Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow i cannot think that i almost agree with post just placed
And i am pro TMMI all the way to the top or bottom.
Its not going to make me rich and its won't matter if my penny stock disappears
I dont agree with lines two or 4
We have the Raytheon deal or so it was published and now Geppto avatar
I have spoken with that lady and have only ever found her very professional so maybe you got her on a bad day ??
Do i agree with your last three words .Well if nothing comes to light by say Feb i think its time to vote on that position
Well thats my thoughts
Lets see if this gets deleted :)
Hi Sealife,
I have tried but to no avail to get the questioned posted as it keeps getting deleted.
It is a question that has to be asked to put demented ones to rest with there slander and constant attacks on TMMI
TB
Fracked
I have to say you amaze me how you continue this relentless attack on TMMI even being the share holder you say you are with what i deem are false statements.
You called me a liar about the patent office ! I proved you so wrong ,when i provided a step by step process to the group !! Yes provided by a live person to see the patent challenge you failed to share this with us but all you would do was dare us to call as if we would not !I guess you did not want us to see the patent challenge.I guess this does not concern you
Secondly the same thing applies to Raytheon. Well you said you spoke with the director of IR .Well i will call you on that also as i did call and found out a completely different story.
So how i see this is two side I being TMMI can happily say I sleep really well at night knowing the facts behind what i write and post,and i guess you pro Dementia group say you are truthful with what you post.
All i can say is when this all plays out in the end then the reality of who has been truthful will be very clear.
PS did anyone Google the Dr who wrote the paper for TMMI patent challenge ,where he arguers the entire thirty some lines of what the Patent says all dealing with Prior Art.
Guess what i did ,and here is just a snip it .
Samsung on April 21 launched its own infringement suit against Apple. Dan Schonfeld, a professor of computer science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, testified that Apple infringed the '239 patent in its iPhone through the use of FaceTime and a feature for attaching video to messages and mail.
This guy was expert witness for Samsung in the Apple Samsung tech trial of this decade!.
Is Dementia going to pull out one of the Apple witnesses to challenge Dr Dan Schonfeld ???
You would have to know your stuff to be involved with this.Hmm Hurd Elton compared to this guy are probably realizing just what they are involved with know in the tech world
PS you spend way to much of your time here on this board.Must be nice to have that free time.
I agreee with what has been written about some past shorts.But even they will have to pay the piper soon once this start to go.
Go TMMI
TB
Wow it just gets more snake charming with all these continuous recycled stories.
It is getting old and tired.
For all of those who are really interested in what is happening even more behind the scenes is below.
You don't need to be a insider like you have accused me of or have a phone link to the company or lawyers which i don't !! as this is all for public viewing.
You can call and find out from the patent office Fracked up at the number i gave the board.You are right it does not say injunction.!
TMMI is challenging the ownership of the patent 8639053. Hmm injunction vs rightful ownership.
Petition for interparties review of patent
I think the key wording form the one who wrote the paper was Prior Art.Look at this mans CV who has dedicated his life to video compression.
Man he is so highly respected he was just involved and provided opinions in one of the largest tech suits which just took place.Google his name and you will see which one it was Hmmm just a mom and pop type guy who knows nothing of what he is talking about :)
Sound familiar.
If you want here are the steps to read thanks to the live voice ( Cathy)at the patent office.Its the only way to get information
go to www.uspto.gov
On the left side go down to where it says PTAB.Click on it
Click on the right side where it says Trials
Then click on Patent review process
Then click direct link under PRPS
Click search for proceedings
Put in patent 8639053
Enjoy read.
Fracked this was a phone call away like you said call patent office.
Spin away your story on this .I am sure this is all just a waste of all us share holders money ?
TB
Fracked after your dare to call I did!!!! Thanks you for the dare I am glad i called your bluff
On the contrary to what you said nothing is there .Its the exact opposite Your right there is some very interesting info there which i will let others track down for themselves.
I will give them the info as it is all online for everyone to read.
But frackedup i think the info below will let you know i have .
The number to call the patent office is 1 571-272-7822
Just ask them you want to find out some information on patent 8639053 and 8351509 which demented have claimed to be theirs.
With the help of the real person they got me to where i could only find out info on one of the two.
