Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
WRONG . . . CJ, I have respected all of your due diligence on BVTK but I disagree with your comment "There is no such thing as MM's."
The price is clearly set by supply and demand but that is in the NYSE and in NASDQ.
I just hung up with eTrade and the agent said just the opposite holds true in the OTC. The agent also said the MM's do set the price in the OTC. He also said in the OTC, MM's are not bound by the free market rules of supply and demand.
MM's can sit on a ASK price for as long as they want. And they can put the price anywhere they want whenever they want.
If anyone has a complaint regarding any of the actions of specific MM's, go to either FINRA.org or SEC.gov and let them know. That is our only tool to combat suspected price fixing or price manipulation.
Here are their links to file a complaint against MM's and their attempts to fix or manipulate share price.
https://www.sec.gov/complaint/tipscomplaint.shtml
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-complaint-center
I am long with BVTK and I understand the risk and reward proposition but lets be clear on the FACTS.
The 21 million share transaction at the end of the day looked like a buy at .000999
MARKET MAKERS SETTING SHARE PRICE FOR BVTK ,
DAY TRADERS ARE LAUGHING THEIR ASK OFF AT HOW INCOMPETENT YOUR PRICING STRATEGY IS.
IT IS PRETTY OBVIOUS THESE FLIPPIN' SELLERS ARE USING EMAILS, TEXTS, PHONE CALLS AND EMAILS TO COORDINATE MASSIVE SELLOFFS TO DRIVE THE PRICE DOWN SO THEY CAN SIMPLY REBUY AT A TICK OR TWO LOWER AND THEN RESELL ALL OVER AGAIN WHEN THE PRICE CLIMBS ONE OF TWO TICKS.
EACH TIME YOU LOWER THE PRICE A TICK, THESE PARANAS WHO ARE LAYING IN WAIT SIMPLY JUMP IN AND BUY - NOT TO SUPPORT THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY BUT TO SIMPLY FLIP A TICK OR TWO LATER. QUIT DROPPING THE ASK PRICE!!!!
IT IS EXACTLY LIKE YOU ARE LEAVING THE CASH DRAWER OPEN WITH A HUGE SIGN THAT SAYS "HERE, TAKE OUR MONEY - WE ARE IDIOTS"
THE SOLUTION IS TO CHANGE YOUR PRICING STRATEGY AND GO TO A SLOW AND STEADY INCREASE OVER TIME. IT MAY BE BORING BUT IT WILL ELIMINATE SOME OF THE DAILY FLIPPERS WHO BUY ONE MINUTE AND SELL THE NEXT.
PERSONALLY, IT DOESN'T AFFECT ME ONE BIT BUT I BELIEVE YOUR PRICING STRATEGY IS IDIOTIC AND REFLECTS POORLY ON THE COMPANY.
FRIDAY WAS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF WHAT WORKS. 99% OF THE DEALS WERE BUYS AS PRICE STAYED ON A SLOW AND STEADY PRICE INCREASE FROM .0008 ON UP TO .0010
WHAT WAS YOUR GOAL OF GAPPING UP 40% TODAY IF YOU WERE JUST GOING TO LOWER THE PRICE 15 MINUTES LATER - THIS PRICING STRATEGY SIMPLY ALLOWS THOSE THAT SOLD EARLY TO JUST REENTER AND BUY BACK IN AT LOWER PRICES?
His name is Lofgren. Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Lofgren, Deputy Chief of Staff for Capability Development, NATO Allied Command Transformation
https://www.ncoic.org/11-news/events/51-events
I didn't say I didn't know. I merely asked him to explain his version and share why he felt it was going to happen..
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT A MASSIVE SHORT SQUEEZE IS AND WHAT MAKES YOU THINK ONE IS COMING NEXT WEEK?
.04 BY END OF MAY!!!!!!
ATTENTION SEC, NASD, FINRA RE: BVTK
PLEASE BE MADE AWARE THERE IS SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR BEING EXHIBITED BY A FEW MARKET MAKERS UNDER THE TICKER SYMBOL BVTK.
THERE ARE SEVERAL SCREEN SHOTS FROM L2 SHOWING MORE THAN 40 MILLIONS SHARES BEING PURCHASED WITH AN AVERAGE PURCHASE SIZE OF 500,000 SHARES ALL THE WHILE THE SHARE PRICE REMAINING AT .0007.
