Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
REF: 172300
Just Google Walmart, find the store, call the number, and ask.
I did that with 2 sc stores. One said they were send the inventory back, another a few miles away, said they were selling. The jury is out. Maybe that is why no commercial?
If I own a truck stop I would make sure that BBDA included me in their liability coverage, and that EVERY employee understood that this is NOT an energy drink. I would also put a "DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE" sign on the display. Otherwise, I see a potential disaster ahead.
I don't understand. If the technology is so valuable, why would anyone want to sell it? And if the test results were very good, better than 98%, why would the seller want to give up such a windfall to someone else? Is the agreement irrevocable? If so, it's a contract. If not, Jim has nothing.
It's NOT there, I called the store.
Gnarlyman, save your gas for another trip. I called the store and gave the UPC 851482004013. They don't stock it. It's not here either (San Diego).
I get nervous when emails and phone calls are not returned when someone wants to order and says as much. They're either 2 busy or JDGAD.
I feel like I'm standing around with a bunch of guys watching that possum in the commercial. Is it dead....or not?
....Unless he wants to do a buyback when the PPS is <.01. To be really ridiculous, maybe he set off this scenario himself, after the deals were closed. After all, why make all of us rich, too.
Longs better hang in there.
I don't agree, because post-R/S PPS always drifts lower than higher, so the actual buyback price is less.
Here is my one post for the week. It seems that CA has to replace all of it school buses because they don't live up to the state's own emission standards, which have since been rewritten so that kids have a way to get to school. But this email from the EPA announcing their new "REBATE PROGRAM" for successful implementations of particulate reducing ideas should get the attention of the marketing people at AHS, just like the solar panel guys are living off the gov't subsidies. Maybe if the mileage savings plus the cleanup would generate enough of a rebate to pay for each Hy-Impact system?
EPA Clean Diesel News: 9/13/12
EPA is announcing a new National Clean Diesel Campaign Rebate Program for clean diesel. As part of the reauthorization of the Diesel Emission Reduction Act (DERA), EPA will offer rebates to fund projects that reduce emissions from diesel engines. The program is designed to target specific medium and heavy-duty diesel engines; and technologies each year (as funding is available). This is the first ever rebate program in EPA. As such, the National Clean Diesel Campaign is starting with a pilot program that will focus on school bus replacements.
EPA anticipates the acceptance of applications to start in November. EPA will send another email when the rebate application acceptance period opens.
For more information on the National Clean Diesel Campaign Rebate Program, visit http://epa.gov/cleandiesel/dera-rebate.htm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.epa.gov/cleandiesel
E-mail: cleandiesel@epa.gov
You are subscribed to EPA Clean Diesel News. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to: epa_clean_diesel_news-unsubscribe@lists.epa.gov
NO NO don't go back up yet, I'm getting some money!
Despite what has occurred, the NDA is still in effect.
Novice13 for mod-in-chief!
Ha! Normal trading? Pinks? Isn't that an oxymoron?
Why would the SEC suspend trading in
a stock?
The SEC may suspend trading in a stock when the
Commission is of the opinion that a suspension is
required to protect investors and the public interest.
Circumstances that might lead the Commission to
suspend trading include:
• A lack of current, accurate, or adequate
information about the company, for example,
when a company is not current in its filings of
periodic reports;
• Questions about the accuracy of publicly
available information,
And I should give credence to this type of rationale...
They haven't been revoked for 7 years, and in all likelyhood they won't be revoked in the next week, just because you say so.
OR: Out of 364 weeks (7 years), there is a 1/364 chance they will be revoked within the next weeek when HUGE MATERIAL events DROP.
.002% chance That revocation will happen on a purely mathematical basis
Stop repeating the same garbage
Look familiar??
This has to be the quote of the day...by Paul Wall...
Ummmm no the SEC suspended them!
Wow I thought the SEC couldn't do that because they are on the pinks???? Jeez you guys should have done DD on suspensions.
My question...How can so many pretending to be so smart be so unaccountable for their ignorance?
236...I wish our knowledgable pumpers were as accurate in predicting our success as you were (within 24hrs) of predicting its demise. Your call was right on, but your timing was uncanny.
If there is the possibility of positive cash flow, then why not just maintain it as a private partnership and pay dividends. If new money is needed to close another deal, purchase inventory, the company could look inside to it's own stockholders. There are enough of us, aren't there?
I asked because Melatonin is not recommended if you have hypertension, but I took a 3mg tablet last night instead of my normal diphenhydramine (50mg). Unfortunately I woke up at 3 AM (CA) in a cold sweat dreaming about an SEC clamp down on the stock. I had to wait 3 hours listening to Bill Bennett (radio) until the market opened at 6:30. My computer was bedside and I kept hitting "refresh" until I saw some BBDA trades....whew!
Unfortunately I also had 30K sh. of GBGP....ouch.
Looks like I'll be going back to the sleeping pills...maybe double tonight.
Strange the a 1mg dose of Melatonin would last that long. Are ther other contributing ingredients?
Bcause if there was a mistake it would take the SEC 10 days to correct it. This reminds me of my days trading with 1st Jersey Securities in the '80s.
If they were filed would Jim have been obligated to release a PR as such.
Can anyone tell me how many mgs of Melatonin are listed on the can. TIA
How many shares do we collectively have? Maybe we could hold a SH meeting and decide what to do with JF?
Yesterday I sent an email to MSE asking about status of the Global purchase and I got this response...
"Thank you for your inquiry. Please visit the Global site for current information - http://www.glbtech.com/NEWS.asp"
At the time, I thought it was a positive response representing a transfer of authority. I don't know what to think now, and I find it curious that some of the mods have disappeared.
