Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Another Contrary Indicator at work.
They make a call and it goes the opposite way.
One of the best technical Indicators I use.
Abit too drastic. Why not just fire him and get a real leader in there.
600 employees choking the life out on LONGS with expenses .All while dumping shares at low prices to pay those ernployees.
Listen to nothing by a couple of pushers here. Follow what the market has been screaming out for 3 years.
They have as many as 500,000,000 shares authorized. They've undoubedly sold some into the market already.Additionally, they just added $13 million in debt financing for their Derby project at high interest rates.
The question I'd have why are they so willing to depress the sh/ px at such low prices by selling into it to raise cash. Seems to me Expenses are eating into cash with insufficent revenues to offset it.
If they had sufficent cash on hand and any degree of confidence in their near and long term growth, wouldn't it be prudent to wait for the stock to appreciate,& raise cash at more favorable terms.
What you're hearing from certain board promoters is flowery statement about coming projects, increases in revenues , and a closing inon a profit.
Don't listen to any of it.It's all promotional guess work with no basis in fact.
It's being manipulated up a penny. Damn those scalpers. LOL
There's much to learn grasshopper.
This is a good start.
https://www.dummies.com/book/business-careers-money/personal-finance/investing/general-investing/investing-for-dummies-9th-edition-282306/
Never used the phrase imminent. More like possible and it still is.
But hey; it'll be a bargain supreme. Wait and load up.
Dig that hole deeper. You seem to enjoy it.
If you're happy with $1.48 after having bought at higher levels, it doesn't take much to make you happy. Even the huge losses you bought puts a smile on your face.
Having bought shares at multiple levels higher, and you're elated if it ever gets to $1.48 again ???
You're truly comedic.
The 3 blind mice are bragging now that they bought shares at a low price here.
The only reason they would post and announce that is they're seeking affirmation that they did the right thing.
What that means to me is, they really don't have the confidence in their purchase and need other fellow Bulls to affirm it.
Can't give you a target low. The avg px analyst have on it is $1.48 with the low of $1.00.
According to Peter Lynch ( highly respected on Wall Street) his formula says FCEL has a negative worth which means it could go much lower but not necessarily.
In effect, there's little or no fundamental reason to own the stock at all. That's been the case for years. The company's results confirm it.
Terchnically its trend continues decidedly down.
So what a Bull is left with is a bad gamble. History proves that as those same Bulls bought every drop only to see the stock go lower.
A couple of them on this board have no understanding or appreciation of fundamentals or T/A. There results prove that.
When the fundamentals change and the technicals line up, it'll be a time to be serious about owning shares. Right now, FCEL is selling shares into the market.
How's that for confidence?
Best advice is to sit on what you have and cross your fingers. Avoid what you hear from te pushers.
Can't get past $1.00. How's it going to get to $1.60 ?
In your reasoning , If/when it get to $.50 it'll be a screaming buy.
Ever think there's a reason why it struggles to stay above $.80 ?
Tell me its "manipulation" going on for 3 years. LMAO
That answers the WHY. I couldn't figure out why the stock didn't pop on the news .
Wasn't aware they made this announcent in Sept.
Notice the 3 blind mice added shares thinking the news was something to write home about. CLUELESS !!!
The Toyota announcement today joined by FCEL's FEW, re: trigen is the 1st solid piece of news the company has annonced. It may be enough to move the needle to $1.00 or so.
Finally something to talk about.
No filling stations. Shell just closed a bunch of them.
There's the hoot.
Where's the filling stations? Besides, California is 1 state of 50. There's a world out there w/o a place to fill.
The interest rate of the Derby financing from 2 banks is 7.25% and 8%.The loan is for $13 mil subordinated but the company will receive $11.2 mil after fees are taken out.
Dilution will continue in order to make payrents
Stock reacting accordingly. The market doesn't see the Derby projects financing or the return from it as a positive.
"Quote" I am buying all I am able.
FCEL need that for their dilutive behavior.
Here's the shovel. Dig a little deeper.
$1.00 is where it stops. Charts don't lie especially when they back up fundamentals.
When the quartertly is released you'll see another loss. This time and due to the lack of announced revenues the expectation is once again to disappoint.
Duyring the quarter the company sold into the market to raise much needed cash to build out their plants. The expense from this accomplishes 2 things:
1) It offsets any benefit the company may derive from the meager sales it gained.
2) It ensures a wider loss/sh than otherwise would have been expected.
Note: Sales may increase from its 55% drop in the prior quarter. The slight increase compared to the drop shouldn't impress.
Lest we forget, the company is diluting your value every time they sell into the market. And, on top of that, they're borrowing . Thus weighing on the financials.
All professional analysts, trusted for their objective and thorough research, see losses through 2029. They've been saying that for 3 years and THEY ALONE HAVE BEEN RIGHT. Compare their record with the promoters and observe the results. The difference is startling.
LMAO. Not only possible; but assured. I've been saying it for years following analysts research. And guess who was right.
Check the record.
What you excuse to "manipulation" is savvy traders knowing where and why this stock and company belongs. 3 years of "manipulation" ??? Give it a rest and stop the comedy .
If you or Hogwash had a scintilla of understanding of what the markets takes into account when valuing a company and its stock , you both would know that fundamentals, technicals and trusted analysts research are what the market considers.
All of that is reflected in the company reports, their earnings or losses and what the market sees as reasonable expectations of the future.
