Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Was $SRMX given the U-Blox modules for free to install in their products, or will it show up as a bill? If for free, then yes, it is a collaboration.
Otherwise, they continue to misuse words like "partnership" and "collaboration".
If Max Li chews gum during his presentation, will that constitute a collaboration with Wrigley's?
From press release: "Utilizing the broad portfolio of u-blox 4G products, including Narrowband (NB-IoT) and LTE Cat M1 modules, Tri Cascade will deliver next generation energy efficient smart neighborhood products and solutions to global customers."
The way I read that, they are using U Blox technology in their products to improve their products. Doesn't that make Tricascade more of a customer of U Blox than a collaborator with them?
EERO seems like a genuine competitor to SkiQ in the marketplace: https://eero.com/experience
That company focuses only on the router, though. Does not believe in the philosophy that "the more products, the merrier..."
Will be interesting to see the philosophy that ultimately wins out.
Does anyone have an idea about company's current market cap/share count? Thanks.
I liked your post and agree with the sentiments, but was unable to stay heavily invested here. I will not make back my losses with this stock, as I'll never invest much in it anymore.
Whatever happens here or in other stocks, it definitely seems that the only way an investor can score big is on stocks where they have enough belief in it that they can hold when they are 80 percent down, or when they are willing to average down out of belief that any drop is more attributable to market games than to the company's execution. For me, I don't think I'll ever have tremendous belief in a company anymore if there is no insider investment... if insiders aren't sinking on the ship alongside me.
It could only be a 500 million company if Chemostat process was used to treat all tumors, cancers, etc. To get FDA approval for expansion of its use to any cancer requiring chemotherapy would take a much longer time and most likely another company moving it through the FDA process.
Do you have a lot of lines from "Lonesome Dove" memorized? I love the book, and McMurtry ... but still, having a line like that memorized was surprising to me.
I think Delcath is the odd stock where CEO is literally hating on its stockholders. Rejection of the RS from last year seemed to annoy her to no end -- somewhat understandably, IMO -- and now she does all she can to make sure stock is a miserable experience for shareholders. Definitely no reason to crush stockholders on Jan 2, or announce muliple financings and another RS months in advance...and now to drag it out after getting approval to finance and RS.
Genuinely could keep going up for a while. Aside from today's news, it was drastically oversold after releasing great news about licensing the "women's cream viagra", and getting 1st dibs to license the Orbitz drug which Bill Gates Foundation has already committed many millions to.
Amazing amount of flippers today, all the same, as nearly 11 million has been traded and there are only 11.5 million shares.
thanks for the link and post.
I understand, but who would set up their own router while getting free wifi at Starbucks, etc? There may be occasions where it comes in handy, perhaps, but I really don't know who would make great use of the "portability" aspect.
SkiQ is a portable router, which does sound cool, but don't you need a pre-existing Internet to install it? So if you are travelling with it, don't you need to be in a home or motel already offering Wifi, etc?
Is it worth an added cost to pay for portability?
Insiders may start buying stock once market starts to pay people to buy shares at a price higher than what the shares are worth. And it seems we're heading in that direction.
It seems companies can close up shop and take a year off to study cryptocurrencies, yet still command a higher share price/market cap than this junk.
The bearish posters make more sense to me. It may work out okay, but i already regret having that hunch a few days ago that it will shoot up again. The people making money on Delcath right now seem to be going for 2 percent intraday trades. I didn't expect it to trade like Aralez at these prices, but more like Rennova (which seems to have great days or awful days), and that just hasn't happened.
I understand, Grupo Datco is big. But $SRMX is deliberately overstating their current relationship with Grupo Datco.
They are one of many companies being allowed (either for free or for a small fee) to connect its products to their network in a live setting.
If they are able to win a real contract, where new homebuilders use their products, this would generate income for $SRMX, and their products would be running on the Grupo Datco/SigFox network.
That's how I understand it.