DUE TO THE FACT THERE WAS NO MOVEMENT IN SHARE PRICE INDICATES SOMEONE IS OVER LOADING AT A FIXED PRICE WHEN IN FACT, AFTER 10 OR 20 MILLION, THE MARKET SHOULD HAVE MOVED THIS ASK PRICE UP TO .OOO8
PLEASE NOTE FORMER CONVICTED MARKET MAKER VNDM FOR ILLEGAL NAKED SHORTING WAS AT THE TOP OF THE LIST FOR A PERIOD OF 30 MINUTES DURING THIS TIME WHERE THE ASK SIZE WENT FROM 10,000 SHARES AT MARKET OPEN TO ONE WHERE THE ASK SIZE WAS THEN INCREASE TO 40,000,000 AND THEN 35 MINUTES LATER, ASK SIZE WAS LOWERED TO 10,000,000.
WHAT MAKES THIS HORDING OF SHARES AT THIS SINGLE PRICE EVEN MORE SUSPICIOUS WAS THE ASK SIZE WAS LISTED AT .0007 FROM THE PREVIOUS DAY WAS AT 10,000 SHARES AND THIS WAS AFTER A DAY WHERE THE SHARE PRICE WAS STAGNANT FOR MOST OF THE DAY WHERE THE SHARE PRICE WAS ALSO .0007.
SIMPLE MATH ON OUR POOL OF INVESTORS
With 3.5 billion shares outstanding, that also equates to 3,500 investors each owning 1 million shares. Even if Tom's circle of influence is 500 strong, and assuming they all bought 1 million shares, that still leaves 3,000 people who would also need to buy 1 million shares to lock up the float.
Now I know some people own 5-10-20 million shares but others don't so all I am trying to do here is shed some light on the fact we are just in the second inning of a 9 inning game.
The stock has only been active for a month and I don't know about you, but it is not easy to refer a pink otc stock to friends or family knowing how volatile the market can be - especially after what we have just witnessed over the past 30 days.
In conclusion, I would say keep the faith and hope the financials are as good as we think they can be. If all of these proposed contracts, contacts, opportunities and agreements come through, then we can believe all of the DD that has led us to this point.
I am long here and hope we can all celebrate in a few months as all of the pieces come together to spell Success GO BVTK$$.
EXCELLENT JOB!!!!!
ITS DD LIKE THIS AND ALL OF THE OTHER DD AND HARD WORK FROM PRO BVTK ALUM LIKE CJ, DIEGO, AND ALL THE OTHERS THAT MAKE THIS BOARD WORTH READING.
SEE YOU ALL IN A FEW MONTHS FOR OUR VICTORY CELEBRATION!!!!
IF THIS WERE TRUE . . .
FIRST, THERE WOULD BE A PAPER TRAIL. WITH IP ADDRESSES, CREDIT CARD STATEMENTS, CELL PHONE RECORDS, EMAIL TRAILS, BANK ACCOUNTS AND TRADING ACCOUNT STATEMENTS SHOWING LARGE AMOUNTS OF REVENUES WITH TIME STAMPS AND DATES IDENTIFYING WHO WAS INVOLVED.
AS FOR THE PUMP PART, THERE WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED PR's, DECEPTIVE POSTS, PHONE CALLS, DIRECT MAIL PIECES OR SOME OTHER FORM OF COMMUNICATION.
WHILE MANY OF THESE SO-CALLED ILLEGAL PUMPERS WOULD CLAIM THEY WERE JUST LUCKY OR THEY DID THEIR DD AND PROFITED OVER TIME, THE SEC AND HOMELAND SECURITY FROWN AGAINST INDIVIDUALS COLLUDING TO PROFIT FROM PRICE MANIPULATION AND ILLEGAL PUMP AND DUMP SCHEMES, ESPECIALLY IN MATTERS OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
SEE DEETS BELOW ON HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002.
IN CASES WHERE NATIONAL SECURITY IS A CONCERN AND IN CASES OF CYBER TERRORISM, THERE IS A STRONG CASE TO BE MADE THAT ANY STOCK PRICE MANIPULATION AGAINST THIS COMPANY PROTECTING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE WOULD FALL UNDER A VIOLATION OF THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT FROM 2002.
https://www.dhs.gov/homeland-security-act-2002
After 9-11, in the year 2002, the US Congress passed a law known as the Homeland Security Act and in it, it states-
(14) The term ‘‘State’’ means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any possession of the United States.
