Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
QDX TM active again for QMC.
S/N 88629519
Ok. So you need some software to regulate the light wavelength and intensity.
I know my iPhone already has controls to regulate the intensity, but it’s all white light.
They would need future phones to have lights that could be programmed to emit the necessary wave length. That’s not that much of an enhancement to existing phone tech.
Didn’t one of them post on LinkedIn or Twitter that thy already were testing with potential customer?
I was trying to find the link to what I thought I read this week.
I don’t know about your phone, but mine had a white light right next to the camera.
You don’t need UV or blue light to excite quantum dots. Their excited by energy which is present in all light.
It would just depend on whether the light on a phone was intense enough to excite them to the right level to cause the qdots to illuminate.
From John Hartigan on LinkedIn today:
“This is a groundbreaking development! I am extremely excited to be part of Quantum Materials Corp. We are in talks with some of the largest companies in the world about this technology!”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/quantum-materials-corp_quantum-materials-corp-announces-anti-counterfeit-activity-6582673943214252032-Ii5s
Thanks. Forgot to search for quantum dots when I had the right numbers in USPTO system.
Worse case, QMC has to license this from Merck and apply it to their blockchain adaption.
But, we’ll let the patent attorneys and USPTO figure this all out.
Agreed.
I know QMC has used patent lawyers and would when needed. I hope they’ve hired a good one for review of the “patent pending” one that they mentioned.
Ok.
Found these. The first is a reader device for an image.
Second is for a marking, but I don’t see a description of the marking that would rule out QMC filing use of qdots to create a light source as an image. Merck’s patent seems to be geared toward something similar to a unique holographic image or sorts.
I just did google patent search and the first was only one that appeared.
I’ll look again, thanks.
I assume it can. I’ve only started learning about block chain, but I think their point is the combination of a digital image and the ledger are what can’t be counterfeit.
Good questions though.
Good questions. We already know that multiple company’s have capability or are developing printing machines. I think Kateeva already has one and was working with Nanosys.
I can’t speak for what they intend to do, but my interpretation is that you attach quantum dots to an item. You scan it’s light signature into block chain. Then as the item is transported or when it goes to get used, the buyer or user can scan the qdots again to verify the recorded light signature matches the initial one. All records will be kept in the block chain to track the item from manufacturing to user and thus confirm authenticity of the item.
They only need light scanner that stores the light signature as a digital image. Hello mobile phone camera. ;)
First patent their using an undefined image. This is quite broad in what their defining which maybe why it’s still pending.
I couldn’t find anything related using you second patent number. Did you have a typo in the number you provided.
Taking a guess at it, they’ll be able to produce qdots in the reactor of particle bandwidth of color (diameter of qdot) with high yield and consistency. They will then have to mix them into batches to yield a unique light signature for each item/device.
I’m interested to see how this plays out. Looks like LG filed for the QLED trademark right after the QDVision use went inactive in 2014. Samsung didn’t file for the trademark until much later, but it was stated that they bought the trademark from QDVision if I recall correctly from reading the press releases back then.
Sorry, didn’t read the article appropriately. Missed the fuel cell part, doh!
Problem with your requirement is that you can’t replenish water if you take the hydrogen out. Water is nothing but Hydrogen and Oxygen (H2O).
John Hartigan's first public presentation as CRO of @QuanMatsCorp at @CapitalFactory for its Innovation Council #Blockchain Summit ... #QDXTrusted ... pic.twitter.com/TMaCY70NXT
— Quantum Materials Corp. (@QuanMatsCorp) September 18, 2019
It’s all the same subject. Discussion on trade mark law and status or recovery of the QDX Tm.
Ways to revive and abandon trademark
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.wikihow.com/Revive-a-Dead-Trademark%3famp=1
Well it’s not registers now is it? Lol
Optimistic jump? I’m debating trade mark law, not the stock or company specifically. Changing the subject?
Ok. So they file a new application.
Common law still applies and I don’t see it being denied as a new TM application.
https://www.upcounsel.com/common-law-trademark
Except the rule has a 2 month extension if you didn’t get the notice of abandonment (up to 6 months after notice).
This is also here to limit the duration as you said, but simply adds a little margin say, as an example, if an attorney doesn’t forward the email notice from the USTPO.
Lol! Someone clearly misses it.
The notice did go to the law firm, not QMC. Firm could not be working for QMC now and it don’t get forwarded to QMC.
Lol! I still think they have 2 months up to 6 if they didn’t know about it and can provide adequate justification.
Even if it was the 5th extension.
Thanks. Didn’t see the care history.
Read my second response, read the actual notice letter and click on link in notice.
How about you dig a little further?
TSDR link when you click on the TM number.
“Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all documents in this file, click on the Trademark Document Retrieval link at the top of this page.”
From documents:
“OFFICIAL USPTO NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT
TRADEMARK APPLICATION ABANDONED - FAILURE TO FILE TIMELY SOU OR EXTENSION REQUEST
U.S. Application Serial No. 86636475
Mark: QDX
Owner: Quantum Materials Corp.
Docket/Reference No. 049871.00009
Issue Date: July 01, 2019
The application above is abandoned because we did not receive within six months of the Notice of Allowance (NOA) issue date:
(1) A Statement of Use (SOU); or
(2) A Request for Extension of Time to File a Statement of Use (Extension Request).
If you did not receive the NOA or if the delay in filing your SOU or Extension Request was unintentional, you can file a "petition to revive" using the Petition to Revive Abandoned Application - Failure to File Timely Statement of Use or Extension Request form. You must file the petition within two months of the issue date of this notice. The petition must include the following:
(1) A signed statement by someone with firsthand knowledge of the facts, stating that the delay in responding by the due date was unintentional;
(2) A petition fee; and
(3) An SOU or Extension Request and the required fees, including any fees for extension requests that should have been filed if the application had never been abandoned, or, if you did not receive the NOA, a clear statement of this fact.”
From link to petition in notice:
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) "abandons" a trademark application after a Notice of Allowance is issued when a timely Statement of Use (SOU) or Request for Extension of Time to file a Statement of Use (Extension Request) is not received. You can file a petition to "revive" an abandoned application if your delay in filing an SOU or Extension Request was unintentional.
You must file the petition no later than two (2) months from the mailing date of the Notice of Abandonment. If you never received the Notice of Abandonment, you must file the petition within two (2) months of your actual knowledge of the abandonment and no later than six (6) months from the date the application status was updated to "Abandoned ? No Statement of Use Filed."
Read the other note about 2 months if you get the notice and 6 months if you didn’t.
Clicking on the USTPO link for QMC’s QDX TM, you can see that they just failed to respond and provide a Statement of Use. Maybe the attorney of record listed on the USTPO TM info page isn’t working with QMC and QMC just missed the communication and subsequent deadline for responding.
They clearly are branding the new block chain with QDX given the new QMC website and twitter hashtags.
https://www.quantummaterialscorp.com
https://twitter.com/QuanMatsCorp
Reading up on the USPTO site, it looks like they can easily reclaim it by responding to the USTPO within 6 months. The US is common law for trademarks. Even without the registration, QMC could still have all the same rights to the use of QDX based on everything I read.
Didn’t go anywhere, just too busy. Just moved 4 states south.
You know the annual report is due in 2 weeks?
Numbers should show some of what you think hasn’t happened.
Agreed. Really looks like they are trying to create a buzz before some “industry-changing news.”
I’m sure we all hope it’s mind blowing and finally gets this stagnated share price going up significantly and get us all out of the red finally.
Clearly some branding started by this new blockchain business segment of QMC.