Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Bingo! eom
Paule is Walnuts
"Finally, should these words be considered honest debate or am I now an unqualified debater who should be labeled a suicide writer or Internet terrorist? "
ROFLMAO... poke poke poke
Internet terrorist. PGUWL
animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif
Paule is Walnuts
test...
animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif
Paule is Walnuts
Before I read the two messages by Fred and NW( I may or may not respond as the idea of debate is not to win or loose but to further enhance ones scope of understanding and this has obviously degraded into a battle of I’m write you’re wrong) I just want to reiterate one thing…
During this entire conversation I have never not once condoned Ola behavior and have always said I would abide by Matts decision no matter. (like I have a choice)
The entire crux of my argument is that nobody has the right to take away my right to be an asshole simply because they think they as an asshole smell better.And do get me straight everybody is an asshole!
Paule is Walnuts
Mey Matt..More censorship....
Colt and others were talking about politics and starting a related board to politics and guns on the barms board. I showed up to give Colt some help by placing the URL to IHUB politics board. I responded directly to Colt and put OT in front of the post. How much more inoffensive could I have been? Hell its not like I do not let OBG Spam the Bible board as long as he follows his own rules of OT first...
In response the management threatened me with You and how much you hate spammers and deleted my post.
Long live the free world. I'm getting so sick of this shit.
Paule is Walnuts
I did understand Turkey...
But I think the Bible was inserted as a possible reference point for the historical and literary content. My point of contention which I guess I didn't put across well at all, is just exactly what part of say this 8th grade exam would religious texts prepare us for. When we insert these books of religious background we start the cycle of ‘feel good’ and desist in the cycle of pure learning. If we wanted to get back to pure learning the Bible as a reference source would send us backwards, not forwards in this process. Granted the Bible was used as a reference tool in early schools, but simply because the majority had access to them. As the times changed so did the materials made available, increasing the quality of education.
Paule is Walnuts
K2 yes you did and I love you right back eom!
<A HREF="http://www.animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif" target="_new">http://www.animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif</A>
Paule is Walnuts
Hey Husker/Vivian..where do I go to learn how to put the jpegs in my profile sign off?
<A HREF="http://www.animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif" target="_new">http://www.animation-station.com/anigifs/anim1622.gif</A>
Paule is Walnuts
http://dns.ncentral.com/~pgk/images/fox.jpg
Paule is Walnuts
http://dns.ncentral.com/~pgk/images/turkey.jpg
Paule is Walnuts
Israel launched a new invasion in its six-day offensive aimed at crushing Palestinian militias in the West Bank by rolling into Nablus late Wednesday, Palestinian witnesses said. The thundering sound of tank shells could be heard in the West Bank’s largest city as Israeli forces consolidated their hold on all the major towns in the Palestinian territory. Meanwhile, scores of Palestinian gunmen were hiding inside one of Christianity’s holiest shrines in Bethlehem and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat remained under siege in nearby Ramallah.
April 3 —NBC, MSNBC AND NEWS SERVICES
Paule is Walnuts
The Hard Truth By THOMAS L. FRIEDMANApril 3, 2002
A terrible disaster is in the making in the Middle East. What Osama bin Laden failed to achieve on Sept. 11 is now being unleashed by the Israeli-Palestinian war in the West Bank: a clash of civilizations.
In the wake of repeated suicide bombings, it is no surprise that the Israeli Army has gone on the offensive in the West Bank. Any other nation would have done the same. But Ariel Sharon's operation will succeed only if it is designed to make the Israeli-occupied territories safe for Israel to leave as soon as possible. Israel's goal must be a withdrawal from these areas captured in the 1967 war; otherwise it will never know a day's peace, and it will undermine every legitimate U.S. effort to fight terrorism around the globe.
What I fear, though, is that Mr. Sharon wants to get rid of Mr. Arafat in order to keep Israeli West Bank settlements, not to create the conditions for them to be withdrawn.
President Bush needs to be careful that America doesn't get sucked into something very dangerous here. Mr. Bush has rightly condemned Palestinian suicide bombing as beyond the pale, but he is not making clear that Israel's war against this terrorism has to be accompanied by a real plan for getting out of the territories.
Why? Because President Bush, like all the other key players, doesn't want to face the central dilemma in this conflict — which is that while Israel must get out of the West Bank and Gaza, the Palestinians cannot, at this moment, be trusted to run those territories on their own, without making them a base of future operations against Israel. That means some outside power has to come in to secure the borders, and the only trusted powers would be the U.S. or NATO.