Its amazing what freedom of information provides to those who want to dig.
Of the two i could i come up with some info on 8639053!
Tracked down a problem for you IPR2014-00804 5/23/2014.Does this ring a bell???
The number again to call the patent office is 1 571-272-7822
For those who choose to call and do your own detective work you will see what else is brewing. Like Frackedup said .He is correct there is no injunction but wait til you read what is.
Good luck to those who choose to call the patent office
TB
This is an open question.
Jay you keep talking about the patents that demented ones have been awarded. 8639053 and 8351509 but that they cannot use.It is an interesting read of what they say but it is also a duplicate of what TMMI said they can do.
Has anyone including you Jay even looked at or called the US Patent office to try to figure out or support what your saying about the above patents and why they have not been able to use?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
I am going to try and make time to call the patent office to get any info on those patents i am just not sure what to ask.I guess a good question would to be is there anything they know going on with those two listed patents that would prevent them from using them would be a good question to start.
If anyone has a better idea on this direction please give your input
Maybe it is just like calling Clark county court house for updates on the law suit.Sometimes you get little tidbits other times nothing
Cheers
TB
Hmmmm
One simple answer to that he was told a bill of goods that DFI who was the ones working on the code for TMMI that DFI merged with DFMI
We all know what happened or did not happen big squat nada
Per there lawyer in court and documented
Well that could have happen but i don't know that was so long ago.
Any corporate merger has files SEC documented paperwork just not food for thought
Keep spinning your sinking ship as it is so full of BH
TB
Our stock is looking just fine.And we will get thru all this market manipulation.
How goes court case discovery have we got any updates.Just looks likes lots of delays.I see the amended complaint was filed and TMMI has asked for jury trial.Guess they just want to get at it right away no more But i am sure once the judge says enough is enough and stop avoiding things.
Can you not just wait for trial on your slam dunk case which was to be thrown out almost 2 years ago?
Good on you
Go TMMI
So did I.!!! I spoke with IR who told me they are doing Joint research program with TMMI
So it comes down to you say one thing and i say another.
I will say yes and you will say No so lets change topic because this yes and no is getting really old.
Lets wait til next week settlement conference which TMM Inc will hopefully just go straight to jury trial,then this will all stop.
Hopefully the unneeded negative chat with the notorious 3 will cease probably sooner than later once they realize they have no where to run there game anymore.
TMM Inc is real and as Stewguts stated when TMM Inc came out of Bankruptcy back when, it was shown they own VDK 1-1.4 as assets and had rights to 1.5-1.9
How can you argue with legal court filings !!! ????
I am sure someone will have a spin on this and cannot wait to read more BH BS
Keep spinning your stories .
I have a feeling you will soon /very soon maybe within a month or so finally call it quits,or have to call it quits when you and your other scammers realize that your years of deceit with this whole technology will finally come crumbling down and you will lose.
I am sure joint research means both parties have a financial commitment of some sort!
This is off course my opinion only from my reading of the court doc's
TB
Our management team and board are just doing fine
Try are crossing all the T's and the I's
For the main event
Well i can personally speak to have calling Raytheon and getting confirmation they are in a joint research program so its up to the readers as what and who to believe.
TB
You say one thing.
I disagree we have the exact opposite.
TMMI has an office,programmers and its own software,also a joint research program with Raytheon( with vdk1-1,4 which it owns outright.No lawyer or judge can argue that it owns that it is working on to improve TruDef so that once it is ready the sky is the limit
Hey Lax Daddy and Jay ,
Can you please ask this question to frack ,Whazz and Bill,
They have put me to ignore because i re asked stewy questions which only needed a yes or no answer.
I guess it is not a question they wan to or can directly answer
Thanks for your help in getting it answered
TB
TMMI Believer Thursday, 09/18/14 02:01:52 PM
Re: 4retire post# 11342
Post # of 11378
OK Bill,
Whats your answer to Stewy!!
I would like to hear your words on this!!!
I would love to hear Fracked and Whazzup give a reply also.
Wont hold my breath as you all seem to avoid a simple answer here.
All he is asking is for a Yes or No.
Not a big detailed side track description.
YES or No
Can you do it ?
