Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
agree, please be at meeting with rest of us so you can get all your questions you have answered by Tom and Chuck themselves
Yep, Yep, Yep and Yep
They need to be more detailed and say what that even means. Did Verizon call them for donations or is Ecrypt One so powerful it can hold back a CAT 5 hurricane? Every time they tweet something raises more questions than answers
I also agree about the Alliances, etc. Mostly just stuff pennies do with each other so they have something to say. usually amount to about nothing. but again would love to be wrong
I hear ya and agree. I got in at .0007 so it'd have to totally crash to not make a profit but the hopes of the unicorn and holy grails are slipping fast (if not gone). But either way - will hold and see. would love to be proved wrong
All this eye-spy and connecting the dots can be fun and all but personally I'm just ready for them to either announce the "game-changers" from months ago, if they exist, or just put rest of 10q show no profit but at least remove stop sign. I'll hold this as long as it takes but must say all excited has long been gone.
but they did mention many "potential" deals throughout 2016 and not a single one went through. So i'd rather just they wait and then announce after its signed and paid for.
there's still 8 months we don't know about so hoping for the best
I know I was up $14,000 now under $3000 and I know many have lost much more. and I never lost as I got in @.0007. I was pretty calm it just kind of pissed me off as we got final 2016 Q and crickets. Had hoped something would have went through. It's a gamble. And I'm still in game for sure. just venting
I questioned him on that very thing, we knew the contracts either weren't real or failed or they didn't pay because you don't keep borrowing millions if you have millions coming in. So did it all pick up Jan 1st. I guess we will see
if deals flop say they flopped, just don't have 10 million in BS 8-ks when in reality there wasn't any. The dilution slowed down so maybe they got a few starting 2017. they have that $20 million line of credit so maybe they are buying time hoping like hell something lands. that what it seems to me
like I said i'm keeping my shares but its frustrating to be told there were contracts when in fact there were literally none. Maybe they all paid Jan 1st, 2017
I know many are fluff but many said signed for x amount (most in telecom). If they are doing all the work up front and nobody is paying on the backend then maybe they need to rethink their business model
so you're honestly saying that there were dozens of signed contracts yet nobody paid or they all fell through
my only gripe is honesty. I'm holding my shares so that's an aside but if you add up the supposed contracts in 2016 8-ks you would think we would be showing some revenue, in millions. I don't see any at all. So if 8-ks are not to be believed then that's a problem.
Am I missing something, so now we have full 2016 year. I remember posts stating we had contracts in the millions. What am I missing?
2 more FINS get current and see how many if any of the big deals come through. Just slow process but I'm hanging around
industry jargon or not at that point in time heading in wrong direction (ANY self respecting trader knows this). I hope things looks great on the March 31, 2017 10q. I have a lot tied up in here. We just don't know until we know.
Let's hope so
This is the only sectioned I'm concerned about. not good on the Sept 30,2016 10-q. Has to be much better on March31,2017
Uncertainty as a Going Concern
The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since inception (April 19, 2007) through September 30, 2016 of $19,493,670 and has a working capital deficit of $5,830,155 as of September 30, 2016, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
sure the word contract is a little misleading for SEWP. what it means is they are on list of vendors who are "pre-approved" to sell to all branches of government
awesome! I've been talking about getting into penny stocks for 20 years. 47 better late than never. scored big with SC*L now ready for a much bigger payday with BVTK.
hey at $1 PPS not so much chump change anymore let alone $2-$5 dollars. You'll have a few whales but stocks live with having a lot of smaller players
Think of how many no-name Microsoft has bought over the years especially in their gaming division. and I agree you would have to think these big companies know who their taking meetings with and aren't wasting time with nobodies.
Agree, In my previous post where I stated Crucialtrak is focusing on companies with a government contract like BVTK with SEWP and CBC Americas with GSA Schedule 84 well that was for 2014 and appears they no longer hold that so I think as far as sales they will be leaning more toward BVTK and not so much CBC as time goes on.
The deal itself is great in that a lot of buyers want a whole package deal and with CrucialTrak BVTK will be able to offer everything from communications with EcryptOne to biometric security. "award winning" biometric security I might add
Seems like CrucialTrak is trying to partner up with companies on governemt contracts such as Bravatek on SEW and CBC America on GSA Schedule 84 contract
nevermind I see it's part of the CrucialTec family of companies http://www.crucialtrak.com/BACS/about/family.php
just to be clear is crucialTrak same as Crucialtec?
ok then, looking forward to it
its acting great. I have a core amount I'm holding long since .0007 and I've flipped for thousands. just like McDonalds I'm lovin it!
why, are you trying to get lawsuits, info sure - just seems kind of odd you'd state it as "insider" info. if it is just keep it to yourself
demanding his number doesn't make anyone want to give it up. I've never talked to him but have no dought. The first time I emailed him he answered back in less than 5 minutes and I've had several email discussions with him. I'd take reader3's advice
well, then email him and ask for his number. that would seem the logical thing to do.
I do believe he jumped the gun on some things that are taking longer than he anticipated
I got in @.0007 so I can't complain at all
that's ridiculous. Of course people do but it's a waste of time, ever been in a class action? you may make lunch money while lawyers make millions. You make your bets and you live with the results - that's problem with people cry lawsuit when things don't go their way
I agree the guesses on PPS are just that. Show me a penny and lets go from there. I was referring to OC calling BS because no one sent him Tom's number.
I still say email him and ask for his number before you call BS.
just email him tom.cellucci@bravatek.com. he answers if he's around rather quickly. So don't know what you are referring to as BS
and just why are "class action lawyers" circling overhead