Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There's a 10-minute edit window. And my understanding is that you get another 10 minutes after your edit.
Which begs a question I'm not going to ask but that I'd wager someone will answer eventually.
But 98.217% of $138.50 is another matter.
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/board.asp?board_id=43
It's called the Wish List, but it's also a good place for bug reports, as is this one.
This has been bugging me since last night and I knew I had to be doing something wrong and couldn't figure out what it was until I read JXM's excellent post about the types of communities.
What I did wrong was I had a set of rules in my head for how I wanted this particular neighborhood (this thread) to run and subconsciously assumed that everyone knew what I was thinking. Bad mistake. Maybe I'm so used to people knowing how I feel about things that when I change my tolerance levels, I forget to let anyone know. Or maybe I just shouldn't have been awake so late. Either way, I screwed up.
I have revised the header to this thread to state openly that I don't want the battles from elsewhere being brought to this thread and don't want this thread being used for even the *slightest* bit of negative commentary about other people. Basically, I don't want even the tiniest hint of SI's "Welcome" thread's frequent misuse (as a sounding board to complain about other people and attack them) to show up here. This thread is a place to hammer out issues with the site's technology and philosophy, and to get clairification on the inevitable gray areas. I'm also fine with it being used as just a kind of hangout. I'll let my hair down a bit here and just hang out, and hope others will too.
So, all that said, here's the main thing:
Mr. Mark, I apologize not only for my over-reaction to your post, but for not giving one iota of a hint beforehand that I didn't want that kind of thing on this thread or that something that I wouldn't have even blinked at on SI would be something I'd delete here. I will not restore your post, but I am going to delete Jenna's in which she made the derogatory comments about the people on Silicon Investor in general. I spoke with her about those comments last night and am satisfied that we understand each other and that her intent was not to belittle the users of the site so much as the site itself.
Further, to characterize your post as a "personal attack" was wrong. That term, as it was used on SI, implies a certain amount of vehemence that just wasn't in your post.
All, I hope we're clear on the rules for this particular thread.
Regards,
HuBob
Just another human
All excellent points.
I'm shooting for more of a sprawling town in which many communities can co-exist; even ones that don't want to interact. Some of those communities will be planned communities, some will be inner cities, and some will just be Suburbia. That call, for the most part will be made by the person who starts the thread.
The exception is the stock-specific threads. Those are Suburbia.
This thread is a planned community. I'm the chairman, so that's my call. Yes, it's a planned community that lets a lot of chaos happen, but that's because everyone's welcome here. Just don't throw your empties in my yard.
And, thank you for your post because it solved a problem for me that's been nagging me since last night. Something was wrong, I knew something was wrong, it bugged the heck out of me, but I couldn't put my finger on it. Now I see that it's obvious, and I'm addressing it in my next post and a change to the header.
The Rules
This post is intended as an overview of the rules of engagement for participating on Investors Hub, or, more specifically, what to expect of me based on what some of you already know of me based on my role at Silicon Investor.
For the most part, there won't be any difference. For example, spam, threats, and invasion of privacy will continue to be dealt with swiftly and severely.
Spam
The definition of "spam" that we'll use here is: "Multiple posts of the same or essentially the same content." If someone spams the site, they could receive a warning or account termination, depending on the extent to which they did it. I have never been tolerant of spam, and never will be, as it's often a tool used by scamsters and subtracts dramatically from the value of a site to the community who uses it.
Generally speaking, two copies of a post is the limit, and one of those copies must be in a thread specific to the stock and the other can be in any other thread that isn't specific to a particular stock (like a "Trade of the day" type of thread). More than that, and it's spamming.
Advertising
Advertising and Spam are not the same thing, although ads are frequently spammed. A post being advertising doesn't necessarily make it spam, although advertising will be strictly limited as well.
Links to one's site in a thread header are acceptable if the purpose of the thread and header isn't strictly to advertise the site.
Links within posts are only acceptable if they're part of a non-advertising message and if the link is either in support of the (on-topic) content of the message itself, or if the link is included as part of one's signature line and is to the writer's homepage, provided the homepage isn't a paid site or a site with ads; essentially that the link isn't an attempt to make income by enticing users to visit it. Examples: If I sign off a post with "Bob Zumbrunnen, http://www.bobzumbrunnen.com", it's not advertising. If I discuss technical aspects of a stock's recent price activity and post a link *directly* to a graph illustrating what I'm talking about, it's not advertising. If I write a post asking readers to check out a newsletter I'm offering, it's advertising. If I do it more than once, it's also spam.
