iis...(put something here)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
tundra1: Where is the company? Who works for it? Any SEC filings? What products? A website? Have you received and shareholder communications? Anything? Anything at all? I'll answer for you. Nothing. Any trading is on nothing. Ridiculous but true.
Bigfootbud: NeoMedia/NEOM did not change their name. Two years ago after NEOM's core patents expired, NEOM went into default and YA foreclosed on all NEOM assets. NM, LLC a private company now owns all the former NEOM patents and property. NEOM shareholders were left with worthless shares in a non-reporting, DTC-Chilled shell company.
lesnshawn: What part of the following do you not understand? The DTCC is the authority that places and lifts DTC Chills. NOT Ameritrade Customer Support,intern, or the Ameritrade CEO for that matter -- the DTCC. It's called a "Resumption of DTC Services". It's really very simple to prove or disprove. This is the link:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1 find and link to the notice that lifts the chill. Please, show us.
I wrote more details here that you ignored. http://investorshub.advfn.com/board/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131910863
PlayInTheGreen: Thank you.
Be Confident: Sure there was. Sure. All your DD e.g., news is either outdated, incorrect or misunderstood by you.
PlayInTheGreen: The DTC Chill was never lifted. That was a lie. I asked lesnshawn to show us the notice at the DTCC source that would prove the Chill had been lifted. He has not pointed us to the notice because it does not exist. It's called a "Resumption of DTC Services". I went back into last year myself - nothing. This is the link:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
Be Confident: Partners? Ridiculous. NEOM which is a non-operational company without patents or a service does not have licensees, clients, or partners. Regardless, NEOM and MSFT were never partners. MSFT took out a license for the former NEOM patents after being sued by NEOM. Years later, MSFT turned over their platform (TAG) and customers to NEOM competitor, Scanlife. TAG was then integrated into Scanbuy's ScanLife platform.
DENSO, part of the Toyota Group, a world leader in automatic data capture technology is the inventor of the QR Code®. DENSO allowed their patent to be used by the world so to spread adoption of QR. http://www.qrcode.com/en/history/
MSFT can do what they want with QR Codes. NEOM has nothing to do with it.
Be Confident: If you like posting about technology that has nothing to do with this stock ticker why don't you launch a blog? Oh, right you're implying NEOM has patents that benefit the technology. Do you still not accept that NEOM no longer has any assets, IP, product, App, customers, revenue, office space, staff, or management?
pop: I understand now. Thank you. Kinda like how all technology on the planet was secretly anticipated within the all encompassing NEOM [former] patents.
lesnshawn: Well? Show us the notice at the DTCC source that the Chill has been lifted. It's called a "Resumption of DTC Services". I went back into last year - nothing.
This is the DTCC link:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
lesnshawn: Show us the notice at the DTCC source that the Chill has been lifted. It's called a "Resumption of DTC Services". I went back into last year - nothing. This is the link:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
tundra1: That's a lie. Not a dishonest act. The outcome is basic math, the outcome when you reverse split billions of shares that trade at .0001 per share. NEOM has reversed split like this before (from 1000s of shares to 1) and it obviously devastated existing shareholders each time. But I agree that it is not likely to happen. NEOM's shell is not reporting, has no management team to make such decisions, and in spite of the postulations of others NEOM is still on the DTC Chill List.
IamBaphomet: Because there is no reason for anyone to do so. Even with a reverse merger it would be setup to the benefit of the new money coming in, NEOM shareholders would be reversed split into nothingness - as has already happened several times in NEOM's past.
tundra1: That's just silly.
tundra1: Based on what? What is the criteria for investment/investor value? NEOM does not own and has not communicated anything of substance to justify sales or 'momentum' of any kind. NO IP/Patents, technology/platform/App, clients, revenue, SEC filings, office space, staff or management team.