It's not what you contrive will be. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. Wise Up. The both of you belong where you are........ In the deep abyss you've put yourself in.
Small adjusment today suggest a follow through beyond $1.00 is ridiculous. Recall the support at $1.00 was busted. That now is resistance.
Since no fundamentals can drive the stock much higher, watch for the selling to come in not to far from here.
To say $2.00 in May, is pure promotional non-sense. Nothing technical ( much less fundamental) can justify that.
WHILE THE MOTLEY FOOL WRITES THERE'S SOME HOPE FOR PLUG, HE WOULDN'T BUY PLUG,FCEL OR BLOOM. FCEL AND BLOOM LOSSES 10 CONSECUTIVE YEARS EACH.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/04/23/why-plug-power-bloom-and-fuelcell-energy-stock-pop/
10 years of consecutive losses. mORE TO COME.
Debt added doesn't help the bottom line at all. Especially when they have enough of it.
What's the return after costs and repayment ?
He and Hogwash don't read anything but links talking about the "potential" of hydrogen. they block out what doen't serve their purpose. That's why they share the same deep hole.
Quote " Where's the $.50 share you promised last week"?
If it gets to $.50 it'll still be overvalued. The "potential" you blabber has no value. Show me where it is in the quarterly report numbers.
You do realize it has a negative worth according to Peter Lynch.
The proof is in the price and the direction. Put you're "saying anything " up against the analyst research, the markets acceptance of your views, the technicals, the fundamentals and the companies bottom line.
What do you get? $.86.
Explain that!
Get ready. They'll "manipulate " this down to $.50.
Wow! Geez with all those fundamentals why is there no strong buying support to offset it. HUH
And that means Sales. Where are they. Surely a 55% drop in sales last quarter doesn't bode well for the cause.
Remember, the same expectations of huge increases in Sales was bandied about before the last quarterly report. In this quarter, have you heard any sales announcements from the company ? I haven't!
The market, analysts, and those understanding existing, past and expected future fundamentals have priced all of what you believe will bare fruit in. They price it at $.86 cents which by the way is more than its negative worth.
In fact , one might say its way overvalued now.
Quote " Stock under $2.00 is insane; let alone $1."
No really when one looks at the value of FCEL according to Peter Lynch's calculation. Actually it turns out the company has negative value.
He did his Due Diligence and the markets respects it.
Yes; " It can only get better from here"
That's because it can't get much worse.... you hope.
It'll be on its back for years . That's what experts say who do honest and trusted Due Diligence.
Quote " It defies magination".
Not yours ! It runs rampant withHogwash.
The King is sitting on his crown. He continues to embarras himself.
Meta has nothing in common with FCEL. In the last 3yrs Meta ran from $100/sh to over $500/sh. In the same period FCEL went from just under $12/sh to $.86.
And FCEL's performance came when the whole market moved to new historic highs. Does that tell you something about "numbers". The performance of FCEL reflects their fundamentals which do not exist.
If you're referring to Peter Lynch's valuation of FCEL , his formula is widely accepted on /Wall Street in its analysis of a company's value.
Your leader threw out a valuation based on nothing. He called it Due Diligence. As you can easily see its not.! It's pie in the sky based upon zero Due Diligence. Had he done any his evaluation would be factual.
Your comments are really clueless. You appear to be willing to embarras yourself.
According to Peter Lynch the value of FCEL Corp is (negative) - 1.2 USD. He sees the upside as (negative) - 239%.
His formula has been used by Wall Street to determine the true value of a company.
Read on . Avoid contrived values. They haven't done honest DUE DILIGENCE
https://valueinvesting.io/FCEL/valuation/fair-value#:~:text=As%20of%202024%2D04%2D19,Energy%20Inc%20is%20%2D229.3%25.
Broken. Follow the indicators. Follow the Trend.
https://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?show=&insttype=&symb=fcel&x=41&y=14&time=8&startdate=1%2F4%2F1999&enddate=4%2F25%2F2024&freq=1&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&comptemptext=&comp=none&ma=1&maval=100&uf=8&lf=4&lf2=256&lf3=512&type=2&style=320&size=2&timeFrameToggle=false&compareToToggle=false&indicatorsToggle=false&chartStyleToggle=false&state=10
Hybrids is where the sales are. Hydrogen vehicles wii pickup the droplets.
Check Fords Sales yesterday and note where they're coming from.
Then , where's the H2 filling stations especially outside Ca.
The credibility and therefore as reflected in the trend of a stocks price is contingent upon its acceptance by the the market and is shown as such in the research done by professionals. If any of what you read comes from outside sources, rest assured their motivation is not objective and not complete. Its solely promotional in its content.
Witness the myriad of promotional posts made over years past. Has any come to fruition?
Check the record. Check the results. Compare them to what professionals have written.
The stock is $.88 for a good reason. That's the facts.
Assumptions do not flow to the bottom line. Expenses do. Sales creations are futuristic assumptive thinking; not factual,
55% drop in sales quarter to quarter is not a basis for improved results.
Reality is what the market prices in. It has what is believable; not what could be.
It that the same "win-win" that was said they have in So. Korea.? Um; what happened?
Wait; and wait; and wait.
I trust you realize that revenues can as much add to losses as they could reduce losses. Expenses offset sales.
The so-called "good news" you celebrate has not direct benefit to FCEL; nor does it speak to sales to FCEL or the expenses they would occur.
The post you respond to is no more than a promotional piece designed to convince others . It still opens up a pandoras box of questions and doubt.