Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ben, be nice. What, you think I’m Cahn ning you? I don’t play OTC tickers long term. I day trade or short them. Either way the Q comes I don’t care. You ask why? Because if the numbers are good I’ll have the kind of days I did with this ticker after Andrew’s article. If they’re bad (unlikely) I know how to play that too. Regardless, aftervknowing Donald Steinberg, Bruce Perlowin and everyone involved in Cannavest for as long as you’ve been alive (10 /29/87);as I’ve stated on numerous occasions I don’t believe the numbers so I really don’t care.
If that’s what you hope for CVSI I hope it works for you. Be careful what you hope for. Statistical history shows that when an OTC Stock Uplist s they typically get an immediate 25% bump and thereafter most go down or at best stay flat. Perhaps this article will help you see that using statistical data. It’s about this exact subject.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/3957442-uplisting-power
I agree. But try as he may DP hasn’t “uplisted and TRTC remains flat constantly bleeding money while the principals continue to file Form 4 after Form 4.
Yes, so strange that 4 or 5 likely older, wiser to the Cesspool Of The OTC and probably wealthier have different opinions then newbies who fall in love with OTC Stocks which are so easily manipulated they’re not traded on a stock exchange but via a middle man / market maker.
Where you’re from does everyone have the same opinion? Because the USA I know has a first amendment and right to free speech and differing opinions. That’s the entire purpose of this board, for people with varying opinions get together and discuss them, not continually attack one another.
Yes it is! With a little volume and a larger disparity between the high and low it could be yet another great day trading play for me. CWeb has been better for that this past week. Oh, did you hear, Coke formally announced they have NO INTEREST in CBD or THC infused drinks.
https://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=78593142
But that other HUGE beverage company “Baristas Coffee wants in. They trade on the Pink Sheets and their big announcement was met by an 11% drop in price to $.0012 Maybe CVSI will do their deal with them. Then they can claim to be in 20,000 locations for sale.
Thx for the good word but after 40 years dealing with the dozens it takes to promote and run a tour this is child’s play. But hey, how can we be speaking to one another? Yesterday there were accusations that you and I are the same person.
Happy November all, any news on the Uplist Yet? It’ been 13 weeks, surely such a game changing company deserves an answer in 1/4 of a year.
All good man. I generally ignore what’s said here unless it’s kind. I appreciate your apology.
Theres the perfect example. One moment I’m a paid bashed, the next I don’t post enough and get told show your slip or shut up. I don’t speak to people that way and I don’t reply to when spoken that way.
I have no problem with people making all the money they can. If you read through the thread I’ve never made a personal attack against a single poster. Just the opposite happens when people spend their time posting about me instead of the stock. I even wished Ben a happy 31st birthday. Trump seems to have made it all right to be divisive. I don’t believe in that. I’m an old school hippie R&R promoter who believes in a world without guns and peace between all. Apparently the millennials feel differently. I see it as sad.....
I don’t care about Q3 sales. I don’t believe the numbers. All I care about is a 20% or close spread between the day’s high and low so I can make yet another 10 or 12 grand with very little exposure so when the house that Mona, McKay, Titus, Llamas and Perlowin built crashes I’ve got nothing to lose.
As I’ve explained dozens of times. The OTC is a playground for me. I bought 100,000 shares at $.36, sold 1/2 at $72-$.75 getting ALL my money back and slowly sold the rest selling the final 30,000 shares right at $7.00 giving me about a 1/4 million dollar profit after taxes. Since the Citron article on anyday where there’s decent volume and an 18% to 20% or more difference between the high and low I use 50k to 60k, buy 10,000 to 12,000 shares and make a quick 10 grand. I’ve done it a minimum of a dozen times to date. bringing me to being up about $350,000.00 with nothing in the “stock” over 2-4 hours.
I never asked why nor do I care. I simply said you want my identity you and the people who disagree and use the logically fallacious tactic of ad hominem attacks reveal your identity and I’ll reveal mine. Since I’m the subject of 20% of the posts on here I’d like to see it happen. You’ll be quite surprised. You, Ania, and the like reveal your identities and the mysterious BKK who’s inside all your heads will happily reveal his
If you’ve read a single word I’ve posted I’ve made it clear I DAY TRADE OTC Stocks. Who do you think bought 6,000 shares Friday at $9.00 to sell them today at $10.03 but thank you for making my point for me.
500 posts in 4 years and you use the logically fallacious ad hominem attack as your point because you have no point. Children and the OTX......sigh
Post yours and have everyone who sees fit to attack me because I disagree and I’ll post mine. I think you’ll be surprised. You can NEVER post the monthly Partners update from Ibex Investors unless you’re a partner or a partner (like me) gives it to you or posts it as I did.
You and your 4 followers keep believing the way to make money in the OTC is buy and hold. You’ll learn a painful lesson quickly.
Ben, I have this Associate Creative “BuzzFeed” that says we’re not ever “uplisting”. What do you think?
Oh and Ben I forgot, happy birthday!
Ben, perhaps you didn’t realize we have the Internet now. I can post anywhere from my house in Laurel Canyon, my flat in the bohemian heart of the sixth arrondissement in the Saint Germain de Pres district of Paris or my penthouse on South Beach
You May Be Correct. But CVSI is not in an uptrend either. I’d say it’s flat. Within $.20 of $5.00 either way, everyday. Almost enough if the volume picks up to continue day trading for the 5 to 10 grand I’ve turned at least a dozen times since Citron shined the light on this ticker.
