Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Now I am out. An up day when there are 3 sells to one by. Good luck guys but the MACD are starting to worry me. Hopefully I am wrong, but I am going to buy back on the dip.
Rivetz would be the huge game changer. However, if any of their companies are bought, this will go through the roof and then will be listed quickly. Their portfolio is insane right now. I think it took time to take that PVSP loss off the books. Not sure if Paul still has his 40 million shares. However, because the ladies are paid in shares, they have a huge incentive to move the price.I nearly fell over after seeing the last K. Their business will only go up from here. Just need to get the weak hands out of this one.
I have been trading VSTR the whole time. Last year when it had it's run, I bailed at .01 and bought on the way down. Most people know I never put more than $1,000 in any penny stock, I mainly do bullish call spreads. However, I keep 5 lottery tickets going at a time. I have averaged 100% return per year every year on this stock. However, I had when it makes these mad runs straight up. I also have some of the Rivetz token. Since the new regs in the US, I am unable to trade half the crypto I own...RVT being one of them. HOWEVER, if you read their whitepaper on the Facebook Libra, I have a feeling that they will pop and when they do, Valuesetters will be a .10 stock. As crazy as it sounds, we are at the point I believe that this could go to $1 with the number of companies they are invested in. It has just been a rocky five years and these spikes get frustrating.
Yes, I have been buying since .0017. If the the MACD's cross I am selling everything and buying back at .005
the MACD needs to change direction.
I got to give it to them, they did it. I also have to say...they would not be doing this if there wasn't something that is going to push them forward.
Your opinion. Remember, past performance is no indication or guarantee of future results. I really don't think this is going back to trips after all they went through to get up listed.
OTCQB...they did it. So I guess they were not lying. It took weeks as they mentioned, but they are now trading on OTCQB. Got to give them credit for following through on that one.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190731005057/en/Textmunication-Holdings-Begins-Trading-OTCQB-Market
Keep in mind, This company is not dead, and in my opinion has a bright future. However, there is a greedy law firm of attorneys that are going to get them on the NASDAQ. Believe me, if they announce the reverse, I will buy heavy right before the reverse. They want this to be a minimum of $1-$2 and probably looking to have a $5 to be listed. We are seriously on the verge of a 10 to 20 bagger.
You just proved my point. I don't have time to run through all of them, but I will start at the bottom, here's last years news on Visium Technologies...yes a reverse stock split and name change.
https://www.visiumtechnologies.com/visium-news/2018/11/15/nustate-energy-holdings-inc-announces-name-change-ticker-symbol-change-amp-reverse-stock-split-25-apr-2018
Thanks for helping to prove my point. 2 for 2 on the reverse splits. Maybe you should research your own information before you post. The reverse is coming.
LOL...you have to have cash to do a buyback. Again, do you really think that this law firm cares about the shareholders? Nope, they care about getting the company listed and getting their bonus.
I know how to get to the EDGAR database It is all nice and neat in this filing that shows a full history of the shares issued. I am not sure how you can read this and believe that there will be a cancellation or buyback or anything else but a R/S.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1386049/000144586619000111/byoc_424b.htm
Companies do not uplist with over 1 billion shares. Especially with revenues this low. The fact that they are now using this firm shows that they are serious about uplisting and will do what the firm tells them. When the R/S is announced, wait for it to tank deep into the trips, buy and then you should hit big. But you are crazy if you don't think they are not going to announce a reverse split in the near future.
You better watch this thing. The law firm they just hired did an uplist for BLNK to the nasdaq last year. They forced a 1 for 50 reverse split 6 months prior. They will announce the reverse, this will crash into the trips, buy the trips and after the reverse we will have a 10 bagger.
Wrong, I will like BYOC after the reverse split. We all know what is going to happen. They will announce a reverse split. It will fall into the trips, they will do somewhere between a 1 for 100 and 1 for 1000 reverse, then after the reverse, we have a 10 to 20 bagger. Name one pennystock that uplisted with a billion shares.
How is that nice news? BLNK, the last firm they uplisted did a 1 for 50 reverse split 6 months before they were uplisted. That firm is in control now. This means BYOC will do a reverse split.
Here's the last firm they uplisted. 6 months prior to the uplist they had them do a 1 for 50 reverse split. BYOC will be doing the same.
https://www.lucbro.com/single-post/2018/02/21/Lucosky-Brookman-Congratulates-its-client-Blink-Charging-Co-BLNK-on-its-18500250-Capital-Raise-and-NASDAQ-Listing
No, actually it is fact. Look up Blink (BLNK) They used to be listed under the name CarCharging. In August of 2017 they changed their name to Blink and did a 1 for 50 reverse split. Then in Feb of 2018 they were uplisted on the NASDAQ. Like I say, the Law Firm does not care about the shareholders.
BYOC will do a reverse split.
https://www.blinkcharging.com/single-post/2017/08/29/CarCharging-Announces-Corporate-Rebranding-and-Reverse-Split
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/02/14/1340306/0/en/Blink-Charging-Co-Announces-18-500-250-Public-Offering-and-NASDAQ-Listing.html
So tell me how you think BYOC is going to be different.
LOL, I think we have all heard of that...I really don't care if they said they are not going to do a RS. It doesn't matter. It is what Lucosky Brookman tells them to do. You really think the law firm is going to tell them to do a share buyback? Look up that firm. Look at their past clients. R/S at this price is imminent. Look at BLNK. Lucosky Brookman just had them uplisted on the NASDAQ last year. 6 months before uplisting, Lucosky had them do a 1 for 50 reverse split. Look them up. CarCharging was their previous name and they changed to Blink, did the reverse split, and then hit the NASDAQ. The reverse split is coming.
