Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
when enough people realize that our monetary system is complete shit...and then perhaps find out how it was stolen from us and used to enslave us forever (in theory)...then, perhaps things will change for the better. when the intelligent good people are sufficiently awakened and informed...then, critical mass for positive change may happen. the how and when are anyone's guess. 5% or so of the best folks has often been sufficient in the past. i seek to live fully, satisfactorily and in my own unique fashion. i am no one's slave.
it's disgusting. some consider us to be their property. the system is set-up this way and it continues to move evermore in that direction...ie. showing us by force who controls and who does not. truly a nightmare reality...unfolding and manifesting itself by design.
to reiterate...the societies of this world are sick and insane:
News from Alex Jones:
Mock gunman terrifies students
Jerry Allegood
News & Observer
Sunday, March 2, 2008
http://infowars.net/articles/march2008/020308gunman.htm
'I have known about Jersey paedophiles for 15 years,' says award-winning journalist
EILEEN FAIRWEATHER
UK Daily Mail
Sunday, March 2, 2008
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/020308paedophiles.htm
Military heat ray gun zaps 60 Minutes reporter
David Edwards and Chris Tackett
Raw Story
Saturday, March 1, 2008
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/010308gun.htm
video: Alan Watt - Flashmobs, Revolutions and brainchips
Entropiate
41 min 33 sec - Jun 13, 2007
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4543855892537509598
This presentation has been assembled to support Alan Watt's audio release of 13th April 2007 entitled "Pathocrats' Conspiracy Agenda for an ... all » Upcoming Generation". The discussion is based around the recent UK Guardian coverage of an MOD think tank report outlining the "future strategic context" facing Britain over the coming years. In other words, this is not a conspiracy theory but a declared plan of action from the actors themselves. Forewarned is forearmed
Alan Watt - The Capstone That Killed JFK and The Speech That Sealed His Fate
29 min 1 sec - Jun 20, 2006 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8789700203199905805
Alan Watt in this mostly audio but with some video, talks about who killed John F. Kennedy. There is included a great speech ("The President and the Press" speech April 27, 1961...according to Alan, this is why JFK was killed - bartermania) by JFK which is both funny and poignant. http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com
video with Alan Watt as guest (around 40mins worth) Outside the Box # 48 (Featuring Alan Watt)
Alex Ansary
59 min 50 sec - Apr 20, 2006 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3828044841557742823
Former Shortwave talk show host Alan Watt joined me from his home in Ontario, Canada. We discussed secret societies, mind control, and ... all » deprogramming. His website - www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
-----------------
- very good show! Alan's got a pretty good grip on most things. no one's perfect and neither is language...for transmitting information. still, Alan's one of the best out there. - n/b/k
so many cowards and sleepwalkers. INTEGRITY is more valualbe than gold! either the idealists will win this battle or the end of humanity is near (simplified but a summation...remnants are possible). that is how i see things. major changes are coming. strong individuals are the only hope for human survival. the insane elite do not see themselves clearly...what they believe will save them (life extending tech and controlling sentient AI) from my p.o.v., looks like completely flawed thinking. they are parasitic and weak as individuals. they will fuck us/do their best to fuck us but, in so doing they will likely doom themselves. these evil fuckers really really suck. i see an intense compression of events on the horizon...many will die...and it will not likely all be because of economic collapse/chaos and ignorance. we shall see...perhaps.
interesting isn't it? fuck authority! think for yourself. make up your own mind. our societies are shams/cons that control, enslave and killed us off intentionally. what a sick fucking disgusting mess. this world makes it hard for me to not hate.
(dang-it...i hit the wrong button)....so, here's that reply again:
well, it would seeem to me that much of what goes by the general designation of human created law is crap! this is part of the matrix of evil that enslaves. it must be undone as well. it is certainly severely unjust. so much work to be done...in the freeing of one's mind and body on this earth. i hope this is not a fatal human flaw. there is no room for secrecy in governments and in institutions at this time. the current systems are systems of death.
- the calm before the storm - the scientific tyranny is being implemented. supercomputers crunch the #'s and the scenarios. free-thinking/freedom-loving individuals are the enemy. the trends continue to point toward and add up to very bad things for the freedom lovers/idealists/individuals of the this world...and specifically, for those on this piece of land called the US.
