Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh, I forgot to add this. There is more than one reason that a stock goes dark. IMHO, JBZY went dark because of what I mentioned in my previous post. They have grown very fast and growth sometimes makes it harder to prepare the financial paperwork and it is taking longer to put it all together. They were late on all of their previous financials, so that tells me that they were having problems with preparing them to begin with to comply with US standards. The annual report isn't any different, in that respect. IMHO, the only difference is in what the financials will show this time. They will reveal what we actually own in JBZY. And, I believe that many will be stunned by how much we have grown in the last year.
GLTY and to all the longs.
That is what I am saying. This stock has been trading at around 10,000 shares per day. If they were diluting, it would take over 480 years at this level of trading. Where do you get that they are diluting this stock because the share structure is blank. The shares traded would have to be much higher, like 1,000,000 per day, for them to dilute any significant number of shares each day. So what you are calling my calculations are more what your theory of dilution is.
GLTY and all the longs.
So listen to something that is legit. It would take over 480 years to dilute the preferred convertible shares at 10,000 shares per trading day. The math goes like this. 10000 shares times 5 days per week times 52 weeks times 480 years. The total of this equation is 1,248,000,000, which is still less than the total convertible common shares owned by Dequn Wang.
If you take out all the holidays and days that the market doesn't trade, you would have a much longer time period.
Good luck with any theory or thoughts that they are diluting because there is no share structure information.
GLTY and all the longs.
JBZY IS A:
REAL COMPANY AND A UNICORN, REAL COMPANY AND A UNICORN, REAL COMPANY AND A UNICORN, REAL COMPANY AND A UNICORN, REAL COMPANY AND A UNICORN!
GLTY and all the longs.
We will see shortly, soon, pronto!
GLTY and all the longs.
I was just finishing dinner at a Chinese restaurant and opened up my fortune cookie. It said, "Never mind tomorrow, TODAY is the day.
I don't usually believe in these, but a few weeks ago, I stated that May 17th was special to me and that May 17th was the day I would like the financials to be released. It probably means nothing, but tomorrow is my TODAY because it is my TODAY, from the time I read my fortune until the same time tomorrow night.
If the financials come tomorrow, I may have to start believing in fortune cookies. Remember May 17th! I just though I would add some levity to this board.
GLTA the longs.
You can't judge a person by what he has done in his past. I believe Sam Walton filed for bankruptcy a few times before he became successful and built his empire.
GLTY, though, and to all the longs.
Look up "Unicorn in stocks" on google
Thanks for bringing that up! You know, I like the sound of that. I don't remember ever using the two words together, but they sound good together.
Maybe in a year, those two words will be synonymous and perfect for this company.
GOLDEN UNICORN
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
You can start with the Annual Report 2016. Read the section that states "Products." In there, you will find patents and a brief description of the long life battery.
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/169288/content
Then you can read the article published by Han Jianfang, one of the principles in ZJMY, which I had saved in Word and have copied below. If you know how to translate the article name into Chinese, you might be able to find the exact same article in Chinese and then translate the entire article back to English. That way you can get the originally displayed article with pictures and data the way it was published. That is the way I do my research sometimes.
On the Change of the Range of Endurance in the Third Generation of Electric Vehicle Cooler Technology
Zhongyu Mingyang and Han Jianfang: Discussion on the Change of Range in the Third-Generation Electric Vehicle Cooling Technology
share to
FavoriteCommentTime: 2017-02-08 11:07Author: Han Jian FangSource: Han Jian Fang
Since the beginning of this century, electric vehicles have experienced explosive development. The four major groups in Europe, Japan, the United States, and China have worked together in a short span of ten years to launch the final charge for the goal of replacing traditional fuel vehicles with electric vehicles.
At present, the global auto giants are scrambling to compete in the battlefield of electric vehicles. They all make every effort to obtain leadership in the future of electric vehicle technology. In this race, although China replaced the United States in 2015, it became the world’s No. 1 seller of new energy vehicles. First, this advantage was further expanded in 2016. However, this is only due to the government's incentive to spur the policy . The quantitative advantage does not mean that it is technologically advanced. Chinese auto companies do not have too many core technologies. A major breakthrough is made in Europe and the United States. The core technologies of mainstream electric vehicles are mainly Japanese and American.