Grupo Datco and SigFox, in fact, do want every iOT company to utilize its network.
Grupo Datco and SigFox are partners -- real partners.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=https://www.grupodatco.com/es/iot/&prev=search
I do genuinely think you write really well. I find it hard for anyone to have much issue with your posts.
Some of the recent jabs between those on chats outside of this forum have also included a poetic flourish or two. Take away the cheap vulgarity or two, and I've quite enjoyed some of the sentences or turns of phrase, such as using descriptive terms like condescending or over-jubilant or philistine, then saying these are not traits typically associated with muskrats or whatever. Anyway, nice to suffer amongst some interesting conversationalists.
To clarify, has anyone seen a "written" review of SKiQ? Not one composed orally by one of the fine SkiQ enthusiasts manning the phones for Sprint, AT&T, and Verizon...
Curious, has anyone seen a review of SkiQ on CNET or anywhere?
Agree with Sam. He responded to a question. His pessimism re: last financing was frustrating to me (who had $30000 invested at the time) but proved well-founded too. Even a little over-optimistic, if I recall.
ANyway, moving on, if we get a nice, irrational run to 15 cents, then I have bought enough where I can make my money back.
Simply down more, right now, but expecting some sort of run.
Curious, are some people loading right now? Reverse splits are almost always awful, initially, but financings for companies otherwise facing bankruptcy are sometimes very bullish events, even if the financing is junk.
And, looking at market cap, just don't know how much lower this company can go.
Did you ever wonder why the tweet did not include Grupo Datco among its recipients? $SRMX has a tendency toward overstatement, and since neither Grupo Datco nor AT&T have returned the favor and mentioned $SRMX in a press release, or a tweet, I personally find it easier to assume $SRMX are simply one among the many iOT companies allowed to make use of the Grupo Datco/Sigfox/Velocom networks...
That is by no means nothing. But it's not a home run nor even a swing of the bat. It means, at this point, they're in the stadium.
https://www.sigfox.com/en/news/sigfox-wnd-and-velocom-join-forces-connect-argentina-global-internet-things-network
If the company were to ever focus on a single product, like SkiQ, they might be able to market it, to update it and improve upon it and provide customer service for it. They'd have some potential for success, perhaps.
Right now, they are way overextended for a company without money, and with competing products from AMAZON, APPLE, Google, and fellow small companies.
Company also should be honest about its partnerships. Grupo Batco is allowing small companies to use its network to their products. Same situation as AT&T. Good things might come of it, but nothing is guaranteed.
The article explains the relationship between Tricascade and Grupo Datco. If there was a commercial partnership, Grupo Datco would not be silent on it.
Agree. And since they are not currently get paid anything in this partnership, it's more a case of them trying to showcase their products.
"To encourage the development of IoT applications, Grupo Datco offers the possibility to test applications without connection costs and is only charged when the development enters the commercial phase."
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.convergencialatina.com/Nota-Desarrollo/203888-3-9-Datco_avanza_con_su_red_multiproposito_para_IoT_y_hace_foco_en_ciudades_Inteligentes&prev=search
https://www.bnamericas.com/en/news/ict/sigfox-partners-to-expand-iot-products-to-argentina/?position=697193
Press release of a different iOT partnership with the Argentine company. From a year prior.
Lots of info circulating on other boards about the elimination of convertible loans as a practice, starting today. I think it's partly why RNVA has been doing well lately (and it's no crappier a company than ICLD), and it might bode well for ICLD stock obviously (as most lenders who redid their loans to the company redid them in convertibles, correct)...
Once they reach 2.4 billion shares, .005 cents will likely equate to a 12 million MC company. That equals or exceeds the market cap of many debt-free companies with seemingly lucrative products (like a Viagra cream for women, etc, or an iron ore company whose project's NPV exceeds 1 billion) ... so it's getting hard to call SRMX cheap anymore.