Leah LaChapelle was on Jack Blood's show today discussing her new book (below). - interesting -
http://www.co-creatornetwork.com/
schedule: http://www.co-creatornetwork.com/showschedule.html
Central Show Schedule
11:00am "What We're Thinking About" with Ken Ludwig hour 1 (live Tue,Wed,Thur)
12:00pm "What We're Thinking About" with Ken Ludwig hour 2 (live Tue,Wed,Thur)
1:00pm "Unzipping Reality" (previous broadcast)
2:00pm "Unzipping Reality" (re-broadcast of last show)
3:00pm "What We're Thinking About" hour 1 (re-broadcast of today's show)
4:00pm "What We're Thinking About" hour 2 (re-broadcast of today's show)
5:00pm "Unzipping Reality" with Leah LaChapelle (live)
6:00pm "What We're Thinking About" hour 1 (re-broadcast of today's show)
7:00pm "What We're Thinking About" hour 2 (re-broadcast of today's show)
8:00pm "Unzipping Reality" (re-broadcast of today's show)
Unzipping Reality
Host: Leah LaChapelle
E-mail: commonsense@fearorlove.com
Website: www.fearorlove.com
Call-in: (512) 782-4387
Skype-Call-in: on-air-call-2
Show Time: 5:00pm - 6:00pm CST - Mon - Fri
LEAH LACHAPELLE lives with her husband, Wayne, in Austin, Texas and is the mother of four children. She has been active in local politics and in bringing people together in the local community. In 2005, she started the business, Liberty Rising Productions. She is a speaker, has a local access TV show, "Fear Or Love" and is frequently heard as a guest on various radio broadcasts. This website, FearOrLove.com is a great source for information and materials for purchase on the distinctions of the First and Second Awakenings. Leah can be heard on www.co-creatornetwork.com where she hosts her live stream show, "Unzipping Reality" Mon.-Fri. 5:00-600 pm CST.
Her passion is to dismantle fear-based thinking and to discover new possibilities for a new paradigm to emerge for Humanity through unconditional love. Her encouragement for that to actualize is to "Trust the Process!"
http://www.fearorlove.com/ http://www.fearorlove.com/home.htm
Subject: RE: Your field guide as your travel down the rabbit hole... Feb 26, 2008 1:59 PM
from: VANMETER SAYS FREE RENO NOW
Body: RE: Your field guide as your travel down the rabbit hole...
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: BreakTheB0x (www.TruthNetRadio.com)
Date: Feb 26, 2008 6:51 AM
The highest caliber in Patriot Media, these websites, created by hosts of TruthNetRadio.com, are an exhaustive documentation of the crimes of the New World Order against we the people.
Thought-Criminal.org
RogueGovernment.Com - BlackListedNews.Com - Thought-Criminal.Org
RSS Feeds; get the latest NWO news delivered straight to your toolbar!
Network clip 4mins
just heard this on Alex Jones's show:
"Taxi To The Dark Side" - Trailer
3 min - Apr 25, 2007 - (188 ratings)
the Bush administration's policy on torture, the filmmaker behind Enron: the Smartest Guys in the Room takes us from a village in Afghanistan to Guantanamo and straight to (....)
more evidence of the insanity of the system and the insane who built/run & control it...for their own benefit only:
Traitor Greenspan Urges Gulf States To Abandon Dollar
Former Fed chief's insistence that Arab nations dump greenback peg could lead to economic chaos in America
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 26th, 2008
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/022608_abandon_dollar.htm
i caught this when it was repeated last night (links after post)....
MySpace bulletin post from: VANMETER SAYS FREE RENO NOW
Date: Feb 26, 2008 1:59 AM
Subject: RE: RENO RADIO interview!!!
Body: RE: RENO RADIO interview!!!
Please come over to tnrlive.com to catch the rebroadcast of Cirino Reno Gonzalez interview from todays Global Reality Show with Josh Reeves and make sure you catch tomarrows show too for part 2 of the interview.
here
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Sir Charles Karate
Date: Feb 25, 2008 3:32 PM
For those that don't know, Reno was arrested by Federal marshalls for his support of Ed and Elaine Brown. He never actually committed any existing crime, so they made some up to fit the occasion... He's been in jail since September awaiting trial. In two weeks it will be six months. Speedy shmeedy this is homeland insecurity!
First they came for the Trade Unionist...... And I said nothing.....
