Why waste your time responding to my post!!!!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
sorry the sale of homes are public information. LMAO
I have this guy in HOLIDAY FL, who looks into things like this, CEOS backrounds and things of that nature. Kind of how I got directed that type of info on CEO WILLIS, luckley for me HOLIDAY is only like 30min depending on traffic. LMAO CEO WILLIS in MICHIGAN getting a tan?????
HAHA good one??? who would ever have a house in FL when they live in MICHIGAN??? Funny you actuaully make that statement, when I was going to ask where the mangment team of ECIG was located. I think I will have someone go by the House in Clearwater as see whats up.
I have already made some inquiries in to the CEO's and few other ECIG board members past. Its goona cost alittle but worth the laugh at ECIG.
I am writeing a report on ECIG company and stock history. And maybe it will be published intoo DOCtrine. LMAO
I never said any wrong doing by the CEO happened. I say what i saw was shady base soley on my opinion.. Should I try, and sell "ECIG CEO" some worthless stock?? As he has done to investors"
Year over year, Electronic Cigarettes International Group, Ltd. has seen their bottom line shrink from a loss of $478.2K USD to an even larger loss of $20.7M USD despite an increase in revenues from $1.5M USD to $3.1M USD. An increase in the percentage of sales devoted to SGA costs from 94.68% to 132.63% was a key component in the falling bottom line in the face of rising revenues.
No nothing about Brent willis's house process is the strange part, its the sale of it and to whom!!! It in a LLC now. STRANGE????
capricious and arbitrary? When I post public information about the ( ECIG) CEO of a Public Company, And then state my opinion??? ECIG is shady
This by no means anywrong doing by the CEO, but a little shady in my honest opinion.
CEO, Brent David WIllis, bought with his wife there Clearwater home for $4,125,000 in 2006. They sold it in AUG 17,2011 for $2,425,000 to a Ernest A Reinhard, who is an officer at Southeast United Properties, LLC.
Southeast United Properties, LLC is a Foreign (non Florida) limited liability company based in Federal Way. They registered with the Florida Department of State's Division of Corporations on Sep 6, 2012.
Which Ernest A Reinhard sold to LLC for an amount not disclosed. This southeast united properties llc based in the state of WA . In my honest opinion this does not prove any wrong doing, but shows concern that he sold his house to someone, who then put it in to a LLC company, to basically safe haven his house if any criminal wrong doing or lawsuits would comeabout. I know fl has good bankruputys laws for homes, but they can take it when you are a criminal, or maybe hiding of assets???????
That is a FEDERAL LAW, where when and if the SEC comes after you state law has nothing to do with it. Its still a law that allows the SEC to keep these guys on thier toes becasue usually you dont want to have to defend yourself. So either way if a baord member were to use that defense he can still be charged NOW where he could not before.
sorry I only know him as BILL FIELDS, either way i think i knew his Name, googled both. NOt much info except a few bios, like selfpromtion. Not a big deal, I was saying in my personal opinion that people like to just run with the fact he held a title which in it had CEO, but not CEO like has in head hancho of the shabang. I never gave my opinion on his mangment skills as there is no info on any of that.
You know there are many companys who print info about OTCBB stocks FOR a payement though. Real companys do not need to pay a website to print a story about their board. LOL MARKET WIRE is what someone uses for DD will lose all thier money in my opinion!
This comments on ECIG are just my opinion, no one is forceing you to read my post. I would rather take advice from someone who had no stake as the persons claims who have no real bias. has for people saying to buy, are wanting to drive up stock In my opinion. NOt just to drive up the shares of ECIG for LONG but to actually sell to the person they told to buy ECIG..
Yes i hope that the ECIG board is aware of Sarbanes–Oxley Act!! A law to hold board memebers weather involved in daytoday or not responsible. Most likey becasue Big NAme CEos tend to join all these company boards for lots of stock/warrents/cash/etc.. They are really there just in name. Maybe bill fieldds can weigh in on the 1 -10 or inbetween 1-100 RS talk that is going around?????
When did ECIG become public?? becasue on thier website in 2014 they wrote under major milestone of their company.
Acquires United States based Fin Branding Group to become the world’s largest independently owned e-cig company??????????
INDEPENDENTLY OWNED?????
