Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I mean, what did you think was gonna happen. This was always a long shot
Guess we'd have to call them GERSlander megalodons?
Correct
Thats called circumstantial evidence. Sure, the name has evidence but there's a reason why its impermissible in court, because its not real evidence. Again, since you cherry pick the points you want to expand on. I've been all for BTZO being overhyped.
But essentially what you did was watch a horror movie, pick a character and said "he's the killer" and now you cant stop patting yourself on the back Harry style.
As per usual, we're on the same side just different teams
Wellllll I'm mixed on those comments. Lets call some spades some spades right.
No doubt the BTZO potential was overhyped. You and I had long debated its potential, if any. We always agreed, at least casually, that BTZO should see a small bump in contrast to GERS bump and, based on the actual evidence, that's what it should've been.
Your underlying tone that this is what was always supposed to happen is a little inaccurate. To make this deal happen, if thats whats happening, it'll have taken a monster bone job to BTZO for it to occur. Just seems a little unfair to say "the writing was on the wall" when in all reality, you and nobody actually had no real evidence to back up your claims. So really the writing on the wall was a mixture of protecting your own interests in GERS (which got me to buy GERS so I'm appreciative) and some good intuition.
At least now we can use the "Bit" in our name to go wild when crypto currency next takes off lol
There's no such thing as "doing what's right" at these levels.
Probably because that was the plan the whole time
I mean sure, if most of my money wasn't tied up in wedding and honeymoon
I was hoping for slightly bigger drop. Gotta get to be a whale
Noooo you said it would drop. Ugh.
If the GERS BTZO connection was still live, yes. But, given the lapse in documentation period, that's a big if. Also, depends on how the new deal shakes out
Ooh snap so he is actually out? Just assumed he went dormant due to embarrassment
Doesn't matter if we can't prove a connection
No matter. Im no stranger to loss in the stock market, certainly not at this level. I also have no problem being patient. I make excellent money and am in no need of the funds at this time. If it takes a year after i buy the discounted shares, just means i pay less taxes lol.
You know where I'm at. Im hoping for a drop. But I've got all the time in the world for this long term potential
Ehh my average was that low but my holdings were meager at best
Ehhh. I've seen stats be real old on there. Seems fishy they both did it at once.
feels like that sounded sarcastic. I do enjoy you.
The fact that it is now classified as full blown means it was still being processed. infarction.
Also good to know that of your many errors criticized in your sentence, you decided to respond to only one.
See? Aren't you having fun? Also you got me with Hippocrates. You're a funny guy.
Couple of notes as you're obviously not in the medical field.
1. It would be an infarction
2. It would be a cerebral infarction because why would you say brain lol
3. Just call it a stroke, man.
4. Go GERS as usual. We're all just passing the time here.
Maybe I'll go voice a complaint to the SEC and post an article then pat myself on the back for the thin illiquid movement of this stock.
Haha no no. Just my friend Harry and I having a brainstorm session together. I'll cut it out lol.
I think I saw someone say recently that he didn't want this board "clogged up" with messages that were unrelated to Greenshift or GERS stock.Your mention of a complaint to the IRS certainly fits that criteria.
Is there something you would like to know about the company or the stock, aside from the information that would be contained in 18 months' worth of SEC filings?
I think I saw someone say recently that he didn't want this board "clogged up" with messages that were unrelated to Greenshift or GERS stock.
Your mention of a complaint to the IRS certainly fits that criteria.
Is there something you would like to know about the company or the stock, aside from the information that would be contained in 18 months' worth of SEC filings?
Naw. This board moves at a snails pace. If and when our day comes, you will not be able to keep up with the posts.
Boredom really. I've never encountered someone so confident with such little reason to be. From the concepts of trading thin all the way up to interactions with the SEC, it's truly remarkable how inaccurate the posts are
Why don't you write the IRS an email filing a formal complaint. Let us know what they say. I think we all remember the huge impact it had when you went to the SEC and i for one have never been more grateful to another person.
You can't do it Monday either.
Or Tuesday
Or Wednesday
Or Thursday
Or Friday
Or the whole week after that.
Or months after that. Unless you're looking to get between 8-10 cents. Although 5000 is chump change so maybe you'll be happy with that.
Unless they bought at .10
No. That is the only problem. You cannot sell your shares at the price you want right now.
That's some thrilling stuff. Put all 2000 shares you have for .085. You'll make 170 bucks! Only problem is there's no liquidity soooooo you couldn't even if you wanted to
And yet, back in the world where people know how stocks work, the bid is only .05
I'd be happy to do the math for you regardless of direction if you need help with that.
I'm sure the seller is thrilled about their 40 dollar trade and, moreover, the 5 dollar difference between .07 and .08
Yeah i think i saw Paul Ryan on here somewhere.
Oh sorry, im also asserting that he won't. Nobody was saying he thinks if a Gerswhale sells out, it'll drop the price to very low levels. He said the last RS was executed predicated on the fact that the price was below acceptable levels without penalty.
Rule 6490.
Granted my initial interpretation/presentation makes it seem like FINRA is more involved in the process but the fact remains that FINRA is capable of reviewing and denying a RS.
Once again, if we believe dilution has not occurred, another RS with no change in the share structure would be very likely to get reviewed. Especially given the history of the company. Obviously we're working off partial information here but FINRA is capable of reviewing and denying RS and GERS would look suuuper suspect if they executed another one.
That said, there's no argument that KK holds the majority voting power. He can attempt to execute as many RS as he wants in his position. Doesn't mean he'll get approved.
FINRA regulates OTC and requires approval to execute an RS. So, yes.
if we agree there's been no dilution, limited chance an RS gets approved. Further, kk would just be begging to get audited. Possible, yes. Likely, no. Unpredictable, always.
I was hoping your selling meant your departure
Soooooooo, does that mean you're gone?