Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Week Long Blockade 200+ Alumni @Harvard Administrative Bldg
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/04/13/blockade-kicks-heat-week-divestment-call-escalates-harvard
Over 200 people on Sunday night—including students, faculty, alumni, and community members—initiated what they say will be a week-long blockade of Harvard University's main administrative building as they kicked-off a week of civil disobedience and direct actions designed to elevate and escalate an ongoing student-led campaign to force one of the nation's most elite post-secondary schools to divest its financial holdings from the fossil fuel industry.
The blockade of Massachusetts Hall, which houses the office of University President Drew G. Faust, followed a day of activities on campus which focused on the crisis of climate change and the national divestment movement in which schools, local governments, pension funds, religious institutions, and individuals have been urged to pull their investments from the coal, oil, and gas industries. Participants left an evening rally, marched across campus, and took up posts in front of various entrances to the building.
According to Divest Harvard, the group spearheading the activities, "Harvard Heat Week will bring together stakeholders to stand united and call on Harvard to divest its endowment from the fossil fuel industry. The climate crisis leaves no room for neutrality, and we must be clear — sponsoring the destruction of people and planet is NOT an investment."
Chloe Maxmin, a Harvard senior and co-founder of Divest Harvard, told The Daily Crimson, the school newspaper, that President Faust and the administration have "consistently ostracized" the students pushing for divestment and "used ever-changing statements" explaining their refusal to ditch fossil fuels.
"We're actually not that radical," said Maxmin. "We’re not insane. We’re genuinely frightened for our futures and truly believe that Harvard is sponsoring some of that fear."
Divest Harvard co-coordinator Jasmine P. Opie, a junior at Harvard, said the group has "spent a long time" presenting their arguments to the administration, but to no avail. "The point of our civil disobedience is not just out of the blue," she said.
Climate Change Conference led by the Vatican
The Pope will hold major summit on climate change. Will he speak out for fossil free future? http://t.co/mpNGXoVKcx pic.twitter.com/yBmQMPkpjD
— 350 dot org (@350) April 20, 2015
Harvard Heat Week pushes "divest from Fossil Fuels"
http://harvardheatweek.org/about/
About
Harvard Heat Week will bring together stakeholders to stand united and call on Harvard to divest its endowment from the fossil fuel industry.
The climate crisis leaves no room for neutrality, and we must be clear — sponsoring the destruction of people and planet is NOT an investment.
Sunday April 12 we’ll kick off Heat Week with an Action Training and rousing Heat Week Launch event. Each day during the week, Mon-Fri, we’ll gather to highlight a different set of Harvard stakeholders.
Shake up+Shake down..Climate Neutral Biz
There is a big realignment right now of materials sourcing and I guess that is the battle of the future world leaders - securing and realizing the potential of materials export business
With an ultimate goal on solving the near term climate crisis
The universities are betting big on this tech IMHO they must believe in it to have it occupying their new Labs & be using the money from the Department of Energy... Kind of like an indirect form of a grant - just makes it so a different set of IP laws apply
Long time no Instatrader! He must want news!!!!
Hey bro send me an email bhmltn7 at live.com
I guess you are too busy tracking Porgressive Care! Lol =)
Remember folks HYSR has about 9% of the total Outstanding Shares held by about 20 shareholders on this forum!! #LongForever !!
Pearl Investments has their disclosed stake...
Eric McFarland probably holding 15% himself!!! I think he sold us down off the 4¢ January High to finance his new place in Queensland, Australia!!
NYC Climate Week: People's Climate March
http://www.climateweeknyc.org/events/peoples-climate-march
We need HYSR Advertising Sponsorship in place
No f****** joke..Wish I had $1mUSD on each!!!!!
This s*** is a elementary fund raiser at these prices!
If I had one stupid banker smart enough to believe in me I would be smacking that ask back to 13¢ And breaking 17¢ the next day
This stands to break out on one drop of news as is, bunch of premie p***** money managers shorting this well guess what.... Next News Break every short seller and his mama will be crying when Voltage Update + University of Iowa update hits!!!!
+2-Celcius Target utterly inadequate 3/15/15 ScienceDaily
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150327091016.htm
Two degree Celsius climate change target 'utterly inadequate', expert argues
The 2°C target has been said to carry an increased risk of sea level rise, shifting rainfall patters and extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, and heat waves.
