Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Patterning PEDOT:PSS[H2 Generator Cells]; water-vapour-assisted nanoimprint lithography
We present a new water-vapour-assisted nanoimprint lithography (NIL) process for the patterning of the conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The process was optimized with respect to relative humidity, applied pressure and temperature (RH, p, T). The control of environmental humidity was found to be crucial. High quality nanostructures were reproducibly obtained at high relative humidity values (RH [greater, similar] 75%), with sub-100 nm resolution features attaining aspect ratios as high as [similar]6 at [similar]95% RH. The developed process of water-vapour-assisted NIL (WVA-NIL) strongly affects the electronic properties of PEDOT:PSS. By current–voltage measurements and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy we demonstrate that the process parameters p, T and RH are correlated with changes of PEDOT:PSS conductivity, work function and states of the valence band. In particular, an increase in the films conductivity by factors as high as 105 and a large decrease in the work function, up to 1.5 eV, upon WVA-NIL processing were observed. Employed as an anode buffer layer in P3HT:ICBA bulk heterojunction solar cells, PEDOT:PSS processing was found to affect significantly the device performance.
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/ra/c4ra04807e
Nirala Singh, Eric McFarland on HBr Fuel Cells
http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/162/4/F455.short
Rhodium sulfide (Rh2S3) on carbon support was synthesized by refluxing rhodium chloride with ammonium thiosulfate. Thermal treatment of Rh2S3 at high temperatures (600°C to 850°C) in presence of argon resulted in the transformation of Rh2S3 into Rh3S4, Rh17S15 and Rh which were characterized by TGA/DTA, XRD, EDX, and deconvolved XPS analyses. The catalyst particle size distribution ranged from 3 to 12 nm. Cyclic voltammetry and rotating disk electrode measurements were used to evaluate the catalytic activity for hydrogen oxidation and evolution reactions in H2SO4 and HBr solutions. The thermally treated catalysts show high activity for the hydrogen reactions. The exchange current densities (io) of the synthesized RhxSy catalysts in H2-saturated 1M H2SO4 and 1M HBr for HER and HOR were 0.9 mA/cm2 to 1.0 mA/cm2 and 0.8 to 0.9 mA/cm2, respectively. The lower io values obtained in 1M HBr solution compared to in H2SO4 might be due to the adsorption of Br- on the active surface. Stable electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) of RhxSy catalyst was obtained for CV scan limits between 0 V and 0.65 V vs. RHE. Scans with upper voltage limit beyond 0.65 V led to decreased and unreproducible ECSA measurements.
Precursor: http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/160/10/A1902.abstract?sid=4dbab2a1-8c4c-4e54-9083-0e9adfcd11e9
Syed Mubeen Presenting,Biannual Electrochemical Society Meeting 10/14/15@Phoenix,AZ
http://www.electrochem.org/meetings/biannual/228/
https://ecs.confex.com/ecs/228/webprogram/Paper59686.html
1736
Low-Cost Synthetic Routes for Fabricating Tandem/Multi-Junction Photoelectrochemical Devices
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
West Hall 1 (Phoenix Convention Center)
W. Cheng (University of Iowa), A. M. Rassoolkhani (Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa), and S. Mubeen (University of Iowa)
Using sunlight to convert widely available and inexpensive feed stocks such as water, CO2, and industrial wastes (including halogenides) reliably to fuels and value added chemicals, efficiently and cost-effectively, has been, and continues to be a major goal. Most such reactions require a minimum of 1eV or more photon energies. For example, the minimum free energy required to split water reversibly is 1.23 eV. However, kinetic limitations and other sources of inefficiencies (for example, water oxidation on photoanodes is kinetically sluggish, and CO2 reduction at photocathodes needs high overpotentials) make the practical energy needed to carry such reactions even considerably higher. A single-junction photosynthetic device would therefore need to base on a semiconductor with a band gap (Eg) > 2.5 eV for it to carry out water splitting or CO2 reduction, precluding the exploitation of a substantial portion of the solar spectrum. Using tandem/multi-junction photovoltaic architectures is an attractive strategy to overcome these limitations. Such strategies have been estimated to be capable of achieving ~18% solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiencies. John Turner and his colleagues [1] demonstrated a solar-to-H2 conversion efficiency of 12.4% using multi-junction III-V semiconductors in 1990’s. However, the high cost and complexity associated with device fabrication using Si and III-V semiconductors to produce triple junction devices have impeded commercialization. Here, we report a novel and low-cost wet chemical synthesis route to fabricate a tandem junction PEC device through direct deposition of inexpensive and efficient metal oxide/sulfide based photoanodes on single junction Si solar cells which act as photocathodes. The above structures were able to generate sufficiently high cell voltages to drive valuable, and, at times, challenging photoelectrochemical processes sustainably.
