Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
massive dilution = new shareholder lawsuits = no settlements = no plan
You don't know.
Everyone so confident that these new investors show up - the hilarious part is that the reason the commons keep going down is due to all the political wrangling - you're NEVER going to get a fair shake from them and I bet you get more lawsuits and the Settlements the plan is counting on will never take place! good job guys - you've all convinced yourselves you're right about all of it when you haven't thought about it from the settlement angle that you're plan counts on. You'll just get more litigation.
Oh there aren't CURRENTLY common shareholder lawsuits. Just wait.
So you reward the gov't for their malfeasance and expect new money to rush in! Good stuff. I know we're in the age of ZIRP or whatever but whichever risk department gets comfortable with this should be fired. And to your point on dilution, another knock - maybe we kick that discount rate up to 75%! more dilution for commons... see it keeps getting worse until no one wants to put money in at any level... that's the point you seem to be helping me make.
taxpayers?
Everything if you believe your congresspeople. Which I don't because they're all shills.
why? well this doc helps explain http://www.pbs.org/pov/darkmoney/
corporate capture is systemic, in all branches, so good luck getting 3rd party money in the door here.
I only said that because your statement ran counter to his, and since you're admittedly less informed, perhaps your self assurance should be reconsidered.
yeah I'm sure Howard knows less than you.
Nice spin! You missed your calling as a washing machine.
https://twitter.com/metal_crab/status/1046804009712058369?s=19
Paul Muolo - No Comment on Lamberth ruling? Shocked SHOCKED I SAY
good point! lol
no one has any idea wtf that means
Trial bitches
I can't believe this body of people is at all dysfunctional!?!?! they all seem so professional.
Wagner is like an angry soccer mom. Wholly unimpressed.
lol Duffy asking a sexual harassment witness about the structure of the FHFA?
that's my point. They 100% have to pay out existing shareholders an amount that is EQUITABLE.
That means an entire rework of how that cash flowed back to 2008. Which means that the gov't has to cut a check for the money that they fucking stole.
IT's not that hard to understand.
no we've gone down that rabbit hole. If there is no restitution then no one will show up. You cannot fuck over an entire class of shareholder and pretend it didn't happen.
oh so you say the same thing could happen again tomorrow - where my money goes to $0 overnight because the gov't lied to the people and wanted to steal all their money for their budget?
yes institutional money will never figure that out....
ooooooh sign me upppppp uncle sam!
wheres the money for the recap - a question no one can answer.
Howard comments on access journalism
https://howardonmortgagefinance.com/2018/09/12/comment-on-fhfa-capital-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-7816
Note that his answer actually implies that Maria IS in on the joke.
Howard on Paulson's 9-26-18 Fox News interview:
https://howardonmortgagefinance.com/2018/09/12/comment-on-fhfa-capital-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-7813
lol - we're going to make it look like we give a shit about our least impactful biz unit...
while the guys doing the real high dollar stuff can hide under the cover
https://twitter.com/ajsaeedy?lang=en
http://ajsaeedy.net/
I'm a recent graduate of Yale University, where I received a B.A. and M.A. in History in May 2015. Now, I’m a public policy researcher and freelance journalist based in Brussels, where I write about European affairs, the global economy, and fragmenting forms of statecraft. Since I’ve arrived in Brussels, I’ve written for Reuters, ViceNEWS, Foreign Affairs, EUObserver, and more. You can read my thoughts on politics, music, life in Belgium, game design, and everything else at @ajsaeedy. Feel free to email me.
LOL
what is Watt's crime even? Other than obvious payoffs to do nothing but those are hidden offshore somewhere that no one will ever find unless we have a global panama papers situation.
This is not a bad idea.
What is bad about it is that it lets the gov't win for lying.
or the scotus rape hearings
spade a spade
the tat needs to say 'net worth sweep'
at least in china you get a score!
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-18/china-social-credit-a-model-citizen-in-a-digital-dictatorship/10200278
here the gov't just keeps a file on you without your knowledge!
what made it criminal?