The commentary presents a rare inside-view of a two-day discussion at the Lima Conference of the Parties (COP) on the likely consequences of accepting an average global warming target of 2°C versus 1.5°C (measured from pre-industrial times until 2100).
The discussions were part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 'structured expert dialogue' in December 2014. They reveal unevenly distributed risks and political power differentials between high-income countries insisting on a 2°C target and low- and many middle-income countries pushing for 1.5°C or lower.
The 2°C target has been said to carry an increased risk of sea level rise, shifting rainfall patters and extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, and heat waves, particularly targeting the Polar Regions, high mountain areas, and the Tropics.
The author Petra Tschakert from The Pennsylvania State University and a coordinating lead author of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report says: "The consensus that transpired during this session was that a 2°C danger level seemed utterly inadequate given the already observed impacts on ecosystems, food, livelihoods, and sustainable development.
"A low temperature target is the best bet to prevent severe, pervasive, and potentially irreversible impacts while allowing ecosystems to adapt naturally, ensuring food production and security, and enabling economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner."
In her commentary, Tschakert explains that the target of keeping the global average temperature rise to below 2°C originates from early studies in the 1970s. This target became anchored in policy debates over the decades, and was officially sanctioned as the long-term global goal for greenhouse gas emission reductions at the COP15 in Copenhagen in 2009.
Despite support from high and upper middle-income countries with high emissions, the 2°C target has been subject to repeated criticism from climate scientists, economists, and political and social scientists.
Alliances representing over 70% of the parties around the table, including over 100 low- and middle-income countries and small island states, have repeatedly said that a 2°C rise is unsafe for their communities, and insist on a long-term goal to keep global average temperatures below 1.5°C. These states include the Pacific nation of Tuvalu that was recently hit by Cyclone Pam.
While the 2°C target is now being re-evaluated, no reference to an explicit 1.5°C target is included in the 2014 Lima Call for Climate Action, despite specific remarks on the lower temperature limit being made throughout the negotiations.
Having taken part in the latest structured expert dialogue in Lima, Peru, with country delegates to the COP, fellow IPCC authors and representatives from UN agencies and intergovernmental organizations, Tschakert now shares new insights into the ongoing debate on the adequacy of the long-term goal.
A representative of the World Health Organization at the session stressed that there was no 'safe limit' for health, as current impacts and risks from climate change were already unacceptable, impacting people's health significantly and inequitably. This includes a rise in undernutrition, food- and water-borne infections, and excess deaths during heat waves, of which 10,000 have already been attributed to the 2010 Russian heat wave.
In addition to heat waves, science participants in the dialogue said that extreme events such as floods and hurricanes were expected to cause high risk in a 2°C warmer world. These events would put at significant danger disadvantaged populations in megacities like Lagos, Mexico City or Shanghai, people whose livelihoods are dependent on natural resources, and those at risk from conflicts over scarce resources.
Tschakert says: "Using a figure for average global warming may indeed be the most convenient and compelling means to discuss the severity of climate change impacts, but not only does it inadequately capture the complexity of the climate system, it poorly reflects locally experienced temperature increases and the extreme and large variation across regions -- no single person or any species faces a global average."
Singapore highlighted that certain risks were already catastrophic for people and ecosystems in their region while only moderate in the aggregate. Along the same lines, Ethiopia re-emphasized the uneven distribution of risks for the African continent. Trinidad and St. Lucia stressed regional differences in risk from ice sheet loss and coral bleaching. Botswana raised the subject of costs for mitigation, adaptation, 'loss and damage' and technology transfer associated with both temperature targets.
In terms of ecosystems, it was said that limiting warming at 1.5°C could keep sea level rise below 1m, saving half of the world's corals, and leave some of the Arctic summer ice intact.
Tschakert says: "These implications emphasize what is truly at stake -- not a scientific bickering of what the most appropriate temperature target ought to be, but a commitment to protect the most vulnerable and at risk populations and ecosystems, as well as the willingness to pay for abatement and compensation. This should happen now, and not only when climate change hits the rich world."
The findings are timely as the long-term goal to stay below 2°C warming is currently undergoing a 2013-15 Review, the results of which are expected this June and could be adopted in Paris at COP21 in December 2015.