TB
Stewguts Thursday, 09/18/14 12:59:00 PM
Re: 4retire post# 11340
Post # of 11347
From what I gather 4retire, you are also representing that the proper documentation exists. Then you would agree as evidenced from the shell games and foreclosures initiated by Panik that he has clearly demonstrated that he possesses an understanding of basic corporate law. Therefore he ought to have known what is needed to be done for there to have been a proper merger to have taken place between the two corporate entities. No?
Corporate Merger Procedures
State statutes establish procedures to accomplish corporate mergers. Generally, the board of directors for each corporation must initially pass a resolution adopting a plan of merger that specifies the names of the corporations that are involved, the name of the proposed merged company, the manner of converting shares of both corporations, and any other legal provision to which the corporations agree. Each corporation notifies all of its shareholders that a meeting will be held to approve the merger. If the proper number of shareholders approves the plan, the directors sign the papers and file them with the state. The Secretary of State then issues a certificate of merger to authorize the new corporation.
So tell me this 4retire, did the above happen?
A simple Yes or No will suffice.
According to 4retire he has me on ignore. If it becomes apparent that he will not respond, could someone else here repost this message to him. TIA
tic toc tic toc...
OK Bill,
Whats your answer to Stewy!!
I would like to hear your words on this!!!
I would love to hear Fracked and Whazzup give a reply also.
Wont hold my breath as you all seem to avoid a simple answer here.
All he is asking is for a Yes or No.
Not a big detailed side track description.
YES or No
Can you do it ?
TB
Stewguts Thursday, 09/18/14 12:59:00 PM
Re: 4retire post# 11340
Post # of 11347
From what I gather 4retire, you are also representing that the proper documentation exists. Then you would agree as evidenced from the shell games and foreclosures initiated by Panik that he has clearly demonstrated that he possesses an understanding of basic corporate law. Therefore he ought to have known what is needed to be done for there to have been a proper merger to have taken place between the two corporate entities. No?
Corporate Merger Procedures
State statutes establish procedures to accomplish corporate mergers. Generally, the board of directors for each corporation must initially pass a resolution adopting a plan of merger that specifies the names of the corporations that are involved, the name of the proposed merged company, the manner of converting shares of both corporations, and any other legal provision to which the corporations agree. Each corporation notifies all of its shareholders that a meeting will be held to approve the merger. If the proper number of shareholders approves the plan, the directors sign the papers and file them with the state. The Secretary of State then issues a certificate of merger to authorize the new corporation.
So tell me this 4retire, did the above happen?
A simple Yes or No will suffice.
According to 4retire he has me on ignore. If it becomes apparent that he will not respond, could someone else here repost this message to him. TIA
tic toc tic toc...
Jay,
Where is the court update.;
I have looked online and don't see a thing
Please advise
Thanks
TB
Did iterated pay MCI/TMMI the approx 20 mil spent on the code back.Nope.
How can they take there money of public investors and then say TMMI has nothing.
Hmm don't think the law will let that happen.
So not sure why you stick to your story when it is so wrong.
How go your patents?What have you done with 8,639,053 and 8,351,509
Much of anything good arising from your patents.Still have not heard about LOI from NABS
Please fill us in
I want to know more about patent injunction jay spoke about can you fill me in
What does it mean to have an injunction against there patent ??Which one
They state they have two
Thanks for the insight
And your point we all understand things take time and money thus joint venture
you are always so negative!
you have made your point as fracked up also has .
why not leave the board alone let the court case fight out and let's let the courts decide
OMG i have to for once agree with the defendant in this case yep nothing saying anything we all know ISI needs to be added to the case but it did not say much else than that,how would they all fit in this picture.
Where in the court filings does it say it was a fictitious claim.
Unless you are the lawyers involved you have no idea why that was dropped from original complaint.I am not certain but i could only bet it was a strategic reason as opposed to being anything else!
Everyone wants to play lawyer.
You guys will continue this day in day out process of beating on each other when in the end TMMI will keep doing what they are with Raytheon and the courts will deal with the rest.
Whazzup/4Retire/Fracked
If you chaps are so complete with your read on financials of TMMI not TMM how did you miss note 13 as Jay found about about the joint research program listed for validation of what was released?