Nissan LEFT Electric Vehicle
At present, the global electric car market is colorful and many brands compete for one another. However, all the pure electric vehicle products sold are based on two very different technical routes. These two routes have a complete impact on the ecosystem of the future electric vehicles. Different judgments and design strategies led to the formation of two distinct technical systems.
1. The Japanese technology route represented by the Nissan Leaf can also be referred to as a pure electric car version 1.0 or first-generation electric car. Its characteristics are:
1 It originates from Japan's best-selling hybrid car, and thus has the creative logic and birthmark of a hybrid car.
2 Nissan Leaf's technical solution considers that in the two options of manufacturing cost and cruising range, it should be more inclined to lower manufacturing costs, while sacrificing longer cruising range, which is exactly the same as the concept of hybrid vehicles. Therefore, take the electric car should not be excessive loading of the battery capacity, 20 ~ 25kwh enough, though the mileage is not more than 200 km, but the price is expected to compress the vehicle twice with the following specification fuel vehicles, so as to Accepted by the tolerant market.
3 The power output of electric vehicles should be equivalent to the same model of fuel vehicles. A-class vehicles with 1.6-liter engines should use electric energy as power, and the maximum single-speed motor output power should be about 80 kW. Under this premise, using a battery of about 20kwh to drive a motor with a maximum power of about 80kw, it is necessary to continue the scheme of the hybrid vehicle using a rate-type battery, and the discharge rate characteristic of the battery should reach 10C.
4 The energy supply mode should be selected for fast charging mode, while the battery with smaller reserves is technically easier to achieve fast charging. The goal is to be able to fill 80% in 10 minutes, which can make up for the deficiencies caused by lack of mileage.
This is the complete technical system of Nissan Leaf (EV 1.0). Most car companies in China except BYD have adopted the same follow-up strategy as fuel vehicles after Nissan's introduction. They both accepted the Nissan Leaf's technical solutions and the products are all imitated versions of Nissan Leaf. .
Whether this technical system is feasible depends on two conditions: First, a breakthrough in 10-minute fast charging technology. If so, this technical system is perfect. The second is that the battery life is enough to make the vehicle travel 300,000 kilometers and achieve the same life of the battery and the vehicle.
Therefore, the four major car companies in Japan and dozens of professional companies have established fast charge associations since 2008, and set up a multi-billion-dollar fast-charge technology development fund. Unfortunately, after six years of research and development, ten were burned. After several hundred million US dollars, it turns out that the high-current fast charge cannot match the current passing capacity of the battery's inner conductor, electrolyte, diaphragm, and tab, and it cannot prevent damage to the battery. Fast charging is not technically feasible ( At present , the fast charging mode provided by Chinese car companies and Tesla is not really fast charging, but medium-speed charging. Therefore, Japan's fast charging association disintegrated in 2014, and led Japanese car companies to give up on the development of lithium-ion vehicles and turned to the main focus on fuel cell vehicles.
The mileage life of the battery is the product of the cruising range of a charge and the cycle time of the battery. If the cruising range is less than 200 kilometers, the battery mileage life that can be achieved with the same cycle time is very low. Nissan Leaf's 150 taxis in Tokyo were less than three years old, and their cruising range was reduced to tens of kilometers. The facts show that this technical route has suffered great setbacks at two crucial points.
2. The technical route represented by the Tesla model can also be referred to as the 2.0 version of the electric car or the second-generation electric car. The characteristics of this technical route are:
1 In the options of cruising range and vehicle cost, it is more likely to choose higher cruising range while sacrificing lower vehicle cost. The cruising range of more than 400km basically relieved the user's mileage anxiety, but the selling price of the entire vehicle also increased exponentially, making the product a toy for the rich. Even so, it can cultivate a niche market with a certain scale.
2 To make the vehicle have enough cruising range, it must be loaded with a battery with more capacity. The capacity of the battery can even reach 4 times of the Nissan Leaf, and the discharge current of the single battery can be diluted. 3C discharge is enough. Therefore, there is no It is necessary to use high-rate batteries, but to match high-energy batteries - this is an important feature of the 2.0 version of electric cars.
3 Because of the large battery load (90Kwh), the 10 minute fast charge (6C) is technically more difficult. To charge the vehicle with 90kwh battery for 10 minutes, not only the battery will suffer irreversible damage, but also the charger's power must reach more than 500kw, a charger needs to match a 630kva independent transformer, if installed in a parking lot 10 A quick charging device cannot withstand the grid. Therefore, 10 minutes fast charging is not suitable for 2.0 electric vehicles, Tesla and vehicles matching the power supply mode is based on slow charging, with the name of fast charging is actually charging for moderate speed charging supplement.