-SCK
gpandtedsmom !READY!
From: Lori
Date: Feb 25, 2008 7:09 PM
From: VANMETER SAYS FREE RENO NOW
Renos interview rebroadcasted on TNRlive.com Global Reality Show w/ Josh Reeves later tonight!
--------------------
http://www.tnrlive.com/
CHECKOUT THEIR CHATROOM! I WILL BE IN THERE AS "NONENTROPIC" (when i'm logged-in that is). I REGISTERED THAT ID.
schedule: http://www.tnrlive.com/index.php?page=schedule
excellent selection of news items to read on the home page as well. at some point soon, it'll go in the iBox. - n/b/k...bart...whatever :)
WAKE THE FUCK UP! A.R.M.: American Resistance Movement 4mins 8secs
5mins 54secs video: NO, I WILL NOT COMPLY! PERIOD
PREMEDITATED MERGER
North American Army created without OK by Congress
U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight domestic emergencies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 24, 2008 1:45 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57228
"In May 2007, WND reported President Bush, on his own authority, signed National Security Presidential Directive 51, also known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, authorizing the president to declare a national emergency and take over all functions of federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, without necessarily obtaining the approval of Congress to do so."
those quotes really piss me off! some people are so arrogant/so full of themsleves/so full of sh!t. nice finds todd.
Never before seen video interview of Reno at the Browns (20mins 11secs)
From: VANMETER SAYS FREE RENO NOW
Date: Feb 23, 2008 4:29 PM
Subject: never seen before video interview of Reno
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-4525506565267233353&hl=en
thanks to Terry Melton
------------------------------
NORTHCOM Furthers NAU Police State Agenda
Published on Thursday, February 21, 2008.
Rogue Government - Lee Rogers
http://www.blacklistednews.com/iNP/view.asp?ID=5676Source:
RON PAUL ON THE MAIN MALL
Sponsored by Students for Ron Paul
Saturday, February 23rd, 2pm
The University of Texas Main Mall
Open to the public
With live music by
Jimmie Vaughan, Horton
Brothers, Blueprint Rebellion
and more!
http://ronpaulaustin.com/feb23/
http://wtprn.com/
http://ronpaulaustin.com/
------------------
- worth putting on both boards -
RON PAUL ON THE MAIN MALL
Sponsored by Students for Ron Paul
Saturday, February 23rd, 2pm
The University of Texas Main Mall
Open to the public
With live music by
Jimmie Vaughan, Horton
Brothers, Blueprint Rebellion
and more!
http://ronpaulaustin.com/feb23/
http://wtprn.com/
http://ronpaulaustin.com/
similarminds.com...hmm, yes i know it well. stay away from that "nonentropic" character/individual (on it's forum)...for he is me and i am scary-strange or something :) ...if, one ever goes there. you have been warned.
Montana Threatens Secession from U.S.:
a MySpace bulletin post from: VANMETER SAYS FREE RENO NOW
Date: Feb 21, 2008 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: Time to move to Montana?
Body: RE: Time to move to Montana?
Sounds good to me...Im game.
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Truth Hurts ~ A Pain Necessary To Cure
Date: Feb 21, 2008 4:30 AM
Montana Threatens Secession Over 2nd Amendment?
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Dave 4 Ron Paul 1
Date: Feb 21, 2008 8:03 AM
Hmmm!
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Mudd(R-PA)
Date: Feb 21, 2008 6:17 AM
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: ANI GIT UR GUN QUAY1 ***READY***
Date: Feb 21, 2008 9:14 AM
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: MAX FAN (NASCAR/Ron Paul/LSU/Cowboys)
Date: Feb 21, 2008 6:01 AM
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: DavidReedy
Date: Feb 21, 2008 12:14 AM
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: CharlesCopeland.com
Date: Feb 21, 2008 12:02 AM
Let the Second Amendment War ... Begin!!!
==========================
Montana Threatens Secession from U.S.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Sources: District of Columbia v. Heller
List of involved officials
Montana Secretary of State Brad Johnson's Comment in the Washington Times
In
District of Columbia v. Heller,
Does a "collective rights" view of the Second Amendment breach Montana's contract for statehood?
The United States Supreme Court (herinafter "Court") will soon consider D.C. v. Heller, on appeal from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court has agreed to resolve the narrow issue of: “Whether D.C. laws violate the second amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes.”