Palestinians who use suicide bombers to blow up Israelis at a Passover meal and then declare "Just end the occupation and everything will be fine" are not believable. No Israeli in his right mind would trust Yasir Arafat, who has used suicide bombers when it suited his purposes, not to do the same thing if he got the West Bank back and some of his people started demanding Tel Aviv.
"The only solution is a new U.N. mandate for U.S. and NATO troops to supervise the gradual emergence of a Palestinian state — after a phased Israeli withdrawal — and then to control its borders," says the Middle East expert Stephen P. Cohen.
People say that U.S. troops there would be shot at like U.S. troops in Beirut. I disagree. U.S. troops that are the midwife of a Palestinian state and supervise a return of Muslim sovereignty over the holy mosques in Jerusalem would be the key to solving all the contradictions of U.S. policy in the Middle East, not new targets.
The Arab leaders don't want to face this hard fact either, because most are illegitimate, unelected autocrats who are afraid of ever speaking the truth in public to the Palestinians. The Arab leaders are as disingenuous as Mr. Sharon; he says ending "terrorism" alone will bring peace to the occupied territories, and the Arab leaders say ending "the occupation" alone will end all terrorism.
Like Mr. Sharon, the Arab leaders need to face facts — that while the occupation needs to end, they independently need to address issues like suicide terrorism in the name of Islam. As Malaysia's prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, courageously just declared about suicide bombing: "Bitter and angry though we may be, we must demonstrate to the world that Muslims are rational people when fighting for our rights, and do not resort to acts of terror."
If Arab leaders have only the moral courage to draw lines around Israel's behavior, but no moral courage to decry the utterly corrupt and inept Palestinian leadership, or the depravity of suicide bombers in the name of Islam, then we're going nowhere.
The other people who have not wanted to face facts are the feckless American Jewish leaders, fundamentalist Christians and neoconservatives who together have helped make it impossible for anyone in the U.S. administration to talk seriously about halting Israeli settlement-building without being accused of being anti-Israel. Their collaboration has helped prolong a colonial Israeli occupation that now threatens the entire Zionist enterprise.
So there you have it. Either leaders of good will get together and acknowledge that Israel can't stay in the territories but can't just pick up and leave, without a U.S.-NATO force helping Palestinians oversee their state, or Osama wins — and the war of civilizations will be coming to a theater near you.
Paule is Walnuts
March 31, 2002
Suicidal Lies
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Columnist Biography: Thomas L. Friedman
The outcome of the war now under way between the Israelis and Palestinians is vital to the security of every American, and indeed, I believe, to all of civilization. Why? Quite simply because Palestinians are testing out a whole new form of warfare, using suicide bombers — strapped with dynamite and dressed as Israelis — to achieve their political aims. And it is working.
Israelis are terrified. And Palestinians, although this strategy has wrecked their society, feel a rising sense of empowerment. They feel they finally have a weapon that creates a balance of power with Israel, and maybe, in their fantasies, can defeat Israel. As Ismail Haniya, a Hamas leader, said in The Washington Post, Palestinians have Israelis on the run now because they have found their weak spot. Jews, he said, "love life more than any other people, and they prefer not to die." So Palestinian suicide bombers are ideal for dealing with them. That is really sick.
The world must understand that the Palestinians have not chosen suicide bombing out of "desperation" stemming from the Israeli occupation. That is a huge lie. Why? To begin with, a lot of other people in the world are desperate, yet they have not gone around strapping dynamite to themselves. More important, President Clinton offered the Palestinians a peace plan that could have ended their "desperate" occupation, and Yasir Arafat walked away. Still more important, the Palestinians have long had a tactical alternative to suicide: nonviolent resistance, à la Gandhi. A nonviolent Palestinian movement appealing to the conscience of the Israeli silent majority would have delivered a Palestinian state 30 years ago, but they have rejected that strategy, too.
The reason the Palestinians have not adopted these alternatives is because they actually want to win their independence in blood and fire. All they can agree on as a community is what they want to destroy, not what they want to build. Have you ever heard Mr. Arafat talk about what sort of education system or economy he would prefer, what sort of constitution he wants? No, because Mr. Arafat is not interested in the content of a Palestinian state, only the contours.
