Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yeah, because averaging down is never done.
They can take my shares when they take my guns...
out of my cold dead hands.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Interesting if true.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ValuInvstrToday/status/832420823411654656
Pray tell, who has a better track record of enforcing confidentiality and snuffing out leaks of sensitive information the past 20 years, the federal government or the collective top fortune 50 companies (the ones the feds haven't co-opted) ?
Ever heard of something called wikileaks?
Repeating a lie enough times does't make it true?
Great, maybe it will drop 50% and i can double my purchasing power.
No room, then please explain how stock was sold to build equity in a company that has no room for investors?
If you're still accumulating like me, it's nice that the shortsighted are stoking the fires of fear.
My base has been set for a while, but it's nice to be able to continue adding to my trading position.
It's a Valentine's day miracle!
Keep the faith brother. 6 months and every hour will be power hour.
Power Hour is real
Is he the one that sang, "I bought the law, and the law won... I bought the law, and the law won."?
Since you've been following a guy that was relatively unknown by 98% of the country before November, exactly what have you observed over these many years?
Nov election moved it. Mnuchin's single statement really MOVED it.
The organized protests being aired on fake news stations is because, the current administration IS doing exactly what they said they would do. And doing it at warp speed. A novel concept to politics.
So knowing that the administration is keeping their word, rather you agree with their views or not is irrelevant here. And their word was that F and F are top 10 priorities that they wish to address. Was there something not said about the first 100 days?
I don't have time to worry about looking stupid, i've been too busy trying to get my hands on more cash to get in at this pre-rocket level.
Mnuchin being lower in the batting order is a positive sign. The votes are there.
When the Saint's Go Mnuchin In!
advancementvotearama2electricboogaloo
Sarcasm. It's not been priced in.
Sure it is. It's exactly why this play is about topped out. Turn out the lights, no where to go from her folks.
Hahahahahahaha! Funny stuff. Do you do birthdays as well?
My take on it all, is just that. Without definitive terms, you can't and don't know entirely how to calculate the situation.
You can produce postulated answers, but nothing can be definitive.
I would hope that honest accounting would be applied, but what has been honest in concern of these entities thus far?
Pre-payment of a principal before the principal is even drawn for a loan should not only be applied to the principal, but should be drawing fair interest on the positive balance as well. And why not equal interest to that being charged by the treasury?
Lots of possibilities with no definitive answers.
This is the longest Christmas Eve in history!
Sure, sounds good. I'd put a lot on shorting this if I were you. Lol!!!!!
Figuring what kind of dividend?
Federal courts need drained as well.
Democrat, so pretty much.... both are know to base decisions largely on feelings.
Gee, wonder how a joke of a community organizer thought he knew how to completely change the nations healthcare for the better?
Oh yeah, a felon wrote 90% of it while in prison..... great source for policy.
Obviously much better than a neurosurgeon.
Yes.
Capuano is a Representative but an obvious example of crossing over.
"Only" is not correct either. What is lacking between the 4 corners of the document is also very important.
And many cases are brought to the courts because of such.
You mention damages... seems that the court does weigh it's decision on how a decision may damage, or seriously and grievously cause suffering or harm to the parties.
Please inform me if I am wrong in the following:
One party has been made whole to the monies loaned at and above the original terms of the loan. Which arguably may have only been necessitated by false accounting methods. And so not only made whole on a potentially unnecessary loan forced on the company, but the entirety of the conservatorship may be in question. Not only such, but more importantly, the original management of said company was removed by force and so only were the warrants/loan agreed to by agents assigned to that company by the same entity as is party to the loan in question.
If there was no merit to the actions, would they not have been dismissed?
If there is merit, then the court when abiding by previous precedent will weigh potential harm to both parties in making decisions.
To what extent will the treasury be harmed in relation to the original loan/monies if the warrants are canceled?
To what extent will the company be harmed if the warrants are not canceled in relation to the original loan with loss of value to the company, all monies paid toward the end of that loan, plus swept profits following repayment of that loan in full?
If the validity of the Conservatorship is open to fight, how are all actions that followed not open to the same evaluation of validity?
The answer always depends on the question. Are the correct questions being asked and answered.
"Only" is not correct either. What is lacking between the 4 corners of the document is also very important.
And many cases are brought to the courts because of such.
You mention damages... seems that the court does weigh it's decision on how a decision may damage, or seriously and grievously cause suffering or harm to the parties.
Please inform me if I am wrong in the following:
One party has been made whole to the monies loaned at and above the original terms of the loan. Which arguably may have only been necessitated by false accounting methods. And so not only made whole on a potentially unnecessary loan forced on the company, but the entirety of the conservatorship may be in question. Not only such, but more importantly, the original management of said company was removed by force and so only were the warrants/loan agreed to by agents assigned to that company by the same entity as is party to the loan in question.
If there was no merit to the actions, would they not have been dismissed?
If there is merit, then the court when abiding by previous precedent will weigh potential harm to both parties in making decisions.
To what extent will the treasury be harmed in relation to the original loan/monies if the warrants are canceled?
To what extent will the company be harmed if the warrants are not canceled in relation to the original loan with loss of value to the company, all monies paid toward the end of that loan, plus swept profits following repayment of that loan in full?
If the validity of the Conservatorship is open to fight, how are all actions that followed not open to the same evaluation of validity?
The answer always depends on the question. Are the correct questions being asked and answered.
Absolutely.... and that is exactly what the response should be. Let any congressional politician that is concerned, start by divesting all of their assets first.
So tired of all the hypocrisy and the fake news stations running it 24/7.
Wonder if maybe he was speaking to desiring a thorough investigation as to whether the "unless" portion of your post applies?
Appeals being for purpose of review and such.
A lack of thorough review by the apleals court, might be deemed making "blind" decisions to stay a previous verdict.
But that's just a blind guess on my part, as I've not acted to seek supportive or lack of supportive evidence.
Absolutely agree. I appreciate your posts. I appreciate posts of those I may not agree with also as they provide additional views to consider.
I was attempting to bring attention to a recent pattern that I hope does not continue. Where solid questions (to certain members)related specifically to the GSE have been deleted without cause.
Seems that some light should be shined upon this activity. Your posts are highly valued and frequently followed, therefore my response.
Please pardon any confusioin I may have caused.
Thanks again for your opinion.
No fear. This is/was expected.
The illegal piggy bank is in jeopardy and they aren't going to let go of that without an ugly PR campaign.
But here is the good news, Trump is Trump. You know to a large degree what you are getting. He's not the average politician swaying in the breeze of popular thought, thought propagated by biased media.
Like him or not, he's a leader. A leader that makes decisions and sees them through.
Mnuchin will be approved. The war has already been won.
Please keep your hands and feet inside the ride at all times.
It doesn't, and you won't get an answer. But your post asking might get deleted.
It's a frequent occurrence.
Lol!
Can't wait for Vegas! Should be a great time!
Which one of them is specifically the United States Government? Seems that is generally the plaintiff and defendant in most cases.... no?
Statutes of Limitations are important... wonder if anyone has filed a suite?