Although having narrowed the question under consideration, the Court must necessarily decide whether the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution secures an individual right to keep and bear arms, or a collective right for states to arm their National Guards.
Viewing this question from the perspective of diverse citizens, the current state of law is different, depending on where the citizen lives. The various federal circuit courts of appeals have ruled differently on this question, causing the Second Amendment to mean something quite different for a person residing in San Diego, California than it does for a person residing in San Diego, Texas. To resolve this difference is at least part of what will result from the Court's consideration of Heller.
About the facts in Heller much has been written. It is not necessary to reproduce that discussion here.
What is important here is that what the Court rules in Heller will have import far beyond the narrow focus of the Court's declared intent. The Court's ruling will have an impact on all states, and upon all people living those states. It is the purpose of this essay to disclose one considerable impact that may not be apparent unless this argument is advanced to the Court.
Although the argument made here is specific to the State of Montana, this argument may be valid for most, if not all, other states.
Synopsis of argument
A collective right interpretation of the Second Amendment by the Court would breach Montana's Compact with the United States, a contract entered into in 1889, a time when no authority seriously held a collective right view and therefore no part of the intent of the contracting parties.
Compact with the United States
When Montana entered into statehood, that event was accomplished via the legal mechanism of the Compact with the United States, now preserved at Article I of the Montana Constitution[1]. Other documents which will enter into this discussion include the Organic Act[2], the Enabling Act[3], Ordinance 1[4], and the Proclamation of Montana statehood by president Harrison[5].
Montana's Compact with the United States (hereinafter "Compact") is a bilateral, written contract or agreement that binds the parties thereto. Compact defined: Bouvier's, 1839[6]; Bouvier's, 1856[7]; Webster's, 1884[8]; and Black's, 1910[9]. "The terms 'compact' and 'contract' are synonymous. Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 1, 92, 5 L, ed. 547."
The only difference between a compact and a contract in any reasonable usage of the terms as they apply here is that a compact is more generally an agreement between or among states.
Montana's Compact shares many points in common with usual, bilateral contracts. It includes competent parties, subject matter, legal considerations, mutuality of agreement, and mutuality of obligation.
In this context, the term compact also has considerable overlap with the term "treaty." For some aspects of consideration of the effect of a compact, treaties are more nearly analogous, because treaties are always between nations or states, or the treaty-making authorities of nations or states. Further, treaties often contemplate a longer time span than usual contracts, as does Montana's Compact. Treaty defined: Black's, 1910[10]; and Bouvier's. 1856[11].
It is a bedrock principle of contract interpretation that contracts must be interpreted so as to give credence to the intent of the contracting parties. This principle is so well established as to need no elaboration here. The same principle applies to treaties. From Bouvier's Law Dictionary of 1914, "Treaties should be liberally construed, so as to carry out the apparent intention of the parties to secure equality and reciprocity between them; Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 10 Sup. Ct. 295, 33 L. Ed. 642. When made with an Indian tribe its words are to be construed as an Indian would understand them; Jones v. Meehan, 175 U,S, 1, 20, Sup. Ct. 1, 44 L. Ed. 49." and "While they are to be liberally construed, they are to be read in the light of conditions existing when entered into, with a view to effecting the objects of the parties; Rocca v. Thompson, 223 U.S. 317, 32 Sup. Ct. 207, 56 L. Ed. 453."
Intent of the parties
When Montana entered into statehood and adopted the Compact as a part of the Montana Constitution of 1889[12], included was a provision guaranteeing the right to bear arms to "any person."[13]. The right to bear arms reservation was at Article III, Section 13 of the 1889 Montana Constitution. This was exactly the same language as used in the territorial Montana Constitution of 1884[14]. The language was unchanged in the revision and readoption of the Montana Constitution in 1972, with the RKBA provision being lodged at Article II, Section 12[15].
To be clear, the wording of the right to bear arms reservation in the Montana constitution is exactly the same today as it was in 1884, and as it was in 1889 upon adoption of the Compact. This reservation of right clearly and unambiguously contemplates an individual right for "any person," language that simply cannot be respun to somehow mean a right of state government. As the Montana Supreme Court has said, the individual rights reserved by the people to themselves in the Montana Constitution are specifically a direct bar to government actors. (St. v. Long, 216 M 65, 700 P2d 153, 42 St. Rep. 643 (1985)) This is contradictory to a theory that when the people of Montana reserved themselves this right they somehow meant to confer authority to government actors.