4 The Tesla model has increased its cruising range to more than 400km. Even if the air conditioning is switched on in summer and the warm air in winter is still about 300km, it can basically meet the psychological needs of the owners. Longer battery life can also produce more important results: Assuming that the Tesla model and the Nissan Leaf have the same battery cycling cycle of 1000 cycles, the mileage life of the battery is the product of the cycle cycle and the cruising range. The mileage life of the battery is 400,000 kilometers, which is significantly higher than the latter's 160,000 kilometers.
In fact, because the battery load of the Nissan Leaf is 3 times that of the Tesla model, the cycle life of the battery is 25% lower than that of the model, and its mileage life can only reach 120,000 kilometers. The result is the Tesla technology system. battery life mileage to more than three times the Nissan Leaf - although in the early owners to pay higher prices to buy a car units, to post it eliminates the cost of replacing the battery, from that point, the second generation of electric cars than The first generation of electric cars has a long-term vision.
The above is the complete technical system of Tesla model (EV 2.0). China’s BYD adopted a technology that is different from Nissan’s listening wind when the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla model have not yet been introduced. The difference is that the technology uses a rate-type lithium iron battery. After updating to an energy triple battery, it is basically the same as Tesla's technology. The other car companies in China, after mimicking Nissan's listening wind N years ago, had not abandoned the listening wind technology and moved closer to the Tesla technology system until nearly two years.
However, there are still many fatal flaws in the Tesla model (EV 2.0):
(1) The long battery life of the vehicle cannot be combined with the low price. The expensive selling price makes it impossible to enter the civilian vehicle market. Although Tesla will develop a Class A vehicle with a price of USD 35,000, it is bound to sacrifice more than 400km of battery life. The original advantages.
(2) When a 60-100kwh battery is used to maintain high battery life, a high-energy battery must be used. The energy density of a single battery should be greater than 200 wh/kg or even more than 300 wh/kg. However, as the energy density of the battery increases, the temperature rise during operation will be more severe and the safety will deteriorate. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out temperature management of the battery and even cool it by cooling method. As a result, the weight of the battery box is increased, the cost of the entire vehicle and the load of electricity are increased, and the power consumption efficiency is reduced. There are still major hidden dangers in the safety.
(3) Power supply is provided by the charging pile, and its efficiency is extremely low. In a city with 2 million motor vehicles, building 100,000 charging piles can satisfy demand for a small number of vehicles. However, if the number of electric vehicles rises to 50% of the vehicle's ownership, it will be completely impossible to provide charging piles and charging spaces for 1 million electric vehicles. Especially for commercial vehicles, the long charging time will occupy their attendance time, which is unacceptable for taxis and network owners. The operating intensity and exhaust emissions of operating vehicles are 5-10 times that of private cars. If they cannot provide high-efficiency energy supply for operating vehicles, this means that such a technical system is not perfect.
(4) For private cars, the battery mileage of 300,000 kilometers has been basically satisfactory, but for the operating vehicles, taxis with single shift attendance travel about 300 kilometers per day, and taxis for double shift attendance are daily. Traveling about 500 kilometers, driving 10-16 million kilometers per year, according to the battery mileage life calculation of 2.0 electric vehicles, 2-3 years battery reached the limit of 300,000 kilometers of life, it can not be used normally, in 8 years of vehicle use During the period, the battery pack needs to be replaced 2-3 times, which is unfavorable for any taxi owner. Therefore, the Tesla technology system can not meet the requirements of the taxi industry , and this industry is the "touchstone" for testing electric vehicles.
After many years of training, BYD finally built a model project for an electric taxi to completely replace the fuel taxi in Taiyuan. However, after less than one year of testing, many problems have been exposed. The expensive price of vehicles has forced the government to increase fuel vehicles. Part of the purchase price of the selling price and the fact that the attendance rate is greatly reduced are major defects that cannot be overcome. With the continuation of the trial, the problem of battery life is gradually exposed, which will eventually lead to the inability of this model project to be copied and promoted in other cities.