Did we “Uplist yet? Or is it going to be in November because it wasn’t in July, August, September or October As for your question “wouldn’t have anything to do with the sell off in the ‘entire’ sector”? No, I don’t think so. I’m in CWeb up 11% today. I’m also in MedMen up 9% today but somehow this rocket of a ticker that’s going to be “uplisted” at any moment has falling volume and is up (Yea) 1%
Absolutely 100% correct
Theres an awful lot of ad hominem attack posts being removed. Hmmmm. As to my VC/Hedge Fund, here are links delivered monthly to the 90 partners of the Fund in which I’m anL.P. (Limited partner). We have 4 MP’s Master Partners and about 90 LP’s (Limited Partners) Of which I’m one.https://ibb.co/kehr00
https://ibb.co/dgFYDL
https://ibb.co/edMUnf
https://ibb.co/h7TmYL
We’re a fairly small VC / Hedge Fund with about 500 million invested
Theyre not frivolous, they’re keeping you in red at $5.00 or below for over a month
Ahhh, someone who can see the Forrest through the trees
If you go up 100% a day you’ll be trading at $10.00 tomorrow. Both events have the equivalent odds of happening, Z E R O
Soon at $30.00? You wrote that 6 weeks ago. Did you mean soon as in days, weeks, months or in your dreams? Because I see $5.00 +/- a quarter, $5.00 for a loooooong time. Or is it the “Uplist” that’s going to make $30.00 a “no brainer”? BTW, did we Uplist yet?
Low volume, in the R E D, just where CVSI belongs.
Youre not getting to NASDAQ or any other stock exchange. Far too many bad players involved, fraud committed and fines paid. As long as the name Mona appears anywhere within this company, you’ll stay on the OTC where Mona, Steinberg, Perlowin, Llamas before his death are the kings of the pinky scams.
My bad, which green IS that? I currently see $5.04, that’s R E D
Which green is that? Oh, we’re up $.01 now. That green
Did we Uplist yet? Did we hit that 10+ you were talking about a month ago?
Yea, in the red
I disagree, CVSI is a great day trading tool. As long as there’s over a million shares of volume and an 18% to 20% difference in the day’s high and low with 50 or 60 grand you can make 5 to 10 grand a day. Most often in and out within an hour.
You can have THAT claim. I have no interest in it.
Sorry, I live on the Las Olas Isles. The neighborhood “Lucky’s Markets In nobody I know drives through. “Lucky’s Market, now there’s a huuuuuge chain (not) that’s a big claim to fame for the quality of the (what is it today? 3 million stores Mona’s Miracles carried in?
I think today’s trend is firebomb the messenger.
”I know a guy”...........I think that states it all. That’s less (if possible) then anecdotal, it’s a story about an anecdote. Again, not evidence and in this case not even anecdotal. Did we “Uplist” yet?
Testimonials are anecdotal, they’re generally considered the weakest level of evidence and very closely related to using anecdata. Testimonials used as evidence are common in the fields of pseudoscience and alternative medicine, where claims being refuted or supported are somewhat vague and difficult to test. It may also be the case the some people do not wish to have their claims evaluated in a formal analysis.
Usually, the reason for studying a particular treatment is to see if it would work on others. In order to achieve this end, it is necessary to study large numbers of people (a "sample"), ideally in similar circumstances, and who do not know whether or not they are receiving the treatment, after which, one can make a valid prediction as to the effect on a similar, larger "population". Anecdotal evidence (also proof by selected instances, or, more pejoratively, anecdata) is use of one or more anecdotes (specific instances of an event; stories) to either support or refute a claim. The use of anecdotal evidence to draw a conclusion is like using the NBA all-star teams to estimate the average height of Americans.
Whereas anecdotal evidence is sometimes the starting point of a proper scientific investigation, it is all too often the ending point and every point of a pseudoscientific investigation. In the world of pseudoscience, an anecdote is the equivalent of a peer-reviewed, double-blind, repeatable scientific experiment with consistent results.
Anecdotal evidence is especially vulnerable to confabulation or outright deceit.
Remember: the plural of "anecdote" is not "data"
While anecdotes — when true, at least — are nice illustrative stories, they do not constitute evidence. This is because anecdotes only ever apply to individuals or individual experiences and are subject to the biases that this brings with it. It is impossible to say that an individual anecdote is representative and it is also impossible to actually detect the real cause of the anecdote.
For instance, with life-saving medical treatments (say, pills that reduce heart-disease and subsequently lower the death rate), there are some deaths that occur whether or not the medication was taken. Therefore, if someone who is on the medication dies, you cannot tell if they would have died anyway without it — you can't prove that the medical intervention worked, or not, from the one case study.
It is very rare for an intervention to be, by itself, a sufficient cause of something. Rather, they tend to change the probability of a given event occurring. This means, obviously, that one can cherry pick examples that show something does or does not work, regardless of what effect it actually has. For instance, if the municipal government of some city enacts a law to reduce crime, one can find anecdotes "demonstrating" the exact opposite of the law's actual effect, whatever it may be. If it's effective: "Before the law I never had any problems with crime, but since its enactment I've been mugged once and had my house burglarized! This law is useless!" If it's not: "Before the law, I was robbed twice, but ever since the law, I haven't been robbed once! It must be working!"
Ultimately, anecdotal evidence is very prone to false positives.
In what’s now reached a FIVE part Series, Dr David Gorski, American surgical oncologist, professor of surgery at Wayne State University School of Medicine, a surgical oncologist at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute,States the following about CBD’s. I’d suggest reading a world renowned scholar for evidence as opposed to listening to anecdotes on YouTube.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-marijuana-as-the-new-herbalism-part-5-turning-herbalism-into-science-based-medicine/