They have had a few products on the market (surge suppressor, etc) that have garnered little interest, and lost money, and, when factoring in the dilution costs, they've recently spent a few million on a thermometer to go after that niche market of individuals who would love to spend tenfold on a thermometer they could talk to.
Last summer, TriCascade was in talks to build a Smart Home at University of California-Irvine.
Curious, whatever happened there?
As this was presumably just for promotional purposes for them, did they ever explain why they couldn't make that happen?
It definitely means incompetent management. If they had known they needed these Series E warrants to get hedge funds to invest, then they needed to say at the outset that they were raising share count to 2 or 3 billion (which is ridiculous but not unheard of). Then perhaps they could have possibly raised most of the money they would need for the year before doing the RS. Right now, it seems the first 500,000 shares to reach a billion are being spent less for advancement of Chemostat than to appease hedge funds by fattening their tummies a little.
A sell of almost 4 million shares at 4:04 PM. Perhaps they didn't hear the new story about Verizon and SRMX... Or perhaps company is paying off a lunch bill.
16:04:22
$ .0034 High
3,818,537
This stock tries one's patience, but it appears to be well-run, they appear to have great respect from (and ties to) non-profits, and they seem to be eliminating as much risk as possible from all their licensing deals by getting some proof of efficacy before even spending the first dollar, etc.
It benefits them to get their stock out of being oversold so they have more options, should new opportunities arise on the acquisition side, and while dilution will be a constant until they monetize something from their portfolio, it's certainly not the norm for biotechs to receive zero to negative value for their products (if they're presumed to eventually be very profitable -- and one presumes a women's Viagra cream will garner some interest out there).
I have 31000 shares, for now, and while I likely won't go much higher than that, I simply don't understand how $DARE won't command a $100 million MC once there's some understanding of the good products in its portfolio. So while I may yet sell too early, I won't sell until it seems I'd have given myself at least a 3- or 5-bagger, all of which would make me quite happy to have endured this currently tiring ride.
One has to assume shareholders paid for the barcodes, just as one assumes we paid for their sponsorship of the conference, etc.
Their job, as it appears, is to spend, then pump, spend, then pump. They are starting to become less successful with the pump.
RNVA warrants up over 77 percent today on volume.
This is probably why RNVA insiders were granted the last 100 million in shares, just days after they announced more convertible dilution. The dilutors working with them in these toxic financings will approve the RS, etc, as will the insiders who now have about 100 million shares (all given to them free).
So RNVA has the votes to do whatever they want.
Stock is purely for good swing traders IMO. Wish good luck to all, but the devil seems to keep RNVA stock in his portfolio for a reason.
I think people try to devote about zero percent of their lives thinking about routers. I do think this company will have a homerun if companies that have produced their own routers in the past decide to ultimately go with SkiQ as their primary/default router of choice. That would mean they think so highly of SkiQ that the lower profits they receive from producing their routers in-house will be made up with increased revenue from a potentially bigger or happier customer base.
Anyway, good luck. I will try to trade this again at some point. And will follow it as it's simply an interesting stock to follow, with lots of twists and turns. Might not be significantly better than FreeSeas in its heyday, but it seems to be.
There is no such thing as a blockbuster router if people have to go to a store and buy it to replace the default product they receive from Verizon or DirectTV or wherever. The majority will always accept the product they were given.
For SkiQ to succeed, it absolutely needs to be the default router that customers get from their Internet or streaming provider; or else it has to come with the purchase of a new home, etc.
By simply offering it in places like BestBuy as an upgrade to one's current system, SkiQ will not be able to generate any more revenues than everything else that TriCascade has produced.
That's my opinion, at any rate. Best of luck to all.
Same here... It makes absolutely no sense to me... but since most of the catalysts are supposed to come out mid-year, it is possible we are in too early. Then again, this is definitely an easily manipulable stock, and whoever is taking it down right now likely has the means to send it soaring too. I just hope I can hold out until the rise comes.