In summary, neither the 1.0 (Nissan LEAF) nor the 2.0 (Tesla) electric vehicles are the ultimate solutions for electric vehicles that can replace fuel vehicles.
Third-generation electric vehicle technology system
The third-generation electric car is the crystallization of China's original technology. It is an electric vehicle R&D team led by Professor Cai Jiming of the Center for Economics Research at Tsinghua University. It is led by Han Jianfang, a senior researcher, and has spent seven years trying to overcome difficulties and develop hard technologies. Achievements. The results were fully reflected on two electric vehicle prototypes. The two electric vehicles were based on the operating conditions developed by the Kaiwing C3 platform, and the battery life was 340 (cell capacity of 2.2ah) and 390km (cell capacity 2.6 ah) power-swappable electric sedan, and based on the development of the Kaiwing V3 platform, life is 430 km (cell capacity is 2.2ah), 508km (cell capacity is 2.6ah), and 625km (monomer A battery-charged dual-mode electric 7-seater SUV with a battery capacity of 3.2ah). These two electric vehicles have clearly surpassed the Nissan Leaf and Tesla models in key technical indicators.
2016 Rendez-Vous exhibition debut of millet Ming Yang V3EV pure electric SUV (ie Chery Kay wing C3EV)
The typical characteristics and technical indicators of three generations of electric vehicles:
The first generation The second generation Third Generation Third Generation
Representative models Nissan Leaf Tesla Model S Huaju EV (to be listed) Huaju V3 (SUV) EV
Length × width × height 4970*1964*1445 4250*1720*1510 4665*1790*1750
Maintenance quality 1260kg 2200kg 1360kg 1780kg
Battery type Magnification type Energy type (unsafe) Cryogenic ( safe) Cryogenic ( safe )
Battery specifications Laminated Cylindrical 18650 Cylindrical 18650 Cylindrical 18650
Monomer battery capacity 3.4AH 2.2AH 2.6AH
Battery charge 24kwh 90kwh 40.5kwh 77.8kwh
Battery box weight 320kg 950kg 285kg 430kg
Rated power of motor 40kw (center) 1 2 0kw (high) 18kw (low) 20kw
Motor arithmetic average efficiency 0-10000 turns lower than 80% (low) 0-1 5 000 turns <80% (low) 0-5000 turn >90% (high) 0-5000 rpm ≥88%
Motor weighted average efficiency ≤ 75% ≤ 75% ≥ 92% ≥ 90%
Motor cooling method Water cooling (power consumption) Water cooling (power consumption) Natural air cooling Natural air cooling
Battery working strength 9C discharge (high) 3C discharge (middle) 1C discharge (low) 1C discharge (low)
Matching charging mode Fast charge (failure) Charging pile (low efficiency) Automatic power change (high efficiency) Replace dual mode
Operating range mileage 160km (low) 420km (high) >340km (high) >518km (Ultra High)
Maximum mileage 200 557km 430km 668km
100km power consumption/ton in urban area 10.3kwh/100 km (high) 9.2Kwh/100km (in) 7.9kwh/100km (low) 7.8kwh/100km
(very low)
100kg battery box operating range mileage 50km 50.52km 121.32km 117.44kg
Vehicle price 240000 yuan (in) 8 5 million (high) Bare car <100,000 Naked car: 160,000 yuan
Battery Life 80-120 thousand kilometers 20 -25 Wan km Lifetime warranty Lifetime warranty
Safety Large current discharge (poor safety) High-energy battery (poor security) Low current discharge (good safety) Small current discharge
(safety is good)
Maximum speed km/h 144 240 140 135
0-100km time 10.74s 5.1s 12s 12.5s
Among all 18 key technical indicators comparable, the third-generation electric car Huaxie sedan EV and Huaju SUV pure electric car achieved the 16 best, only the maximum speed and 0-100 km acceleration time than the Nissan Leaf wind speed. Slightly worse, many of the indicators of the Bitsla model are behind, but the Tesla model is a luxury car. Its price is 3 times higher and it is the pursuit of a sports car. This pursuit does not meet the energy saving and environmental protection concept of electric vehicles. . In this sense, the absolute superiority of third-generation electric vehicles is unmatched. Therefore, only the third-generation electric vehicles can solve the “four major problems” that restrict the universal adoption of electric vehicles, and their products will surely win in the future market competition.