Be: About as relevant to NEOM (which no longer owns any IP/patents) as this other next big thing...
https://www.retroist.com/2011/09/22/sony-presents-the-next-big-thing-betamax/
Be Confident: Theselinks have nothing to do with NEOM, a company without patents, product, or people.
tundra1 et all: Trading with nothing of substance behind it. NEOM is non-reporting and has no platform, clients patents, assets, CEO, staff, office, revenue, capital, nada, nothing, zilch - they lost it all to YA. Stating the obvious, the real value of a company is driven by actual revenue and real news. 65,500,000 million shares have traded today at an insignificant sum for no reason and people are excited? Don't tell me something big is brewing, on the horizon, etc. - that has been pushed for years and years. Ridiculous.
Be: Sure, everyone knew the expiration date of the patents.
Be: The "048" patent and all continuation/child patents has expired.
Bigfootbud: Correction. YA/NM, LLC. would now be the ones to get back to you.
Bigfootbud: YA Gloal/NM LLC would be the ones to now get back to you.
Bigfootbud: How is this good for shareholders of NEOM? NEOM no longer owns this technology or any patents.
rocket18 & Be: U.S. Patent No. 8,805,728 EXPIRED two years ago when it's parent patent expired.
A patent's expiration date is based on it's PRIORITY DATE NOT PUBLICATION DATE. In the case of U.S. Patent No. 8,805,728 while the patent was issued on Aug 12, 2014 the priority date was Jun 20, 1995.
ANY patent attorney will confirm this. ANYONE who really knows about patents knows this.
https://www.google.com/patents/US8805728
This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 12/827,814 filed on Jun. 30, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,597 issued Mar. 6, 2012; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 11/765,887 filed on Jun. 20, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,126 issued Jul. 27, 2010; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/768,991, filed on Jan. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,383,209 issued Jun. 3, 2008; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 09/633,932, filed on Aug. 8, 2000, now abandoned; which is a continuation application of Ser. No. 09/232,908, filed on Jan. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,048 issued on Mar. 6, 2001; which is divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/538,365, filed on Oct. 3, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,773 issued on Nov. 2, 1999; which claims the benefit of provisional Application Ser. No. 60/000,442, filed on Jun. 20, 1995, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Interfacing with Remote Computers” (hereinafter, “our copending application”), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Continuation patents expire 20 years from the date of filing of the parent patent application. Once the parent patent expires the continuation patent expires.
...regardless NEOM no longer owns any patents.
WarMachine: Yes, you would think.
Be Confident: When patent 6,199,048 ('048) expired ALL continuation patents derived from it also expired. That is simply how it works.
A continuation gets the priority date of the parent application from which it is derived. An applicant can have a continuation of a continuation of a continuation... - going on for years and each will get an "effective filing date" of the first filed application in the chain.
e.g., "This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 12/827,814 filed on Jun. 30, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,597 issued Mar. 6, 2012; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 11/765,887 filed on Jun. 20, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,126 issued Jul. 27, 2010; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/768,991, filed on Jan. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,383,209 issued Jun. 3, 2008; which is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 09/633,932, filed on Aug. 8, 2000, now abandoned; which is a continuation application of Ser. No. 09/232,908, filed on Jan. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,048 issued on Mar. 6, 2001; which is divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/538,365, filed on Oct. 3, 1995, now U.S. Pat...etc. [adnausia]. "
https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2701.html
...besides when NEOM's core patents expired, YA foreclosed. Now YA owns anything left as NM, LLC. NEOM has nothing.
rocket18: You continue to misunderstand the "assignment" record. Talk to any patent attorney - you are wrong. Absolutely NOT transferred back. That is contrary to the actual facts and the link you provided. FYI.
Be Confident: Re: "...they held the most important and valuable attributes secret." - the patents are published which makes the statement ridiculous. Regardless, it's Irrelevant, NEOM no longer owns the patents.
