Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You will get same % ownership in New Artizen
If you owned 1% of PVSP you will keep your PVSP and get 1% of the New Artizen company.
The advantage is Artizen Shareholder value will be increase dramatically without the all the Billion shares structure of PVSP, and that convertible debt.
New Company will have 100m shares total, all the same common stock, which is good, as well as a CLEAN Balance Sheet, NO DEBT !!!
The NEWS was Good!!
People don't understand what a spin off is and why it can be very good for shareholders.
The Sellers most likely felt they were getting left behind with PVSP stock and Artizen was taking all the $20M with the new spin off.
PVSP investor will get the exact % of Shares in the NEW Artizen Company that they have in the PVSP and you get to keep your PVSP stock.
Management needs to let shareholder know the plans for PVSP and new assets they are looking at, like the cannabis retail mentioned early. Also KRTL Biotech 5% ownership will stay with PVSP.
Artizen Spin Off is best way to unlock Shareholder Value
This is going to allow Artizen to take advantage of multiple expansion opportunities that are available for pennies on the dollar. Potential acquisitions invole licensed wholesale as well as retail operations which will make us a vertically integrated multi sate operator.
With addition of retail, revenue will explode to the $50 million range very quickly.
We will be able to access long term equity capital with shareholder friendly structures.
You are Buying PVSP to own Artizen
If you Sell PVSP you are selling Artizen.
The only way to Buy into Artizen is to Buy PVSP.
The more PVSP you Own, the more Artizen shares you get with Spin Off.
And you KEEP all your PVSP shares for the next merger/ acquisition in the works.
"Structuring Our Existing and Planned NEW Assets"
The timing of these changes is important. The valuations and fates of MSOs and other participants in the cannabis industry have vacillated in several waves since state legalization commenced. We believe that increased legalization is inevitable in time, both at the federal level and in the form of relaxed regulatory restrictions on vertical integration in Washington. Preparing ourselves for that day is an important aspect of our long-term plans, including by expanding our Artizen and other brands and establishing and building on our footprint in valuable new geographies. Doing so will start in the first half of next year as we structure our existing and planned new assets into a strategic platform for building tremendous shareholder value.
These are the "Material Structural Changes" German mentioned
Shareholder Letter Dec 2022,
We previously commenced execution of a plan to position Pervasip to capitalize on our progress and plans moving forward, including by gearing up for a name change and engaging investment bankers and other advisors to evaluate the best approach to achieve our local and national strategic plan in a challenging cannabis climate while delivering significant value to our shareholders.
In doing so, and in conjunction with our announced and other acquisition plans, we are finalizing some material structural changes that will simultaneously eliminate dilution from Pervasip’s historical debts and position us to complete acquisitions and raise capital on fair terms with fixed prices that do not put pressure on our stock. To prevent harmful speculation, our planned changes will involve a series of related transactions that will not include a reverse split. We will provide more information about our intentions in January of 2023, however, suffice it to say that we do not believe that our current market price accurately reflects the intrinsic value of our business and brands, and we are committed to addressing that circumstance as soon as possible during the first half of next year.
PVSP/Artizen is valued at $2.2M, LOL
$20M plus in sales, $35 to $50M in one to two years.
The more PVSP you own, the more Artizen shares you get!!
No Debt, No Conversions, Profitable Company is worth way more than $2M, just foolishness and ineffective pricing by Pinks.
How Do Spinoffs Impact Investors in Parent and Subsidiary Companies?
By GREG DEPERSIO Updated April 27, 2022
Reviewed by KHADIJA KHARTIT
A spinoff is created when a company forms some part of its operations into a separate entity and distributes shares in it tax free to shareholders of the parent company. The number of shares that a parent company shareholder receives is based on the number they own in the parent company.
When a spinoff's shares start trading on a stock exchange, the value of the parent company's stock may drop by the value of the new company's stock. This is due to the fact that the parent company stock no longer reflects the value of the unit that was spun off. Parent company shareholders shouldn't be concerned by this price change because they own the spinoff's shares as well.
The spinoff will get a new name and a new management (unless it had an experienced management in place prior to the spinoff). Spinoffs have generally performed successfully over time.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
A spinoff is created when a company forms some part of its operations into a new entity and issues stock in it to parent company shareholders.