Technical Strategies and Effects of the Third Generation Electric Vehicle Technology System
The technical specifications of the 3.0 version of electric vehicles far surpass the 1.0 and 2.0 versions of electric vehicles because their technical strategies are completely different from those of 1.0 and 2.0 electric vehicles, leading to huge differences in technical indicators. What is the technical strategy of the 3.0 electric car?
(1) The 1.0 and 2.0 electric vehicle technology defines the electric car as the electric version of the fuel car. Other than the power system, the others should be identical. Therefore, based on the characteristics of the vehicle as the starting point to plan and design matching batteries and three electrical systems. The 3.0 technology believes that electric vehicles should take the characteristics of the power battery as the starting point, maximize the battery characteristics, and plan and design the entire vehicle and the three-electricity system according to the characteristics of the battery.
(2) The battery can only achieve maximum life and safety under low current discharge and low temperature rise, and these two points are the key to the survival of an electric vehicle. Therefore, the EV technology should plan the three-electricity system on the premise that the battery has small current discharge and low temperature rise. The key indicator is the capacity ratio, which is the battery storage capacity and the rated output power of the powertrain (including the three-electric system. The ratio of auxiliary energy consumption for heat dissipation.
Taking the Nissan Leaf and model as examples, the battery capacity is 24kwh and 90kwh respectively, the rated output power of the motors is 40kw and 120kw respectively, the auxiliary energy consumption is 2.5kw and 6kw respectively, and the calculation result of the holding ratio is 0.56:1 and 0.71:1. This determines that the wind can only use a bulky type of battery, and the mileage and battery life are very short; while the modeld battery work intensity has been greatly reduced compared with the wind, the battery life is relatively longer. However, depending on the characteristics of the battery, it is only possible to maximize the safety and service life of the battery when the ratio of duty ratio is greater than 2:1. Therefore, both 1.0 and 2.0 electric vehicles do not meet the requirements.
(3) The capacity ratio index is the ratio of the battery capacity to the rated power of the motor. There are two ways to increase the capacity ratio. One is to increase the battery capacity as the denominator, and the other is to reduce the motor power as a numerator. Increasing the battery capacity must meet the reasonable limit that the weight of the battery box does not exceed 25% of the weight of the entire vehicle, which can be solved by increasing the energy density of the battery and the battery box. Reducing the motor power should be based on the assumption that the maximum speed of the vehicle is not less than 130 km and the acceleration time of 0-100 km is not more than 15 seconds (equivalent to the power performance of a 1.5L engine passenger vehicle). The key to obtaining a high-capacity-to-ratio index is the ability to develop a motor that can meet the vehicle's technical performance targets and consume very little power.
(4) For 1.0 and 2.0 electric vehicles, the “heat engine” concept of fuel vehicles is grafted onto electric vehicles. It is considered that the temperature rise and heat generation of the motor, electronic control, and battery are just as natural as the fuel engine. When the three-electric system is treated as a "heat engine," forced cooling is required. The 3.0 technology is concerned about the direction that the 1.0 and 2.0 electric vehicles neglected—the great potential of the three-electric system. As long as the three-electric system can be reasonably matched and optimized, it can be transformed into a “cold” power system. By forcibly dissipating the battery, the motor and the electronic control, the weight of the forcible cooling device can be replaced by an increased battery, which can substantially increase the cruising range and battery mileage without increasing the weight and cost of the battery. Achieve high mileage and battery lifetime warranty.
(5) To make the motor, electronic control, and battery become “cold machines”, the following technical approaches can be adopted: The narrow-speed motor and its drive combination are more efficient than the Nissan Leaf and Tesla motors. In the motor parameter design, if the motor uses a single speed ratio mode, in order to allow the vehicle speed to run more than 200 kilometers per hour, the motor speed can only use a wide design, such as 0-1500 rpm, must take into account the low speed area and high It is difficult to achieve the highest efficiency at the highest speed in the speed zone.
The motor is matched to a multi-speed transmission, and only a narrow range of speed of 0-4500 rpm is required, a speed of up to 140 kilometers can be achieved, and a maximum efficiency of 97.5% and an arithmetic average of 94.13% in the range of 400-4400 rpm can be obtained. Efficiency has significantly outpaced the Nissan Leaf and Tesla's motors. In particular, single-speed vehicles have an operating speed of less than 20 kilometers per hour and more than 80 kilometers per hour. This reduces the weighted average efficiency of the electric motors. Under the comprehensive conditions, the weighted average efficiency is only 75. %about. The 3.0 version of the drive system uses multi-speed transmissions, which greatly increases the probability that the motor will operate in the high-efficiency zone (over 80% efficiency) and ultra-high efficiency zone (efficiency exceed 95%), resulting in a weighted average efficiency of over 92%. The speed ratio is about 17% higher than the drive system.