As far as your profile goes, anything goes, to a point. Feel free to use your profile to advertise another site as shamelessly as you want. All other parts of the Terms of Service apply, but if you want to put a blinking banner in your profile, go for it. If you're a good enough writer that people want to go to your profile to see your other posts, you deserve the hits you get.
Still pretty gray? I'll update with examples as needed.
Multiple threads per ticker
Effective immediately, there is no "one thread per ticker" rule. The number of threads associated with a particular stock needs to be kept within reason, but it'll be my job to ensure that it's kept reasonable. If you want a thread that discusses daytrading QCOM and the existing thread focuses more on LTB&H (Long Term Buy & Hold), feel free to start a daytrading thread about QCOM. If the QCOM thread is too bullish for your tastes and you don't feel welcome there, start a QCOM thread for the bearish perspective.
We do, however, want to keep it "within reason". It doesn't do anyone any good if all of the information relevant to QCOM is divided into a dozen threads. Thread dilution needs to be kept at a minimum. If QCOM issues a press release, don't create a new thread for it. Post it to an existing thread. And if there are 4 threads about QCOM, posting the same thing to all 4 threads would be considered spamming.
Exception: For OTCBB and Pink Sheet issues, the limit will remain at one board per ticker. This is subject to change in the future, but I want to see how it goes with Listed and Nasdaq issues first.
Personal Attacks
At Silicon Investor, quite a bit of ad hominem stuff was permitted. This aspect will be dramatically different here.
I want to hold our community here to a higher standard. And because of the Chairman of the Board concept, there should be less of a precedent problem, or situations where someone got away with calling someone else a moron earlier so it must be okay for everyone to do it.
Another thing that'll help is the existence of the "Parking Lot" thread. Want to tell someone what you really think of them? Go there. All the more reason for us to have much lower tolerance of that kind of stuff in the other threads.
Aside from the Parking Lot thread, no kinds of personal attacks will be permitted, whether they're directed at individuals or groups.
General Rudeness
This is something that wasn't addressed on Silicon Investor at all. It will be here.
Excluding vulgarity, personal attacks, threats, and invasions of privacy, members will be able to conduct their own non-stock threads in any manner they see fit. If your thread is not specific to a particular stock or group of stocks, feel free to post in any way you see fit.
For example, if you have such a thread and post "This stock is a POS and the CEO works part-time at my estate pulling dandelions with his teeth. If this turd ever pokes its ugly head above $5 again, I'm going to short it until you feel some serious pain.", that would be acceptable.
However, if you go to the thread that's specific to that stock and post the same thing, you're going to get a warning or suspension. If you want to post your negative opinion on the stock-specific thread, do so in a civil manner. For example, "This stock is a poor investment choice because the CEO's only prior experience is in lawn maintenance and I will see any rally as an opportunity to re-enter my short position."
On threads that are specific to stocks, civility is expected.
Warnings
On Silicon Investor, I gave suspensions far more often than I gave warnings. This was for a number of reasons:
1. Oftentimes, my warnings were met with very extreme personal attacks and threats against myself. Surprisingly, far less so than suspensions.
2. There was no easy mechanism for tracking warnings.
3. Warnings are very time-consuming compared to suspensions.
4. Having clicked "I Agree" on the Terms of Use was considered warning enough.
5. I was required to communicate a certain way with users; not in the style most comfortable to me.
On Investors Hub, I will continue my philosophy of my role being more "moderator" than "punisher", and further it. This includes giving warnings for all but the most blatant of violations. The availability of the Chairman of the Board concept to reduce my workload is the main reason I'll be able to do this, and when I communicate with members here, I'll be able to do so in the ways I see as appropriate.
So, if you get a warning, please just take it in the spirit intended and know that it wasn't a suspension.
He just lost 98.217% of his credibility? Wow!
Tim, I'm going to jump in here and respond to this.
Neither Jenna nor Pristine, nor anybody associated wtih either has invested a dime in this site. For that matter, neither have I.
Now please drop it, as it's starting to look like your intention here is simply disruption.
