment of the patents from NEOM to NM, LLC. Did you scroll down to see the details? http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-39622-662.pdf
rocket18: Wrong, wrong again. After the 2016 NEOM default all patents were sold at auction. NM, LLC. acquired the patents and they were assigned to NM, LLC at the Patent Office by NEOM. This is the document at the USPTO, http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-39622-662.pdf
NEOM shareholders are out of the picture as they have no stake in NM, LLC.
rocket18: As a matter of fact the core patents used in past lawsuits have expired.It is also a matter of fact that all NEOM assets were lost during default.
lesnshawn: NEOM has no litigations. NM, LLC. owns the IP and benefits from any litigations - which if you check are based on the expired patents and limited in nature
tundra1: Nothing to figure. Trades by unsuspecting buyers being scammed by pumpers/traders. Warmachine summed it up nicely, "More BS selling under retail(beyond 4 decimal point)then buys at .0001 to make a 900% gain for the scammers and excite the unsuspecting that don't know the scam in play."
ptundra1: Dream on. Clearly an ongoing pump and dump scheme.
pop: LOL.
neomania: These companies paid a one time license or covenant not to sue to avoid a lawsuit. No more money coming in from this list.
neomania: Yeah, right.
neomania: NM LLC is not a public company. You should contact NM LLC to correct that page so it will not mislead others.