Maybe I should have said "unfounded" rather than "unbounded".
Don't stop posting now. We need your unbounded optimism.
Hey Rip, here's a recent post of yours. Thanks for helping us thru the times of doubt about this stock...
The SEC does not govern the OTC pink market and therefore they can not halt GTGP for not filing financials. Here is the link that says it all.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sec.gov%2Fanswers%2Fpink.htm&ei=fLxSUMrUAaT2iwK-jIHACg&usg=AFQjCNFqLgUJdn48MFCE0OJE_XmB9AJxWA&cad=rja
OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly known as Pink OTC Markets Inc.)
OTC Markets Group Inc., formerly known as Pink OTC Markets Inc., operates OTC Link, an electronic quotation system that displays quotes from broker dealers for many over-the-counter (OTC) securities. "Market makers" and other brokers who buy and sell OTC securities, can use the OTC Link to publish their bid and ask quotation prices. The terms “Pink” or “Pink Sheets” (as they were formerly known), comes from the color of paper they were historically printed on. They are published electronically today by OTC Markets Group Inc., a privately owned company. OTC Markets Group Inc. is not registered with the SEC in any way and it is not a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Broker-Dealer. OTC Markets Group Inc. does not require companies whose securities are quoted upon its systems to meet any listing requirements. With the exception of a few foreign issuers, the companies quoted in OTC Link tend to be closely held, extremely small and/or thinly traded. Most do not meet the minimum listing requirements for trading on a national securities exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Many of these companies do not file periodic reports or audited financial statements with the SEC, making it very difficult for investors to find reliable, unbiased information about those companies. For all of these reasons, companies quoted in OTC Link can be among the most risky investments. That's why you should take extra care to thoroughly research any company quoted exclusively in the OTC Link. Be aware that some broker-dealers are required by Rule 15c2-11 under the 1934 Act to have some information about the issuer. Ask your broker-dealer whether it has any Rule 15c2-11 information before you invest.
The OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB) eligibility rule required companies whose securities were quoted on the OTCBB to file updated financial reports with the SEC or with their banking or insurance regulators. If these companies failed to file current financial reports, their securities would be removed from the OTCBB, but could be quoted in another system, such as OTC Markets Group Inc.’s OTC Link inter-dealer quotation service. The eligibility rule was phased in over a 12-month period and ended June 22, 2000. On the OTC Bulletin Board's website, you can find a history of the rule and data concerning companies that were removed from the OTCBB. If you are considering investing in a company that trades on the OTCBB, you can find reports filed by the company on the SEC's EDGAR database.
For more information about the OTCBB, please read "OTC Bulletin Board" in our Fast Answers database.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/pink.htm
Not one post today, however.
What is the seriousness of the SEC shortcomings re: filings?
"In addition, the original inventor of the MBS technology recently patented a new, more advanced process which makes the technology used by GTGP Obsolete."
This statement in itself is patently ridiculous. Any new technique has to be price effective, and it also has to be marketed. There may also be previous non-compete clauses in previous agreements.
Sorry....my misplaced cents of humor...
I think those posts get removed....I couldn't even find the last one.
Bob
Not since the interview. Why would he have let his plans known unless he wanted to keep the price depressed, and then admited as much? Look at it as a positive....more time to pile up cheapies.
The effect of his comments re:buyback/pps have been obvious....depressed prices. Can we extrapolate that to mean suppression of positive PRs regardless of their impact?
When asked about the settlement directly, this was the response...
“ I know but will NEVER disclose any company info here or anywhere as its not for me to do but as I said , there is not a car on my driveway that isnt more $$$$ then what the payout is , sooooo just do your research...The one thing I have always said and will to you as well , HLNT .18 TO .25 IN 2012...Seriously , I dont need to say anymore and what I KNOW to be facts will be PRd by HLNT and also someone they have a deal with and deals with , its just that simple...Once again I will be right when the time comes.”
This is what Mr. Southern was responding to when he denied the use of NDAs, especially to non-employees spouting off on the internet. For someone to claim to have an NDA and then even be posting seems counter-intuitive to me. Ridiculous would be a better description. I don't doubt the PRs may be coming some day...perhaps today. But don't act on the hype here unless it's a result of an actual HLNT/AHS posting. GLTA
I'd really like to see those >$1000000 cars!
PD, did you get my PM?
I receiveed this email several weeks ago from Mr. Southern in response to my inquiries re: insider information. Here is his general response and the company's position. So all you new investors out there, please take everything with a grain of salt and do your own DD.
Bob:
Thank you for your comments. While I do not necessarily disagree with your position (re: inside info), I really do not have a clue who ******* is. I do have my suspicions, but none of the folks that I suspect have an NDA and even if they did are not party to knowledge of this settlement. The reason that I know this to be true is that among the very limited number of people that have knowledge of the specifics, none are outside the walls of our office, save our Attorney in New York and the Attorneys on the other side of this case and C*****R*****. They ALL have much better things to do with their time than make statements such as this on I-Hub. Do you have any idea what kinds of cars he drives? Hmmmmmm ... Perhaps *********** just wants some fraction of his 15 min fame.
In any event, as I previously told you, we do not police I-hub or any of the other services available on the internet. Please do continue to read our press releases as they are the ONLY source of information coming from our organization.
Best Regards,
H.C. Southern
Chief Legal Officer
Nico...with all due respect, that list is as obsolete as the name "Wildcat".
That could also be the reason that the new website has not been updated. It's priority has taken a back seat to ongoing deliberations and new contract fulfillment. Same with no news from Launchit. Got to take care of the backlog 1st. Make sense?
PR anyday now...