The number of shares received depends on the number of shares an investor holds in the parent company.
Spinoffs can have great potential for growth due to their smaller size and a management motivated to achieve success.
Due to stock price volatility, spinoffs can underperform in weak markets and outperform in strong markets.
Historically, spinoffs have been good investments for investors.
Reasons for Spinoffs
Companies create a spinoff for several reasons, all of them grounded in added financial return for the parent company.
For one, a company may create a spinoff because, as part of the company, a division didn't fit well with its core competencies. As an independent company, the spinoff may focus more effectively on its own operations and flourish. The parent company then can better utilize its own resources for future successes, as well.
If a company has sought, but failed to interest, a buyer in purchasing a division, it may decide that a spinoff is its next best option. As a spinoff, the newly restructured division may exceed its past performance when part of the parent company and boost financial gains.
A company may be so large that it's unable to effectively and efficiently manage a division so that it achieves value. In such a case, a spinoff can help by allowing the parent company to put its efforts to better financial use.
Another common reason for spinoffs is to improve stock value. For example, a large company with many divisions may have a stock price that management feels understates the value of those divisions. In spinning off one or more of them, the expectation is that the new companies will perform successfully. As a result, their individual stock values would eventually surpass the value they had when part of the parent company.
Impact on Investors
Shareholders should be aware of the price dip that typically happens to the parent company stock price after a spinoff. This occurs because assets that now belong to the subsidiary are removed from the parent company's books, which lowers the parent company's book value.
However, the value of the subsidiary's stock tends to make up the difference that this dip causes. The sum of the two stock prices typically approximates the parent company's pre-spinoff stock price.
Spinoffs shares can lose value for a period of time after the new company is created for other reasons, as well. The drop can be due to parent company shareholders selling their spinoff shares. Some institutional shareholders such as index funds may sell shares because a spinoff isn't part of the benchmark they follow. Other institutions may sell because the spinoff doesn't meet their investment criteria.
The share price of the parent company can rise when spinoff plans are announced if investors believe such a move is financially beneficial. Of course, they could also decide a spinoff isn't wise and sell shares in response to the news. Depending on their point of view, such a time could offer existing shareholders the opportunity to buy or sell parent company shares.
Spinoff investors may see share price volatility due to the company's newness and lack of financial results. As a result, spinoff stock can underperform when markets are weak and outperform when markets are strong.
Spinoffs can perform well due to the force of an enthusiastic management that's eager for success and potentially motivated by financial incentives. What's more, with a parent company now free to focus fully on its own operations, the value of both entities' stock can rise.
Generally speaking, after early price drops, spinoff stocks strengthen and offer a positive performance for several years. They tend to outperform over time. This bodes well for investors who prefer to hold on to their shares.
The volatile price action of a smaller, fast-growing spinoff's stock can mean the potential for lost value. Shareholders who prefer stability could choose to take profits by selling spinoff shares in an uptrend and continue to hold their company shares.
Are Spinoffs Good for Investors?
Historically, spinoffs have been good for investors. On average, both the parent company and the subsidiary outperform the market during the 24-month period following a spin off. Investors who have been able to withstand the unpredictability of the initial days and weeks may see nice gains. New investors looking to take advantage of a spinoff's benefits can choose to invest in the parent, the subsidiary, or both.
Aggressive investors with a high tolerance for risk are often drawn to the subsidiary. As a smaller company, the subsidiary has more potential for growth. Its now singular focus on its own core operations can lead to profitability and a higher stock price. Its wide open future can attract investors, boosting share price.
Investors who prefer more stable returns tend to stick with the parent company. Most companies that are large and established enough to spin off a division have low volatility. Their stock prices remain stable even when the market oscillates wildly. During uncertain economic times, risk-averse investors look to the parent company after a spinoff for better-than-average returns without excessive risk.
Notably, spinoffs can present investors with challenges as well as opportunities. As mentioned, compared to the more established parent company, the subsidiary's stock price is more volatile and subject to market whims.
It's also possible that a spinoff could be loaded with debt and troubled assets. This could put it at a disadvantage and make it an investment to avoid.
