Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It's a matter of being able to trust him. I'm looking for a reason, any good reason that shows up on that proxy with regards to the VC that would allow me to buy. Also, a good solid professional proxy is just standard for legitimate companies. I hope they start off on the right foot. I think long term shareholders (and others) deserve a good proxy with no BS or obscure statements. There is no reason why they can't or shouldnt't that. IMO. We longtermers deserve some good details on this proxy. IMO.
There is always a first time???? Maybe??? Hopefully???
"One could logically infer that a VC name will not be in the proxy and they just don't want to say so because it will cause even more selling..."
That would be a major disappointment IMO. The news of VC capitalization was supposed to be during the holiday season. If it's not included in the PR or is just some vague statement then it may not be good IMO. It would stop me from buying more.
Also, the selling could occur with no VC announcement prior to or after the proxy soI guess it doesn't matter if they are tight lipped. The key IMO is what is in the proxy, the details, and hopefully no obscure wait and see statements. I hope they do this right.
If this proxy doesn't contain info about managing members, VC's, share structure, etc IN DETAIL then they are basically not trustworthy IMO. You are right, we should have had info about the VC'c during the holidays. A good proxy could spur a lot of buying. I'll buy more if the information is included. A disappointing one has the potential to see this go down in flames.....IMO.
The proxy should list the VC's AND management team AND share structure in detail or we could see yucky stuff IMO.
The proxy is mailed out Friday.....so sometime next week the drop on our heads occurs good or bad. They have had a year to prepare for this.
Waiting for the January "Bounce."
Relevant Information should and had better come in this proxy.. This proxy will make or break this, as well it should imo. They have had a year....365 days....52 weeks...lots of minutes and seconds, to work and fine tune this. No excuses this time. Lets see what they are made of. IMO. And no "tweet" proxy. A real paper one. With lots of small words.... on tissue like paper.... in an envelope that looks like it came from the government....with a return envelope with a stamp. IMO.
The VC's were to be announced during "the holidays." Now they should be announced in the proxy. If not....they suck. IMO.
Unless Hayes and PwC decrease their ownership....like I have been saying over and over and over and over and over again by retiring their friggin shares. This could work out great but instead of "we float holders" getting the shaft, the big boys need to make some sacrifices. We the float holders have already done our share by dropping from 50% owners to 10% owners. ENOUGH!! The company existed before with a 50/50 ownership of Hayes and float. Do it 90% US AND 10% OTHERS LIKE MOST COMPANIES DO. EG GOOG. APPLE. ETC. IMO.
Kura,
Unfortunately lots of assumptions. The pattern appears to be that when it is time to pay up or come up with the money it's like cockroaches scattering in the light, quickly disappears . There always seems to be a shift from cashless promise to cashless promise. That proxy IMO won't show any kind of real monetary buyout figure. There will be oooohs and ahhhhhs but nothing solid as far as cash is concerned. If so (a real cash buyout of .05 to .098 or above), as I mentioned before, I will sew my head to the carpet. This proxy will either be a legitimate, professional, fair document or an as usual.... tweet-like POS. We will very soon see what they come up with. If it is bad, shady, unprofessional, then InWith will have lost all credibility and will be toast. Their own mother won't invest in it. They hold the cards. They can't screw this up and expect to come out smelling like a rose. The more I think of it, much depends on this proxy. Not just for us but for "management." All of this IMO. Now for some dental work.
They need to make this proxy a good one, an honest one with as much detail as possible IMO. It will be on record as part of InWith's business dealings with shareholders. I would imagine anyone wanting to do business with InWith (e.g. JNJ, COO, etc) would eventually have access to the proxy and see what InWith is all about....professional, fair, competent....or not. If InWith pisses off 500 plus shareholders with some obscure proxy it could come back to bite them in the future IMO. They need to be honest and careful with this one. This proxy will be examined with a microscope IMO.
Thank You. Very interesting.
"The proxy will be very eye-opening for many investors!"
What do you think it will say???
What information would you like to see in the proxy?
What should rightly be in the proxy?
What information about InWith should be included in the proxy?
What information would you like to see in the proxy?
What should rightly be in the proxy?
When you say everything, that would include management, officers, authorized shares, ?funding? e.g. VC's?........what info would you like to see that would be an encouragement to buy?
SB. Do you know what information would be included in this stock proxy that is coming out? What info do they have to report? TIA
H8ster,
With all due respect, the VC or VC's were supposed to be announced during the "holiday season." They were not and there was no explanation given as to why not. This does not bode well for pushing up confidence which would really help now. Not even a mention that one VC was secured, let alone a name. I smell poo poo until something changes. EPGL needs to put out something legitimate IMO. I won't believe until there is some substantial legitimate info. How likely is that?
C'mon. I'll pay her. I just want someone who knows something about EPGL. Look at it like a referral. She will be thankful. Others can contact her too and pay her.
What's her name and contact info? Maybe a few of us longs can contact her and see what she has to say. Maybe it would convince me to hold or buy more? TIA.
We were told it would be by the holiday season.
News about VC's was supposed to happen during the "holiday season" right?
Exactly right. IMO, tweets are free. PR's cost money and they are saving the money to update the InWith website. Plus they have to pay the new management at InWith. IMO there are no VC's, no "big company" investors. Nada, nutting' and I'm winding out of this disaster. No wait....I can't wait to convert all my shares over to this new "company" to have even more "equity" and have it "dropped on my head" with "the goods" so I'll buy more and more while we still wait on what the real float is....this sucks! IMO.
Thanks a lot. I just bought sterile sewing thread on amazon. More $$$ wasted. Plus I have hardwood floors. Darn.
Can this chitbag hit .024 to .03 by the end of the month or whenever shares convert to InShit? Hope so cause that's where I hope to eject this dooochbaggg. If not I sell on the last day?
Five more trading days??? I thought we had until Jan 31 to hop on to this awesome opportunity??? Time is short. I guess I better buy more now. Whoopy doo. Yeah.
Buying opportunity...Buying opportunity....etc etc.... as InWith now announces their new head...in a tweet..... mank. I'll sew my head to the carpet if this works out well. IMO.
Why be surprised?? EPGL is such a great stock. Great management. Great business plan. More to come 1/10/2018 right? Now a new CEO of InWith mentioned in a tweet (not a PR)....someone that has corporate experience and is a fresh pair of eyes to EPGL, not someone that has been around here for the last 6 years. Awesome. IMO.
Wasn't there a PR company that received 20 million shares to do a promotional campaign but was sidetracked by the hurricane? Yes. Keep buying. Go Go Go!!!
Whoopy dooo!
I feel your pain. At this point he only way to own InWith is to own EPGL. So if folks were interested in InWith I would imagine that they would be buying EPGL. But I also wonder why Hayes/PwC would even mess with the retail shareholder when we would only make up 10%????
I guess this it he January bounce????
Interesting that someone is actually buying at .014??? With what looks like 2M in sells is actually being bought? I would have thought it would drop the price into the .012 or .013 range? Is WDCO still hanging around??
Hey gman....what do you think of the recent "Developments?" You gonna keep riding this? You and I and a few others have many shares. Do we keep the faith?
Gman where are you! What do you think about all these wonderful developments???
Franck. Thats from 2015. 2015 man.!!!! 2015. They need to chit or get off the pottttttt. WTF!! IMO.
Not much info on InWith. Would think there would be as much info as possible so as to draw investors????
https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/people.asp?privcapId=418668790
Good questions frank and they should clear this up ASAP. Also no reason to give details of the company structure including management and financial backers. Any info should be verifiable. IMO.