In my personal opinion, I also can not find anything or much on bill fields. He claimed to be CEO of wallmart. I checked around the time he should have been there, he was not WALLMART CEO as in main guy., he though could have still held a title of ceo but of a small division. Something that I would want to know when selling/buying a publicy traded stock. There is actually if you do dome DD many jobs at walmart that come along with the title CEO/president. just have to make that clear as some like to run with the title CEO as the main head guy. NOPE. EIther HOW does his past backround help ECIG by just sitting on the board.
To aviod legal actions. If your lawyer was smart you would divulge and want the so-called manipulator to sue you!!!! Becasue being the defendent is not always bad as you do not have to proove anything. You sir must proove which will take your lawyer more time and be costly. LOL wow!!!!
In my personal opinion Bill Fields, Former Ceo and President of Walmart, on the Board of Directors does not mean CRAP. His backround does not help this company as he does not take on any mangement Duties. his name is only good for the stock price, also with his tons of warrants in return for being on the board of ECIG.
In my personal Opinion, This stock is worthless and so is the ECIG, CEO/BOARD, and the product. I would sell every share I had, and just hope and wait that karma would bring a nice CIVIL CASE against the company for mismanagement. Why would I listen to people telling me to buy more n more so others can unload thier worthless ECIG stock. ECIG is NOT GONNA BE MY PICK FOR COMPANY OF THE YEAR!! LMAO. ALSO investors that are saying buy buy have no reason except to stop these so called shorters. The investors looking saying they wanna sell have many things to back up the move with the SEC filings alone.
why does he need share holders signatures to start a criminal investigation?? Civil maybe, but not criminal. The DOJ usually only gets involed for criminal and the SEC is who you need if you want a CIVIL. you point out Manipulators as your reason which is criminal and then i guess if you can proove criminal wrongdoing then obv you have a Civil case. So who are you makeing Claims against The MANgement and COMPANY ECIG, OR these annyomos possible manipulators??
frivolous litigation: is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. In my opinion with ECIG weather it be the MANGEMENT,MM, or promoting, You most likey have no case as someone would have been way ahead filing against ECIG . So in my opinion Claims against short sellers are either promoters to get people to buy like a SHORT SQUEEZE , or just in plain DENIAL..
I think I misssed something then!!! who would be the defendant or should I say respondent?? this so called dirtbag?
are you saying you are buying in big and a million shares by thursday in ECIG? Or just making a statement?
A law suit bha bah bah… Shorting ECIG stock is not illegal, The only info or so-called proof of price minpulations are based on peoples opinions as they can counter claim or not counter as you didnt do anythhing but there is a thing called anti slapp law thing <<(2nd grade deffention?. which you will end up paying their lawyer fees etc etc. when it doesnt work out. Only the SEC or a whistleblower, or possible privite finaical detective can look into see whos was dumping when and at what times and see if you can connect them. That would cost some money. your lawsuit in my opinion, would not even make it thorugh the doors, AS you Will have the BURDEN of PROOF not the other way around. Also the Courts are not there to help you with that BURDEN of proof. So if someone is posting their opinion which you find negative as price minipulation, how will your post ,that make this compnay much more then it is ,or a good company, be looked at?? Like I said its only an opinion either negative or postive. Its an investors choice and option to belive if it is negative or postive. which should not be your concern anyways, as opinions on here about ECIG stock to miniuplate the price is against the LAW. SO when an investor decides to write their positve opinion with no facts only to help the stock price is probally illegal. The law is very BLACK AND WHITE n we live in a world of COLOR. JUST MY OPINION LMAO LMAO.
Do you know what A PUT and CALL is, and trust me no hedgefund manager is shorting ECIG. ANY so called HEDGEFUND manger even wasteing a dollar going long or short is ONLY A HEDGEFUND MANGER BY DEFEntion and should not be in my opinon mangeing any ones money but his. agian 2nd grade level talk for a reason. ECIG has no promseing outlook in my opinion. LMAO
Sir my cash on hand trumphs this little company. YES LIttLE COMPANY. ECIG uses DEBT and LOTS of it to beable to USE bigs numbers to try and trick investors to invest. 288 mill in assets, only 4 million in cash lol.
