Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do you follow now?
Well, they took mine at 1.88...
I had 60 day orders in at 2.45-2.95 and had to change them...
We have at least 2 big announcements coming up...
Cash from China any day?
Preferred conversion?
Additional announcement would be additional large orders for THIS year...
Sold 90% stake here becuase I was on verge of calling my own suicide hotline...
Good luck to you aeti!
He’s been optimistic since the price was $70+ share.
Good observation, however I wouldn’t use that as an investment strategy.
Really?Cmon....
How come nobody reshared the google doc? Updated?
FYI: This trail leads to “nowhere”
8k Ambiguity? There was is non here.
It’s 72 hours + plus (?)?
I’ll be clear: the only defense to not filing would be an internal cvm legislation.
Internal legislation doesn’t mean squat. All they are is an excuse to pursue your desired interpretation, but they do NOT replace or replicate existing law.
I wrote my own contract for 15 years tight as a whistle. I never once based the substance of my contracts on anything other than prior accepted and interpretations of existing law. More importantly I never provided services to anybody who did NOT accept BOTH my contract and prior interpretations of the law.
What the F is article “x”? It’s BS.
Speaking of letter/couriers service....I could write a letter requiring signature to cvm...stating my own article “x” if they do or don’t do??? Who the f cares?
cvm safety net is!!!!! Sue what? They have nothing? Until they do!
Suits from 30 years ago will be ringing loud! If there is any “out of then ball park”?
The contract is short till death the sue to heaven (out of ball park).
Like you; for patients...i hope for best.
Greet is going to jail with any success!
Protectionism doesn’t make him a martyr!
Can “you” know see zero sum? Buyout trade?
Who cares which it would be?
Is it 8k worthy or not? Answer is definitely Yes.
Maybe they both lost and agreed in such a case to settle the difference in award without any verbiage.
For example: $5m to cvm. The arbitrator found favor in both plaintiffs with the damages exceeding $5 for cvm...
It’s is news that would reasonably effects investors decision.
Cvm and synh are required to file in this case....
It may not have a financial impact on synh in their opinion...but it’s reasonable to say it would have an impact on their business and is of importance of their investors.
The same can be said for cvm and the obvious financial impact.
Interesting interpretation.
It has a very large impact on cvm financially irrelevant of the outcome. It is without doubt material.
The only way a release of information could be delayed is becuase an argreememt between the 2 parties; based on what? I could imagine, but non of my imaginations seem to merit an extension.
I’ve got it. The arbitrator asked for an extension...
It’s light rock. K. Get it?
Tesla, Elon, get it?
Is it him?
Does it matter?
I think Elon is sooo wrong, but is he stupid? Can you learn something from him?
I definitely have shareholder value in mind when i post. Does “that” make me right or wrong?
My advice would be; sell every damn share you have except for 100 shares. Hold the 100 forever.
Then jump on every single suit that comes about....and you will learn and be prosperous.
This is how “one / group”could negate the light rock and the learning curve....you could hypothetically create a flat no gravity line!
I’ll be surprised if we don’t hit 2.20 by Thursday.
This forecast is purely based on the incompetence displayed here; not the tape, not fundamentals....
FYI: I saw a “ hallmark” post from dr Frost cronies. Beware
Considering you don’t even know the definition of the information you are posting makes it impossible for you to have any opinion about any observation regarding it or somebody else’s.
What does the data you post “show” by definition and what does it NOT show by definition?
It’s sad and funny at the same time.
That made me laugh out loud!
Ok.
I’ll browse the tape from time to time and rouse if its demands merit.
I still bend the metrics sooner than January though.
Is it legal to do so now?
You read that on a message board didn’t you? Lol
Wow. Can I smear volume...
I think there is a chance of cease to exist, but I didn’t interpret one thing you said as so... and I agree with you that more likely a recap (if worse case scenario comes to fruition) as you stated.
However, I don’t agree with either of your basis standpoints for position...
Don’t touch the “pot” sir!
It’s simple. You can buy and sell for 45 days barring now news.
Or you can read the news and buy or sell.
Worst case scenario: the preferred become unlocked and they get bought out super cheap (price doesn’t account for intangibles and they blame market sector decision on the likes of major industry players such as GE).
The only reason to peruse the above direction would be from fraud. The intangibles are obvious and industry players (ge) do NOT have a correlation within the balance sheet to claim comparison.
The comparison would lack business substance. Industry does not automate correlation.