Let's be very clear: Palestinians have adopted suicide bombing as a strategic choice, not out of desperation. This threatens all civilization because if suicide bombing is allowed to work in Israel, then, like hijacking and airplane bombing, it will be copied and will eventually lead to a bomber strapped with a nuclear device threatening entire nations. That is why the whole world must see this Palestinian suicide strategy defeated.
But how? This kind of terrorism can be curbed only by self-restraint and repudiation by the community itself. No foreign army can stop small groups ready to kill themselves. How do we produce that deterrence among Palestinians? First, Israel needs to deliver a military blow that clearly shows terror will not pay. Second, America needs to make clear that suicide bombing is not Israel's problem alone. To that end, the U.S. should declare that while it respects the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism, it will have no dealings with the Palestinian leadership as long as it tolerates suicide bombings. Further, we should make clear that Arab leaders whose media call suicide bombers "martyrs" aren't welcome in the U.S.
Third, Israel must tell the Palestinian people that it is ready to resume talks where they left off with Mr. Clinton, before this intifada. Those talks were 90 percent of the way toward ending the occupation and creating a Palestinian state. Fourth, U.S. or NATO troops must guarantee any Israeli-Palestinian border.
"The Spanish Civil War was the place where the major powers all tested out their new weapons before World War II," said the Israeli political theorist Yaron Ezrahi. "Well, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today is the Spanish Civil War for the 21st century. A big test is taking place of whether suicide terrorism can succeed as a strategy for liberation. It must be defeated, but that requires more than a military strategy."
The Palestinians are so blinded by their narcissistic rage that they have lost sight of the basic truth civilization is built on: the sacredness of every human life, starting with your own. If America, the only reality check left, doesn't use every ounce of energy to halt this madness and call it by its real name, then it will spread. The Devil is dancing in the Middle East, and he's dancing our way.
Paule is Walnuts
Ok Husker/ Excel time to change the Ibox.
I'll leave it up to your creative minds.
I look forward to you surprising me with something cool. And Homer Simpson yelling "Jebus save me" just wont do it..lolololol
God is good God is grand and we thank Him every day for His warm gentle and loving hands. Paule
Paule is Walnuts for God
OT:Simply Politics..http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=444
Paule is Walnuts
Hi Vivian,
how are you today? And the rest of our friendly family?
Let me sing you a little song like to hear it here it goes...
Blue moon you saw me standing alone....everybody have fun tonight everybody Wang Chung tonight..
ROFLMAO
Smile.. Despite all the nasty evil things I’ve said throughout the thousand or so chat boards I frequent I still love ya Viv. Now if you'd just quit putting squirrels down Judd’s pants we'd all be happy.
Another ROFLMAO
Smile.
Walnut not today.
Judd I had never heard a real life turkey gobble nor did I know California was loaded with them.
Turkey and the cows was the only thing the ranchers did not allow people to hunt. I think he was building a nice batch for a few years down the road. Man those suckers are loud. Almost obnoxious at time.
Never saw one just listen to a couple go back and forth.
Paule is Walnuts
Castle...
The story was also a play on my handle, Paule Walnuts the cold blooded mobster killer dude...
I knew it would be ..Controversial… the posting of the story but this time I thought what the heck…
Maybe I’ll finish my Alaska story as a way to make it up to you all…lol
Paule is Walnuts
NW,Fred... et all
I asked you if I had insulted you, you said no then proceeded to insult me again.
You wrote that I was taking the meaning of censor and stretching it to fit whatever definition I needed it to. Even after I provided the Merriam Webster’s accepted for over 100 years definition and showed you that my interpretation coheres with that of Merriam Webster’s.
You then provided your own constricted definition of censoring, a definition that does not cohere to the dictionary, actually three online dictionaries, and two thesauruses.Parts do but as a whole it absolutely does not.
“But for me, censorship is an attempt by government or other public authority to restrict or prohibit access to ideas they wish not to have presented.” NorthW
This is only half the definition and ‘government’ is optional for anybody that seeks to, as the dictionary clearly states: ” examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable” Merriam Webster’s
Your implication that only government censoring thought is an acceptable way to use this word, even and although intellectually dishonest, is simply an attempt to bastardize the meaning to suit your own needs. If we all go around changing word meanings to suit our needs we end up with another discussion in regards as to what the meaning of “is” is. I notice that if we adhere to your definition of censor all responsibility is removed for all those who petitioned Matt to do something about Ola. How convenient and self-absolving.