Never thought I would say this, but the reverse is coming. That law firm is going to have them do at lease a 100/1 reverse. They will not uplist with over a billion shares outstanding. When this hits trips, anyone would be crazy not to buy.
Good grief. I am shaking my head over that one. He needs to call gamblers anonymous. I would have liquidated as fast as possible and then use some to buy on the dips. That is pretty sad to lose all that money and really have no hope to come close to recouping. My theory still remains that he had to sell some to pay legal fees, but I have a feeling he will lose almost the entire settlement amount.
I think that TXHD has one more run in it, doubtful that it could ever run over $1 again. Even so, I think Einhaus is always restricted to only 10k shares per trading day. You must have a real gambling problem when you are handed $250k from a $25k investment and let it whittle down to $31k instead of taking it and celebrating your gains. As Warren Buffet said..."I have made a lot of money selling too soon."
I hate to say it but there is going to be a difference this time, they already gave you shares. Remember, the lawsuit Einhaus Vs TXHD was for a $25,000 loan. They had to pay out 450,000 shares which at the time was about $250k...for a $25k loan. The judge is going to sit there and say...why didn't you just sell your shares like all the other lenders to recoup your money? Why didn't you just sell enough to at least get your $25k back. You had your chance. Actually, if you still have 450,000 shares from the settlement, you are still worth $31k. The $220k in value that you lost is on you, not TXHD.
TXHD at 10:38 10k shares sold, VSTR at 10:32, 10k shares sold. The haunting of Paul Riss.
Fake news. Everyone knows I work for LexisNexis. I went through Shepard's, no cases. I went through Courtlink (Lexis version of PACER) no dockets. I went to Law360, no news. I will set an alert for his name and I will know if something is happening. No one at TXHD is being sued.
I have some of their crypto. They have a utility token. If you go to Telegram, the CEO is constantly updating what they are doing with their 2FA app that utilizes the TEE installed on everyone's phone. This will be the future of safe mobile wallets. What is huge is they just did a Whitepaper on the Libra (Facebook's Crypto) and are involved with talks regarding security in the blockchain arena. They have a couple of large partners that are bringing them in to discuss how a Mobile hardware based Libra wallet can be deployed. Helping them to deliver a model where using big data is not the only way to provide protection. Private keys and strong policies with dual roots of trust can give global telco customers a world class financial solution. Steven Spraque is a strong CEO because he is a tech savvy person that is...old. So he has years of experience watching the evolution of cyber security. He has more experience and understands all the tech these young Tech CEO's understand. IF Rivetz hits with Facebook, VSTR is $1 and some of us will be overnight millionaires.
So why did Tom Dibenedetto become and adviser to the company and how do they have $1 million in annual revs if they are a scam?
I didn't say he was. However, he has contacts in high places that he can get them in front of for new business. I am expecting a company he knows well will start to use their service.
Sounds like those Green New Deal people. I don't think it is that bad. They issued those shares so they could self fund vs going with toxic lenders. Yes, they aren't doing great, but they are not doing that bad. Besides, Tom DiBenedetto would not have become an adviser if he did not have a large account in mind. He probably has a connection that can use the service but it won't close overnight.
In October of 2018, there was a settlement between TXHD and a holder of a convertible note, Lester Einhaus. He received 475,000 shares. 198,000 up front and then the rest in tranches as long as he was not above a 4.99% ownership. At the time it was .70 per share which gave him a value of $332,500. Rumor has it that he never sold his shares which is crazy because all lenders sell their shares as soon as they get their hands on them. Now those shares would be worth $71,250. So if he had just sold all of his shares like all the other lenders do, he probably would have averaged .50 per share or $237,500. After taxes he could have still taken $100,000 for himself and then bought back the same 475,000 share position with the remaining value. Talk about a horrible move.
No kidding, can you imagine all the 8k the major corps would have to file for every sales they made. Things are getting more and more crazy by the day.
And it only took a couple months to happen, course if it went the other way I am sure you would be bragging as well. Here's my prediction...in the next two months, it will hit .10 or it could pop to .50. I will make sure I let everyone know how awesome I am as soon as we see one of those two numbers in the next two months. TXHD
Typical American, if it doesn't work in the U.S. then it doesn't work anywhere. If $txhd gets in the cannabis industry it will be much more lucrative than Health Care. From the looks of it, they are limited with their communications which would make TXHD perfect.
It's good, it is just not a Q that will justify this as a $2.00 stock. Tim has had no effect on business at all. Makes me wonder why he is there.
But it also shows that their liabilities dropped by almost $200k so that is not a big deal.
We knew about that. They had the $300k acquisition of that small company in first quarter. What is really bad is the drop in revenues. It shows they have done nothing over the past year to increase revenues. They said the launch of SAM last year would be a game changer. Looks like that crashed and burned.
And your thoughts?
Don't forget the revenues. They aren't growing either.
That is why I just dumped my shares at .0012. I wish everyone the best. But the ONLY reason I got in this in the first place was the $35 million worth of patents they claimed to have. I realized I am not going to make money on this if all they have are socks. They are competing against all the large clothing lines. I was expecting something to happen with the other technologies. Like I say, I wish everyone good luck, but I lost my faith in Alex and am pursuing other opportunities. I would suggest others take a good look and really think if this is something that will truly move.
Yes, the 2001 split...were you texting in 2001?