I don’t believe aeti management would go in this direction of collusion (they have proven to me to be bright enough and morally bound); however anything is possible....and exits from a paradox appear even more appealing when the corner is turning. —- analogy: some people have crazy investment styles...where, like all they win and lose; but they only fail becuase they can’t hold on when winning - to both maximize the profit and compensate for their losers. (Its a psychological effect of motivated when losing, but complacent when winning... aeti management could suffer from this, but I doubt it. Their escape would intail fraud at this juncture.
They must demand a premium (buyout) or see it out...
FYI: ge was 2 years late to the aeti internal intervention workshop....it would look stupid if they (aeti) jumped ship first?
Sure, sue the whole world.
Seriously, it’s not my expertise, but I don’t see what your thinking (especially if you’re a shareholder).
As a law firm, why not? Get paid to fail or not...
However, if you can portray a case I can entertain I’ll take a small position just to participate.
Having said that, I believe a case would be much better built around cvm management...I’ve stated many of the red flags on multiple occasions.
In the end, you’re better off being a whistleblower! Go it alone.
I’ve thought about, but the amount of work, without knowing I get paid...was still ok....because of the education I’d give myself...but i don’t have the time to also work for money, search for a better job, trade and spend time with family and be a whistleblower.
...you never know though; could be biggest payout ever in cash and education.
I applaud you in advance if you make a go of it.
And on that note; I don’t cvm will get anything...at least not substantial
I’d think in case of loss; they would be payer and could then go to insurance....
Cvm is suing inventive not their insurance...
If not, then they would have to burden to cost of additional time and the final amount would increase...leading right back to my previous posts
Nope I didn’t. Once trump opened his mouth the idea for the trade was lost for me.
I haven’t looked at it’s tape in a while, but this is where I would short it if I had the guts/capital.
Not sure if there is a connection between anson and mmcap, but there sure is between cvm and mmcap.
It’s been a long time (years) since I looked at mmcap history, but he had made few great trades....
He also seems to get a call from some cvm funder when they need help
No, but without spelling out every detail I made an analogy.
How many capital raise has cvm done since then?
How many warrant adjustments?
You own paper equity of cvm.
You could sue alone and go against article “x”
Or class action
But if you take their money??? How would they operate? Sounds like zero sum to me
On another note...I had some time and did some basic research on a post from some time ago about anson funds taking a position. I had already made some brief commments about it, but took a slightly deeper dive.
Did anybody else?
This is “pure observation”; not position taking information...
As I said before, anson and mmcap are geographically close. The founders are also close in age and enjoy what appears similar “tastes”. (FYI: I am not insinuate they are friends; they could be enemies? Too?)
Anson has appeared to want publicity and found themselves with a market value equal to their initial point and down 90% from the high
Sounds like somebody I could have been if I got lucky out the door....I’d like to think I would be better, but who knew?
This is why appreciate my life and ALL it has offered me
Not a good point. This isn’t a car wreck where you sue somebody and find out their insurance expired and the insurance company says go after the individual.
Arbitrator assigns damages / awards. If inventive loses they can fight at another date / platform with their insurance company or vice versa, but can NOT withhold any award from cvm. One of them must burden this expense of findings....
Imagine I own a candy shop with $200 in stock and i owe a manufacturer $100; then I am robbed of $200 in candy. While I’m waiting for reimbursement from insurance for goods stolen I am late on my payment to manufacturer and the manufacturer increases interest on past due debt. I can not tell my insurance “Becuase this arrangement with this manufacturer is this and this supplier is this, etc... I need you to cover those expenses (interest in this case )as well”.
Entities are accountable just like people. One can’t get robbed and then rob somebody else with the excuse that somebody robbed them and expect to be forgiven/not held accountable.
It’s like the poster who mentioned previous r/s be undone...lol
F bro can I please go back and buy “x” stock at this price and sell at this price? Lol
Same with cvm and warrants: go pink, go gray; but adjust an asset? Lol
Problem is; what could one get from cvm if it fails? The answer is “zero”
I had bought back at 2.76. There was weak buy signal so I took $1000 worth; i really thought low $4 was in the cards.
The sell signal I saw yesterday was real strong though. (So I kinda screamed it)
Just playing the obvious 3 day rule here and there a bit agaisnt novice - non margin accounts traders....
Personal I think the run up has a bit to do with a few traders like myself who extracted cash and they are trying to recoup. I crushed them with ~1.35 to ~ $1.95 trade.
Remember this post ; https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139675118
It’s not 100% full proof. As nothing is.
I trust my ability to read tape. I sold out at again 3.07 which was when and where pps was when I saw and posted.
No. Because the tape signal says so
Signal: get out now.
What are you lost about?
Ok. I’ll contemplate.... no. You’re wrong OR you just provided me with years of experience in a moment (thanks in advance)
I can’t bypass the idea: an errant “happening” forgives future actions...