Tschakert concludes in her commentary: "The crux of the matter is no longer about the scientific validity of one temperature target over another... It is first and foremost about overcoming deeply entrenched divisions on value judgments, responsibility, and finance... It is about acknowledging that negative impacts of climate change under a 0.8°C temperature increase are already widespread, across the globe, and that danger, risk, and harm would be utterly unacceptable in a 2°C warmer world, largely for 'them' -- the mollusks, and coral reefs, and the poor and marginalized populations... even if this danger hasn't quite hit home yet for 'us'."
+2-Celcius Target unrealistic==Global Warming Implications==UN Agenda-Focus
Soon UN members be buying shares
UN focusing on climate change agenda as we speak
They'll impose sanctions to level out the playing field of renewables [thin film solar] vs big oil
Waiting for the VOLUME Jose,Cid,Blekko=SleeperCell
Hanergy Stock: +500% in 2014---Just Like HyperSolar
This articule I found is talking about stock valuation in a company with breakthru technology,
Similar to HyperSolar, who also has breakthru tech, their stock has risen 500% in the past year, just like ours
This article should explain how prices work by investigating price manipulation of Hanergy Stock
We know we are sitting on top of Giants right now - Because they refuse to Sell Down to previous levels.. This Stock HYSR has a par value $0.001 and now trades at $0.023
Within the past year we saw a run up to $0.13 and in January we saw a run up to $0.046
Citi, Barons: Why Thin-Film Solar Is-[Still]-Too Expensive
http://m.barrons.com/articles/BL-AFUNDSB-2245
UQ Focus: NearTerm AU Development: LNG and Nuclear
These presentations are more about the 'tried and true' than new age renewables
They mention Hydrogen Production for Consumers via Nuclear Heat Exchange Methods
Nuclear Power Advancements have reached the necessary price points to begin adoption thru China, Australia
You will see here that China had been expanding nuclear power availability all while we remained stagnant
http://www.uq.edu.au/energy/docs/Session%201_Cronshaw.pdf
Right now the push is to have energy abundance so industry thrives in and is attracted to a particular nation-state.
Thus, nuclear build out on par with China is a necessity before they invest in too many H2 Generator panels / vessels
Apparently a large % of homes in AU Queensland have rooftop solar - 25%
H2 Generator Panels, for consumers, with integrated control system, are probably 12-18 months off from Commercialization? At least One would speculate, based on estimated Time To Market
Investors may soon be asking themselves what mix they want of Solar3D panels and H2 Generator Panels by the time we hit such %'s of adoption here in America
UQEI Energy Express Seminar Series
Lots of info on the growth of PV / Solar Industry and all the research behind the numbers!
http://www.uq.edu.au/energy/uqei-energy-express-seminar-series
Eric McFarland hosts at UQ Tech Commercialization workshop
http://www.uq.edu.au/research/researcher-development/innovation-mentoring-workshop
Defeceit funds Research And Development
Have industry leading IP - We are already a GIANT in the Artificial Photosynthesis business!
We have method of manufacture patents, materials patents, and have TWO Leading American Universities on our pay roll! That's University of California, Santa Barbara, and University of Iowa
Now we have Dr. Yat Li from Universiry of California, Santa Cruz - who was just chair to Materials Resource Society symposium on Photoelectrochemical devices for splitting water.
http://news.ucsc.edu/2013/10/solar-microbial-device.html
I think our Research Funds are being well utilized!
Share Structure allows Growth and Acquisition
A/S from UCSB company Solr3D has been used for nothing but acquisition!!! Never ever faced on-book dilution!
TOXIC Waste fuels HyperSolar H2 Generator
Artificial Photosyntheis... Kind of a Pinewood Derby
But at the end of the day, they will manufacture billions of the particles
All comes down to cost/effective
Each component enhances complexity of manufacturing and cost exponentially
Plus various inventors all want their % of the IP to earn them a profit
And manufacturing won't begin until we find everyone on their marks
Our name spreads every day while our science evolves
Moor's law will serve us beneficially, Yat Li will serve us beneficially
But in the pinewood derby of Artificial Photosynthesis, we must build in the value of our patents.