(15) The term ‘‘terrorism’’ means any activity that—
(A) involves an act that—
(i) is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources;
and
(ii) is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and
(B) appears to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.
TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
SEC. 101. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT; MISSION.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established a Department of Homeland Security, as an executive department of the United States within the meaning of title 5, United States Code.
(b) MISSION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The primary mission of the Department is to—
(A) prevent terrorist attacks within the United States;
(B) reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism;
(C) minimize the damage, and assist in the recovery, from terrorist attacks that do occur within the United States;
(D) carry out all functions of entities transferred to the Department, including by acting as a focal point regarding natural and man made crises and emergency planning;
(E) ensure that the functions of the agencies and subdivisions within the Department that are not related directly to securing the homeland are not diminished or neglected except by a specific explicit Act of Congress;
(F) ensure that the overall economic security of the United States is not diminished by efforts, activities, and programs aimed at securing the homeland;
(2) RESPONSIBILITY FOR INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING TERRORISM.—Except as specifically provided by law with respect to entities transferred to the Department under this Act, primary responsibility for investigating and prosecuting acts of terrorism shall be vested not in the Department, but rather in Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies with jurisdiction over the acts in question.
SEC. 225. CYBER SECURITY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2002.
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘‘Cyber Security Enhancement Act of 2002’’.
(b) AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES RELATING TO CERTAIN COMPUTER CRIMES.—
(1) DIRECTIVE TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION.—Pursuant to its authority under section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, and in accordance with this Subsection, The United States Sentencing Commission shall review and, if appropriate, amend its guidelines and its policy statements applicable to persons convicted of an offense under section
1030 of title 18, United States Code.
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out this subsection, the Sentencing Commission shall—
(A) ensure that the sentencing guidelines and policy statements reflect the serious nature of the offenses described in paragraph (1), the growing incidence of such offenses, and the need for an effective deterrent and appropriate punishment to prevent such offenses;
(B) consider the following factors and the extent to which the guidelines may or may not account for them—
(i) the potential and actual loss resulting from the offense;
(ii) the level of sophistication and planning involved in the offense;
(iii) whether the offense was committed for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial benefit;
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 22:55 Dec 10, 2002 Jkt 019139 PO 00296 Frm 00023 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL296.107 APPS24 PsN: PUBL296
PUBLIC LAW 107–296—NOV. 25, 2002 116 STAT. 2157
(iv) whether the defendant acted with malicious intent to cause harm in committing the offense;
(v) the extent to which the offense violated the privacy rights of individuals harmed;
(vi) whether the offense involved a computer used by the government in furtherance of national defense, national security, or the administration of justice;
(vii) whether the violation was intended to or had the effect of significantly interfering with or disrupting a critical infrastructure; and
(viii) whether the violation was intended to or had the effect of creating a threat to public health
or safety, or injury to any person;
(C) assure reasonable consistency with other relevant directives and with other sentencing guidelines;
(D) account for any additional aggravating or mitigating circumstances that might justify exceptions to the generally applicable sentencing ranges;
(E) make any necessary conforming changes to the sentencing guidelines; and
(F) assure that the guidelines adequately meet the purposes of sentencing as set forth in section 3553(a)(2) of title 18, United States Code.
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATING HOMELAND SECURITY ACT
• Fined up to $250,000
• Imprisoned up to one year
• Fined and imprisoned
• Removed from office or employement
AT THE VERY END OF THE MEETING, ONE OF THE GENERALS WHO SPOKE EARLIER SAID - GOOD THING WE HAVE TOMMY'S COMPANY BRAVATEK HERE. I HEARD THE MEETING WAS TRYING TO BE HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS.
IF THERE WAS JUST SOME WAY WE COULD GET NCOIC TO GO TO AMAZON AND LEAVE SOME SELLER FEEDBACK AND RATE THIS PRODUCT??? LMFAO
THIS WHOLE CONFERENCE WAS HUGE.
WE ARE TALKING NATO - HOMELAND SECURITY - AND ALL OF THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES THAT ARE MEMBERS OF NATO WHO WILL WANT TO CONNECT TO WHATEVER NETWORK TOM AND OTHERS PRESCRIBE AS THE ULTIMATE INTEROPERABILITY SOLUTION TO GET EVERYONE WORKING ON THE SAME SECURED, HACK PROOF NETWORK
THERE IS A FOLLOW UP MEETING IN 6 -8 WEEKS TO SHOW NEXT STEPS AND WHAT IS ACHIEVABLE. TOM IS CLEARLY IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT ON THIS ONE. LOOKS LIKE THIS IS GOING TO BE A HUGE CATALYST TOWARD DRIVING REVENUES GOING FORWARD.