(Without going into depth; this is why i Love the market’s “truth”.)
Secondly: the adjustment in warrants alienates this arguement. Coins are 2 sided, but reality is not.
You can’t play all sides...and article “x” only has so much protection? To a point of liquidation?
Which brings me back to (I haven’t mentioned in some time)“orange” jump suits.
The idea of contemplation of you’re scenario, when anti dilution rights have been extenuated via “old” world legalise ,is highly improbable.
If you’re right? I will come back as jktg “k” (know)!
If one wanted to be super duper optimistic? Cvm could cancel the registrations statement as it (s1) is not “effective” and pay emgromed cash for services if they happen to win a large arbitration?
Yes it’s the same.
This post has some “extras” in it, but also contains the jist of it: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140974979
One could pay much more for the shares...
If one was super optimistic; one could buy out the current and future debts of emgromed....up to $8.2m
Neither
Just logic being applied; but don’t you think the news comes out during market hours Friday at the latest?
It’s an event the ceo has pointed to as material multiple times...is he really going to delay it because he can use the limit of the sec rules?
In addition, don’t you think that a settlement has been suggested by the arbitrator? Of course the arbitrator suggests so!
So, I suppose, pre market tomorrow through market hours Friday the information will be disseminated.
The oddity is “Gerty classic” as pijoe put it. (I really like the phrase “gerty classic” - it fits)
A gerty classic would be: settlement at last possible moment; thus release early next week with a deflated story about how viagra was discovered by accident.
So, in a jiffy, the sirens will ring which ever way pps goes, but reality is?
I’m not sure if that was your personal offer?
Either way, not even close
Management: check check check
ss: check
Value: check
Internally liquid: check check check
Liquidation value: check
Intangibles with value: check check check
Growing industry: check
Upside surprise: check check
Like I said I’m not in control. (I’m observing the super trader who flipped the script without detection....trying to learn how to accomplish such a feat; every scenario I contemplate gets shut down unless I have $5m+ in Capital and even then I’m not sure I’d be comfortable)
But I say when. (I hold all the shares being borrowed...I’m doing the dirty work because I’m not good enough to be in charge)
It’s a fair trade. I learn at the price of risk. It’s up to me to learn. I must only do my work. Risk is only a word.
You’re right, more importantly for the right reasons.
See you at $4+
Since you don’t seem to know. That is not the amount of shares sold to take a short position.
Anybody have a tally on how many new gigs “Lake the lawyer” are taking to compensate for disaster ahead?
Nothing like researching history? I’d beg to differ...
How many here looked at history?
And as time passed; how many looked at where their time has been devoted along the way?
That would give one an inclination as to the future....
They were sitting at the table and thought they were buyers or was reality that all the others just sellers?
If you can’t figure out to ask these questions; you shouldn’t be investing....
The answers come easier and easier with time....but they aren’t ever easy
Really? What “sounds” bullish?
Cvm will incur further debt from them.
They can sell everyday for proceeds.
If proceeds exceed debt it goes against future debt.
If proceeds do not exceed debt they can ?
It’s simply anti dilution rights to liquidate.
Did you notice the cutoff? $8.2M
Does that remind you of a particular warrants price?
It clearly reads that if a bunch of ignorant retail investors come along they will not allow it to disrupt the next leg options chain.
Geert has more optimistic hope than this entire board combined multiplied by infinity....it’s ridiculous he even takes the time to put these caveats in the so called liquidation “agreement”
You realize I could stab a voodoo doll for cure...
This is not prove it works mentality; it’s a prove it doesn’t?
So do I. I have more than of trading volume.
It goes when I say go. And I’m not in control.
Make an offer I can’t refuse
I didn’t read. Buy I will say; every pediatric nurse believes and knows immunotherapy...and says
Good luck to all participants! Of all trials! Of all!!!!!
Friend! The study (massive) was first constructed to find anomalies within to extract success.
The study was inherently “lost in time” due to cro.....One would assume this would favor arbitration, but it is imperative to NOT ignore the study was massive to find anomalies.
All the while the educational finance workshop plays a fiddle....
Ps. At the end of a recent post: I posted “remember....” with a periods - not ?
This was a sign of respect. The one who wins always asks the question????....????...
——-
I can point to infinite examples....do remember my post about learning Latin?
FYI : the tape Reads inconclusive, but an expert is playIng.
Expect fall pps. Then expect rise; time the 3 day rule settlements of novice traders who don’t like a warning. Then game on. It is what it is.....
What if machines out smarter us? Thank “you” for sharing that with me....I had not run that concept as an intermediary player....only as concept.