I think his knowledge will influence even those focused on Hydrodynamics of our Vessels and Panels
I think our cohesion is beginning to develop and we have had a steady trend of research pouring in to the minds of our group as well as research being published by them as well.
Gold Nanorods, Graphene, and a host of other materials..
Plus coatings designed per application for the types of cells
I think we're in the money!
I could forsee a rapid Commercialization once we hit a sweet spot numbers wise
Consider the fact that UCSB is already working on commercialization which means they're crunching all the numbers...
It can't be long before we see a PR with real numbers comparing out solution to the cost of reformed natural gas (brown hydrogen)
Yat Li also at 2014 MRS
https://mrsfall14.zerista.com/poster/member/29554
DESCRIPTION
1, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA; 2, Center For Autonomous Solar Power (CASP), Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA
The CuSbS2 belonging to simple ternary Cu-Sb-S system is a potential material among the earth abundant photo-absorbers. It effectively blocks Cu migration instability in erstwhile Cu2-xS/CdS solar cells, can replace expansive In and Ga in popular Cu(InGa)(SSe)2 (CIGS) solar cells and in composition more tolerant than current favorite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) solar cells. CuSbS2 has a direct band gap 1.38-1.56 eV and high absorption coefficient, 1-5x104 cm-1 both relevant for photovoltaic solar cells. Even with extensive research in CuSbS2 thin films, there is no unanimity on opto-electronic properties, band-gap and p-type doping, due to sensitivity of the structure and composition to thin film preparatory methods. Inclusion of secondary phases, CuS, Sb2S3 and Cu3SbS4 in CuSbS2 synthesized by direct methods, chemical spray or vacuum deposition and indirect methods, sulfurization of Cu and Sb multilayers in S or H2S vapor are the constrains hampering solar cell development.
This research provides a new perspective on single step synthesis of photosensitive monophase CuSbS2 films by electrodeposition in ionic liquid electrolyte based on choline chloride and urea (ChCl:U) eutectic mixture. We show that CuSbS2 thin film form by co-deposition of constituents Cu, Sb and S in a self-regulating electrochemical environment. Chemical stability of ChCl:U over wide potential range and at high temperatures enables better composition control by unrestricted choice of deposition potentials and highly crystalline phase. Biodegradable and nontoxic ChCl:U enables multiple depositions for low cost solar cell fabrication using green methods.
In this work, Cu and Sb deposition potentials using CuCl2 and SbCl3 precursors in ChCl:U are established as -0.54V and -0.48V vs. Pt, respectively by cyclic voltammetry. Corresponding, binary CuxS and SbxSy electrodeposition was realized with added Na2S2O3 as sulfur source. Based on this data,CuSbS2 films deposition was optimized for potentials and bath composition. X-ray diffraction studies show monophase CuSbS2 films in the chalcostibite orthorhombic crystal structure deposit at -0.65V vs. Pt. in ChCl:U with 1:1 Cu/Sb precursor ratio. Deviant Cu/Sb ratio study revealed Cu3SbS3 and Sb2S3 inclusion at 1:0.071 and 1:1.4, respectively. Electrochemical impedance studies show film growth kinetics by diffusive ionic transport. Direct band gap of 1.64 eV for single phase CuSbS2 film and 1.74 eV with inclusive secondary phases was established by optical absorption. Electrical conduction study shows formation of p-type CuSbS2 films. Heterojunction device in Glass/TCO/nZnO/pCuSbS2/Ag structure with rectifying I-V curves also confirms it. This paper will present the ionic liquid electrodeposition, growth mechanism, structure and optoelectronic properties of CuSbS2 films and the photovoltaic characteristics of heterojunction solar cells based on electrodeposited p-CuSbS2 thin film photo-absorber with n-ZnO window layer
Balanced Budget, Favorable Financing=Respected Shareholers=$GreenPastures$
Pearl Investments owns a big stake as disclosed here
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=65489266
Can't be garbage if they're buying out big blocks at 500% Gain that we have held all year!!!
Plus our former officer now working at General Electric! Hmm, wonder if GE doesn't own Pearl !!!!
No dilution from the UCSB developed Solar3D
Nadir Daghli invented tech for Solar3D and HyperSolar =)
Blekko's Get Rich Quick Q/A!!!! JK,Real Question Here...
I am doing a little unconventional research, and came upon a strange question.