AT THE VERY END OF THE MEETING, IT SOUNDED LIKE ONE OF THE GENERALS WHO SPOKE EARLIER SAID SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF - GOOD THING WE HAVE TOMMY'S COMPANY BRAVATEK HERE. I HEARD THE MEETING WAS TRYING TO BE HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS.
BRAVATEK GOT A MENTION AT THE END OF THE NCOIC MEETING. YEA!!!!
THERE IS NO RS AS PER THE CEO
TOM CELLUCCI IS A SYSTEMS AND NETWORK GENIUS.
TOM IS CURRENTLY ONLINE SPEAKING TO NATO OFFICIALS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY HEADS EXPLAINING HOW TO BRING TOGETHER THE MULTITUDES OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (16) INTO ONE SECURED WORKING NETWORK.
TOM HAS ALREADY SECURED DEALS WITH HOMELAND SECURITY, NASA AND NOW HE IS LAYING OUT THE GAME PLAN TO HELP NATO LAUNCH ITS INTEROPERABILITY GAME PLAN.
THEY ARE UP NOW. LOG IN AND LISTEN AND YOU WILL HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/794352325
TOM CELLUCCI LIVE FROM NCOIC CONFERENCE @ DELOITTE HQ.
SCHEDULED TO START IN 20 MINUTES. CLICK HERE TO LISTEN:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/794352325
TOM CELLUCCI IS SCHEDULED TO SPEAK AT 3:50 PM est
THIS LINK WORKS FOR MOBILE TOO: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/794352325
TO LOG ON, GO TO https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/794352325
DOES ANYONE HAVE INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO LOG INTO THE EVENT?
How do you know it is a dump? Could be a purchase? What evidence do you have?
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
DOES IT MEAN THAT 60% OF THE PEOPLE WHO SOLD SHARES ON THIS DAY SOLD AT A PRICE POINT LESS THAN WHAT THEY BOUGHT THEM FOR?
AGREED!!! NO ONE APPEARS TO BE SELLING TODAY
IN MY OPINION, AS FAR AS I CAN SEE, MOST TRANSACTIONS HAVE BEEN BUYS.
I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW HOW MUCH OF THE FLOAT IS IN THE STRONG HANDS OF PEOPLE WANTING THIS STOCK PRICE TO GO TO PENNIES (OR HIGHER)
ONCE AGAIN, WE SEEM TO BE IN A TUG-OF-WAR BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS WHO ARE HOLDING STRONG AND THE MM'S WHO CONTROL THE SHARE PRICE, FOR NOW ANYWAYS. (SINCE THERE IS NO NEWS OR FINANCIALS TO GO ON)
THE MM's SEEM TO WANT TO KEEP THE SHARE PRICE DOWN TO TRY TO GET PEOPLE TO SELL THEIR SHARES. THE MM's SEEM TO TRY AND BORE PEOPLE IN HOPES THEY WILL FINALLY MOVE ON SO THE MM's CAN CLAIM THOSE SHARES AT THESE RIDICULOUSLY LOW PRICES.
ITS TOO BAD THERE IS NO REGULATORY AGENCY LIKE NASD, SEC OR FINRA WHO COULD INVESTIGATE THE POTENTIAL PRICE FIXING THAT CERTAIN MM'S APPEAR TO BE ENGAGED IN. LIFE WOULD BE SO MUCH BETTER IF THE GOV WOULD PROSECUTE FIRMS ENGAGED IN THE UNLAWFUL STOCK PRICE MANIPULATION. HMMMM?
IF ONLY THERE WAS SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN??? OH, PRESIDENT TRUMP???? DID YOU SAY YOU WANTED TO CLEAN THE SWAMP???
PLEASE, FACTS ONLY!
CHUCK BROOKS IS A BOARD MEMBER, NOT AN EMPLOYEE. Board members are the fiduciaries who steer the organization towards a sustainable future by adopting sound, ethical, and legal governance and financial management policies, as well as by helping make sure the ORGANIZATION has adequate resources to advance its mission.
THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE CAPABLE OF ACTUALLY GETTING BVTK CURRENT WITH THEIR FINANCIALS ARE PAID EMPLOYEES AND IN THIS CASE, THEY ARE TOM CELLUCCI, CEO AND DEBBIE KING, THE CFO.
FACTS . . .
1) EVERY COMPANY KNOWS HOW MUCH DEBT THEY HAVE AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT.
BVTK - TELL US HOW MUCH OUTSTANDING DEBT IS STILL OUT THERE?
2) EVERY COMPANY KNOWS HOW MUCH THEY HAVE IN SALES WITH SIGNED CONTRACTS.
BVTK - TELL US HOW MANY ORDERS YOU HAVE SIGNED AND WHAT ARE THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS OF THESE ORDERS?
3) EVERY COMPANY KNOWS HOW MUCH CREDIT THEY QUALIFY FOR BASED ON THEIR CREDIT RATING?
BVTK - TELL US YOUR CREDIT RATING?
TEAM BRAVATEK . . . TIME TO DELIVER THE GOODS
I am sure most investors feel that the TIME IS NOW for BVTK to STEP UP AND DELIVER.
NO MORE hype, NO MORE feel good stories, NO MORE good ideas, NO MORE special events, NO MORE "WHAT A GREAT OPPORTUNITY WE HAVE", NO MORE "LOOK WHO IS ON OUR BOARD - THESE BOARD MEMBERS DO NOT WORK FOR THE COMPANY!!!! We don't need advice - WE NEED ORDERS, WE NEED TO DELIVER SOFTWARE, WE NEED TO SEE FINANCIALS !!!!!!!
NOW IS THE TIME TO CLOSE THE DEALS
NOW IS THE TIME TO DELIVER THE SOFTWARE TO THE SERVERS
NOW IS THE TIME TO SEND INVOICES FOR SERVICES RENDERED and for PRODUCTS SOLD.
NOW IS THE TIME TO SUBMIT THE FINANCIALS.
TOM CELLUCCI - Dr. Cellucci is an accomplished serial entrepreneur, seasoned senior executive and Board member possessing extensive corporate and Venture Capital experience across a number of worldwide industries. Profitably growing high technology firms at the start-up, mid-range and large corporate level has been his trademark.
IAN TRELEAVEN - Ian has over 20 years of professional software development experience creating Enterprise-class software for some of the world’s largest companies, including Microsoft, Crystal Decisions, Business Objects and SAP.
Most recently a Senior Product Owner in SAP’s Business Intelligence Portfolio, Ian was responsible for product performance and reliability (P&R), driving P&R improvements with multi-release strategies, sizing for traditional and SAP HANA-based BI solutions as well as developing product deployment methodologies scalable to SAP’s largest customer (e.g.: 250,000 users). Previously to that role, Ian was a Senior Software Developer for the Business Intelligence product suite at the company.
DEBBIE KING - Ms. King has served clients with over 25 years of entrepreneurial leadership experience as a business and financial advisor to a number of firms over her career.
She currently serves as the Business Manager to a privately held firm in Dallas, TX and brought a unique set of skills to her position including financial, operations, and business management. Ms. King has assisted firms in business start up, acquisition, expansion, and reorganization.
Her diverse skill set and educational background allows a broad perspective regarding financial and operational business management.
Ms. King’s background as an Accountant has served numerous of firms in various industries in optimizing profit outputs and streamlining business practices. She is a strong minded and focused individual that utilizes her education and experience to assist in analyzing, identifying and implementing operational changes to increase efficiency and profits. Ms. King possesses expansive understanding of financial, legal and business tax applications.
PAULINE EWALD - an accomplished attorney by training with 20 + years of experience managing projects in the telecommunications industry.
THE $MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION - IS THIS TEAM CAPABLE OF CLOSING DEALS AND THEN IS IT CAPABLE OF DELIVERING THE SOFTWARE AND SOLUTIONS TO BE ABLE TO INVOICE ORGANIZATIONS FOR SERVICES RENDERED AND PRODUCTS SOLD?
EXCELLENT FOLLOW UP - MORE "FACTS !!!!"
FACT: THE ACTUAL VALUE OF BRAVATEK IS . . .