Due to the high efficiency, the temperature rise in the energy conversion process is extremely low, and the entire power system becomes a “cold machine” that does not require forced cooling, even if the multi-speed transmission increases energy consumption by 5% compared to the single speed ratio reducer. Efficiency still has a huge advantage of 12%.
(6) Since the 3.0 technology motors are usually operated in high efficiency and ultra-high efficiency areas, there is no need for forced cooling of the motor and controller. Only natural air cooling is required to solve the heat dissipation problem. Therefore, this technology fills the global gap of natural air cooling for drive motors larger than 50kw, which not only reduces the cost of the powertrain, but also saves the auxiliary energy consumption of pumps and fans, making the overall efficiency of the powertrain better than that of the first and the second. Second-generation electric cars have increased by more than 20%. This means that, with the same battery load, the 3.0 EV is more than 20% longer than the 1.0 and 2.0 EVs!
(7) As the 3.0 version of the electric vehicle adopts a motor and transmission matching method, it greatly reduces the motor power required to drive the vehicle to run normally. A rated 20kw motor can achieve the same specification of the single-speed motor with a rated power of 40kw. Battery load decreased significantly. In addition, there is no technical bottleneck in the research and development of high-safety, low-temperature rising power batteries that match the 3.0 version of electric vehicles. The temperature rise of continuous discharge of the electric battery 1C is only 2.5°C. It has been successfully developed, and the battery load is greater than 40kwh. Not only can we obtain excellent indicators of cruising range exceeding 340 km.
And the battery's ultimate discharge intensity is only 1C! This technology enables electric vehicles to reach a new level close to the “cold machine”, eliminating the need for forced cooling of three-electric systems including batteries, significantly reducing the weight of the battery box, and the energy density of the battery system reaching 160 wh/kg or more. Exceeded the upper limit of 120 wh/kg for the ministry's subsidy standard for 2017-2018. Not only that, it also reduces the cost of the battery pack and further saves power consumption. The electric vehicle's most important technical indicator – the power consumption per ton hundred kilometers (working conditions) is only 7.8kwh, which is about 20% lower than that of the wind and the model; the operating conditions of the hundred-kilo battery pack reach a record 200 ton kilometers, which is better than the wind And model more than 80%!
(8) 3.0 Electric vehicle technology uses ultra-high-efficiency, automatic, small-scale charging and replacement technology for power supply. It takes only 1.5 minutes to replace the battery. Charging and changing power are all convenient. This kind of supporting facilities only needs to occupy an area of 400 square meters and only need to invest 3 million yuan to provide services for 200 taxis or 1000 private cars. Not only investment efficiency, work efficiency is much higher than charging piles, but also can be built Under the overpass, green belts and wide roads, a 100-square-meter convenient charging and switching station can also be built in the residential area to provide car owners with convenient and inexpensive services including battery leasing, charging and replacement, and battery maintenance. This technology will bring revolutionary results:
1 Compatible with bare car sales and battery leasing, so that electric vehicles can eventually be sold at the same price as fuel vehicles, becoming the mainstream marketing method for post-subsidy era electric vehicles.
2 Compatible battery maintenance can provide users with battery lifetime warranty service, so that users can completely remove the worry about battery life.
3 The secondary use of compatible batteries and battery recycling can switch the battery flow below 85% of the initial capacity to other uses such as low-speed electric vehicles and energy storage power stations until the disused batteries are dismantled and recycled.
4 In the charging and switching station, the battery is monitored and charged by professionals and professional equipment, which can ensure the safety of the battery to the maximum extent and completely eliminate the burning accident of the electric vehicle during the charging process.
5 By charging the battery station to centrally charge the battery, it can make full use of the low time period from 23 o'clock in the morning to 6 o'clock in the morning to charge, significantly reducing the charging cost, not only benefiting the car owner, but also bringing reasonable benefits to the investors of the charging and switching station. .
