is...whatever
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
But I thought you were a VERY PERSISTENT BELIEVER ( before ) ?!!!
( Regarding your comment saying that you wish that you would have kept your 2009 shares : )
Did you take into account ( at least ) the PREVIOUS 1:35 R(everse)/S(plit) ?
Sounds like you didn't !
Really don't know.
Holding onto my 5 million shares.
:)
Yup.
No BS this ( -> ( Multiple ) R/S ( reverse splits ), paid pumping etc. etc. ).
LOL
So Santa Claus DOES exist ?!!!
LOL
;p
I didn't 'dare' to ( check & ) log in to react from the computer @ my work office as both our public servers were infected by a worm-virus yesterday.
So I do it now from home.
( By the way, ) What ka-ching ?
I'm averaged at appr. 1.28.
Didn't sell @ 1.92, going for the long-term on this one.
Can understand that you're aiming for appr. 1.60 purchase price + 0.20/0.30 = 13% - near 20% profit though.
You're back !
Welcome & good luck fortune !
:)
Oh, DOWN we go some MORE... But NOT relevant, because ( we didn't ) :
Oh, DOWN(wards) / THERE we go...
Ok, I don't mind !
Geek stink breath...
;p
Noooooooooo !!!!!!!!!!
But I'm very sure you're right...
( Even ) After some of the tries ( few years ago ) to contact them & the ones they we're ( supposedly ) officially dealing with resulted in no reply whatsoever.
Expense = big black hole in my portfolio ( = my own mistake ).
I had already left the office a long time ago, trash has become stench of rot so I will leave my shares there, could somebody else please turn out the lights then ?
I respectfully agree with you that you can respectfully disagree with me, just the same as any person can respectfully agree & respectfully disagree with any other -> That's DEMOCRACY !!!
;p
( I ) See this snail getting held up by piles of gold ( in your picture ;p ). Would've expected ( much ) quicker rise, but it can wait, ( with nearly 75% less debt & higher-yield wells operating ) ( in time ) this can only get up anyways...
Hey Spuds,
VRX not doing so well, trying to make some profit here ( 'instead' ) ?
'This one's much better !'
Good luck !
:)
Ahoo
Great for me as well, in my case almost +50% in appr. 1 year's time ( since August '15 ) with price increase ( averaged down in February '16 ) & received monthly dividends.
:)
So many articles incl. N/A's incl. :
http://www.greenvilletribune.com/linn-co-llc-nasdaqlnco-earnings-estimates-in-view/
The professionals who analyze Linn Co, LLC (NASDAQ:LNCO) shares have created price target projections on the firm. They anticipate that the shares will rise to $131.074 within the year. This number is calculated by Zacks.com, a provider of quality investment research. Zack’s anticipate a high between $N/A and $N/A for the stock. This is based on the N/A analysts polled by Zacks.
( Was ) Thinking the same thing...
Last time bought 5.000 x 0,18, sold ( 'too late' ) @ 0,90.
This time bought @ double ( 0,36 x 20.000 ) & half of it ( 0,09 x 30.000 ) to average to appr. 0,20.
Why would they deal with all the hassle of giving shareholders the option of exchanging/transferring their LINE shares to LNCO shares incl. deadline(s) etc. if it was only / all the latest bad news regarding the restructuring ( after that ) ?
Patience, patience...
Why, spaceman ? Why ?!!!
Choose : Insert Twilight Zone or X-Files tune here...
;p
Well, I am. In since August last year @ 7.00 & averaged down to 6.00 @ Jan.+Feb. this year and collecting dividends every month, which is currently appr. 0.08 cents / 1,25+%. Content investor here... :)
Talking...Out...Of...Behind...
Only providing subjective hear-say about VRX & not the requested links / FACTS that others have provided to DO back up what they say/show...
I got in at 0.18 & didn't pull the trigger around 1.60+ height ( hoping for 10-fold @ 1.80 ), but only regretfully afterwards @ 0.90 ( still 5-fold ) when it was dropping as fast as / faster than it climbed before. VERY volatile weeks...