I am very interested, beyond interested in an investment opportunity. Thats excatly why I am here, I just have not seen one or a chance at a good one with the company and board of ECIG.
besides the Outstanding shares does any investor in to ECIG look at the numbers share float?? Bascially showing the number of shares that are available for sale securities. ALOT of those shares are restricted or closey owend by insiders, IF the float is very small it should tell you how un liquid and that buying tons of shares becasue its cheap is a good choice. When You will Have ECIG on paper I think in my opinion I want to invest in stock I can actually sell and get cash for. Owning 50,000,000 shares when no one wants them doesnt mean much. Hey you can use ECIG accounting and just label those 50,000,000 shares owned down as assets and make yourself belive your rich. I invest or would only invest in ECIG stock for money, not a piece of paper that only has a par vaule of .00001.
THREE,FOUR/ I think you better SHORT. \\ ECIG that is ...
Lets make a song together about ECIG. I start the first line.
ONE,TWO/the SEC is coming for YOU/
I feel Investing anytime soon in this stock is just a bad move. ECIG are messing around with dates for proxy, drawing in attention to the stock for reverse spilt, then people think its called off and buy in, then 1 for 100 Reverse split. Which is why in my personal opinion any investing in this company for a little while would be a bad idea. You might be thinking your buying 1000 today then in a couple weeks have 10 shares and the price shoot back to 4 cents. ECIG can not be trusted the way they are running this company.
I only read the first line of the post, then i just read the whole thing, and I am right I never tried to compare them as beinging the same thing as a enity or bussiness model to make any profit. I cleary used the analogy to Show DEBT/Equity can be the same. Then went into that it is misleading, becasue it is hands down, people see a number like 200 plus million in equity and on 150 million in debt so they are doing just fine. For some reason maybe lack of vocabulary the tend not to see (deficit) either way what is a company with only 4 million in cash, tradeing stock at 4 cents etc etc have that kind of numbers. Something smells very very fishy my friend.
Sir, the analogy was not to prove any misleasdings. That was my personal opinion at the end of the post. I was expaining ASSEST and DEBT can mean same thing. ALSO i assumed I was talking to someone who actaully invested in this stock!! If I were to have the same convo with a personal friend I would have maybe made more sense. sometimes you have to keep it simple. Plus the analogy makes perfect sense maybe no great, but i think he got the message.
I never bashed him for COTT as he was basically just asked to leave, though it shows that he was just your avg CEO that can be replaced. MANY CEOS keep there jobs when major things happen and go through many battles. Jp morgan is an example. Thats what I call CEO.. JAMIE DIMON.
For a chief executive who just finished presiding over a breathtaking corporate downfall, Brent Willis, the recently ousted CEO of Canadian soft-drink maker Cott, is taking home a nice chunk of money.
The company filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission revealing that Mr. Willis will go home with nearly $3.5 million. As per his employment agreement, that includes twice his annual base salary and an annual bonus for 2007, a month's pay in lieu of notice of termination, proceeds from stock options, a buyout of his medical benefits, and even a pro-rated bonus for 2008.
Late last month, Cott fired Mr. Willis and appointed a board member, David Gibbons, as interim CEO. The company cited "the business climate and the stock price" as reasons for Mr. Willis' ouster, according to the Financial Post. In February, the stock fell nearly 60 percent in two days after the company said that Wal-Mart, Cott's biggest customer, would be reducing the shelf space it gave to the company's carbonated soft drinks. CBS NEWS IS the source>.. NOt that article which I can not even think of what its called.
Im kind of with you on that. Even though its black n white because it matters but yes here in pennyland It never crossed my mind, reason why I posted the fourmla as sarcasm. I relized no 1 understood the saracastic response so i left it alone.
Hahaha Shady article. An Article about COTT in 2012 when WIllis was LEt GO/Fired in 2008 and half the page is about how great he is lol. when a real credible website about business that had no bias and did not bash him, nor praise him simply say the companys cited he was let go because of workplace atmosphere i think and declined stock price i think either down 40%. The writer even Quotes willis many times as they must have chatted. I wonder how much the writer made under the table. LMAO. Pretty crazy someone wants to write a article about Cott and mostly willis, around 2012 when willis is getting involved and planning this company. LOL
my only comment about willis ws that he was fired, and how that might look. I do not care how he got to become CEO. Also I maybe read your post to quick, did you mean he took over back then or he recently took it over???? regardless after that post I never mentioned him. I also never claimed that the 10QA claims it made changes, I was claiming that the filed a 10/QA which i assume they must have changed something. I