What's more, the new company may need support from the parent. Employees with job insecurity could affect a spinoff's performance.
Not all spinoffs generate shareholder value in early years. In fact, the early bumps in the road with which any new company must contend are enough to scare off some investors. Nevertheless, spinoffs generally do well in the long term.
Why Do Investors Like Spinoffs?
Some investors, especially those with higher risk profiles, are attracted to spinoffs for the growth opportunities that the new, smaller companies offer. Spinoffs typically have a management that's motivated to succeed. The focus on operations, sales, and revenue can be given full rein since leaving the parent company. Historically, spinoffs have performed well over the long-term.
Are Spinoffs Good for Investors?
They can be. As a new, smaller company, a spinoff can offer investors attractive potential for growth in share price as it produces solid financial results. Bear in mind that spinoff stock prices tend to be more volatile. While spinoffs can outperform in an upward trend they can underperform in a weak market. Ultimately, investors should thoroughly research a spinoff to decide whether to invest or not.
Do Spinoffs Create Value?
Yes, but not necessarily in their early years. As with any company, value is created as revenue is generated, profits are captured, and business success is achieved. It helps when a spinoff's management has a financial stake in the company through stock options or substantial equity positions. As a result, investors could see their spinoff stock rise in value.
The Bottom Line
Spinoffs can impact investors in different ways. Spinoff shares can be volatile in the early period after a new company is created. Yet, a spinoff is often helmed by enthusiastic officers and managers who are motivated to see the value of their company and its stock emerge and grow.
Aggressive investors with a higher tolerance for risk may prefer holding shares of spinoff stock. More risk-averse investors may instead choose the stability of parent company stock.
Ultimately, spinoffs tend to perform well over time. However, investors interested in buying stock in a spinoff should thoroughly research its financial and business information before taking a position.
PVSP evaluation of potential targets for acquisition!!
Pervasip has commenced evaluation of potential targets for acquisition upon completion of the Artizen spin-off.
PVSP is not going anywhere! They will acquire and spin off
PVSP is not an operating company, they acquire undervalue assets and then spin them off.
The Retail cannabis in other states will acquired or licensed by PVSP for Artizen as they are not restricted by all the cannabis regulations.
85% is what the Owners of Artizen got in the first place
Nothing new here, Artizen brought in $20M a year to PVSP in the reverse merger, along with all their assets, of course they kept most of the value they brought. Fair all the way around.
You do realize that MM Buying on BID, then Sell on ASK
IMO those are the same shares floating around for the most part. Do not take much to start the ball rolling either way, UP or DOWN.
PVSP Shareholder will KEEP their original Shares !!!
Holders of Pervasip’s issued and outstanding common shares as of the record date will receive an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of Artizen common stock, corresponding to 15% of Artizen’s fully diluted issued and outstanding common shares upon completion of the transaction (in addition to retaining their shares in Pervasip). Likewise, holders of Pervasip’s Series K and other convertible
"In addition to retaining our shares of PVSP"
What sell off? 45M shares traded out of 5 Billion OS
LOL, sell off, more like a slow drift off, LOL
Clean Balance Sheet with Spin Off - NO DEBT
Nice !!
Auditors completing Audits, PVSP and Artizen alone!
Once they are done, Form 10 Registration Statement will be filed with SEC for Artizen Spin Off!
IMO Artizen will be up listed to OTCQX or OTCQB Exchange
No other Class of Shares, Only Common Shares !!!
Big plus for shareholders, no more Preferred shares, we are all equal
All Convertible Debt Cancelled
Artizen will have no convertible debt or other securities.
Everyone will own the same common shares, NO Preferred etc
Great NEWS they got it Done, ARTIZEN the New Company
PVSP is history folks, future is Artizen Cannabis!!!!
Seriously 400M nice, still going for my 2nd 50M
No real Sellers, MM just creating market!
Those 15M on the ASK and the 15M on the BID are MM just balancing the flow, no one is buying or selling with long weekend coming up and market s closed Monday.
Really can't complain, they are doing their job making a market in the stock.