We have all wondered about a HYSR Buy Out Offer before -- But now I am beyond curious on one point.
I have discussed Intellectual Property ownership structures before,
And as you all know, The Regents of the University of California has partial ownership of our patent.
Thus our partial sponsorship from the UCSB Campus in realization and real word potential is being pursued.
So -- As University of California as a whole increasingly is integrated with our progress... Buyout Offers are thereby limited or eliminated, because our patents' value has yet TBD by the university: ultimately, they don't want to sell out early & cheap
Therefore we have the entity that is HYSR that has never advertised interest in "buying out" UC's interest in our patent -- We have rather and alternatively decided to allow them to sponsor us, for an increased steak in ownership via confidential corporately held documents (not privy to shareholders)
1. WE don't know our value
2. UC doesn't know our value
So here is the question -- Our former officer is working for General Electric now...
What is General Electric pursing in the field of Hydrolysis -- in terms of Consumer or Commercial Markets?
Are they building solutions around what will become the next generation of renewable energy?
With HYSR stock up 500% in one year who knows??
$$Germany BIOMASS energy plans - 8% target
http://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Publications/BiomassActionPlan.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Let's learn while we can before US Market goes ZOoM w/o the little guy ! =)
Toxic Waste = Dollars$HYSR -- Bromine Extraction Info!!!
http://www.hypersolar.com/news_detail.php?id=50
COMPANY NEWS
Company also extends sponsored research agreement with University of California Santa Barbara after achieving dramatic breakthroughs in its novel low cost solar cell component
SANTA BARBARA, CA – August 20, 2013 - HyperSolar, Inc. (OTC:HYSR), the developer of a breakthrough technology to produce renewable hydrogen using sunlight and any source of water, today announced that its artificial photosynthesis technology is now capable of producing 1.0 volt open circuit voltage for use in direct solar hydrogen production. This achievement represents a dramatic voltage increase over the previous 0.2 volt just 8 months ago, and 0.75 volt just 3 months ago.
It is well known that the theoretical voltage for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen is 1.23 volts, and approximately 1.5 volts in real-world systems. Achieving 1.5 volts using inexpensive solar cells has eluded the world. For example, silicon solar cells are the most inexpensive and abundant, but their 0.7 volt is not enough to split water. Commercially available high voltage solar cells are unfortunately too expensive for use in hydrogen production.
“Our cutting-edge research program at the University of California Santa Barbara led by Dr. Syed Mubeen Hussaini continues to make impressive progress,” stated Tim Young, CEO of HyperSolar. “The 1.0 volt milestone is very exciting in that it provides us with a clear and encouraging roadmap to reach the 1.5 volts needed for water splitting. The semi-conductor materials used are very inexpensive, which gives us confidence that a low cost system is possible. The process to make this novel solar cell is equally exciting in that it is a simple solutions-based chemistry process. It does not require conventional expensive semiconductor processes and facilities. It was literally made in a beaker.”
Mr. Young continued, “Recently, Honda and General Motors announced a partnership to bring hydrogen cars to the mass market by 2020. While this is great news for our industry, a major unsolved piece of the puzzle is the low cost production of renewable hydrogen for fueling stations. We believe that producing renewable hydrogen anywhere there is water and sunlight is the key to realizing a cost-effective hydrogen economy of fuel cell vehicles. We envision that fueling stations can be built next to self-contained solar hydrogen production plants using our low cost technology.”
HyperSolar’s research is centered on developing a low-cost and submersible hydrogen production particle that can split water molecules under the sun, emulating the core functions of photosynthesis. Each particle is a complete hydrogen generator that contains a novel high voltage solar cell bonded to chemical catalysts by a proprietary encapsulation coating. A video of an early proof-of-concept prototype can be viewed at http://hypersolar.com/application.php. HyperSolar recently extended its sponsored research agreement with UCSB to further the development.
Good Morning America! Let's go $$$GREEN$$$
GRAPHENEA was at Water Splitting MRS, w/exhibition booth
http://www.graphenea.com/pages/graphene-manufacturer-producer-supplier
Sponsored by Repsol [$REPYY]
Electrochemical Capacitor will also PUMP UP THE WATTAGE
http://www.climateneutral.biz/index.php?topic=607.0
An Electrochemical Capacitor with Applicable Energy Density of 7.4 Wh/kg at Average Power Density of 3000 W/kg
SHARE STRUCTURE allows for GROWTH, COMPENSRATION, & ACQUISITION!!!!
