Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ok dokey
Michael is the new I/R guy. Call the company and ask to speak to him as an investor relations person. Not that big of a deal. They liked that he had been a supporter with good ideas and offered him a job. Which was PR'd. Not a huge conspiracy. If you really think any message on iHub does anything to the share price of a stock - I've got a bridge to sell you. =)
Completely new industry. You should do a little background reading on the history of the cellphone industry, or any of the new online things like Google, Facebook etc.
No director "did well". Looking at PRs and SEDI, it appears that all of the Directors basically held all of their shares that were granted and have been buying more or accepting more in exchange for services. When the data is actually reviewed - it tells a different story.
But he didn't sell the shares. You can say it - I know you can.
He didn't sell 10 million shares. Take a look at the insider site or SEDAR. Come on - false info?
You are citing a commentator who wrote a post about a legal proceeding where he has no clue. There is no new lawsuit. It is a verifiable fact. Not an opinion. A fact. Would you like to retract?
Again - what lawsuit are you speaking of - please point it out.
There's not another lawsuit. Please only spew facts. Thanks.
Is the CEO not entitled to be paid for services? So, there is a scam? assuming he sells those shares right away for 2 or 3 cents, we are talking about him making a max of 7,500 in comp. How about we all save our pitchforks for something legitimate, ok?
Hi B'dog - will you point me in the direction where it shows insiderS selling. From looking at the actual reporting sites it appears that insiders have been buying. So - where is the information to support your assertion. I'd love to know.
https://www.canadianinsider.com/node/7?ticker=ATT
Not required - apparently opinions are all that is required. Hence my belief that locusts are actually running the company.
Oh dearie - good to see your boy doesn't have a creative bone in his body. I guess imitation is the best form of flattery. Don't worry - when you are not coming up with this stuff on your own you'll screw it up at some point. Looking forward to watching you drop back when the "liquidity" dries up. Placing my marker. Smooch!
OK, I hate to do this but... =)
So, should I complain about execution when Lenovo introduces a new laptop computer at CES that I want but can't get my hands on until a few months later? Or Apple when they release a new phone at a PR event and I can't get my hands on it for a couple of weeks ... or a watch that doesn't show up for 6-9 months?
Curious (pun intended) minds want to know...
Can you copy language or link to file?
Criminal investigation? Termination? WTF? There is no criminal investigation and Mike didn't leave the company. Ugh. Where does this nonsense come from?
And what is there to say about the lawsuit now? The preliminary battles were fought and Abattis won. Now the lawyers prep the case, take depositions, find documents. Are they suppose to announce via PR every step they are taking?
I know - it's like a shake down from the mob. And he isn't even being coy about it. Wish I had a gig like that.
I think you may be confused as to what a direct marketing company does. They basically take products and sell direct to consumers - think infomercials etc. If you look at Brazos past life at TriVita you will get a sense of what they are setting up to do: sell CBD infused nutraceuticals directly to consumers and avoiding the wholesale and retail PITA. Most nutraceutical direct marketing occurs out of Utah and other western states as the laws favor operations there. While Canada regulate nutraceuticals (hence the language in the PR) the FDA in the US does not (thank Orin Hatch and the GNC Mormons for that).
Just a little background - it's not a marketing company as in fancy ads, flyers etc - it's to get the products in the direct to consumers sales channels.
Sweetcheeks - you'd enjoy it too much. I'm stoked with the S1 filing - do you know what that means? Liquidity your company could only dream about.
I think I may be confused - everything I've read has said that MMJ taxes go to schools.
Ha. Yes, indeed. Nothing like $2k to point the way to riches.
I'm just not sure what I think of the background of the IR person - what do we know about him? Is he credible? Do you have an insight into that?
Shark - how much info do you now have access to inside the company? What do you think of the new IR person?
True, but rarely are first line entrepreneurs very good with media etc. Zuckerberg - holy cats, for example. It's either something you learn over time or the second CEO is hired to "mature" the company a bit. Mike built the foundation - that is what he is good at, IMHO. Now it is time to build out the rest of the house. Each person has their positives/each has their negatives. They are people afterall - not robots programmed to make the most rational, unemotional response each time. =)
Actually, he took one for the team - perhaps you should dig deeper and think about why he may have transitioned out of being "the face" of Abattis.
Where is it?
I'm not sure why you think I am arguing with you - I answered a question from Shark. Relax.
My point was that everyone always clamors for more and more information from management about what they are doing. No legitimate company provides that type of information - they provide regular no nonsense updates based upon things happening. I want Abattis focused on execution of their business plan - not communicating to every Tom, Dick & Harry what they are doing. I think the recent Twitter communications are not a good thing - that feed should be for official corporate communications and nothing else. So - I hope that the company continues on doing what it does. I am long and don't need day to day reassurance. If they start doing that - their focus is for shrat and the company will never succeed.
It's an introduction letter from the new CEO. Take it what it is and move along. As I've said before, I for one hope that they never get into the back/forth of operations discussions. No legitimate and credible company does such a thing.
I don't have L2 - can anyone post some knowledge about the trading that happened yesterday in the US?
Thanks - forgot to sarcasm is not appreciated. =) Inaccurate facts - ok. Sarcasm - not. Bingo!
Remember - all numbers are from qtr ending 9/31 - so they don't necessarily reflect the last 3-4 months. One thing I hate about the quarterly reporting system, it is always so out of date.
I don't know - the fact that the CEO and CFO put in close to 1million personally to keep the company running in the early years? I love how "shareholders" think that the #1 goal is somehow share price - it isn't. It is to create a sustainable company for the long term. Focus on short term share price is what is phracking the economy and corporate creation.
Hi folks - I don't have PM, so I can't respond to your messages. I got them however. The sell off makes absolutely no sense. If you read the audited financials - there isn't anything that is way off or concerning. The BCSC PR was actual helpful as it clarified where in the process all of the applications are and it is in a better place than I thought - they are actually past the security checks etc. The forward looking stuff is what we are going to start seeing in all the companies reporting through BCSC in the MJ area and it isn't any different than before. I've come to the conclusion that if you are playing in the MJ space and a public company, you sign a deal with the devil (BCSC and HC) that basically gags your mouth from saying anything positive. I'm expecting that while we see more communication from the new CEO - I bet it has less and less to do with MJ due to BCSC and HC.
Thank you for your insightful wisdom.
If you read the PR and compare it to what others say in the area - it's the same. From my inquiries, BCSC is cleaning up lots of companies in the MJ space's PRs and reporting. They are taking a proactive stance to make sure all communications are very conservative in their outlook as BC does not want to become like Ottawa where it's Wild West loopholes for reporting. The fact it wasn't halted is a really good sign that all they wanted was to clean up sloppy communications. If there were serious shenanigans, they would have halted it in a second.
Every share sold is another share bought by someone else. They don't "disappear" or anything. It dropped 1-2 pennies. Let's have a bit of perspective.
Then sell. Take the loss and walk away. If you are cranky about being up a few or down a few thousand, you need to be flipping for pennies. No offense meant - just, is it worth the angst if you get so cranky over a couple thousand?
It's looking like MJ is going to become a commodity which is what I believe HC wants. By being a commodity all of the craziness and wild speculation will tamp down. I think the whole point of HC's process was to get to this point. Especially since HC had no desire to be in the MJ business and the courts foisted it on them. Abattis' plan for diversification is looking better and better as each month goes by.