SPACE BAR, HA HA HA !!!
:)
You can say 'looking good' when it's up a bit ( 1 day ago ), he can say the same factual 'looking bad' when it's down ( today )...
Got me some @ 0,18.
Let's see...
Regarding the Feb. 2nd 'http://ir.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/press-releases/detail/113/clean-coal-technologies-inc-announces-webcast-to-update' on Technology Testing and Corporate Financials, DID ANYONE GET THE CORPORATE FINANCIALS PART ( if the later Feb. 5th 'http://ir.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/press-releases/detail/114/clean-coal-technologies-inc-announces-the-successful' is regarding the technology testing part ) ?
I think he means his buttocks, HA HA !!!
;p
D@rn dude, I sold back in 2009 @ US$ 10, perhaps to you ! :)
-> In my case I also listened to my wife -> to go on holidays ( therefore sold as we needed the money for that ) ...
Bought @ Q4-08 ( & Q1-09 ) against 5,50 and 3,75 but couldn't get them @ 1,25 placed order. Sold them mid-2009, to my regret. Now back in @ 45 since December for dividend etc.
Yeah, also that was paid for by the investors after the 1:35 reverse split ( last year )... ;p
Thanx for agreeing on the truth, Cartman !
Will read the detailed new 8-k when I have time for that.
By the way, was it / did Lone Wolf leave as moderator as I noticed that it has decreased from 3 to 2 ( you & AKthisistheone ) ?
Ok, thank you for the explanation, Cartman !
If it was because of me using the same b-word & content/meaning following dsaul's 20th post # 34219 : 'Too many investment options to b*tch and moan about any one
company.' then I don't understand why his post is still there in its original form.
If it was because a word similar to poop, ok then here is the re-post with the original word replaced by a 'less sensitive loading' :
After holding the SHARES for appr. 7 years incl. a 1:35 reverse split last year, I had decided to sell them. So yes, I've sold my SHARES. Pretty sure I'm entitled to MY own opinion ( 'to b1tch about 1 company' ) & at least I'm telling the truth instead of just talking some nonSENSEe ( out of the blue, talking about DD ).
Update : Oh, I get it, his last reply has been taken down & the previous 1 has expired the 48-hour period.
-> Re-Update : Oh, no, it hasn't ( it's still within the 48 hours after the date stamp, just double-checked this ).
Just a general comment : Hmmm, quite weird that the B-word ( which I feel is more vulgar than -> ) is allowed & the S-word isn't...
Well, that's 'JUST' MY opinion...
;p
I wanted to reply to that last 1, but it's already gone.
'Too bad...'
Well, here's what I'll say after remembering some of what that noob wrote :
Yes, I've held them for nearly 7 years or so, but very luckily, I sold them against a mere 7% loss ( after having averaged down ) in the recent months instead of a near total-loss last year / before.
Yeah, why PR it in 'more expensive' black & white writing if you can reverse-split the shares a couple of times ( in the past ) & pay MILLIONS to (ex-)officers instead, huh ?!
( By the way, I think jmd168 meant PR it on the web ( instead of webcast ), not actually physical printing material... )
Nahhh..........
Nehhh..........
I would believe it. As it's highly likely that it's an honest, objective post that wouldn't help the poster ( negative info & hardly any ( shares ) transactions ) anyway.
Although I also 'believed' this could be a winner a long time ago but has instead burned a BIG BLACK HOLE in my portfolio...
HHHhhhhhhh..........
I'm afraid that, even so, ( even ) according to their own recently filed 10-k, they still expect loss in the coming years ( especially with increasing / such high salaries ( before any results finally still having become concrete ) incl. shares for which the loans, urrrh I mean funding were needed ) @ page # 16 :
'We expect that we will continue to have net losses from operations for several years until revenues from operating facilities become sufficient to offset operating expenses, unless we are successful in the sale of licenses for our technology.'