Militia Act of 1903 was the beginning of the National Guard and directed the federalization of the National Guard. "The National Defense Act of 1916 … transformed the militia from individual state forces into a Reserve Component of the U.S. Army - and made the term 'National Guard' mandatory".[16] Since the National Guard was not invented or authorized until after 1900, there could have been no understanding in 1889 that the purpose of the Second Amendment was to authorize the states to arm the National Guard.
According to the Organic Act [2], the people of the Montana Territory were required to devise a constitution that met certain requirements in order for Montana to become eligible for statehood. Therefore, Congress, acting as agent for the several states, had full opportunity to review the proposed Montana Constitution as a result of passing the Enabling Act (February 22, 1889)[3] that allowed Montana to become a state. That is, Congress knew full well that the people of Montana had reserved the right of "any person" to bear arms, and found that reservation not inconsistent with the federal system and the Second Amendment. "It is further to be observed that treaties are the subject of careful consideration before they are entered into, and are drawn by persons competent to express their meaning, and to choose apt words in which to embody the purposes of the high contracting parties." (Rocca v. Thompson, 223 U.S. 317, 32 Sup. Ct. 207, 56 L. Ed. 453.)
Further, before Montana was allowed statehood, and as a part of the contract, the Montana territorial legislature, on behalf of the people of Montana, was required to approve Ordinance 1[4]. In its fifth paragraph, Ordinance 1 declared, " Fifth. That on behalf of the people of Montana, we in convention assembled, do adopt the constitution of the United States." This adoption was on February 22nd, 1889. Certainly, the Second Amendment, in the exact same verbiage as it occurs today, was a part of the "constitution of the United States" that was adopted and accepted by Montana in 1889 via Ordinance 1.
In the proclamation of Montana statehood, by President Benjamin Harrison, dated November 8, 1889[5], he specified that Montana had been required to prepare and adopt a constitution that "not be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States …" Further, he declared, "Now, therefore, I, Benjamin Harrison, President of the United States of America, do, in accordance with the provisions of the act of Congress aforesaid, declare and proclaim the fact that the conditions imposed by Congress on the State of Montana to entitle that State to admission to the Union have been ratified and accepted and that the admission of the said State into the Union is now complete." It was accepted in contract that in Montana, "any person" had the right to bear arms.
Conclusion
In 1889, Montana and the other several states entered into a contract - struck a bargain. That contract was reduced to writing and is found today as Montana's Compact with the United States and is recorded at Article I of the Montana Constitution. In that contract, via adoption of the corollary and required Ordinance 1, Montana adopted the U.S. Constitution, definitely including the Second Amendment. Congress and the President, acting as agents for the states, allowed Montana into the union contingent upon Montana proffering an acceptable state constitution. That constitution, as it was accepted by Congress and the President, included the reservation of the right of "any person" to bear arms, a clearly individual right maintained and asserted today in exactly the same verbiage used in 1889.
There is no question that the contract into which Montana entered for statehood was predicated upon an understanding that the people of Montana would benefit from an individual and personal right to bear arms, protected from governmental interference by both the federal and Montana constitutions. That was the clear intent of the parties to the contract.
Therefore, any holding that the Second Amendment merely gives the power to the state to arm its National Guard would violate Montana's contract, because it would be in conflict with the intent of the parties of the contract at the time the parties entered into that contract.
Some speak of a "living constitution," the meaning of which may evolve and change over time. However, the concept of a "living contract," one to be disregarded or revised at the whim of one party thereto, is unknown. A collective rights holding in Heller would not only open the Pandora's box of unilaterally morphing contracts, it would also poise Montana to claim appropriate and historically entrenched remedies for contract violation.
Endnotes
[1] Montana constitution, Article I: "All provisions of the enabling act of Congress (approved February 22, 1889, 25 Stat. 676), as amended and of Ordinance No. 1, appended to the Constitution of the state of Montana and approved February 22, 1889, including the agreement and declaration that all lands owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes shall remain under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the congress of the United States, continue in full force and effect until revoked by the consent of the United States and the people of Montana."
