Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And where exactly should this be trading at?
Too bad you couldn't offer web development and pr consulting. I hear it pays well.
excuse me, im not distorting anything. Ive been pretty firm in supporting this company through thick and thin for many, many months. Fact is $382,000 for web development and pr and business consulting is insulting.
Im getting weary of the "distortions" coming out of your camp.
"No Dilution" ....really??
"16.5 million in asset backed financing" ...really?
...and the list is much much longer.
Please stop with the "if you're not rah rah, then youre an evil basher crap. Im a realist, and until the company proves me wrong, then im correct. Everyone here is losing thousands, and everyone has the right to be angry.
I believe that eoc said the same...
I'm still in shock at the compensation for the website development...
Pg and eoc received this as compensation???
O M G....Peter, what have you done???
You got 2's? I didn't get any...
Wouldn't be surprised to see a large t-trade today.
Was there ever a determination which pr's were bogus?
Lee, when is this supposed to happen?
The only thing I found is Merk.
This is from Sierra, who is generally worthless.
Lee, let's go back to your partnership comment.
Please expound.
Lee, can you cite the source?
...new investor here.
You're parsing hairs. This sounds more like an informal invite issued to a few shareholders to visit the company.
Yes. This is now a stock which has become visceral. Gut feel.
On one side, we have the potential of a huge run. You have to trust that the company is taking a systematic approach to fixing the pps. Uncover the corruption, fix the corruption, and move forward in a big way.
The other side says nothing has happened, pr's are false, and is a total scam.
Which one?
Being a long, my "gut" says stay the course. Add if you can, and don't sell now, which, depending on your pps average would result in a near total loss. So, if you think about it, holding is no longer a gamble, but rather has become a no brainer.
I will continue to add, and wait for events and announcements to unfold. After all, as traders, we all dream of dirt cheap shares right before a huge run. Buy into the fear.
Glta.
PVEC is not retail, so who really cares if the name is there? Matters not. Talk about nitpicking...
That's the rub here. No one really knows if there are any ships.
Lots of conjecture but nothing verified.
It was a great sign that PVEC held strong yesterday!
Long and strong!!
Thanks...so is it relatively meaningless in this case?
Can someone explain how par value is determined?
Will you be in attendance tonight?
Someone said, I think it was you, jaw dropping would be better.
Etrade is a selling machine of late...
What's coming out today?
Yep. He's putting all his eggs in the CC basket.
Seaam, are you participating in the conference call?
Go to the website, on the right side of the homepage is an announcement. Follow the instructions (email them your name, email address and ph number)
I did.
I'm very curious to see what they say.
This doesn't have the feel of a company paid promotion at all.
Most include several emails and text messages. I get many everyday, but nothing on PVEC.
Promotors usually pre load, and promote the heck out of it to attract many investors to quickly raise the pps so they can dump before the investors can get out.
None of that happened at all.
Exactly! And bring an 8 k with it as they pr'd they would.
Perhaps. Let me re-phrase it this way.
The next pr needs to be verifiable beyond reasonable doubt. All the T's crossed and the I's dotted.
Peter need to kick butt on the next release!
We'll see. Just once I want to see something positive without sufficient ambiguity which causes it to be picked apart.
I'll go 1.
As long as we get an 8k, 2 major pr's with verified acquisitions, disclosures properly filed removing the yield signs, current share structure, and detailed status report on the buyback, and at least one verifiable merger.
Whew...go to work Peter.
Nice charting. You called it.
If so, why not just pr it? More eyes that way.
Sorry eoc, but the buck stops with Peter.
A CEO is ultimately judged by his decisions. This also includes his hiring choices. If Steinbeck can't do the job then cut bait and find someone who can.
You can't just say its not the companies fault due to the inactions of his staff.
I can answer your first question.
The TA is Olde Monmouth, and they do not disclose SS for any company they represent.
Adding to your list:
Please update us on the Turkish one day cruise which was re-scheduled for November.
Please update us on who is the new PR firm which was announced recently.
Just once I would love to see something this company does that leaves no room for any negative interpretation.
Just once!