Sorry, everyone, for the disruption, including that caused by my post.
Bob
I'm comfortable with the security of the PM area here, as I've been unable to hack it. However, we're going to change the handling of them somewhat to protect ourselves from ourselves and to speed things up quite a bit. Especially for searches.
Since I know that a lot of people here are geeks (you and I included, Jens), I'll update everyone on changes, even if they're not of the immediately-obvious kind.
I won't get into announcing our intentions on changes though. I don't like the "all talk, no action" I've seen elsewhere and the unavoidable slipping delivery dates. I prefer "little talk, lots of action."
Right now the priority is to go through it all one more time to make sure we're all comfortable with coming out of beta and going into production. We're monitoring the servers a lot and it looks like they're in pretty close to the condition we need them to handle the traffic we expect in the near term.
It's really kind of funny to have scripts banging away at the site on multiple high-speed connections while users are active on it and pop up Task Manager and see the equivalent of "Yawn. Is that all you've got for me to do?"
But of course!
Actually, Matt can clear up the login issue (or has he?) but I leave myself logged in all the time, as I've got no problem with cookies if they make my life easier. I can't be trusted to remember that my password is "jainluvsme". Or is it?
"Why Investors Hub?"
Or, to give the fuller question: "Why is the guy formerly known as "SI Bob" now working for a startup site called Investors Hub?"
When I was laid off from Silicon Investor in a mass layoff across the parent company, InfoSpace, I was immediately inundated with offers to join other sites, including 3 offers of majority or complete ownership of existing sites, and offers of funding to create a site of my own.
For the first few weeks, I was leaning very strongly toward starting a site of my own. I feel that the community is still out there, though not as much on Silicon Investor anymore, and that if I wrote a site that simply enabled the community rather than constantly impeding it, it would be successful; basically the original Silicon Investor philosophy.
I'm not talking about just the technology, though it's the most important aspect. I'm also talking about inflexible rules. To use an easy example, forbidding "spam", but not defining it (despite my asking for a definition to be added to the Terms Of Use many times while I was there and being repeatedly assured it'd be added -- last I checked, it's not even in their Glossary).
What I wanted to build was a site that emulated the old Silicon Investor while avoiding a lot of the problems of the new version. A simple interface that's navigated quickly and easily and isn't full of "features" that visually distance the user from the underlying function of such a site: reading and posting messages.
Also, by writing my own site, with the help of my best friend (who can code circles around me), I could assure that it's done competently. That was a HUGE issue for me, and those who saw how I dealt with the Oracle changeover, and read between the lines, could see the huge layer of disgust that was right below the surface. Disgust that'd been there for ages and was caused by such things as making a new user's loginID and alias the same thing (thus giving away 50% of their login info, the password hint often giving away the other 50%) despite my frequent table-pounding about it being a major security issue. Disgust at inane indexing that was so bad, I was only allowed to delete posts at night because a single deletion would take several minutes and slow the site to a crawl. Disgust at sending 64,000 characters of data to display a 1,000-character message. Disgust at interface decisions made by people who didn't use the site. Disgust at never being asked for my thoughts on new features and being ignored when I offered those thoughts.
Geez, that's a big can of worms that easily led to one of my trademark digressions. Suffice it to say that the most important thing I wanted was a site that didn't have the many technological problems of where I came from. Again, a site that enables the community rather than impeding it.
Something that a lot of people don't know about me (but was a major reason Brad and Jeff Dryer hired me in the first place) is that I started a BBS (for those who weren't around then, that's a "Bulletin Board System", which was the predecessor of internet message board sites) in 1987 and quickly grew it into one of the largest in the country (at one time, it was by far the largest in terms of file availability) and was one of the few profitable ones. I shut it down in 1997 when I saw internet message boards getting ready to beat me up and take my lunch money. The lessons I learned running it apply 100% to the internet variety of the same thing.
While running my BBS, I attended a BBS convention at which Jack Rickard (publisher of Boardwatch magazine) spoke at length about "community" being the most important word when discussing online communities. The lesson stuck and is why I've always preached that all decisions, be they about technology or rules of engagement, have to take the community into account first.
I wanted to create a site that always kept the community in mind and tried not to interfere with it unnecessarily. I wanted the site to be completely server-based, so that only the minimal amount of necessary data would be transmitted to the user, making for a faster and more secure site.