[2] Organic Act: http://www.leg.mt.gov/content/mtcode_const/organic_act.pdf
[3] Enabling Act: http://www.leg.mt.gov/content/mtcode_const/enabling_act.pdf
[4] Ordinance 1: http://www.umt.edu/law/library/Research%20Tools/ORDINANCE%201.doc
[5] Proclamation: http://courts.mt.gov/library/proclam.pdf
[6] Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1839; "COMPACT, contracts. In its more general sense, it signifies an agreement; In its strict sense, it imports a contract between parties, which creates obligations and rights capable of being enforced, and contemplated as such between the parties, in their distinct and independent characters. Story, Const. B. 3, c. 3; Rutherf. Inst. B. 2, c. 6, 1. 2."
[7] Bouvier's Law dictionary, 1856; "COMPACT, contracts. In its more general sense, it signifies an agreement. In its strict sense, it imports a contract between parties, which creates obligations and rights capable of being enforced, and contemplated as such between the parties, in their distinct and independent characters. Story, Const. B. 3, c. 3; Rutherf. Inst. B. 2, c. 6, 1. 2. The constitution of the United States declares that " no state shall, without the consent of congress, enter into agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power." See 11 Pet: 1; 8 Wheat. 1 Bald. R. 60; 11 Pet. 185."
[8] Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 1884; "Com'pact, n. [Lat. compactum, from compacisci, compactum, from com, for con, and pacisci and pangere.] An agreement between parties; covenant or contract; - either of individuals, or of nations.
"The law of nations depends on mutual compacts, treaties, leagues &c. Blackstone.
Wedlock is described as the indissoluble compact. Macaulay.
"Syn. See COVENANT."
[9] Black's Law Dictionary, 1910; "COMPACT. An agreement or contract. Usually applied to conventions between nations or sovereign states.
"A compact is a mutual consent of parties concerned respecting some property or right that is the object of the stipulation, or something that is to be done or forborne. Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 4 Gill & J. (Md.) 1.
"The terms "compact" and "contract" are synonymous. Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 1, 92, 5 L, ed. 547."
[10] Black's Law dictionary, 1910; "TREATY. In international law. An agreement between two or more independent states. Brande (Brande's Dictionary of Science. GM). An agreement, league or contract between two or more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by commissioners properly authorized, and solemnly ratified by the several sovereigns or the supreme power of each state. Webster; Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 60, 8 L. Ed. 25; Edye v. Robertson, 112 U.S. 580, 5 Sup. Ct. 247, 28 L. Ed. 798; Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet. 571, 10 L. Ed. 579; U.S. v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. 407, 7 Sup. Ct. 234, 30 L. Ed. 425; Ex parte Oritz (C.C.) 100 Fed. 962."
[11] Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856; " TREATY, international law. A treaty is a compact made between two or more independent nations with a view to the public welfare treaties are for a perpetuity, or for a considerable time. Those matters which are accomplished by a single act, and are at once perfected in their execution, are called agreements, conventions and pactions."
[12] Montana Constitution, 1889: http://courts.mt.gov/library/1889cons.pdf
[13] "Right to bear arms. The right of any person to keep or bear arms in defense of his own home, person, and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but nothing herein contained shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons."
[14] Montana Constitution, 1884: http://courts.mt.gov/library/1884const.pdf
[15] Montana Constitution 1972; http://leg.mt.gov/css/mtcode_const/const.asp
[16] National Guard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Act_of_1903
STOP THE NATIONAL I.D.
STOP THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION!
BECOME A LIBERTARIAN - STAND FOR SOMETHING!
TOM CRYER - LAWYER WHO BEAT THE IRS (Watch all 4 Videos)
no problem Jim. just tryin' to do the best i can with what i've got in this "World Gone Mad" reality/existence i was born into. there's so much room for improvement though.
what i keep hearing about this stuff (brain implants, the direction and focus of related tech and so on) from folks like Alan Watt and Alex Jones is that the elites plan to create/seek to create/are working to create: a "hive-mind" mentality/reality for the masses...while "they/we" are still needed. their goal is to eliminate all independent thought. that's why they hate individuals. strong independent thinking individuals are their biggest threat and the ones who will undo them...if, it is possible. yup, i can't stand their kind at all.
yes...if, the system remains in place...those who submit to it will likely be chipped and eventually have chips implanted in their brains. the totalitarians seek complete control over all. for them, there is no room for us to have freedom...and this includes free-thought...the ability to think for ourselves.