Reference:
Khaselev, O. & Turner, J. A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting. Science (New York, N.Y.) 280, 425–7 (1998).
Electrochemically Deposited Sb&In Doped Tin Sulfide (SnS) Photoelectrodes
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp512927y
Mark Seal †, Nirala Singh †, Eric W. McFarland †, and Jonas Baltrusaitis *‡
† Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5080, United States
‡ Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, B336 Iacocca Hall, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119 (12), pp 6471–6480
DOI: 10.1021/jp512927y
Publication Date (Web): March 11, 2015
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
Semiconducting tin sulfide (SnS) was deposited electrochemically from electrolytes containing Sn and S precursors and conditions optimized to maximize its performance as a photoelectrode. Films composed of primarily orthorhombic SnS were electrodeposited on titanium substrates from electrolyte containing 20 mM SnSO4 and 100 mM Na2S2O3 at pH 2.5. For deposition a cathodic pulse of -1.25 V vs Ag/AgCl was applied for 2.75 s followed by a 0.25 s pulse of +0.25 V vs Ag/AgCl repeated for 30–45 min. The films were annealed in argon at 300 °C for 3 h. The addition of SbCl3 (<5%) to the electrolyte gave rise to doping of the SnS film with Sb which resulted in an increase in the photocurrent as well as a switch from p- to n-type semiconducting behavior in an acidified Na2S2O3 electrolyte. Incorporation of p-type In into the films from addition of In(NO3)3 had a smaller effect on the measured photocurrent, and at higher precursor concentration (>5%) the dopants resulted in the formation of secondary phases of Sb and In oxides with reduction in the measured photocurrent. This doped SnS material could potentially be used in systems for the photoelectrochemical production of hydrogen and oxidation of organic wastewater. Density functional theory calculations supported the experimentally observed conductivity increase for photoelectrons as an Sb dopant induced curvature of the valence band. These calculations also provided an explanation to the previous experimental work where Sb doping was used to decrease the resistivity of SnS films. The combination of an automated electrodeposition of an earth abundant metal sulfide with the theoretical calculations to guide the synthesis is an exemplar of how to improve the efficiency of SnS-based solar energy conversion materials.
Understanding constraints, transformation rate of global energy infrastructure
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.177/abstract;jsessionid=16EDE2AA46CDE48E0840BA0B69966A81.f01t04
Joe L. Lane1, Simon Smart1, Diego Schmeda-Lopez1, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg2, Andrew Garnett3, Chris Greig4 and Eric McFarland1,*
Article first published online: 8 MAY 2015
DOI: 10.1002/wene.177
A massive transformation of the global energy supply system is required if deep reductions in atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions are to be achieved. A top–down review of historical data and energy forecasts provides a perspective on the magnitude of the challenge. Global engineering capability has expanded significantly over the last two decades, accommodating more than 100 GW/year increase in electricity generation infrastructure. However, business-as-usual demand forecasts to 2050 will require more than double the global rates of energy project execution. Transforming to a low-carbon energy supply mix requires 30–70 GW/year of additional infrastructure, due to the increased reliance on intermittent renewables, and the earlier-than-expected replacement of existing coal power plants. Although all power systems share many similar subsystems that will need to be delivered regardless of the technology type, meeting the extra demands for engineering design, construction and/or supply chains may not be possible. The discussion focuses only on physical limitations of electricity generation, specifically around the timing and scale of retiring and/or replacing coal-fired power generation capacity to meet the International Energy Agency's two-degree scenario. We ignore the economics and politics of the transition scenarios and the transformation of the transportation and industrial sectors. What is clear is that the longer the delay in starting a significant transformation, the greater the challenge will become. Decision makers must understand the constraints to technology transitions to deliver effective policy. A broad international consensus is not required, instead reaching agreements and developing economically sustainable pathways to technology transitions in the United States, China, and India is more likely to be successful and the only means for significantly curbing global emissions.
I'm thinking it's too low volume to make the real deal run we are waiting for...
Honestly seems like there is a huge short seller on this thing...
If the tide rises with an influx of buyers it will solidify the shareholder base and expand our marketing reach
We are going to need support above $0.12 for gains to hold
Someone dumped 450k shares on Friday under 0.02
blekko's discourse on HYSR PPS [past+present]
Today marks a great day in HIS-STORY for the accomplishment of this technology.