Just like Prohibition, STATES will demand Legalization of Cannabis
Five interesting facts about Prohibition’s end in 1933
December 5, 2022 | by NCC Staff
On December 5, 1933, three states voted to repeal Prohibition, putting the ratification of the 21st Amendment into place. But did Prohibition really end on that fateful day?
In some ways it did, but just as it had taken a while for laws to be enacted after the passage of the 18th Amendment in 1919, winding down those laws also took some time.
Congress first proposed the 21st Amendment in February 1933, and it took the unusual method of calling for state conventions to vote on the amendment, instead of submitting it to state legislatures. Conventions in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Utah approved the amendment on that fateful December day, bringing the total to 36 states who wanted to end Prohibition—the three-quarters majority required by the Constitution.
The ratification of the 21st Amendment marked the end of federal laws to bar the manufacture, transportation, and sale of intoxicating liquors. But the 21st Amendment returned the control of liquor laws back to the states, who could legally bar alcohol sales across an entire state, or let towns and counties decide to stay “wet” or “dry.”
Here are five interesting facts about the slow demise of Prohibition:
1. Two states (North and South Carolina) rejected the 21st Amendment before December 5, so the vote was not unanimous.
2. Another eight states didn’t meet before December 5 and didn’t even act to vote one way or the other on the 21st Amendment: Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.
3. One state didn’t end its version of Prohibition until 1966. Mississippi decided to keep its Prohibition laws for another three decades. As of 2004, half of Mississippi’s counties were dry. Today, 17 states don’t allow any of their counties to be dry.
4. It was never illegal to drink during Prohibition. The 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act, the legal measure that included the instructions for enforcing Prohibition, never barred the consumption of alcohol--just making it, selling it, and shipping it for mass production and consumption.
5. The Cullen-Harrison Act, signed about 10 months before the 21st Amendment was ratified, allowed people to drink low-alcohol content beer and wine. Incoming President Franklin D. Roosevelt had the Volstead Act amended in April 1933 to allow people to have a beer, or two, while they waited for the 21st Amendment to be ratified. The first team of Budweiser Clydesdales was sent to the White House to give President Roosevelt a ceremonial case of beer.
Missouri marijuana businesses can deduct expenses on state tax returns!!!!
By MJBizDaily Staff
January 10, 2023
For the first time, legal marijuana businesses operating in Missouri will be able to deduct business expenses when they file state tax returns in 2023.
The Missouri Independent news outlet confirmed the updated policy with the state Department of Revenue.
The change was included in the constitutional amendment – which was narrowly passed by voters in November – that legalized adult-use marijuana in Missouri, state Sen. Denny Hoskins told the Independent.
The move is significant considering that Section 280E of the federal tax code prohibits marijuana businesses, which are federally illegal, from deducting operating expenses on state and federal income taxes.
Ask yourself, Closer to the Bottom, or the TOP?
We are .001 from zero value, and a 100% increase puts us at .002. We should be trading at .02 or .03 right now, and much higher when the Cannabis Bull Market gets going again later in the year or early next year.
Either way, smart money will built their positions now while the market is heavy discount mode. The Dumb money will be chasing the rising prices, just like always.
Share Price says Company worth $3.6M, LOL, LOL
Company with revenue of over $20 MILLION and projecting over $30M this year is worth a lot more than $3.6M.
The markets, especially the pinks, are fundamentally flawed due primarily to the lack of liquidity in these markets, and pressure in either direction can result in EXTREME UNDER valuation as well as EXTREME OVER valuation. Remember GGII recently ran to over 3 cents from .001 and is now back down to .0013. That cannabis company has 20 Billion shares outstanding and the market cap ran to over $700 MILLION, with $1.6M revenue a quarter, LOL
Use you Brains here, PVSP is going much, much higher once the Fog of Legalization clears and the Audit is completed. Getting off the Pinks will help also as more people can rely on the financials, including investment bankers, most of which are prohibited from dealing with Pinks.
Indiana lawmakers introduce bipartisan bill to legalize marijuana
Another State to Legalize marijuana SOON!!
Katrina Nickell Jan 11, 2023 NEW ALBANY, Ind. (WDRB) -- Indiana lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have made a push to legalize marijuana, but it is dependent on changes made at the federal level first.