Bill not sure who Phil is but i am quite Able to speak and report for myself as he is not the only shareholder on this board who can fly to Vegas and go to the courts to read while playing in Vegas.
But i guess if what i am saying which seems to be the same Jay is saying ,sealife and a few others i guess we are all the same person also.
Good luck to everyone with TMMI
TB
I personally spoke with Raytheon IR dept and was clear on asking a question about is as an investor in TMMI i read a release that thy are doing a joint research program with TMMI
There response was yes.
I have no reason to lie.
You can take me for what i am saying is the truth or believe fracked or whazz up.
Either way good luck to all TMMI investors
TB
Hey new alais,
I think your point has been made,
Now lets just let things play out as they fall.
Nothing will ever change
Well not being a lawyer but from what was said somehow indirectly HP thru its acquisition of Autonomy which bought MediaBin which intern bought out ISI,somehow with the connection some one will have to be made aware of it in the legal department as it does indirectly involve them.
HP has been in enough hot wage over the last couple of years all on its own after the debacle of accounting errors with Autonomy.
Will just have to wait this out to see what happens.
Lawyers always do like to drag stuff out for there hourly billings.
In the end i am still Pro TMMI right to the end
TB
Where are you getting court notes not even posedt to court site.
When i called the courts to find out minutes court said the only way to know is via lawyers is what transpired.
Is there no such things as legal privacy issues with that?Non disclosure issues
But thanks for sharing if these are the true court note minutes
No Legal merger between the two parties.
DFI and DFMI never legally merged!!
Regardless what is said on the board .
Look to the courts after they approved TMMI and DFI
Absolutely !!!!!!!!!
Bill
Lets just see what happens in court
All the banter back and forth here really has zero impact on end outcome.
IMO the 27-29 people who were part of stealing the codec from the rest of the 8000 plus TMMI shareholders who had no idea this scam was happening will get there due justice in the end.
If you cannot see that then as you say comprehension is an issue.
The big question is for who
TB
Again Iterated cannot pull the plug on the millions TMMI put into developing 1-1.4.
Has nothing to do with VDK 2.0
Lets not confuse the 2
!-1.4 TMMI has bought and paid for
It was TMMI money put it.
If iterated wants to repay tmmi only maybe they could.I am not a lawyer
Guys
That has nothing to with VDK 1-1.4 which TMMI put in millions of dollars to develop.
Not even iterated can pull out of that or i guess they could but what about all the money paid to them for exclusive rights to the codec.
Please explain this.
VDK 1-1.4 not VDK 2.0
You keep saying that and we say different from that .
So why don't you just stop with your negative unwarranted attack on a solid company with solid management
If you believe what you do.
Lets say you are entitled to your points but this is a pro TMMI board
Well we all know very well where you sit.
So why dont you leave the TMM"TMMI" board alone for us who have money in the game can actually share positive info.
I also have seen all court records and with limited education i can see how it all Favors the true owners of the code TMMI
Long for TMMI
The deal with Raytheon is real,just got off the phone with there IR,
So no fluff.
Again i see Jay called and also confirmed it.
Just from a simple phone call
Good luck with your dream
TMMI all the way
I agree with Stewguts.
If you doubt the company sell your stock and be done with it.
If you doubt or question the company morals and management and don't want to call them or believe what they are putting out.
Again phone call or sell and you have not to worry about it anymore
You cannot have two companies using same patent!Or can you?
Who owns the patent dimension or is it rightfully TMMi's
That could be a problem for one of the two
DD
Thanks for that.You have now shown your hand.
One of two things you either worked for iterated way back when so can really only be one of a few people or else you some how got your hands on some ones private codec!!(stolen) Sure not public.
Now please do explain to this public board how you were able to work with VDK 1.4 which was very proprietary and solely owned by TMMI way back when in 1992 when they paid over 20 million dollars for it and prior to that iterated property.
Again it was not for public use.
This should be a very interesting answer which you will try and come up with.
Thanks for this.
Busted !
TB
DD
Have you worked with VDK 1-1.4
Simple yes or no
Your reference to VDK 2.0 is mute as that is not
what TMMI is using
So if not all your stories have zero reference
to what TMMi is doing
Good luck continuing taking about VDK 2.0
On a board with a company not even using
it
You still never answered my original question
TB