We are looking at HYSR from a single perspective at most times - when in reality this is a multi-dimensional behemoth if I have ever seen one.
PPS on the other hand... Why so 'lackluster'?
Rome was not built in a day - HYSR doesn't seem to be able to be built up to strong PPS no matter what.
Why? Short Selling - You can call it what you like or you can call it how you see it.
Big Money Industry is pitted against HYSR and there is only a few things we can do about it.
We've together tried holding an incredible amount of shares in this company.
Through tabulations we as a forum [+a few external members] owned 30% of this company,
This was before the most recent issuing of shares that roughly doubled the outstanding share count.
Are we mad about the Outstanding Shares being increased -- No
Do we know what the plan is for the newly issued shares -- Well... We don't own them. None of our business.
What we can be sure of is that they are going to be used for some sort of investment purposes.
We also know that although the company prints shares historically at .005 the going market value is $.02
Are we the tide? The Ocean? The Beach? We are market makers
Fortunately we are holding stock in a breakthrough technology that is backed up by patent applications.
It also doesn't hurt investor confidence to be backed up by UCSB, UI, UCSC, and UQ.
University of California Santa Barbara, University of Iowa,
University of California Santa Cruz, and University of Queensland, Australia
We also have connections with research labs internationally - Fudan University, Shanghai
We also have recently had a big event with SHELL, DOW CHEMICAL, FLUOR, and MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL
[ https://mrlweb.mrl.ucsb.edu/seminars-and-workshops/2015-New-Frontiers-Workshop ]
What does the CHART tell me??? There have been 3 monster runs on this stock in the past 18 months.
Three monster runs that the Short Selling Billionaires stopped holding the line on.
So are we holding shares in the right company? I think so.
They can call a dog a dog and be right - Until that specific moment in time where a company breaks the inertia.
HYSR in my opinion is on that doorstep of breaking the inertia.
The market forces and the market makers are at work -- This is bigger than HYSR
The Hydrogen market will be green soon and we as shareholders will stay green forever
Can we expect some concrete updates from Tim Young in this Decembers' upcoming Shareholder Letter?
I am sure willing to bet so! Thresholds have been broken, 1.5+v is next step
Lets keep up the amazing research going on here on the forum -- We have great scientific info coming out
People are looking beyond the HORIZON and that is what it is going to take here!
We are the top of our class - This HYSR forum is truly a unique place in my humble opinion.
I look forward to getting financial opportunities lined up here for myself that will enable a future of continuance.
North America will have its time in the sun just like QUEENSLAND and if we coalesce cohesively,
The shareholders here can be dearly rewarded for their dedication.
There is a particular way in which I am seeing we can do the following:
CREATE a OTC Public Company w/Dividends Paid @ 5% [on SOLAR and HYDROGEN - Financials Permitting]
Simultaneously Licensing Fees paid to HYSR will recouped - as we are ground floor HYSR Shareholders.
I am not one for impractical philosophy. I would love to have a practical 'CASH OUT' value of HYSR @$0.32 right now.
Can this be 100% accounted for by short sellers? Yes and No.
If you recall the price of HYSR through the year has held its points of resistance.
There is a fine line with this stock and those trading instead of building around it are taking a risk.
We all have different amounts of time that we've committed and I am thankful for every member of this group.
Going Forward you will see much coming in the area of concrete science relative to the industry.
There has been a clarion call for knowledge, understanding, and opportunity among our group.
Besides the details and analysis relative to concrete science, we have other strengths among our factions.
Marketing and Industry analysis are going forward at a fantastic rate.
We can welcome the Outstanding Share Increase because it keeps the price where we want to buy more.
We can learn and figure out how to build around this company to be a part of its integrated whole.
How?
Money
I have a plan by which we can strategically make the trades we are all wanting to make.
We all want to do one thing with this stock... What is it guys?
We want to run it to 8, CASH OUT + SELL DOWN to $0.03....
THEN RUN IT TO 12, CASH OUT + SELL DOWN to $0.06....
THEN... Stick with me guys.... RUN IT TO 18... CASH OUT, + SELL DOWN to $0.09
Now that would seem like enough... But to make it happen, we are going to have to spend some of our profit.
When we get a successful run to 8... We are going to need to hit the $0.08 on the head
Then we have to be willing to spend half our profit to bring it back down to $0.03
7 weeks in between runs rinse, wash, spit, repeat
If the stock goes nuts in between our consolidation period then we are still holding perhaps 25-30% of our base
And we have a decent profit on hand from doubling it already.
Following this we can make one or two more runs and then go big... We will have money to market + build.