Indiana House Bill 1039 was introduced Monday, authored by State Rep. Jake Teshka, R-District 7, and co-authored by Rep. Steve Bartels, R-District 74, Rep. Doug Miller, R-District 48, and Rep. Justin Moed, D-District 97.
If passed, once marijuana is removed as a "federal schedule I controlled substance," it would legalize marijuana use for anyone 21 years and older, and for people with serious medical conditions who have a doctor's permission.
The bill would also create the Indiana Cannabis Commission to oversee, implement and enforce regulations. It would also create a cannabis excise tax and revenue would be deposited in the state general fund.
Michele Finn is an active advocate for legalizing marijuana. Finn owns Michele's Apothecary in downtown New Albany where she legally sells Jubilee of Wellness Delta 8 and other THC products.
Finn was introduced to aromatherapy and CBD products when looking for a holistic approach to help her mother, who underwent radiation treatments during a battle with leukemia.
"I saw a very urgent need and didn't want to lose my Mom," Finn said.
She said House Bill 1039 is a "good starting point," but is critical of lawmakers moving too slow on legalizing marijuana, and said there are several people who are missing out on its benefits.
"I chose to break the law in order to save my Mom's life and I am so grateful that I did," Finn said.
Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb has not shared his thoughts on this current bill, but he and other Republican lawmakers have said previously they're reluctant to legalize it in Indiana, as long as it remains illegal under federal law.
Debt Holder Converting surprised Mgt
I don't think Management expected the Conversion and got blindsided as shareholders did.
It is what it is and we will work our way through it. For now, take what the market gives you, in this case super cheap shares caused by debt conversion shares flooding the trading.
16M BID looking for Shares, LOL
Trolling for Shares, let's see if there are any more conversions out there!!
$700 worth of Selling today, LOL
Conversion Price is not accurate Share Value
Share Price is artificially being influenced by Supply and Demand in balance of available shares, Conversion adding 170M shares of supply recently that is being accumulated at these insane prices. Stock price is not going up until this overhang of shares are absorbed by shareholders.
We will just keep accumulating and take what the market gives, LOL
Last of the Conversion !!
Finally, light at the end of the tunnel, LOL
Last Trade was .001 Total Daily Vol 3.6M
MM after hour Conversion was the rest 6m, for 12M total volume
Exactly, and why these prices are a GIFT!!
Smart money sees this and keeps accumulating shares at these insane prices, which are mostly the result of the Conversion dumping going on, a simple supply issue, nothing to do the operational fundamentals.
Bipartisan Lawmakers Urge Biden To Back Marijuana Legalization
POLITICS
Published 9 hours ago on December 17, 2022
By Kyle Jaeger
Bipartisan Lawmakers Urge Biden To Back Marijuana Legalization Amid Administration Scheduling ReviewAs the Biden administration works to conduct a review into the marijuana’s federal scheduling, a bipartisan coalition of congressional lawmakers is asking the president to officially get on board with outright legalization.
In a letter obtained by Marijuana Moment on Friday that’s expected to be sent to President Joe Biden and top cabinet officials next week, the lawmakers said that while they appreciate the scheduling review directive, “the administration should recognize the merits of full descheduling.”
“While we do not always agree on specific measures, we recognize across the aisle that continued federal prohibition and criminalization of marijuana does not reflect the will of the broader American electorate,” the letter says. “It is time that your administration’s agenda fully reflect this reality as well.”
Current signatories include Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Congressional Cannabis Caucus co-chairs Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Dave Joyce (R-OH), Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Brian Mast (R-FL), as Politico first reported. More signatures are still being sought ahead of the letter being finalized in the coming days.
“Marijuana does not belong in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a classification intended for exceptionally dangerous substances with high potential for abuse and no medical use,” the lawmakers’ letter to the president says. “The decision to schedule marijuana was rooted in stigma rather than an evidence-based process, and it is time to fully remedy this wrong.”
“Descheduling marijuana can uphold federal and state authority to regulate cannabis, while also authorizing states that wish to continue to prohibit cannabis production and sales the right to do so,” it continues, noting that the House has twice passed legislation to federally legalize, tax and regulate cannabis.
