Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Crickets prove NOTHING...
And you know it.
What do you think that Emil would be putting out a PR if he were in serious negotiations with a possible licensee or buyer? Sure, the other party would just love that...they would walk away faster than you can blink...
I'm glad it's quiet - quiet is how professionals work...
That doesn't fly....you stated as fact that there are NO negotiations ongoing for Voip Pal
prove it
prove it
Nothing.........yet........
End of story
once again, total misinformation. The companies MUST go through the IPR process on their way to Federal court. You KNOW this, and yet you insist upon lying.
PTAB validations of patents are directional for how cases are reviewed by Federal Courts. This is common knowledge among patent attorneys and judges.
prove it
Another EXCELLENT article by IPWatchdog re: Voip Pal's IPR battle.
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/07/11/no-answer-ptab-apple-sanctions-request-against-voip-pal-after-six-months/id=99112/
The longer the buyer waits, the greater the risk if they are on the wrong side of a Court decision.
nyt - how can you make such a statement, given that you are not privvy to any of the conversations that may be taking place among interested parties.
I need some help with my math - is .095 less than .05? Anyone?
what incredible investigative work! Well done....
LMFAO
OH
nyt Tuesday, 07/30/13 03:49:19 PM
Re: Spec_Investor post# 5742 1.000
Post #
5767
of 56476
I'm relatively new & relatively unknowledgable about this stuff. If you have a buyer, must then be a seller & vice-versa, right? So when u say buyers, no selling, what does that mean.. buy or sell from MM's?
nyt -what does the 800+K bid mean?
yeah I love math.
Stock was 5 cents July 2017
Now 8 cents in July 2018
If I remember my math, that means it's up over 50% from 1 year ago....
yes, such a "joke" that VPLM won BIG at IPR.....and is now moving on to discovery in Federal Court with other defendants.....such a joke that new even stronger patents have been granted....flame away...the "joke" is making great progress
The market disagrees with you.
Welcome back...I agree with you
thought I would check this one out...
.02 and dropping like a stone....no thanks
You made the statement about VPLM having an agenda....not another poster
prove that allegation.
Frankly, it doesn't matter whether they are laughing or not....What matters is that the cases are moving to trial with strong patents....if they are found to be infringing, they will pay.
Why has no one bought them? Easy, they stall and stall until they HAVE to, and then the pain is greater.
The industry considers them a joke? I don't think that Apple, Verizon, AT&T and Twitter are laughing....
We're beating Apple the way the Warriors are beating Cleveland.
The series isn't over, but.....
Funniest thing I have read this week.....
It just doesn't work that way, when the biggest companies know they can file motions and appeals to drag it out....HOWEVER, the sweep IS an important landmark for the patent portfolio
The Oil Services Supreme Court ruling supports the PTAB's ability to review and cancel claims. It also supports the fact that once challenged in IPR a patent is much stronger if the claims are left intact.
In this specific case, the Oil Services ruling increases the value of a PTAB win for Voip Pal.
oh please elaborate on the "unremarkable" nature of the patents....be specific
but the patent claims are quite real....
I know enough about the patents to clearly understand that if a company wants to legitimately operate as a telco, fully integrating legacy and modern networks, they need VPLM's IP.
I also understand that in this world, the largest companies ROUTINELY use/steal IP owned by others WITHOUT LICENSE and play a long game of IPRs, appeals hoping to wear down the owner of the IP. And in some cases, they are successful because the owners of the IP often do not have the resources (capital or human) to fight the long battle. Regrettably, the legal system is neither fast nor efficient.
In this specific case, Voip Pal has shown that they have the expertise, the determination and the financial resources to fight successfully. I understand that shareholders can become weary of what feels to be an endless struggle, but this is the nature of IP litigation.
"First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win."
Mahatma Gandhi
Good luck to you and to Apple.....There's no point in continuing this conversation.
We'll let the court(s) figure it out....
The purpose of the new lawsuit is to defend the patents, not manipulate the share price
nice try....
standard disclaimer for a company in patent litigation......next....
that's right -
Oh wait a minute, didn't the company file patent infringement cases, and get a favorable PTAB ruling?
Sure looks like the company is making every effort possible to protect its IP....
Yes, that's why Knobbe Martens has represented this "ONE EMPLOYEE" company for all these years....
I really appreciate your coming over from the Apple board to alert us of this...I don't know how we missed it......
And to think this "one person company" just got 4 new patents granted that are even stronger....and found the time to file a new infringement case
It's amazing how resourceful some people are.....
LOL
Well, I would say that was one heckuva talented employee to provide expert testimony on all of those IPR's, write the patents, test the network, and respond to Apple, Verizon,ATT and Twitter legal teams.
Yessir that is one heckofa talented person right there...
"First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win."
Mahatma Gandhi