Start date... Meaning - When are we prepared to actually market this company and make it run?
October - Halloween. To be honest and everybody stick with me last point in close
Everybody and I mean everybody should hit the streets on Halloween with 4"x4" HYSR Cards, Brochures, ETC
Advertise Advertise Advertise
Next run can be NEW YEAR again, Advertise Advertise Advertise
Are we stock promoters? No... We promote Renewable Energy Solutions... Stuff that will save the world.
business plan in progress, time to market seems perfect to me
The market will react to Hydrogen as a transportation fuel and bein on the front end of renewable Hydrogen production will always result in profits in economies of any scale
If we make smart deals - land investments - and a certain degree of liquidity/ability to pick up and move, we could get a lean clean and green company started and bridge the gaps out here
Guys I'm starting a Hydrogen Production facility!
A blend of HyperSolar and Solar+Electrolysis
We have some technical gurus here I have now noticed
I think we should COLLABORATE
I'm prospecting a facility located in MN with primarily MN investors to begin with
Then going big time once we the first facility financed -- Perhaps under either "Unici Energia"" or "Lumi Unici" brand become a public traded stock
bhmltn7 at live.com
we're a well educated group... =) BFF's?
HYSR Focus=Cutting Edge R/D
It has been indicated to me:
".. WE just want to focus on hydrogen production, knowing that if we accomplish that, other valuable chemicals can be produced using the same process."
They're only focusing on R/D and are waiting for the market to catch up =)
Accumulate freely at these prices
Eric McFarland notes on Urgency of Climate Crisis
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wene.177/abstract
A massive transformation of the global energy supply system is required if deep reductions in atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions are to be achieved. A top–down review of historical data and energy forecasts provides a perspective on the magnitude of the challenge. Global engineering capability has expanded significantly over the last two decades, accommodating more than 100 GW/year increase in electricity generation infrastructure. However, business-as-usual demand forecasts to 2050 will require more than double the global rates of energy project execution. Transforming to a low-carbon energy supply mix requires 30–70 GW/year of additional infrastructure, due to the increased reliance on intermittent renewables, and the earlier-than-expected replacement of existing coal power plants. Although all power systems share many similar subsystems that will need to be delivered regardless of the technology type, meeting the extra demands for engineering design, construction and/or supply chains may not be possible. The discussion focuses only on physical limitations of electricity generation, specifically around the timing and scale of retiring and/or replacing coal-fired power generation capacity to meet the International Energy Agency's two-degree scenario. We ignore the economics and politics of the transition scenarios and the transformation of the transportation and industrial sectors. What is clear is that the longer the delay in starting a significant transformation, the greater the challenge will become. Decision makers must understand the constraints to technology transitions to deliver effective policy. A broad international consensus is not required, instead reaching agreements and developing economically sustainable pathways to technology transitions in the United States, China, and India is more likely to be successful and the only means for significantly curbing global emissions.
I concur!!
Email me brother! bhmltn7 at live.com
1.4v Milestone = $$$$$$
100% correct-Poor Execution on my behalf
I really hope to get this trading in the right direction soon
There is real opportunity here and great things "on the horizon"
Anyone with the faculty and resources with enough vision to see will be a happy camper by August
SEPTEMBER RUSH COMING LOAD IT UP
MARK MY WORDS BOYS
WE ARE "coming of age" THIS SEPT
Consiglieri Financial: Horizon Fund
My MARKETING/Investment branch is incorporated.... $$$$ Ready to Rock!!!!!!
HyperSolar still my dream ticket to freedom & establishment
I love the vision love the product love the real world potential of this
Let's settle in grab a seat enjoy the company and make a way for ourselves in the world
#GreenTech2015
#ClimateNeutral2030
All the ORIGINAL HYSR HOLDERS PLEASE CHECK IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BLEKKO COMING BACK SOON SOON SOON FULL OF POWER
HYSR 1.8volts !?!?!?!?!? PUSH for the FUTURE...
This is one opportunity and we need to show Tim Young our power, we are his aides he is our leader -- Lets be fearless lets take the dream from a vision to a reality
This SEPTEMBER I'm making us all millionaires
Mark your calendar
Start your engines
Say a prayer & we are in there baby!
People are flipping for 1-4% on the daily lets blow them out of the water and get back to our 13¢ PPS, flip that and sell off down to 8, then reload for 33¢
PJM-This is solid info-Great Post!
My life is upside down brothers, I will be back soon.........
Stay Strong HYSR Family!!!
Goofy reply?!? Cid is on another planet
UCSB BIOSOLAR Went 185% -- HYSR NEXT!!!