By definition MATT is a censor of Ihub.
Which brings me to why Fred liked this so much. Does he need some new toilet paper? If so I hear Charmin is softer than computer paper the two-ply really sooths them roids.
“ I think applying the term to teachers shushing a student who is interrupting a lesson, or a guest in a private home who refuses to act politely, weakens the term and detracts from what I view as the true evil of censorship”
That is an opinion. And thank you for addmitting your opinion on the matter. In my opinion I do not feel censorship is indeed ”evil” in any way what so ever. I rather take an antiseptic approach to a word that serves us admirably in society daily.
A wise man one said, “Discipline is not a deterrent to happiness but rather a conducer of it. When we censor ourselves, our own actions our own thoughts, others no longer have the need to.”
Now as I said NW what you are seeking is the clarification between justified and unjustified censorship. If you would like to keep the topic related I’d be glad to continue but your feelings outside the accepted sources of information have no bearing. And to present them as factual while simultaneously accusing me of improprieties is extremely intellectually dishonest. It might work in a courtroom but here it is simply insulting.
Paule is Walnuts
Husker..
Printer, scanner, fax, copier, and telephone.. Lexmark x63
I have no idea the overall quality of the machine but the wife likes it and that works for me. Maybe I'll fax something?
Paule is Walnuts
"If you have ever heard a debate at Oxford or Cambridge Universities, you will appreciate the enormous creativity there is in insulting somebody to the core without the use of a single word of profanity."
Touché,… But as CharleyMike stated the thickness of skin still applies. Have you ever seen an intellectual throw a tantrum?
Removes all illusions of perceived superiority.
Paule is Walnuts
A loud machine goes..EHHHHHHH! "xxrayeyes
you are fined one credit for violation of the verbal morality code section 16318 if you insist on using the word "a-hole" a police officer will be sent to take you to a correction facility for assimilation behavioral training immediately. Please be well"
Humor, take it as it was intended.. I guess we just disagree. Some good invective now and then keeps us on our toes.
Be Well.
Paule is Walnuts
I think I understand your point Viv,
The problem with book with religious overtones, as I se it, is that the line between historical fact and religious dogma tend to vary. And with each book come a separate and different interpretation.
Paule is Walnuts
Turkey I have been studying the 18th century with a passion…
Not only are your words so true great people with great minds have spoken them before. Keep on talking friend. I find it refreshing when compared to many interpretations of same subject. The separation state from religion has advanced us forward, to bring us back into the dark ages would be to reconnect the two..
No disrespect intended to any one else.
Paule is Walnuts
Or you could just tell me how and why you disagree...
As a transitive Verb My definition fits every example you have given..
Main Entry: 2censor
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): cen·sored; cen·sor·ing /'sen(t)-s&-ri[ng], 'sen(t)s-ri[ng]/
Date: 1882
: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable
We are asked to censor our own actions and when we do not other do it for us. Some actions are censored by law, Specific to speech the running into a building and yelling fire. Or say Olas behavior on these boards.....
Sorry you will not continue with this conversation. Unlike others I actually listen ponder the position and try to respond in kind. You have always been polite to me no?
Paule is Walnuts
Judd/Waif and board re ticks…
The one that bit me managed to dig itself into my skin. When I looked down I saw most of its body still on the outside of my skin with the head in so I pulled the sucker straight out and tossed it into the toilet. Observing the tick in the water I could swear I saw all legs and a head….
That being said, this is my first tick bite ever. I have a black and blue mark the size of a shirt button. I dug around in there with a needle and didn’t feel any pain. Unusual in itself, as sticking a needle a 1/8 of an inch into ones body normally hurts, the bone about the size of a quarter around the bite hurts like hell. Did I mention the bite is in the belt line of my hip? I cannot see anything in the hole and if squeezed hard enough it does bleed.
Is there something I should look for do at home, or should I head on off to the doctor for some anti biotic?
Next year all my clothes will be sprayed with the Anti-Tick product Waif provided in his web-link.
Paule is Walnuts
To anybody that cares..
I now own a 5-1 so I can start exchanging photos with you all again.
Paule is Walnuts
What Are They Thinking?
Inside the Minds of... Yasser Arafat, Ariel Sharon
By LISA BEYER
Yasser Arafat
It's fair to assume that there are places Yasser Arafat would rather be than imprisoned in his own compound with Israeli tank commanders as wardens. But it's not by mistake that he wound up there. Even if Arafat didn't anticipate exactly how the situation would unfold, this is a war he wanted.