So, I was putting together the game plan for developing such a site when I ran into Investors Hub.
After looking at it in-depth, I found that Investors Hub was basically the site I wanted to write myself. A simple, streamlined, intuitive interface, without a lot of stuff getting in the way of the underyling purpose of the site.
I spoke with the owners at length for about a month and found that not only did they share my opinion of what a message board site should be, they would let me be responsible for guiding what it would eventually become.
I knew that if I started my own site, I would be competing against a site that not only would be a formidable competitor, but that'd already found a soft spot in my heart because of the many things it was already doing "right". Not to say that it's perfect, but it will become nearly so.
And that's why I have accepted a position at Investors Hub. I will be performing many of the same duties I performed at Silicon Investor, which was Terms of Service enforcement and (attempts at) getting sparring combatants to chill out.
I am looking forward to being a part of developing this site into the place where most of the online-savvy market investors and traders congregate, and expect to do so primarily by giving you, the community on whom such a site utlimately depends, what you need in such a site.
Regards,
Bob Zumbrunnen
Operations Manager, Investors Hub
You're welcome.
I hope you understand that was directed at you as well. "taco bell"? Name-calling is uncool.
I hope everyone is clear that when you allow these posts about posters and not about the company, you set a precedent and can no longer delete posts for being "personal". Every chairperson needs to take that into account.
Bob, does the site time you out after a certain period of no activity?
Not to my knowledge, but I can't swear to that. Matt would know.
I learned a long time ago not to take everything I read on the internet as Gospel, and continue to be amazed at folks who haven't learned that lesson.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15652507
i don't make personal attacks on people, in case you hadn't noticed.
I'd never seen you do it before, so it came as a surprise to me. But in my opinion, intimating that someone's a porker is a personal attack and such statements have nothing to do with any disagreement you may have over the way a person conducts themselves.
You'll be missed, and I mean it.
Bob
Did she call anyone in particular a loser?
i
wonder if marketgems aka pristine.com has invested money in investorhub.com....just curious.....nice new
server btw..those things cost big bucks eh?
I know the answer to this, so I'll just let you speculate on it all you like and see how many people will believe the resulting theory. How about speculating sometime that Saddam Hussein bought me my backhoe. Those things cost big bucks eh?
Not favoritism at all. Personal attacks. On my front porch, at that.
If she'd written the same kind of thing to you, I'd have zapped it too.
Careful there...
We've also been talking about something similar and it's a project for down the road when we're a bit more established.
Good For You, too. Nice to see such nice, cheerful commentary on this board. :)
Ain't that something?!? I told my wife about him showing up. Definitely quality folk!
Dear Chopped Liver,
Whaddya mean everybody knew? If they did, you told 'em. hehe And you were sworn to secrecy.
Okay, I did tell a few people a week or so ago, and large number of folks this afternoon.
Thanks for the welcome and I do expect to be hearing from you at least once a week, even if only via PM.
HubBob
LOL! I forgot about that one. I left your name that way *just* long enough for you to see it happen. Reminds me of a change I made to Tim's name once.
LOL! Love the name. Of course, you know you were the inspiration behind my starting to sign messages on the other site as "The SIer formerly known as SI Admin (Bob)"
I got the Honda 450ES. Top of the line for Hondas. Electric shift, full-time 4WD, digital speedo, etc.
I don't know enough about them to say it's the best of class, though. This one's an amazing workhorse, but it's not much as a "toy". I'm giving this one to my wife and getting myself a wild toy and getting my daughter a tamer one.
If you're gonna play aggressively on it a lot, I'd avoid anything that's full-time 4WD. You just can't make the thing lose traction to do a drift. And it doesn't wheelie very easily.
It's extremely windy here and, because my workshop is only partially walled right now, huge sheets of siding are blowing off of one of the walls. I parked the backhoe by that wall hoping it'd be a suitable windbreak, but it's not working. Had to park the 4-wheeler on what was left of a stack of siding about an hour ago. Went to retrieve one of the sheets that'd blown off the stack and got creamed by another one that flew off at me. Scary!
let me let me..i would love to have access to the data base
"Admin (Tim)"? Hell will have a Figure Skating contingent at the Olympics before that happens. <g>
BTW, svejk's "HuBob" is growing on me. Or "HubBob"? I can't remember if "hubbub" is spelled with 2 b's or 3.