HOLD STRONG BROTHERS
WE NEED TO MARKET THIS STOCK!
Remember I emailed Tim and he is doing everything he can to NOT issue shares but he does need FINANCING to make the action happen!
IMHO BIG NEWS With the new Aqueous production methods we are taking strides forward!
Hey sorry for information delays....been awfully busy!
Hope to have new research and information coming soon,
Right now working on some projects and starting my first solar farm, financing, etc
UN SDG's. "Six months to save the world"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/we-have-six-months-to-save-the-world-says-leading-economist-10291729.html
G7 Countries to phase-out fossil fuels by 2100
https://euobserver.com/environment/129013
G7 leaders agree to phase out fossil fuels by end of century
The high-level backing by G7 countries - Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US – increases the likelihood of almost 200 countries agreeing to a long-term goal when they meeting for climate talks in Paris in December.
The conclusions after the meeting in Bavaria, southern Germany, said the Paris agreement should have “binding rules at its core to track progress towards achieving targets”.
They also call for a “legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force” that would apply to all countries.
“Binding is a very important term”, said German chancellor Angela Merkel after the two-day meeting ended.
The G7 also endorsed for the first time a global target of a 40 to 70 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, compared to 2010 levels.
According to press agency Canadian Press, which quoted sources that have seen a draft text, Canada and Japan have been trying to water down the text, attempting to keep any binding targets out of the conclusions.
Merkel said the conclusions were “the result of very hard work”, but refused to single out which delegations were dragging their feet.
Both Merkel and the French president were praised for the outcome.
“To get the US, Canada and Japan to agree to this is a remarkable achievement by Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande, and a good sign for the negotiations," said Michael Jacobs, advisor to the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate.
The G7 also noted that the earth's average temperature must not be allowed to rise above 2 degrees Celsius, but this is a pledge that has been made before, including at international climate talks.
More importantly is the statement “that deep cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions are required with a decarbonisation of the global economy over the course of this century”.
It is the first time that G7 leaders speak of decarbonisation - reducing to zero the carbon emissions from fossil fuels - of the global economy.
That means that by the year 2100, there are roughly two outcomes for fossil fuels.
One is that energy production has shifted away from coal, oil, and gas – the three fossil fuels which according to the International Energy Agency, in 2012 accounted for about 81.7 percent of the world's energy.
The other is that fossil fuels are still used, but their emissions are captured before they would have been released into the air.
However, the technique of carbon capture and storage, is still at an experimental stage.
Within minutes of the publication of the conclusions on the G7 website, climate groups and business organisations sent out positive reactions.
Greenpeace activist Kelly Mitchell called the result a “powerful call to move the economy away from fossil fuels and towards an renewable energy future”.
Others noted that investors will feel more confident about putting money towards renewable energy.
“This long-term decarbonisation goal will make evident to corporations and financial markets that the most lucrative investments will stem from low-carbon technologies” said Jennifer Morgan, head of the Global Climate Programme at the think tank World Resources Institute.
“From an investment point of view, this announcement from the G7 today only serves to further highlights that fossil fuels now and in the future are a poor risk”, said Tim Buckley, director at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
DIY H2Generator Particles
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/ra/c4ra04807e
Patterning PEDOT:PSS and tailoring its electronic properties by water-vapour-assisted nanoimprint lithography
We present a new water-vapour-assisted nanoimprint lithography (NIL) process for the patterning of the conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The process was optimized with respect to relative humidity, applied pressure and temperature (RH, p, T). The control of environmental humidity was found to be crucial. High quality nanostructures were reproducibly obtained at high relative humidity values (RH [greater, similar] 75%), with sub-100 nm resolution features attaining aspect ratios as high as [similar]6 at [similar]95% RH. The developed process of water-vapour-assisted NIL (WVA-NIL) strongly affects the electronic properties of PEDOT:PSS. By current–voltage measurements and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy we demonstrate that the process parameters p, T and RH are correlated with changes of PEDOT:PSS conductivity, work function and states of the valence band. In particular, an increase in the films conductivity by factors as high as 105 and a large decrease in the work function, up to 1.5 eV, upon WVA-NIL processing were observed. Employed as an anode buffer layer in P3HT:ICBA bulk heterojunction solar cells, PEDOT:PSS processing was found to affect significantly the device performance.
BLEKKO's back! =) JoseSD Wins"Quote Of The Month"
JoseSD:"Hahahaha i'm sure blekko is in Moscow now...pulling some strings to manufacture de H2 generator there..."