There have been volumes of background info passed around on BVTK over the past 3 weeks. We all agree the BVTK package we are investing in is rock solid. The DD includes the background on employee reputations of the CEO, Tom Cellucci, the cyber genius of Chuck Brooks, the financial expertise of Debbie King, the powerful Boards these key people sit on, the Committees they are a part of, the graduations they attend, the books they have written, the contacts they have in their Rolodex, the relationships they have built, and even the fact the industry of cyber security is exactly the right place to be if you want a growing industry to invest in.
NOW, With all that being said, THE time is NOW for the COMPANY and its KEY PERSONNEL to step up and TELL US exactly what their FINANCIAL score is - STAND UP AND EXPLAIN WHAT ITS TRUE VALUE IS - EXPLAIN THE ACTUAL AMOUNTS OF BVTK REVENUES AND EXPENSES.
HOW ABOUT AN INCOME STATEMENT? A BALANCE SHEET? AN ORGANIZATION CHART? The investors deserve to know what this company's true value is and who we are counting on to close the deals and deliver the programs to our customers!!! It has been a month. YOUR TIME IS NOW!
BILLIONS OF SHARES have been bought by people who want BVTK to succeed. The future value of the share price will only be determined by the FINANCIALS of BVTK GOING FORWARD - Remember what a FINANCIAL REPORT IS??? When revenues less expenses plus future earnings equal TRUE VALUE. These are the SCORESHEETS that are SUPPOSEDLY being finalized as we speak. These DOCS will EVENTUALLY show the world the following to be TRUE:
FACT: BVTK HAS THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS SIGNED
NASA CONTRACT SIGNED
SEWP CONTRACT SIGNED - $20b CEILING - Bravatek Solutions Inc (OTCMKTS:BVTK) was awarded the Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurement, SEWP contract – valued at $20 billion. The contract will entail the provision of telecom services as well as cyber security email protection software.
FACT: BVTK PATENT APPROVAL
FACT: Any public announcement for Bravatek has to be the truth and nothing but the truth according to the the agreement which they signed pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The tweets are the truth.
FACT: Ecrypt One available at Amazon Web Services (AWS)
https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B018IUT9OQ?qid=1494205929379&sr=0-1&ref_=srh_res_product_title
If you are buying this morning, be sure to lock up those shares with a SELL ORDER at some higher price so MM's can borrow them.
Nice to see the effects of the P&V Smoothie have worn off LOL
The MM's and Mgt that have allowed the stock price to drop in such a dramatic fashion have also encouraged most savvy traders to leave the building for other opportunities that have lower floats and more aggressive pricing. Yes, there are companies who want to price their stock in such a way as to attract investors, not stick it up their ask.
It is apparent the weak link on this team is the person or persons who sets the stock price. They have made it apparent at this time, they do not want to compete with other companies for the trader's hard earned money.
VNDM NAMED IN 2016 LAWSUIT FOR SUPPOSED NAKED SHORTING
It is upon information and belief that one or more of these brokerage firms are assisting in naked shorting the stock: Automated Trading Desk Financial Services, LLC, Canaccord Genuity Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Citadel Securities, LLC, G1 Execution Services, LLC, KCG Americas LLC, Maxim Group LLC, and Vandham Securities Corp.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120887104
caravan Tuesday, 03/01/16 02:44:34 PM
Re: Toxic Avenger post# 54928
Post #
54929
of 56720 Go
The RICO lawsuit against Wallace has not been dismissed or "lost". I guess you missed this recent court filing:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ROCKDALE COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
R. Martin Spencer and
Elaine G. Spencer, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 2015-CV-1800-I
Neil T. Wallace, Bette Wallace, )
The Estate of Harold Wallace, )
and Danielle Sims )
)
Defendants )
NOTICE FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDED COMPLAINT
COMES NOW Plaintiffs R. Martin Spencer and Elaine G. Spencer in the above styled action, and pursuant to the Georgia Rule of Civil Procedure §9-11-15, the Plaintiffs will provide the court with new and additional information to further support claims made in the original Complaint.
On January 26, 2016 this court granted Neil T. Wallace's ("Wallace") Motion to Dismiss due to Personal Jurisdiction (Exhibit A). This Supplemental and Amended Complaint will provide further information asserting that Plaintiffs do have personal jurisdiction over Wallace due to new and relevant actions by him since the original filing of this Complaint.
This Pleading will demonstrate how Wallace's years of legal and online activities across four state lines and internationally were all done in order to unjustly enrich himself, his family, and his associates in an amount in excess of $2,400,000.