For some time after the first Oslo peace accord in 1993, Arafat appeared to have genuinely embraced the idea of pursuing his political goal--an independent Palestinian state--through negotiations alone. But something flipped. That became evident two summers ago when, at talks at Camp David, the Israelis offered him their best deal yet on a state. By objective measure, the offer still wasn't good enough, but Arafat didn't merely reject it. He could have asked for more or counter-proposed; instead he left the table, went home and fueled a new uprising, which led to this war.
Why? Arafat is old, ailing and preoccupied with how he'll be remembered when he's gone. The only way for him to be Arafat the dealmaker, founder of Palestine, would be to sell short the Palestinian dream. No Israeli leader will give him a state unless he relinquishes claim to all or most of East Jerusalem, allows Israel to gobble up parts of the West Bank to accommodate the Israelis who have moved there and tells the Palestinian refugees from the 1948 war that they can forget about their U.N.-sanctioned right to go back to homes that are now part of Israel proper. On some level, Arafat may understand that all these compromises must be made before Palestine is born, but they won't happen on his watch. At this point he's much more interested in being a hero than in being a leader.
What to do in the meantime? Arafat can't have failed to notice that his approval ratings go up when his people are battling Israel; when things are relatively calm, they have time to notice what a corrupt, incompetent government he heads. Plus, Arafat figures the violence will demoralize the Israelis and soften their positions at the negotiating table. Violence has worked before. The hijackings of the 1970s kept the Palestinian cause alive in a way that Kurds and Basques can only envy. The first intifadeh, though far less brutal than this one, brought the Palestinians the Oslo peace talks. And, most relevant to Arafat today, Lebanon's Hizballah militia compelled Israel to withdraw unconditionally from south Lebanon two years ago--just before the fateful Camp David talks--by bloodying Israeli troops in the field and Israeli civilians along the border. What Hizballah got, Arafat wants too. He can't fight a conventional war with Israel because he has no real military. And so the suicide bombers are his army.
Ariel Sharon
Ariel Sharon isn't all that interested in peace. He would take it if it came his way, but he doesn't actually believe in it. And so he doesn't indulge in dreams of it, isn't inclined to take risks for it on the chance that it might be real.
Sharon does believe in fighting. It is what he has known his entire life. He has participated in each of Israel's wars, starting with the 1948 War of Independence. As far as he's concerned, that battle is still going on. Israel is still fighting for its very life, he believes, because the Arabs cannot be trusted to forego their hostility, let alone to accept that a Jewish state within their midst is an irreversible fact. Perhaps they never will, but a campaign to win their hearts and minds is not the kind of mission he considers his responsibility. The matter doesn't interest him much. Sharon is not much of a global thinker. He is not informed by theory but by what has produced results.
Sharon sees what's before him and what he has already seen, which is lots of fighting, all of it ending with Israel victorious. All but, perhaps, the Lebanon war Israel launched when Sharon was Minister of Defense in 1982. And that wasn't a total loss. Yasser Arafat and his Palestine Liberation Organization were run out of Lebanon and off to a more distant exile in Tunisia.
Even if Israel didn't lose in Lebanon, Sharon did. The country blamed him for the terrible casualties suffered by Israeli soldiers. A government commission judged that he bore indirect responsibility for massacres in two Palestinian refugee camps, Sabra and Shatila, by Israel's proxy militia in Lebanon. Sharon was compelled to give up his beloved defense ministry. His ethic of aggressive vigilance seemed to be discredited, his self-sought image as Israel's superdefender was in shambles. He stood accused of leading the country to excess and to shame. For nearly 16 years, until he became Foreign Minister in 1998, he was shut out of the topflight ministerial posts.
Now is the chance he has been waiting for to say, I was not wrong; it is right to fight. Arafat has shown who he is and his Arab allies have too. They are enemies. Everyone sees that now. They won't make peace. All Israel can do is beat them into a periodic quiet, as it beat its enemies in 1948, again in 1967, again in 1973.
The battle won't stop for good. There will be no ultimate victory. So what? Life is hard. The Palestinians want a state? That is not my problem, Sharon believes. They are Palestinians, he is not.
Already, by fighting, Sharon, whose aspiration to national leadership was so recently a joke, has turned himself into a consensus figure among Israelis. Come to think of it, he does believe in peace. Peace between himself and his domestic detractors.