Honestly I love this news out of Iowa... Right when I was talking to Tim about manufacturing and processes they start dropping clues!!
I'll kick in overdrive on DD and we should be whipping these babies up DIY@Home by the end of the week!!!
Let's go to Mars! Someone catapult this out the atmosphere I am working on funding/financing
Still figuring out where I'm going to get in on this, maybe my home brand of fueling stations idk
Tim says that the world is pushing towards utility scale power plants when I want to pus towards DIY@Home Off Grid type applications
I'm sure there will be a happy balance
DD links coming at close of one fort night
Jose-Your predictions continue to be surprisingly accurate
My HYSR project is called Magic beans
So far avoiding IP concerns
In all seriousness I am in branding phase though
HYSR Illuminati, read the signs $0.020=2.0Volts
The truth is out there
They're hitting 2.5v and 5v as you saw in January
PR machine gaining traction! Lift-off coming soon!
HyperSolar featured in major news outlets, that means the volume will be rolling in soon !
I'm convinced $$$$$$$$$$!!! HyperSolar H2Generator reigning [inter]national press!!!!
In all honesty somebody please tell me how you think HYSR got in the Guardian
Do u think they paid them off? Ha
Do you think they compensated w shares? Laughable
This is called the business world - AND Tim Young has our back here folks!
He's trying to make a PUSH back for the 0.05 PPS valuation And PUSHING to double our MKT CAP
spoke with him AT LENGTH and we are in the hands of a CEO who is now FIGHTING FOR HIS INVESTOR BASE!!!!!!
We are making it happen folks see u soon
BLEKKO
HYSR BUY Territory. Ladder In/Out@Pivot Points Guys
Chart to come!!!!
ASK always RUNS... What about the BID!!!!
With no bid support this is a house of cards
That's why they don't mind diluting to no avail they would rather eat steak and print shares for their friends than let DOGS like us get much more than a scrap off the table
Buy and hold for 5 years and you will have a 270% gain
If you aren't holding that duration bye bye
Ppl out here will prefer something with liquidity and structured growth I'm just saying watch this do what HYSR did if it doesn't then I'll be happy I will be back in 1/3 weight EOM and this sucker will be right at my target lolol
Haha remember volume does tend to fluctuate from day to day
I like your style though I think we have potential in this stuff
You gotta trust me partially and try to let this ride down a bit though !
There's no volume on either of these stocks and there's no BID support either so just like a dear friend and HYSR fan told me "the best favor you can do to all your shares is try to sell some of them"
Then tell me what profit you locked in. These numbers are imaginary.
No bid support - Floating ASK - Dilution powerhouse
They will come through some day but we don't know what tier of the pyramid we're on they are floating and bouncing and diluting and volume still hasn't picked up.
Even stocks like Hanergy Thin Film hit a level where they become fixed until they reach their next tier of production or growth
If this was really taking off we would have 40 million volume every day I'm just saying we can see what tune you are singing next week and continue to have our discourses at no charge =)
im not saying don't buy CABN I'm saying be cautious if you are just making entry
Im making a whole website about HYSR CABN and SLTD I mean so far in loving the potential but there is not bread and butter on the table that I know of anywhere you have to play the highs and lows think or swim to make a buck out here
Excited for next PR! Jose get the calculator
What date and time will the stars align?
Jose... Come on
"HYSR to buy a solar manufacturer? A Hydrogen company? I don't get it... "
You making me look bad out here bruh,
Hyper-SOLAR? "hydrogen company" based on solar
BIGGEST hurdle will be CHEAP manufacturing in a world that doesn't need better solutions - Yet.
They are satisfied with what they have and SLTD will build upon what they have in that regard.
To make these old dog manufacturers interested in learning a new trick you have to give them a big cut of the pie a big slice of the Millionies.
They don't want our product until it beats substantial efficiency points and outshines their Standard Solar PV Systems
We might as well buy a flipping MANUFACTURER THAT ALREADY GENERATES REVENUE - With Financing, of course, and use the profits to pay for our R&D. This is what SLTD did in regard to their acquisition of Solar Installation companies.
Then we can utilize a branch of their existing warehouse space and transition the production line to our new method of manufacture.
We could then purchase a secondary manufacturing company and do the same. Do this in two key locations in the Midwest. Then create a 3rd branch in house yourself so you have three strategically placed plants to start from.
Utah Mississipi and Minnesota
Not sure but No BID support here? I don't think we can expect to have a strong bid support any time soon, do you?