Therefore, EV 3.0 technology is not a single technology in one or two aspects. It is a complete technology system that can replace the disruptive innovations that Nissan Leaf and Tesla is currently most successful in the world. The car has passed a durability and reliability road test of hundreds of thousands of kilometers, and the outstanding performance indicators have shown everything. It will be a revolutionary event in the field of electric vehicles, and it will surely bring about the cooperation of car companies and investors to the world at the same time as soon as 3.0 technology electric vehicles for testing, appraisal, application notice directory, build model project, realize mass production. The best opportunity for electric vehicle technology!
At present, the 3.0 technology of electric vehicles has been verified by test data on prototype vehicles. Under the premise of battery energy density lower than 250wh/KG, 3.0 technology can be used to develop working conditions of 600-700Km and maximum life of 800-900km. The electric passenger car, which is the result of the 3.0 vehicle integration technology. However, mass production will also be available for sale in the second half of this year after the vehicle has received an announcement. Therefore, the 3.0 technology system of the electric car is the key to unlocking the chain. Although it is still "dive", it is not far from the day when it takes to go public.
Han Jianfang is a member of the Expert Committee of the Electric Vehicle Leading Group of the Henan Provincial Government and the CTO of Zhongmu Mingyang Electric Vehicle Company
This article was written by authors of EV CenturyNet. They are responsible for the authenticity and neutrality of this article. The views represent only individuals and do not represent EV Century. Thanks to the authors for their contributions, we also welcome more attention paid to electric vehicle experts, scholars, and owners to submit contributions. E-mail: yangshiming@21cnev.com.
Author: Han Jian Fang
If BMW were smart, they would enter into an agreement to put our battery in all their EV's. Just saying!!!!!
It's only a matter of time that we will know who we have agreements with and which companies will have our batteries in their EV's and which ones will let us put our Z logo on modified version, of their EV's, so we can sell them in the US, as our own. I am almost positive that's the Wang plan to cut back on the costs of setting up new manufacturing plants in the US from scratch.
GLTY and to all the longs.
I am not sure I understand your question. If you are asking if there will be more in JBZY than batteries and Z-car EV's, we don't know yet. We do know that these are part of JBZY. But, as stated on the OTC-JBZY website, this is a holding company and holding companies are usually set up to house more than one subsidiary and can house many.
We will have to wait and see what the financials show and wait for the company to become more transparent. In time, they will let us know what they are merging in each time they decide to bring in another piece of the Jinbo pie.
GLTY and all the longs.
You got it! That's why I always say this is a Unicorn. Solves all the major problems of the 2nd generation batteries.
GLTY and all the longs.
JBZY is a UNICORN. I can see that valuation once the factory is completed and starts production. Pretty soon we will see it is not a scam, but a well thought out business model to solve the main four battery issues, lessen the pollution problems in China and grow a battery and EV start up company and become a major player in the EV industry.
GLTY, though, and to all the longs.
The answer to both questions is yes. If you are saying that this is such a small province, you fully don't understand communist countries and governments. Nothing happens without the Communist Party approval and backing. That is why they were able to put the signage on the government owned high-speed trains. Was that a provincial agreement. I don't think so. The train is a nationally owned utility. I am sure there are others here that understands how any part of any government in a communist country works. Oh, BTW, as far as getting approvals from any ministry of the national government, the government can do what it wants to do, including giving exemptions to specific industries or companies to not have go through the registration process of any company or any of their activities for that matter. IMHO, the government decides what they want to publish or not publish. That's the way it works in a communist country. We are very naive when it comes to communism, in our beliefs.
GLTY and all the longs.
The imagination that this is a scam is speculation.
The reality that this is real, based on solid DD, is a fact.
Financials are coming, that is also a fact!
GLTY, though, and to all the longs and faithful.
You got it! It happened the last two times it shot up significantly. You can almost judge when it will spike upwards by the huge dip right before.
Volume seems to be picking up also.
GLTY and all the longs.
IMHO, I got a feeling that financials will be coming soon. It is popping up pretty quickly, since the MM's are letting it go up, and it looks like shorters are covering today. Someone knows something.
At $10 some of us will be millionaires, but we know better. We know this will exceed $10 by many fold. We will reassess where it will be when we see the financials and then decide. Tknuckle doesn't need any help to manage his stock portfolio. Last I heard he is doing very well.