“Additionally, unjust scheduling of marijuana and normalizing federal cannabis regulation go hand-in-hand—like ending restrictions placing disproportionate burden on researchers seeking to study marijuana compared to other Schedule I substances. The federal government must correct this prohibition and the continued criminalization of otherwise legal marijuana—allowing research to meaningfully advance, creating legal job opportunities, promoting public safety not unjust incarceration, and upholding established state regulation of cannabis production, taxation, and sales.”
“We cannot negate the need for legislative action and federal guidance on many of these components, but all branches of the federal government must recognize the need for the descheduling of marijuana and in a manner that protects the will of each state and the markets and regulations that are within their authority to establish,” it says.
The coalition is circulating this letter as congressional leaders work against the clock to enact more modest marijuana banking and expungements legislation during what’s left of the lame duck session.
A senior Senate Democratic aide told Marijuana Moment on Friday that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is “making a last ditch effort” to put the incremental reform in forthcoming omnibus appropriations legislation—but key players like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) have posed obstacles.
Advocates certainly would like to see broader legalization enacted sooner than later, but it’s become apparent that there’s currently not enough support in the Senate to garner the required 60 votes for passage.
The letter that will be sent to Biden doesn’t necessarily ask that he take unilateral action to end prohibition, but it suggests that his support for the issue could make a critical difference. As it stands, the president supports decriminalization and letting states set their own policies—but he’s been unwilling to back federal legalization so far.
“Descheduling is necessary to end the harmful federal marijuana prohibition and help our law enforcement officers appropriately prioritize public safety,” the coalition says. “Descheduling also provides the clearest path to address the legal uncertainty facing small businesses in states with regulated cannabis markets. by creating opportunities for regulating and taxing commercial marijuana activities.”
“We expect the Departments of Health and Human Services and Justice to continue to expeditiously conduct your directed review of marijuana’s scheduling. While Congress works to send you comprehensive cannabis legislation, the urgency of full descheduling should inform the Administration’s position on overall cannabis reform. Marijuana’s continued inappropriate scheduling is both arcane and out-of-touch with the will of the American people. We look forward to your Administration working transparently and proactively with Congress to enact this crucial step.”
Closed up 10%, LOL, LOL, LOL
LOL, too funny, like the end of the world was coming or something. It is the neighborhood Pinkville, nice house in bad neighborhood gets dragged down with the rest of the junk in the neighborhood.
Artizen is a real company with over $20M revenue and 2023 could easily do $40M, which will spin off excess cash that will end this conversion BS.
179K on Tape in 6s
Big trade, $104
12.7M Converted Today
Purple Trade below the BID was the MM completing the Conversion trade.
They pulled the bandaid off , LOL
Converter has to end of year to get it done, so grab some cheap share while you can, 2023 going to look
very different.
Schumer Makes ‘Last Ditch Effort’ To Put Marijuana Banking In Spending Bill
2 hours ago on December 16, 2022
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is “making a last ditch effort” to put marijuana banking reform in forthcoming omnibus appropriations legislation, a senior Senate Democratic aide told Marijuana Moment on Friday.
With time running short in the lame duck session, there’s been a concerted push to use the spending package as the vehicle for the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. Lawmakers failed to secure a deal to attach the reform to a must-pass defense bill last week, leaving them with limited legislative options.
There are some GOP senators who’ve expressed support for moving the cannabis banking proposal, either as part of large-scale legislation or as a standalone, but other key players like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) represent major obstacles.
Negotiations were partly complicated after a Justice Department memo from earlier this year surfaced in a report, revealing that DOJ had some concerns about possible unintended consequences of enacting SAFE Banking. That prompted several Republican senators to hold a meeting with the department last week.
On Thursday, Democrats shared revised SAFE Banking text with Republicans that “addresses DOJ implementation and money laundering concerns,” the top staffer told Marijuana Moment and other news outlets on Friday. “Democrats have also presented language aimed at addressing the issue of legacy cash.”
We know we are closer to bottom than TOP, LOL
Gets kind of hard trying to push the price to zero, when you generate over $20M in revenue and will be growing rapidly in 2023 and 2024, hey have at it, I like my odds here, still buying!!!