I want to take up small positions in a few companies but they appear to have no support at the bid price
Appears only 1 MM on Bid... And
I intend to wait to buy... There is no volume available at this price, it instantly goes to .0105 of anyone buys shares. If we let it sit down here for a while.. Maybe there will emerge some liquidity
If it doesn't come down let's start buying small positions in the June.
What say ye?
Trail Buy Limit & Sell Limit on this
"The Great Transition" Author:Seven Surprising Realities
http://www.earth-policy.org/mobile/releases/seven_surprising_realities_behind_the_great_transition_to_renewable_energy
Seven Surprising Realities Behind The Great Transition to Renewable Energy
EPI Releases May 13, 2015
The global transition to clean, renewable energy and away from nuclear and fossils is well under way, with remarkable developments happening every day. The Great Transition by Lester Brown, Janet Larsen, Matt Roney and Emily Adams lays out a tremendous range of these developments – here are seven that may surprise you.
1. Solar is now so cheap that global adoption appears unstoppable.
The price of solar photovoltaic panels has declined 99 percent over the last four decades, from $74 a watt in 1972 to less than 70 cents a watt in 2014.
Between 2009 and 2014, solar panel prices dropped by three fourths, helping global PV installations grow 50 percent per year.
Deutsche Bank notes that as of early 2014, solar PV was already competitive with average residential, commercial or industrial electricity rates in 14 countries, and in California – even without subsidies.
By late 2014 there were nearly 600,000 individual PV systems in the United States, almost twice as many as in 2012. This number may well pass 1 million in 2016.
In 2013, just 12 percent of U.S homebuilders offered solar panels as an option for new single-family homes. More than half of them anticipate doing so by 2016. Four of the top five U.S. home construction firms – DR Horton, Lennar Corp, PulteGroup and KB Home – now automatically include solar panels on every new house in certain markets.
In 2007 there were only 8,000 rooftop solar installations in coal-heavy Australia; now there are over a million.
Saudi Arabia has 41,000 megawatts of solar PV operating, under construction and planned – enough to generate up to two thirds of the country’s electricity.
For the roughly 1.3 billion people without access to electricity, it is now often cheaper and more efficient simply to install solar panels rooftop-by-rooftop than to build a central power plant and transmission infrastructure.
2. Wind power adoption is rapidly altering energy portfolios around the world.
Over the past decade, world wind power capacity grew more than 20 percent a year, its increase driven by its many attractive features, by public policies supporting its expansion, and by falling costs.
By the end of 2014, global wind generating capacity totaled 369,000 megawatts, enough to power more than 90 million U.S. homes. Wind currently has a big lead on solar PV, which has enough worldwide capacity to power roughly 30 million U.S. homes.
China is now generating more electricity from wind farms than from nuclear plants, and should have little trouble meeting its official 2020 wind power goal of 200,000 megawatts. For perspective, that would be enough to satisfy the annual electricity needs of Brazil.
In nine U.S. states, wind provides at least 12 percent of electricity. Iowa and South Dakota are each generating more than one quarter of their electricity from wind.
In the midwestern United States, contracts for wind power are being signed at a price of 2.5¢ per kilowatt-hour (kWh), which compares with the nationwide average grid price of 10–12¢ per kWh.
Although a wind farm can cover many square miles, turbines occupy little land. Coupled with access roads and other permanent features, a wind farm’s footprint typically comes to just over 1 percent of the total land area covered by the project.
Wind energy yield per acre is off the charts. For example, a farmer in northern Iowa could plant an acre in corn that would yield enough grain to produce roughly $1,000 worth of fuel-grade ethanol per year, or the farmer could put on that same acre a turbine that generates $300,000 worth of electricity per year. Farmers typically receive $3,000 to $10,000 per turbine each year in royalties. As wind farms spread across the U.S. Great Plains, wind royalties for many ranchers will exceed their earnings from cattle sales.
3. National and subnational energy policies are promoting renewables, and many geographies are considering a price on carbon.
Unfortunately, governments worldwide still subsidized the fossil fuel industry with over $600 billion, giving this aging industry five times the subsidy that went to renewables.
But by the start of 2014, some 70 countries, including many in Europe, were using feed-in tariffs to encourage investment in renewables.
Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) or quotas are in place at the national level in some two dozen countries. More than 50 states and provinces in various parts of the world have them as well, including 15 states in India and 29 states plus the District of Columbia in the United States.
Some 37 countries, including the US, have national production or investment tax credits for renewable energy.
Some 40 countries have either implemented or are planning national carbon pricing mechanisms. A May 2014 World Bank report counted a further 23 subnational jurisdictions pricing carbon. Seven regional cap-and-trade pilot programs are already under way in China, for example. When China rolls out its planned national cap-and-trade program in 2016, roughly a quarter of global carbon emissions will then be priced.
