Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not to mention a history of 31 multiple aliases, and the foulest language this board has ever seen.
#31 @OTCstocks23 2/2/24
#30 @Benidiot99 1/17/24
#29 @Benidiot69 1/17/24
#28 @Benidiot1 1/17/24
#27 @Nickscammer123 1/16/24
#26 @Nickscammer 1/16/24
#25 @Bencocklover 1/16/24
#24 @Bendumbass 1/15/24
#23 @Snpwscam 11/18/23
#22 @SCAMPANELLA 12/17/23
#21 @Drugmanidiot1 12/9/23
#20 @Benidiot 12/8/23
#19 @Benclown 12/3/23
#18 @Bencisaclown 11/28/23
#17 @SNPWclowns 11/27/23
#16 @NickScampanella1 11/26/23
#15 @NickScampanella 11/25/23
#14 @Benasslicker 11/21/23
#13 @Bobslo 11/11/23
#12 @Meninblack 11/6/23
#11 @EM2023 10/22/2023
#10 @CS2023 3 10/21/2023
#9 @OTCalerts88 09/28/2023
#8 @Scammeralert88 09/25/2023
#7 @SNPWbuster 09/21/2023
#6 @OTCsleuth8 09/20/2023
#5 @OTCinvestor88 09/19/2023
#4 @SNPWfraud 09/18/2023 09:28:27PM
#3 @Clownbusters 09/18/2023 06:49:03 PM
#2 @Scammerpolice 09/17/2023
#1 @Raymond W 09/16/2023
Did I try to justify it? I don't recall trying to justify it. I was just pointing out that Form 10-K is due 15 days after the the first solar eclipse of spring in states in the path of totality, unless it was cloudy.
Our 10-K annual report is due 90 days after our fiscal year ends on December 31st. In a leap year that would be March 30th. But because March 30th this year was a Saturday, the due date became Monday, April 1st. With the fifteen-day extension, the due date is now Tuesday, April 16th.
Here are some references:
That would be true if the SEC didn't adjust due dates that fall on weekends.
Unless of course the non-market day is not an official SEC market holiday. For example, Good Friday, when the market is closed, but reports can be due.
Yes I did. (I'm the one who put the due date rule information in the board IBox info page because we used to have lengthy due-date debates every time a report was due.) The extension always begins one calendar day after the due date. The due date itself is never considered the first day of the extension. So the fifteen-day extension started on April 2nd.
Look at it this way. If something is due on a Monday, and you are given a one-day extension, then it is due on Tuesday. You don't count the Monday as the first day of the extension, because then it would still be due on Monday. ;0) Similarly if something is due on a Monday and you are given a two-day extension, it is then due on Wednesday. If you counted the Monday as the first day of the extension, it would be due on Tuesday, and your two-day extension would only have given you one extra day.
So to recap, this year being a leap year the annual report due date would have been March 30th. But since that was a Saturday and due dates that fall on non-market days are always adjusted to the next market day, the due date became Monday, April 1st. The extension gave an additional fifteen calendar days beginning on April 2nd, making the due date April 16th.
It's due the 16th this year.
Hey, thanks, Renee. I guess we'll see the change tomorrow.
Yeah, the "predetermined timeframe" part is very intriguing. Seems to me they were saying that it is predetermined by the company.
I'll give you two answers to your question.
The "90-days" referred to in that notice is the transition period for transitioning between FINRA policies. The transition period began on 11/20/2014 and ended 90 days later. During that time both the old policy and the new policy were in effect. After the 90 day transition period ended, only the new policy was in effect. The 90 days refers to the policy change transition, not to the amount of time the D remains on stocks.
There's a reason Nick Campanella wasn't convicted of any crime in that case. He didn't commit any crime. He wasn't even charged with a crime. As you well know.
James D. Tilton Jr. and James A. Tilton are not the same person.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/manage_msg.asp?message_id=173446035
The James A. Tilton associated with NSAV and the James D. Tilton Jr. associated with the litigation you mentioned are two different people. None of the companies mentioned in that litigation are NSAV.
That James Tilton that you mention is not associated with NSAV. Ours is James A. Tilton. The one in the litigation that you mention is James D. Tilton.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NSAV/profile
Seems to me on the 20 or 30 times at this subject has come up, it is usually pointed out that not only was Nick not convicted of any wrongdoing, he wasn't even charged with anything. But if anyone has any court records to indicate otherwise I'm sure we will see them someday.
Any volume reported is trades. Trades are between buyers and sellers. Therefore all trades are both buys and sells, regardless of how the volume is classified.
