Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh and in case it wasnt clear, that means i think Gers will make a solid investment
Hes weighing it a little too lightly but you're weighing it a little too heavy. Being mentioned would be nice But anyone with even mediocre researching skills will discover the connection between the two (pending it still exists) moreover and to sort of reference the parenthesis here, i think we should expect to see documentation clarifying the nature of the agreement. This would be incoming investors would have to do even less work to discover the BTZO connection.
The only thing i can say about SS is we've all seen bloated stocks run and I expect BTZO to be more of an explosion than a sustained investment. As in, when a stock wants to run, it runs, regardless of SS then, when the hype has settled, reality and SS and all that jazz take over. So yes, lotto play but I still like my odds on it making a move.
Also not true. But have fun.
0% chance I read this
Litetally didn't and won't read any of this.
Depends on the terms of the settlements. If they're confident they'll get licensing and compensation, might be a good move to avoid the inevitable drag out on payment these companies are able to do. Sure, maybe your lump sum is bigger on settlement, but you might exit without licensing
That's what bothers me about it. Feel like we were on the cusp of something big before Fongs death
well i didn't buy backup GERS for no reason lol
Fair. It does not make it impossible. I still suspect you asked the question for.... less than savory reasons. Could be wrong about that too.
Good assessment and good info. Still enjoying the GERS action.
Colder in Rochester though
C'mon bro. You're better than this. Even at 16%, they'll earn more than 280k on these settlements. If GERS (a company with a rich history of dilution and reverses) doesnt need to dilute in front of their 20%, why would it be logically sound that Btzo is somehow drowning without that money.
Seems bold but dream big.
Think I'll try to add some more
Just as many people can show that they dont. So let's just watch football and eat chicken wings for a month!
Yeah there's no factual basis to that whatsoever.
I feel you bud some are here for a quick flip. If i wanted out, i could be but I'm betting the connection between BTZO and GERS is alive and well.
It's not a matter of belief or disbelief regarding your knowledge, i just never take anything as gospel in penny stock world. I just try to exist like anything can happen.
Who cares if all are or are not taking things as gospel? Being level headed traders is to our advantage. That said, and no need to discuss further as we've already done this but we can't be sure if the relationship between the two has or will changed. I hope it hasn't i believe you hope it has.
What i DO know, i had a good new years, I'm ready to watch GERS and maybe BTZO run.
That's pretty bold.
Just a few more weeks.
We agree this is true, yes. We've discussed before. But consider this then, even when BTZO gets 16% of GERS settlement after the dust settles, theoretically they should move in a valuation in line with how GERS moved up. I would say given they'll get 8/10 of the value GERS gets because of Flux agreement that BTZO should be valued 8/10 as GERS. But we know the share structure wont allow that. That said, it's a percentage game, right? To go up 1000% from where GERS was hovering (lets say .075) theyd have to move a lot more than BTZO would have to. Both should make gains though, enjoying my GERS right now fella! Plenty plenty plenty of meat on the bone!
I know I'm not who you directed the question at but I'll be its a little bit of both. That confession of judgment is a pretty telling sign in terms of both proof of concept and where it is trending.
.5, pfft.
Ok, ok. I understand given our history of debate how that question comes off. Excited to see, been adding
Oh, don't take that as a criticism or counterargument or attempt to discredit. I'm like 99% sure it is, but unless my skimming skills have declined appreciably, I didn't see them explicitly mentioned.
Been soaking up some GERS and BTZO last few days
Maybe i missed this but how are we sure it's GERS they're talking about?
We don't have a CEO or really anything so i doubt it
Still contingent on the relationship between BTZO and GERS being intact. I'm inclined to think it is (not just because that's most beneficial to me, either). But if that's intact, no reason to think people wont look to us as a value option to GERS
Lol i think you forgot a 0
Always appreciate your insight. Enjoy your slumber
Another stay? Does that seem likely? Certainly KK would want to press the issue you would think.
Hey fella. Still waiting to clear some money up. We still have up to February 14th, right?
Yo do me a solid and doom and gloom this stock. Bout to get some cash in a few weeks. Gonna run train.
Wait, are we not friends?
I thought we were friends.
Yessssssss and I'm about to get a big influx of cash
To what end?
Dutch and I had a discussion last week where we explored the basis of these ownerships.
Kk obviously wants to hide his money but i think the ultimate goal that Dutch uncovered was that Flux owns 80% of BTZO. This means he can likely hide his money up there. Kk wouldn't take the middle man out of his grand scheme.
Imo
You have some concept of what it probably does/definitely should mean, it just doesn't fit the narrative that GERS will be the sole benefactor from this settlement. So it's more convenient to say that KK has created these numbers arbitrarily and without any intention of enforcing it. Which is admittedly also a possibility.
Ohhh it's you! You've been gone awhile, forgot your username. Carry on