Exhibit B, submitted under O.C.G.A. 9-11-15(d), is a copy of U.S. North Georgia District Court filing by Atlanta SEC attorney Richard W. Jones. Mr. Jones states that Plaintiff Martin Spencer's stock, which was purchased at a Sheriff's Sale in Delaware for $1,000.00 by Wallace, is now valued in excess of $2,400,000.
Wallace has an extraordinarily broad Power of Attorney for his mother, Bette Wallace. As can be seen in Exhibit C, Wallace tried to represent his mother in Delaware by way of his mother's Power of Attorney. (Note: only pages 1, 11 and 12 are included in Exhibit C since those are the only relevant pages in this matter). The Delaware Superior Court denied Wallace's request to represent his mother and his family continues to retain Adam Gerber.
Using that POA Wallace retained Mr. Jones to assist in removing the legends on the stock so it will be free trading and capable of being sold in the public OTC stock market. It is upon information and belief that Wallace intends to give a portion of those shares to his associates, George MacLeod and Greg Stone (both residing in the UK), to cover any naked short positions (selling of stock not actually owned) they have initiated in manipulating the stock of the Plaintiffs' company, GeckoSystems International Corporation. It is upon information and belief that one or more of these brokerage firms are assisting in naked shorting the stock: Automated Trading Desk Financial Services, LLC, Canaccord Genuity Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Citadel Securities, LLC, G1 Execution Services, LLC, KCG Americas LLC, Maxim Group LLC, and Vandham Securities Corp.
The remaining stock Wallace will sell and make over two (2) million of dollars per his own belief. The stock was bought by Wallace for only $1,000.00 and was suppose to only cover a $17,100 default judgment awarded to Wallace's parent in Delaware.
Retention of a Georgia attorney by Wallace on his mother's behalf constitutes doing business in the State of Georgia and thus gives the Plaintiffs jurisdiction over Wallace.
Per O.C.G.A. §9-11-15(a) Exhibit D is entered as additional information. This letter dated May 22, 2015 from Wallace to Plaintiffs' SEC attorney in Florida, is extremely insightful for a number of reasons: (1) he states that the shares in question have new owner registration and yet to date he will not allow the Delaware court to mark his parents' $17,100 default judgment satisfied with those shares; (2) he signs the letter as attorney for his mother, Bette Wallace who is a resident of Florida. At the time Wallace wrote the letter he was, and still is, ineligible to practice law in Florida, according the Florida Bar Association. This is a deliberate misrepresentation of his status with the Florida Bar Association and is only meant to be intimidating to the Plaintiffs' SEC attorney; (3) he has no basis for complaining to the Plaintiffs' SEC attorney about stock issuances; (4) the last sentence of his letter is a personal threat toward the Plaintiffs. This letter is an excellent example of Wallace's attempt to harass, threaten and intimidate. He has written many similar letters over the past eight years to the Plaintiffs' business partners and associates.
Plaintiffs assert that Wallace's misrepresentation to Mr. Leinwand goes further than just intimidation. Making a false statement regarding his status as an attorney such as Wallace has done in this letter constitutes interstate fraud, either wire or mail depending on how this letter was sent to Mr. Leinwand from Virginia.
O.C.G.A.§16-14-4 (a) states that it is unlawful for any person, through a pattern of racketeering activity or proceeds derived therefrom, to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise, real property, or personal property of any nature, including money.
The Plaintiffs will be able to show during Discovery and Trial how, since 2007, Wallace has conducted multiple, serially connected activities outlined in the original complaint in order to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise, real property, or personal property of any nature, including money."
In order to accomplish this unjust enrichment of receiving stock his SEC attorney has valued in excess of $2,400,000.00, Wallace has used the mail, telephone, computers, the internet and various courts. Since Wallace is barred in Florida and New York he has been able to use his legal knowledge to manipulate the courts to further and enhance his advantage, as will be shown herein.
. The Plaintiffs' attorney, Donald Gouge, addressed the Delaware Court of Common Pleas, in a recent letter dated January 21, 2016 (Exhibit E), submitted per O.C.G.A. §9-11-15(d). His letter obviously expresses frustration with Wallace and gives an excellent summary of the matter. Wallace informed the Delaware court on August 27, 2013 (Exhibit F) he and his family would satisfy the judgment after sale of the stock and ownership registration had changed. That happened and yet he still refuses to have the court mark his parents' default judgment of $17,100 satisfied. It is believed that Wallace does not want the default judgment marked satisfied at this time because having that legal declaration will not fit into his plans for receiving unjust enrichment in excess of $2,400,000.00 in stock for himself, his family and his cohorts in the United Kingdom.