I wasn't aware of that being a possible response to them. I've PM'd myself a link to your post and a reminder to check with the lawyer about that.
Greetings, Josef! Very glad to see you here!
I'm sure we're gonna have screwups here, but they'll be "ours". Really looking forward to it. :)
BTW, how would you feel about a huge Datek ad taking up, say, the upper 90% of the browser. <g>
LOL! I think I know exactly who you are on SI. <g>
Good to see you here!
I bob, glad to see you land on your feet over here on IHUB.......do me a favor....fill IHUB Matt in on Dealer and
the past goings on at SI........a travesty...and it will continue to be one if you allow the same thing to happen
here at IHUB
Glad you mentioned that, but first, one of my usual asides: As I was typing the tags to italicize the quoted text it occurred to me that I didn't think much of those tags when I first saw them, but I quickly decided I like them a lot better. Easier to type and a lot easier to deal with on this end.
Back to your point....
An important rule I'm imposing on myself here is that it's a clean slate. On InvestorsHub, I will not take into account anything having to do with another site. If I booted someone from SI, they're welcome here and I won't take their SI activity into account.
I expect IH to hold itself to a much higher standard, which I'll detail later. But I do hope that we'll all use this as an opportunity to start anew with each other to the extent possible. I know how grudges are, but I tend not to carry them around.
Bob
Uh-oh. <g>
Glad to see you, JXM. And you know how I feel about your opinions, so give me a couple of days to catch my breath, then hit me with your thoughts, good and bad.
Bob
Now that I'm officially on-board, and the site is running on the good hardware, we're going to be formalizing the wish list tonight. I expect something really cool regarding that 10-post thing but am not at liberty to say yet. No timeline on that one.
Bob
Thanks, Jane. And I'm glad to see you here.
Really glad to be here, Bernard, and, yes, I'm familiar with our posts. Have been lurking for quite a while.
To say I'm pumped about this is an understatement. I'll post later why it was that I went with InvestorsHub out of all the choices I had.
And some of the misgivings about the CoB concept that I've seen are shared by me, so I'm going to be all over it. The most important thing for now is that if a post remains deleted, that choice was made by me.
Bob
I wanted to immediately express some of my thoughts about the "Chairman of the Board" concept here, so here goes:
Overall, I like this concept quite a bit because, in a perfect world, it makes my job a lot easier by making the site more self-policing, and will usually result in posts that don't belong here getting deleted much more quickly. When I submitted a detailed proposal to SI a couple of years ago about how to make threads more self-directed, what I proposed had a lot more in common with how InvestorsHub does it than how Silicon Investor does it.
While the potential benefits of this feature are dramatic, there are many potential downsides:
1. Puts community members in the position of being "the bad guy". I'm accustomed to being a site's "heat sink" (get mad at me instead of your fellow community members) and feel it's an important element of a community's overall well-being.
2. Opens the rules up to a large number of different interpretations and implementations, all of which are potentially biased.
3. Makes it possible to silence critics of a stock, on really shaky ground. For example, deleting a relevant but critical post because a line from it was stated in another post, then citing "spam" as the rule that was invoked.
4. Situations that require admin intervention might not come to the admin's attention.
5. Since the chairperson is, in a way, acting on behalf of the site and its administration, it's important that the chairperson conducts himself accordingly.
Because of this, the Chairman concept and its implementation will be under the microscope for quite a while and will get changed as needed. I anticipate adding things to it (such as the ability of a Chairperson to temporarily suspend a person's ability to post to that thread) and possibly taking things away from it. From a big-picture perspective, I prefer to limit the number of rules a chairperson can invoke for message deletions.
We'll see how it works out.
It's important to note the following:
I will personally review every post that is deleted and it will not remain deleted unless I agree that it should be deleted. So if, after about 12 hours, your post is still deleted, take it up with me rather than the chairman.
If I see rampant abuses of deletions, I won't hesitate to remove the chairman.
The Chairman feature is important to me and I'll be watching it closely because I have no interest in seeing this site being viewed as a safe place for scamsters to work their magic or getting a reputation for intolerance of dissenting views.