as a point of fact...and i think jawmoke could vouch for this...he tends to be a mix of intj and infp. i have extremely strong feelings (my internal life...an internal feeling core...called Fi in type theory...the introverted Feeling function). i only keep this in check by being very strong mentally (in type theory...i am high in Ni, Te and Ti/introverted Intuition, extroverted Thinking and introverted Thinking...although on a test i recently took...which i will post below/along with my results...my Fi was the highest). yes, i do have feelings. though i tend not to show them. if, i do show them...watch-out. also regarding enneagrams...i tend to use the three highest scores for myself and i do not use it's so called "wing theory". so with this understanding, i consider myself to be 5-1-8 in that order. again, when i get pushed into my "8" mode i am not only fearless...but, i'm scary as hell. i am being pushed into my #8 mode/main survival frame-of-mind more and more again these days. it is interesting.
--------------
InterStrength Cognitive Assessment
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/assessment/survey.html
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) *********************** (23.7)
limited use
introverted Sensing (Si) ************************** (26.5)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) *********************** (23.7)
limited use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *********************************** (35.7)
good use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ******************************** (32.8)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************* (33.7)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ********************* (21.4)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ****************************************** (42.7)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTJ
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Intuiting (Ni): Transforming with a meta-perspective. Withdrawing from the world and focusing your mind to receive an insight or realization. Checking if synergy results. Trying out a realization to transform things.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Thinking (Te): Measuring and constructing for progress. Making decisions objectively based on evidence and measures. Checking if things function properly. Applying a procedure to control events and complete goals.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENTJ, or ISFP
If these results are different from what you know of yourself, you might consider why your developmental pattern does not align with your expectation. You might also consider exploring this result as a possible better fit.
The Four Temperaments
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Theorist; secondly Improviser; then Catalyst; and lastly, Stabilizer.
----------------
again from another type site i post on:
me:
type 5 again. seems rather accurate now. the 131 question test. link: http://similarminds.com/advtest.html
Type 1 Perfectionism |||||||||||||||| 63%
Type 2 Helpfulness |||||||||| 37%
Type 3 Image Focus |||||| 29%
Type 4 Hypersensitivity |||||||||| 31%
Type 5 Detachment |||||||||||||||| 69%
Type 6 Anxiety |||||||||||||| 55%
Type 7 Adventurousness |||||||||| 40%
Type 8 Aggressiveness |||||||||||||||| 61%
Type 9 Calmness |||||||||||||| 57%
type score type behavior motivation
5 48 I must be knowledgable and independent to be happy.
1 44 I must be perfect and good to be happy.
8 43 I must be strong and in control to be happy.
9 40 I must be peaceful and easy to get along with to be happy.
6 38 I must be secure and safe to be happy.
7 28 I must be high and entertained to be happy.
2 26 I must be helpful and caring to be happy.
4 22 I must avoid painful feelings to be happy.
3 20 I must be impressive and attractive to be happy.
like Al Watt and Alex Jones keep saying (and i have come to believe)...they are inbred psychopaths. they marry each other for wealth/power and control. thus, their psychopathic traits, tendencies and beliefs are compounded/constantly sought out to be genetically and generationally promoted and encouraged. thus, the scourge remains/persists and plagues us.
and when they cannot or no longer can control our minds...they will seek to control and/or eliminate us by force.
excellent post! it's all about control. we are pumped full of dualities (the human mind seems to have a very hard time conceiving of things in non-linear ways) and yet...nothing can exist in this world that does not have three parts/three dimensions. the question becomes: what is the true structure/who's in control/what is the plan...what are the trends...and what seems to be the likely outcome? if, one likes the current State, it most likely benefits one. if, it is not working for you it is likely working against you. unfortunately, there is little middle ground here and almost all...based on the structure/nature/planned operation and design of the system will be devoured by it. the system is designed to and it does enslave the masses. as the elitist tyranny grows...the freedom for the rest diminishes to the same degree. there are other options. they are discussed here. my mind at least, will be as free as i can make it...and as free as is physically possible. to life...no power to parasites.