To begin Discovery, Interrogatories and Document Request were mailed to Defendant Sims and this court on February 2, 2016. After she legally responses to these requests, Plaintiffs believe they will be able to show with substance Wallace's involvement with this Georgia resident and why that involvement constitutes a Predicate Act.
Other Predicate Acts committed by Wallace were submitted to this court September 9, 2015 wherein the Plaintiffs' argue that jurisdiction in Georgia is appropriate. O.C.G.A. §16-14-3 (c) states that it is a crime for "a person to put false information into a computer." Wallace has been putting false information into his computer and sending it out via emails, the internet, and letters for years which have culminated in a pattern of illicit activities against the Plaintiffs.
WHEREFORE, having filed this Notice for Leave to File Supplemental Information, Plaintiffs pray that this Court will allow submission of this new information based on facts uncovered after the original filing. Plaintiffs also pray the court will review all facts and statements provided in this filing to declare Georgia as the state of Jurisdiction over Neil T. Wallace.
VNDM HAS BEEN SITTING ON ASK FOR 1000K FOR 30 MINUTES WHILE VOLUME HAS BEEN 8 MILLION SHAES. WHY? THIS LOOKS SUSPICIOUS. VNDM - GET YOUR SHARES AND GET OUT.
SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING
Clearly it's a classic war here between the positive pro BVTK party who want the price to go UP and the anti BVTK MM'S who want the price to go up, then down, then up and then down BECAUSE THIS DRIVES VOLUME AND THIS IS THE ONLY WAY MM'S MAKE MONEY.
PLEASE GRAB SCREEN SHOTS WHEN MM'S LIKE VNDM AND BMIC appear. Their history speaks for itself and we can bring ATTENTION TO THE AUTHORITIES when we see the more questionable activity.
For instance a price is stuck for a long period of time yet there is vast amount of shares traded. Liek just now when VNDM sat on 14 for 15 minutes from 11:07 to 11:29 with over 6 million shares trade and 4 million being buys and the price went from .0014 to ..0013 and then finally, back up to .0014.
Another example worth noting to the authorities is when we SEE LONG PERIODS OF WHAT APPEARS TO BE DILUTION WHEN IT IS MERELY PRICE MANIPULATION. When the price keeps going up and going down over a few minutes, that is a sign. There is no reason a price should keep switching back and forth over 3-4 minutes. This is not normal unless it is meant to drive activity for commission. Again this is not normal market activity - It is often times PRICE MANIPULATION DESIGN TO DRIVE VOLUME WHICH EQUALS COMMISSION
THIS CASE IS CLEARLY A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY. IF you suspect something is not right, the people making buys and selling may also be trying to manipulate the share price and these people may in fact be Russian, North Korean Iran or some other foreign power.
REMEMBER, THESE people do not want this powerful encryption software to come to market because it is known eCrypt One is 99.99% effective in helping our National Security defend our cyber infrastructure.
PLEASE REPORT SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR TO the following organizations. They are the ones who keep the market safe from criminals:
NASD Regulation 202-728-8958
OTC Bulletin Board StockWatch 800-268-6397
SEC Trading Markets - https://www.sec.gov/tm
Homeland Security CyberSecurity https://www.us-cert.gov/forms/report?
IT IS DIFFICULT TO SAY HERE.BECAUSE LIKE TRUMP SAYS "WE DON'T WANT TO TELL THE ENEMY WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO BECAUSE THEN THEY WILL KNOW."
GOOGLE "PRICE MANIPULATION" - IT IS CLEAR AS DAY WHEN IT HAPPENS.
THE PROBLEM IS MOST MM'S GET AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE IT IS EASY TO COVER UP OVER TIME
HOWEVER, MOST OTC TRADES DO NOT IMPACT NATIONAL SECURITY LIKE IN THIS PARTICULAR COMPANY. IN THIS CASE, THERE MAY BE CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT AND IN THAT CASE, THE PENALTIES ARE SEVERE.
54 million shares traded and 40 million of them are BUYS. Again you are wrong. It must be tough going through life with the "Even a broken clock is right twice a day" as your motivation to keep trying.