Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Chart here says not til next year. Disappointing; hopefully the ss is intact by then.
Things could always turn around, I suppose. But it'd take a significant material event.
My bet's on seeing you all again in early 2023. Good luck out there in the meantime.
-$
The OTC is setting up for a hot August. Every dog has its day.
See you around this time next month.
-$
We're setting up for a very good mid-August.
The time to get in is now.
-$
Been trading some amount of shares almost daily, lately. Hopefully she comes back to life.
-$
This one will be very interesting if any decent volume hits. It has a good story, and the ss is ludicrous.
-$
Still patiently waiting.
Good things will happen, here.
-$
Fins out, numbers are good but confounded by unrealized losses in OTC shares held/owned by the company as payment for financial services to other companies.
Fins: https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/331865/content
Disclosure: https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/331891/content
Nice to see no convertible debt, private placement interest. Can anyone confirm whether the fully-diluted o/s decrease from 128m same time last year to 69m this year is due to un-exercised warrant expiry, or something else?
-$
Chart is set up pretty nicely, here. A golden cross forming on the monthly is a rare sight to see, the weekly MACD is looking very nice, and we've converted the moving averages into support on the daily.
Pretty intriguing. Excited to see what happens.
-$
Will we see a PR tomorrow?
-$
Fins up, Q4 revs are bad but annual net loss wasn't terrible at $-21k:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/326033/content
Hopefully the upturn in business will be evident with Q1 2022 filing.
Still interested to see what Danny has been up to; I was correct that his priority has apparently not been direct-to-consumer sales via website.
-$
Oh yeah, I'm brimming with positive sentiment about the past 3 days. There's nothing as exciting as losing >50% value in massive blocks of endless dumpage.
-$
From your lips to god's ears.
From keeping an eye on site metrics for a bit, I get the feeling that the work that's been ongoing has been separate from direct-to-consumer sales via websites. I am not sure whether to hope I'm right, or not. What I do believe is that Danny is a hard worker; I just don't know what he's been working on.
-$
Good to see he's lining up the necessary pieces to remain current.
-$
Patience pays, hope that was you adding. It'd be nice to see you around again.
-$
Moved a lot on low volume, looking forward to seeing real volume.
-$
Thin again. Still here, keeping half an eye on things.
-$
I believe that P&S's transition to operations under a publicly traded name has been on the radar of some since at least approximately August 28, 2020.
I don't know what could possibly make me believe that. It's just a hunch.
-$
SFRX is no longer affiliated with dissolved company Probability and Statistics, which reformed as a publicly traded entity. The shares issued to P&S were returned to SFRX.
The P&S business model was hampered significantly due to the inopportune timing of the covid-19 pandemic. The quality of the relationship between the two company's principals allowed SFRX to be refunded their investment without having to take them to court (unlike other relationships which didn't work out, involving certain shady characters believed to be funding intentional subversion efforts of this forum to this day as retribution).
I've been told this will appear on the annual report shortly forthcoming, along with the approximately +$300k balance sheet adjustment due to appreciation of these shares since issuance.
-$
Does anyone else know anything about this? The new advisory board guy?
-$
There was quietly a new advisory board addition yesterday: Peter Ensio (40) of Vero Beach, FL.
https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/seafarer-welcomes-peter-ensio-to-advisory-board/
Ensio's latest corporate activity was 11 years ago under Custom TechKnowledgy, LLC.
If I was to speculate, this appears to be someone who could have expertise in patents. Is SFRX developing new patents, perhaps to convert the SeaSearcher for terrestrial applications? I hear there may be interest from the multi-billion dollar construction industry because it would allow them to identify or rule out the presence of buried cables more efficiently than industry standard technology. This could significantly improve the speed of approval for new construction projects.
I'm going to patents and conversion because SeaSearcher's development and patent protection is already complete. Why bring someone on with experience in custom/boutique tech at this stage of the game if not for their trademark/patent legal framework expertise?
-$
It's almost time. I'm hearing we're perhaps two weeks from the dominos starting to fall.