Superfluous tripe JMO.
Paule is Walnuts
OK Board...
All who think it should be removed send a request to NYC and if he feels enough have indicated so, I will rewrite a prettier not so graphic version for the group.
I apologize to any inconvenience.
Paule is Walnuts
Amen Turkey. eom
Paule is Walnuts
Hey Turkey...
Ok fine..Geesh. I still think people should not glamorize this sport as much as they do. I think its anything but..JMO television has put illusions in my head that were instantly wiped clean during each hunting experience. I do understand what everybody is saying but I think there should be a compromise. Yes my story was a little over the top but hey…At least it was truthful.
And yes that is what we go for. Trophies are not on Pres list at all, as he is a meat hunter. Just as I told the guide when he apologized about to me for not getting one, I told him that I ended up with the equivalent of veal in the form of wild pig, and that was fine with me. If I absolutely have to get a trophy I’ll go to Russia and get in the record books.
I went down to the meat market today to get prices for when Pre returns home. He carries a freezer in the back of his truck so the meat will not go bad during his 2-day trip home.
And btw one of the guides is 67 years old …we will be booking the fourth annual pig hunt shortly.
And just to make perfectly clear. Every law was obeyed to the letter. I will not operate anyway else.
Paule is Walnuts
Yeah I thought about that NYC...
My first draft had a disclaimer, If that makes you feel any better.
One thing you have to admit after reading my post however. Most if not all illusions have been removed. I prefer people to know what they are getting themselves into before they run out and say “Hey this sound like fun…” Many people in their writing do a lot to make this sport out to something it is not. I think. And many a person recoils away in shock and horror after they experience the truth. Although extremely fun and rewarding Its hard dirty nasty work.
During this trip I listened to one of the guides talk about this same thing. How his hunters would come and see for themselves just what transpires. After they experience and whiteness first hand the brutality involved the guide ends up doing the deed himself. The hunter never comes back. Many complain about the dogs others about the chase. To me it does not matter if those people had done the proper research and not been led to think otherwise they would have been more prepared in deciding to subjugate themselves to this type of hunting in the first place.
Maybe old Colt could step up and tell us about hunters he has guided, along with their various reactions to the style and brutality of this type of pig hunting?
Say what you like about my post, besides being grosser than a pile of maggots I think its honest funny and quite informing..
Pig Killer Paule
Paule is Walnuts
Welcome back Turkey…
Hey about those Northern Pike.. Last years fishing lures for Alaska did not do the trick. The pilot managed to pull in one lousy (ok 24”) Arctic char.
This year I’ll be more in the tundra but still next to water. Do you have any suggestions for lightweight equipment set up with plenty of options for the various fish available?
I was thinking about buying the Cabelas travel combo both spinning and fly set up. I won’t be fly-fishing but removing the reel provides extra space for lures and such…
I will gladly accept all suggestions
Paule is Walnuts
xxrayeyes.. I must disagree...
I hub does indeed tolerate abusive posters. You sirs are talking to one of them. I just choose when to pick my shots more carefully than others. Most of the time. If IHUB was not so tolerant as to welcome and accept my kind, Your kind would die of boredom.
This post reminds me of the movie Demolition man.
"Cauctoes ideas of a perfect society are 40 year old virgins sitting around thinking happy happy joy joy thoughts singing I wish I were an Oscar Meyer wiener!"Edgar Friendly
"I want high cholesterol" Edgar Friendly
"Anything that is not good for you is bad. Hence illegal." Lalena Huxtly
Paule is Walnuts
BTW Fred
I really do not view Matt as a dictator, More a benevolent Monarch.
LOL
Paule is Walnuts
OK NW the answer is
Yes to all.... What you are really asking the difference between justified and unjustified censorship. I think.
In those cases presented I think justified.
Paule is Walnuts
I type to MS word cut and paste here.
Paule is Walnuts
Of course it is Fred...
The SWAMP is a IHUB chat board brought over here from RB.
We talk about hunting fishing cheep wine and good cookies. A bunch of good people with the standing rules of be nice. Although separated by the state lines Many of us know each other in real life We have our problems our growing pains but we eventually get along with relative harmony..
Please feel free to come over tell a whopper of a tall tale drink some wine and chop our firewood for us. LOL
Paule is Walnuts
Hey Fred...Thank you for your kind words. end!
Paule is Walnuts