GLTY, though, and to all the longs and a special wish for Tknucle.
Hi Shark, I agree, there will be many who will be in shock and awe of what we own. Some will be weeping and gnashing their teeth, wishing they had listened to the longs.
Shoot me an e-mail at sjr396@yahoo.com so we can talk.
GLTA the longs and faithful.
Someone else said to check back with them in November and I said it won't be that long before the financials come out. They should be here shortly.
You spelled Unicorn wrong. You don't spell it, s c a m. It is spelled as follows: U N I C O R N.
Neither the charts nor the current PPS will be useful to predict where this is going to go after the financials are released. What is in the audited consolidated financials will be the indicator of where this will end up.
GLTY, though, and to all the longs.
May 17th holds a special place in my heart, but I am happy with anytime. They will be here soon. The long wait will be worth it, regardless of when. I can wait for as long as it takes.
GLTY and all the longs.
You will find out soon how much above $2 this will go.
GLTY and all the longs.
The bears saw the honey in the beehives and they snatched all the sweet stuff up in the blink of an eye. People were warned many months ago not to put stop losses on their shares, but it appears that they just did not understand how quickly they could get robbed. Regrets may set in when they see how much they really lost when the financials come out.
GLTY Art and to all the longs.
Thanks for trying to save us.
GLTY and all the longs.
Forward split more likely after the fins.
Why? If you are thinking this is a scam?
Volume and MM's pushing hard. Those were the two signs we had each time. It looks like this might be it.
GLTY and all the longs.
I got a feeling that those were MM's clearing the stop losses before the financials come out soon. If you remember the last two times it dropped this low, this quickly, we got news and we spiked up fairly quickly.
GLTY and all the longs.
This is what happened the last two times it spiked, right before we heard news.
GLTY and all the longs.
Ridiculous! A 1 for 20,000 RS would have accomplished what you inferring much quicker and less costly. So these are all ridiculous assumptions.
GLTY and all the longs.
Nice to hear from a fellow long, iamnotTylerDurden. I love you user ID. I thought about changing my user ID to iamnotLivingTheGoodLife, but then I would be lying. Financials are a coming soon! No one knows when, but they are a coming soon!
GLTY and all the quiet non-posting longs.
That wasn't the point that I was responding to, so your response was totally off topic. I responded to this post, which was talking about flipping and flippers.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140759181
You are assuming that someone who bought at a lower level is looking at selling right now instead of waiting for the reveal. Or, you are assuming that someone who bought at a higher level is looking at selling right now also. Both were not topics of discussion in the above post nor my response.
In responding to your response, it is possible, but highly unlikely that anyone would sell if they held onto their shares this long. Most are waiting for the financials, so the likelihood of your scenario happening for most longs is rare. I don't doubt that some have gotten tired of waiting, but not many, from what the daily activity shows.
GLTY, though, and to all the longs.
If the average trade is 500 shares. Let's say you buy those shares at the low of $1.48 and sell them at the high of $1.60, you make $60 before commission. The spread of $.12 times the 500 shares equals $60. You can net about $53 after commission. Then you figure short-term capital gains tax, you might end up with $40 or less. Is it worth it? Some people think it is, but it reeks havoc on the PPS.
GLTY and all the longs.
You haven't answered my questions.
The PPS really doesn't matter right now. When the financials come out, it will soar way past the #2.30 RS price. The longs that are invested know that in the short-term, the fluctuations up or down really don't matter because it is only a matter of time when the PPS will reflect the true value of JBZY.
GLTY and all the longs.
That is only your opinion and a few others. The PPS staying in this channel says there are more people with the opinion that THEY ARE THIS!
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
THEY ARE LATE BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN ENORMOUS GROWTH. SHOULD DOES WORK WHEN THIS IS THE CASE.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT FALL FOR THIS RHETORIC. THIS IS WHEN THEY SHOULD HOLD. THE FINANCIALS ARE LATE, BUT SHOULD COME OUT SOON AND HOLDING MAKES MORE SENSE, BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY YOU LOSE IS IF YOU SELL.
GLTY AND ALL THE LONGS
People should not fall for this rhetoric. This is when you should hold. The financials are late, but should come out soon and holding makes more sense, because the only way you lose is if you sell.
GLTY and all the longs
The information you seek is on the OTC-JBZY website. You can look up the website on the internet.
GLTY and all the longs.