In general, I ask that each Chairperson ask themselves one specific question before deleting a post and do the deletion only if they can answer in the affirmative: "Would Bob delete this post?".
If it's really spam, a personal attack, vulgarity, or invasion of privacy, zap it and don't give it another thought. If, however, it's critical of the stock you like or even critical of your motivations, be sure you can give good reasons for it being deleted, because you'll probably be asked. If I find myself undeleting a lot of posts in a thread, it'll have an impact on how the Chairperson concept works in the future and could result in that Chairperson's removal.
Any changes to the implementation of this feature will be as a direct result of how it's being used, so if there are no abuses, there will be no changes. I think it's too liberal right now. Prove me wrong.
One change that will be implemented immediately: It is no longer acceptable to remove a post because "it lacks a link to supporting evidence" or because "it's libel". I've seen this applied in a one-sided manner to remove relevant negative information, and it's not always possible to link to supporting evidence on the internet; especially if you're expressing an opinion. If you post something, stating it as fact, and it isn't true, you could find yourself answering to a judge over the matter, but neither chairpeople nor admins should decide that what you've stated isn't true and remove it. The responsibility lies with other members to refute anything they don't believe is true, and the evidence of the untrue statements, if they're proven untrue by other members, should remain intact.
Members agree not to post libel here, but nobody here is (or should be) empowered to determine that a post really is libel. Judges do that; not site admins and certainly not people with a financial interest in the company being discussed.
To sum up, the Chairperson concept is one of the reasons I accepted this position, and though I think there are potential problems with it that need to be fixed, it is a good idea and will be an important factor in the success of Investors Hub if we all take it very seriously and use it only in the way it was meant to be used.
Regards,
Bob Zumbrunnen
Operations Manager, Investors Hub
An Intro
My name is Bob Zumbrunnen and I'm the new Operations Manager of Investors Hub.
Prior to my accepting this position, I had been the main Community Administrator at Silicon Investor for about 3 years. Many of you knew me there as "SI Bob" or "SI Admin (Bob)".
If you'd like to know more about me in that role, read the following:
http://www.wsj.com/public/current/articles/SB960500735516514271.htm
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15355023
At Silicon Investor, my role was to deal with violations of the site's Terms of Use (TofU, for short) and to step in as required to prevent disagreements from turning into flamewars.
At Investors Hub, I will be doing that and more. My duties here will be those currently being taken care of on SI by Jeff G, Scott Lux, John Busby, and Mike Coddington.
If you've got issues with the site's functionality or features you'd like to see, I'm your man. I'll be working very closely with the programmers, who I've already found to be very competent, and if it's a feature a lot of people want, it'll likely become a reality. I might say "No" if it's something I don't feel would be in the best interests of a streamlined community-enabling site, but I won't say "We'll have that feature soon" and let "soon" become several months.
The following are some realities of at least one other site, and how they'll be different here:
1. Other site: You're told for months that a problem with the site will be fixed in two weeks. Investors Hub: If a problem interferes with your ability to use the site comfortably, it's my problem. It'll get fixed quickly by either myself or another programmer.
2. Other site: If a subpoena is received for your personal information, you're not told (and given a chance to fight it) because it's too inconvenient. Investors Hub: If a subpoena is received for a civil matter, you're told immediately. This was a huge issue for me at the other site and I never got over my disgust at how this was handled.
3. Other site: If you write in with a complaint, you'll get an insulting automated reply. Investors Hub: A *person* will reply.
4. Other site: If a post needs to be deleted because it contains your personal contact info, it'll be deleted sometime that evening because the database is so screwed up it takes several minutes to do the deletion and it slows down and even crashes the site. Investors Hub: Posts that should be deleted are deleted immediately by an admin or a chairperson.
It is my expectation that by putting me in a role in which I can do all of the things I wanted to do at the other site (rather than tying my hands and taping my mouth shut, like happened there), and by having the decisions made by a member of the community who understands what the community is, rather than outsiders who see the community as a necessary evil that gets in the way of building the technology they *think* other people want, we will make this venue exactly what our online community wants and needs.
Together, we will help InvestorsHub become known for its quality content in the way SI was, but without the community-impeding "features" of it.
If you have any questions or comments about the site, feel free to let me know.
Regards,
Bob Zumbrunnen
Operations Manager, Investors Hub