Bentobox: The vast majority of the one-time, non-recurring license payments around the core patents in past years came about as a result of lawsuit settlements. Rather than a company paying millions to lawyers to fight the claims of a patent troll, they settled for a much smaller "license" payment. A small number of licenses were taken by small companies to preempt a lawsuit. That game ended a couple of years ago when the core patents expired. At that point YA foreclosed on the assets so they could run a more economic, scaled down trolling effort for the patent look back period. They couldn't make money at that point while funding the costs of keeping the company public + CEO making $500K a year plus bonus - not feasible economically. As far as the platform/product that YA acquired (under NM, LLC) is was an outdated platform that was never accepted by the market - good luck trying to white label that.
rocket18: Are you really sure?
1. Microsoft doesn't need to purchase the patents, they already have a license. Besides, Microsoft already has their own mobile payment technology and platform in place. ...and NONE of the major mobile payment players have licensed the patents formally owned by NEOM (now owned by NM, LLC.) for such purposes. Wonder why? Reason: No one needs them.
2. Microsoft licensed the patents after being pulled into a lawsuit by NEOM for the "indirect" patents that have since expired.
3. After licensing, Microsoft eventually shutdown the "infringing" platform anyway and turned code resolution and customers over the to NEOM's competitor ScanLife.
Be Confident: All of which has nothing to do with NEOM - a sub penny unreporting pinkie without assets, patents/IP, cash, customers, employees, management team or hope.
Poptech: Ahhhh. Now I understand. Love it. ;)
lesnshawn: Ameritrade is NOT the authority. DTCC is the authority. Show us the notice at the DTCC source that the Chill has been lifted. It's called a "Resumption of DTC Services". I went back into last year - nothing. This is the link:
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
lesnshawn, lesnshawn, lesnshawn. I also provided a link to the DTC website where DTC Operations Notices (which include new Suspensions and Resumptions) are published -- SINVE the Clearstream Chill List was created.
http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/important-notices?year=2017&subsidiary=DTC&category=Operations&pgs=1
Navigation at the bottom of this page links you to the previous set of notices (and so on back to March.) As you read through the notices you will see the lists of new companies added to the chill list (Suspensions) and other companies that have been removed (Resumptions.)
These notices are the source where a chill being lifted (Resumption) is reported. When Clearstream updates their list, these are the notices they aggregate and reflect in their updated list.
NONE OF THESE DTCC NOTICES SINCE THE MARCH LIST WAS PUBLISHED HAS NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (NEOM) AS HAVING THEIR CHILL LIFTED.
Accordingly, when the Clearstream List is eventually updated, if nothing changes, NeoMedia will STILL be on it.
Bentobox: I'm one of the guys making sure people are aware of the red flags. I can't stand the misinformation that NEOM survived the default or there is hope for NEOM shareholder. I don't want to see new, unsuspecting people buy into this sticker and lose their investment.
Bentobox: Huh? Where does it state at http://www.neom.com/ir/shareholdernotices that the Chill was lifted? I'll answer that question, It doesn't.
NO ONE is arguing that the stock can trade while on the Chill List. I wrote earlier:
"If a stock you own has been chilled, the chill may or may not make a significant difference to your ability to trade it, depending on what services have been restricted. A freeze is different. Once brokerages have become aware of a global lock, the stock will stop trading entirely."
NEOM states this as well,"As of February 25, 2013 we have not submitted the requisite information and thus the Chill remains in effect until such time as NeoMedia determines that it is appropriate to expend the significant resources to prepare the request for removal of the Chill. Shareholders may still trade our shares through full service brokers."
IamBaphomet: Being on the Chill List does not stop trading.
IamBaphomet: Really? Here you go. PROOF NEOM is on the DTC Chill List.https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131910863
lesnshawn: The DTC IS THE AUTHORITY NOT some random Ameritrade customer support person. I link to the DTC source material.
lesnshawn: DTC CHILL NOT LIFTED. NEOM IS STILL ON THE CHILL LIST - PROOF! http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131910863