There is buying every day. As long as there is volume, then there are equal numbers of shares bought and sold. All trades are both buys and sells. The confusion comes when the trade volume is classified as "buy volume" or "sell volume", commonly referred to as "buys" and "sells". It's an unfortunate choice of terminology that leads some to mistakenly think that on a given day more shares can be bought than sold, or sold than bought. Only shares that are traded count as volume. And trading requires a buyer and a seller. The classification of "buys" or "sells" just refers to where the trade price was in relation to the bid price and the ask price at the time of the trade. It can be useful as an indicator, but it can also lead to confusion.
https://www.thebalancemoney.com/buying-and-selling-volume-1031027
As stated before, the 14C did not schedule a reverse split.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173172464
You mean this one?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169166500
karmakaziXpert
Thursday, June 16, 2022 11:59:33 AM
Post# 61138
Interesting trades today.
It doesn't work that way. If the company ever chooses to effectuate a reverse split the public would have at least two days warning prior to the proposed market effective date when the reverse would go into effect.
https://cooleypubco.com/2023/11/06/sec-approves-nasdaq-rule-reverse-splits/#:~:text=Listing%20Rule%205250(b)(,the%20proposed%20market%20effective%20date.
No problem. Yeah, it's the use of the term "Corporate Actions" that can lead to confusion. Corporate Actions can be understood to mean the Board acting to give itself the R/S option, or misunderstood to mean the Board effectuating an R/S.
No, the 14C does not schedule an R/S for 11/12/2023. The 14C gives the Board an R/S OPTION which becomes effective on that date. Once effective it will give the Board the option to effectuate a reverse split at any time at its discretion. So the Board could choose to effectuate a reverse split, or choose not to. The Board has given itself this option several times in the past, but as we know, that has never led to a reverse split actually being effectuated by SNPW.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=17000358&guid=Be5-kWrUh_JpJth
On page 2 the 14C refers to the "Corporate Actions" that the Board approved on October 13th, 2023:
The 14C gives the Board an R/S OPTION. Once effective it will give the Board the option to effectuate a reverse split at any time at its discretion. So the Board could choose to effectuate a reverse split, or choose not to.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16987750&guid=DB5-kanF-syeJth
On page 2 the 14C refers to the "Corporate Actions" that the Board approved on October 13th, 2023:
The 14C gives the Board an R/S OPTION. Once effective it will give the Board the option to effectuate a reverse split at any time at its discretion. So the Board could choose to effectuate a reverse split, or chose not to.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16987750&guid=DB5-kanF-syeJth
On page 2 the 14C refers to the "Corporate Actions" that the Board approved on October 13th, 2023:
Maybe they'll grant a plenary indulgence on the IHub Five Hundredth Year Jubilee?
So the venial sins have been forgiven. But the mortal sins have not. Thus the mortal sinners remain in Purgatory (banned) or Limbo (jailed) on a case-by-case basis. And of course the poor booted souls remain in Hell forever. Got it. Thanks.
Thank you.
Is it just me, or have the number of posts per day that free members can post recently increased?
It's like a plenary indulgence. Rejoice, ye naughty!
Are all the poor souls in IHub Purgatory who violated the old rules going to be transferred to IHub Limbo on Saturday?
But struggling to read tiny print is great brain exercise, isn't it? I mean, instead of lazily reading entire words at a glance, it forces us to get back to basics and read them one letter at a time. Fills up those retirement hours!
I'm using both Microsoft Edge and Google Chrome on a Surface Pro laptop. I'm ads free. Starting today unless I reduce the Zoom to 90% or lower my Favorites page is abridged. Normally at 100% Zoom or even 110% Zoom I could see the entire page. That includes the following columns: "Ticker", "Board Name", the number of unread posts, "Last Post", "Options", and the "More" column. But as of today if I zoom at 100% or more, the column titles bar disappears, and the only columns that remain are the board name and the number of unread posts. There is no left-right scroll bar, so there is no way to make anything else come into view. Interestingly this is not true on the various board pages. I can still see everything as usual, even if I zoom to 110%.
But it's good exercise trying to read at only 90% Zoom. Not only does it exercise my presbyopic eyes, it also exercises my neck and back as I lean forward closer to the screen. Of course at my age that can contribute to hunchback. Shall we call it IHunch? ;0)
Same here. Until today I was able to use the 110% Zoom size in Chrome and still see the full Favorites page. Now I have to reduce it to 90%. Otherwise only part of it is visible, and there is no scroll bar and no way to view the rest. This is only true for the Favorites page. I can still zoom to 110% on board pages without losing any part of the page.