4. The financial sector is embracing renewables – and starting to turn against fossils and nuclear.
The financial services firm Barclays downgraded the entire U.S. electricity sector in 2014, in part because in its view U.S. utilities are generally unprepared for the challenges posed by distributed solar power and battery storage.
In January 2013, Warren Buffett gave solar energy a huge financial boost when his MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company announced an investment of up to $2.5 billion in California in what is now known as the Solar Star project. At 580 megawatts, it will become the world’s largest PV project when complete in late 2015. MidAmerican had earlier bought the Topaz solar farm in California, now tied with Desert Sunlight, another California project, as the world’s largest at 550 megawatts. As of its completion in late 2014, Topaz can generate enough electricity to power 180,000 California homes.
Ted Turner has teamed up with Southern Power, a utility serving eight states from California to North Carolina, to acquire seven solar plants approaching a combined 300 megawatts. The largest is a 140-megawatt solar park in Imperial County, California that began operating in October 2013.
Large investment institutions, such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, are channeling tens of billions of dollars into renewable energy. Stuart Bernstein, who coordinates Goldman’s investment in this area, talks about “a transformational moment in time” as renewable energy takes off. Thinking long-term by investing in the transition to a cleaner energy future, he says, “will be important from a societal perspective, and it will be good business for us and our clients.”
5. Coal use is in decline in the United States and will likely fall at the global level far sooner than once thought possible.
U.S. coal use is dropping – it fell 21 percent between 2007 and 2014 – and more than one-third of the nation’s coal plants have already closed or announced plans for future closure in the last five years.
Major U.S. coal producers, such as Peabody Energy and Arch Coal, have seen their market values drop by 61 and 94 percent, respectively, as of September 2014.
The Stowe Global Coal Index – a composite index of companies from around the world whose principal business involves coal – dropped 70 percent between April 2011 and September 2014.
China still consumes more coal than the rest of the world combined, but usage fell in 2014, possibly signaling a peak in usage.
While India has not committed to cap or reduce its coal use, it recently doubled its tax on coal mined domestically or imported into the country – a revenue transfer that simultaneously discourages the use of coal and provides investment capital for solar generation.
6. Transportation will move away from oil as electric vehicle fleets expand rapidly and bike- and car-sharing spreads.
Bike-sharing programs have sprung up worldwide in recent years. More than 800 cities in 56 countries now have fully operational bike-share programs, with over 1 million bikes. In the United States, by the end of 2012 some 21 cities had 8,500 bikes in bike-share racks. By the end of 2016, this is expected to climb to over 70 cities with close to 40,000 bikes.
The share of carless households increased in 84 out of 100 U.S. urban areas surveyed between 2006 and 2011. And as urbanization increases, this share will only rise.
Car fleets are plateauing or have begun to shrink in most major car markets, including the U.S., Europe and Japan.
Car-sharing programs are expanding rapidly. The Frost and Sullivan research group projects that the 3.5 million drivers enrolled in car-share programs worldwide in 2013 will soar to 26 million by 2020.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance projected worldwide electric car sales would hit 300,000 in 2014, and while this is less than 1 percent of total auto sales, the industry is “in the process of passing through the credibility barrier.”
Ultimately EVs and PHEVs will challenge the dominance of traditional gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles, and this may happen sooner than most people realize.
The global financial services firm UBS projects that by 2020 battery costs will be slashed in half, making electric vehicles cost-competitive with traditional cars. With annual savings of up to $2,400 expected on fuel costs, the electric car becomes the obvious choice.
About 80 percent of the remaining oil reserves are held by national oil companies – not by private oil majors like ExxonMobil and BP, meaning that remaining access to oil will have geopolitical implications perhaps even beyond what we’ve seen to date.
7. Nuclear is on the rocks thanks to rising costs and widespread safety concerns.
For the world as a whole, nuclear power generation peaked in 2006, and dropped by nearly 14 percent by 2014.
In the United States, the country with the most reactors, nuclear generation peaked in 2010 and is now also on the decline.
U.S. nuclear power is becoming too costly to use, as the cost of operating aging U.S. plants is rising five percent per year.
The world fleet of nuclear power plants averages 28 years in age, begging the question of whether to repair older plants or simply close them.
Four U.S. reactors were retired in 2013 because it did not make economic sense to continue operations.
As of late 2014, some 31 countries were still operating nuclear power plants, but scarcely half as many – mostly countries with centrally planned economies – were building new ones.