check this stuff out...it's insane imo (i'll respond to some other posts in a few minutes) :
uranium
http://www.uranium.info/prices/monthly.html
rhodium
http://www.kitco.com/charts/historicalrhodium.html
palladium
http://www.kitco.com/scripts/hist_charts/yearly_graphs.plx
- i think palladium has begun it's move toward the level/the price where platinum now is. that's just the way this commodity works...or at least the way it has in recent years. - bartermania
NEW SUBJECT/TOPIC TO CONSIDER FOR THIS BOARD:
Personality Type Theory
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=7424
I've been studying this stuff rather heavily for the past several years and on and off for about 20 years. but, what made me decide to post this here is that the leader of the Ron Paul Meet-Up group i am still a member of (Saratoga County, NY [82 members]...he runs and/or helps to run the Albany, NY group[s][roughly 180+ & 80+ members or something like this] too i think) posted something about there being a much larger amount/percentage of INTJs in these Meet-Up groups than one would expect to normally find from a general sampling of any group or any sampling of society. he is an ENTJ. a very smart nice social and like-able guy. so far, from about 8 or so people giving their general personality type: there are 3 INTJs (including me) and 2 INFJs. i see both good and bad things from these apparent facts. INFJs and INTJs can be visionary. so, one should not be surprised that folks geared this way would be involved with Ron Paul versus people who tend to operate differently (again, because they are different) at this time. INTJs are often natural leaders but, choose not to be until they believe they need to step-up and be one...perhaps, because no one else can do it and/or they see that no one is doing it well enough. a much larger than normal gathering of INTJs and having them getting involved with things...is both a good thing and a bad thing: it means/says things are really fucked-up people and it also strongly confirms my belief that much of what i believe to be true/actually for the most part is true. INTJs tend to be problem solvers. this is good for the people and bad for the State. but, as i see things...there are still so many folks who are mindlocked by the system/it's programming & propaganda...and this is the way things tend to work historically...the question becomes: will the elite be able to remove those like myself and others who are aware and ahead of the rest/the vast majority...before enough of the rest decide to assist in the Liberation? this is the eternal problem. it looks to me like the elites won for the most part in Nazi Germany, in Russia, in China and many others places at least to some degree (with purges/pograms/internments/death camps/firing squads/or whatever...before enough people woke up to halt the heinous acts and intentional political killings. so far to me, things seem to be favoring the elite...as they continue to slowly cook us alive...and continue to enact laws that will likely in the end come after me and many others. this is the way things work unfortunately. i don't like it.
nice...thanks! i did see it.
Rule by fear or rule by law?
Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg
Monday, February 4, 2008
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
- Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943
Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs."
Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.
According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."
Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps millions of people?
Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order."
The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike.
Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of government" in the event of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency." Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure "continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.
U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955), which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative recommendations on combatting it.
According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a native brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping investigative power to combat it.
A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in sit-ins, civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists, peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list goes on and on. According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.
What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens?
The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.
Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.
This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL
when the economy falls apart...because the "money" disappears back into the banksters' system or more hyper-inflation sets in (imo, last year we did have hyper-inflation...probably 30% inflation or more...it just isn't reported. no surprise there)...then, perhaps something may happen. though this is when the con-artists will likely move as well...or since they are controlling the system...it may happen just before they drop a whopping heap of dung on us. except for the fact that people still keeping waking up to a clearer picture of things...i tend to see all trends and signals pointing toward what is called "ENDGAME". i expect very bad things will occur here in the not too distant future. i think things are bad now...i expect it will get much much worse. be wary/be smart/be strong/be prepared and through it all: Live.
looked like a eugenics experiment on a large scale. the truth doesn't have to be found in a book. there was a religious factor. could've been a Catholics/Jesuits small scale battle against Zionists. WWI, and just prior to this, was where the power grabs occurred. WWII appeared to be consolidation and re-inforcment of the earlier bankster coupes. the Cold War period, a firming up of the false duality: Communistic vs. Capitalistic...the people end up getting Socialism & ever worsening perpetual debt-slavery, while the elite end up owning the Earth.
by contolling our money and by controlling our beliefs, from the barrel of a gun, some create one type of reality.
their motto seems to be conform or die. they want no competition. they are the parasitic/psychopathic secretive lying elite powermad-insane.
i've heard there are other ways to help remove heavy metals from one's body (other cleansing agents/treatments/methods). fwiw...i think not carrying too much body fat is probably also helpful/beneficial. eh, i'm just chatting now.