Research and Development Success funded by DEFECEIT #QuickenLoans
GARBAGE fuels HyperSolar H2Generator
Hydrogen-Treated TiO2 Nanowire Arrays for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting
http://research.pbsci.ucsc.edu/chemistry/li/publications/2011_NanoLett_11_3026-3033.pdf
info from Dr. Yat Li's lab
http://li.chemistry.ucsc.edu/sample-page
What if.....UQ PR's before UI!!!!!! Hahaha
Do I get some kind of IHUB prize or award?
=)
I hoped UI was reporting today too, #AllInDueTime
Would have been nice to see that indication but again I think there may be so much more we do not yet know
We honestly need to start publicizing this stock getting it out to the masses
The sooner the better IMHO ^_^;;
I'm all for leveraging the power of social media
Siemens has HYSR on their Radar, but I want to figure out who has ownership of materials sourcing facilities and operations for each material in use in our products
We hoped voltage--But This Is Big!
Read some of the material thru this recent MRS Symposium and you begin to get the feeling we are at the center of something very, very, very big!
The materials indistry is going to be crowding around to get a piece of this BIOMASS Movement and they are already working on contracts in the materials and mining Buisness to line up for this next world changing and industry changing event !
We need more research and specific info about materias sourcing when we get closer to our prototype and production runs!
Is DOW or Mitsubishi going to manufacture H2Generator Particles? panels? Vessels?
2015 Program UU TechInfo Chair: Dr. Yat Li
http://www.mrs.org/spring-2015-program-uu/
MRS2015 Comprehensive List Technical Sessions Info!!!
http://www.mrs.org/spring-2015-technical-sessions/
Dr.YatLi-Electrochemical Capacitor with ApplicableEnergyDensity of 7.4Wh/kg at Average Power Density of 3000 W/kg
http://www.climateneutral.biz/index.php?topic=607.0
An Electrochemical Capacitor with Applicable Energy Density of 7.4 Wh/kg at Average Power Density of 3000 W/kg
Electrochemical capacitors represent a new class of charge storage devices that can simultaneously achieve high energy density and high power density. Previous reports have been primarily focused on the development of high performance capacitor electrodes. Although these electrodes have achieved excellent specific capacitance based on per unit mass of active materials, the gravimetric energy densities calculated based on the weight of entire capacitor device were fairly small. This is mainly due to the large mass ratio between current collector and active material. We aimed to address this issue by a 2-fold approach of minimizing the mass of current collector and increasing the electrode performance. Here we report an electrochemical capacitor using 3D graphene hollow structure as current collector, vanadium sulfide and manganese oxide as anode and cathode materials, respectively. 3D graphene hollow structure provides a lightweight and highly conductive scaffold for deposition of pseudocapacitive materials. The device achieves an excellent active material ratio of 24%. Significantly, it delivers a remarkable energy density of 7.4 Wh/kg (based on the weight of entire device) at the average power density of 3000 W/kg. This is the highest gravimetric energy density reported for asymmetric electrochemical capacitors at such a high power density.
Keywords: 3D hollow structure; graphene; vanadium sulfide; electrochemical capacitor; gravimetric energy density
Teng Zhai †‡, Xihong Lu †, Hanyu Wang ‡, Gongming Wang ‡, Tyler Mathis ‡, Tianyu Liu ‡, Cheng Li †, Yexiang Tong *†, and Yat Li *‡
† KLGHEI of Environment and Energy Chemistry, MOE of the Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, Instrumental Analysis and Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, P.R. China
‡ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, United States
Nano Lett., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00321
Publication Date (Web): April 1, 2015
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
*Y.T. 135 Xingang West Road, Chemical North Building 325, Guangzhou, 510275 P.R. China. Phone: 86-20-84110071. Fax: 86-20-84112245. E-mail: chedhx@mail.sysu.edu.cn., *Y.L. 1156 High Street, Physical Science Building 160, Santa Cruz, California 95064, U.S.A. Phone: 1-831-459-1952. Fax: 1-831-459-2935. E-mail: yatli@ucsc.edu.