It'll be interesting to see if buying picks up in anticipation.
-$
Looks like it's about time. I bet we blow through .02 in short order.
-$
s/s updated, no change.
i can't tell if people here are getting their emotions played this easily or if their game is projecting such a milquetoast persona about their plays.
i also don't care- this chance to build my position has been fantastic. gonna make monster bucks here.
-$
Keep adding.
Remember that wash trading is an effective strategy to temporarily reduce pps, and while illegal it is difficult to detect (for a while) if a group is doing it carefully.
Just because someone keeps selling doesn't mean his buddies aren't pre-set to buy the same shares. Then a day or two later they sell and he buys, leading to no change in share distribution but the illusion of selling.
The best way to prevent this is to keep adding. This bleeds them; they have to sell some of it to you to get it to where they want.
-$
I already called that. It'd be fine news, possibly good if the claim looks good.
I don't appreciate it when people try to hijack my DD and predictions to feign credibility while simultaneously slandering the investment if/when it happens.
-$
SC-13G posted at 11:19 Eastern.
Maximilian Thyssen, on SFRX advisory board since October 2021, has now acquired 451million shares, or 7.13% of the total o/s.
Previous investment success includes being a seed capital investor of Spotsetter, eventually acquired by Apple.
That's a lot of loading. I bet he thinks it'll tank to zero for sure.
-$
It's plausible that Tarku would want the entire share of Silver Strike if the future is promising.
It's plausible in such a case that Tarku wouldn't want to tip off the minority interest owners (Mansfield-Martin) that their stake could be more valuable than they think it is. It's also plausible that MM could have asked for cash up-front for the claim when Tarku approached them for the remaining minority share. Tarku likely wants to keep its operating capital since resource identification and extraction is immensely expensive.
So Tarku wants the claim, but doesn't want to pay cash up front for it, and/or doesn't want to be gouged by Mansfield-Martin. What do they do? A reasonable way to square this circle would be for a third party (EXLA) to acquire the interest from the original holder, then sell it for a predetermined price to Tarku. This prevents the original holder from gouging, and also lets Tarku pay for it in a forward-looking manner.
EXLA has some assurance that Tarku has a vested interest in following through on resource identification and extraction since they already have a large amount of upfront sunk cost. If EXLA is in decent financial position for now, and since they know Tarku is all-in on the claim, they can afford a backloaded arrangement.
Why would EXLA be the correct party to arbitrate this? My guess is they are already in separate (or related) arrangements with MM to acquire their Idaho claim (hence the 'Idaho' tab among projects on the website). We may just be seeing the first tip of a larger iceberg, or perhaps the Idaho claim isn't going to pan out. Regardless, the Idaho situation suggests there's more to the story than we know.
-$
I haven't seen any evidence that the initial deal for the 25% interest in silver strike has been voided/nullified. Pretty sure that was the "buy", and then they just posted the "sell."
I could be incorrect, and that'd be great! But until I see some evidence of that, I'm going to assume that EXLA paid 100m restricted shares and $30k cash for that interest (which they subsequently just sold).
-$
I'm digging more into this. Looks like the long term here is silver and zinc, and in the longrun this may be a backdoor way of getting German/Swiss financiers ZB Capital into two North American exchanges: US through EXLA, and Canada's Venture market through TKU.V.
Next step would be for EXLA to acquire the Idaho property from Mansfield-Martin.
-$
Load the boat!
-$
Large T-trade fired at 16:01 for 14,964,261 at .0031.
Any further information regarding this would be appreciated.
-$
Pretty decent volume today within a tight trading range.
People are arranging their portfolios before the boom! Still expecting one more 5-10% dip (from here) before the rip.
-$
A very good day would be a walkdown to .015 and then an open at .015 tomorrow.
This would be a very, very good.
Charting works!
-$
What pump?
Personally, I'd love to see the RSI cool off slightly after clearing this channel of all available shares. Not that it's too hot, but it's nice to have a springboard to launch off.
I have no problem waiting another day or two for higher upside potential on the pop.
-$