Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
institutional buying for September: 344,742 shares bought 8031 sold: http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-selling.html?t=AOIFF®ion=usa&culture=en-US&ownerCountry=USA
looks like almost 27,000 shares bought by Charles schwabb on 10-7-14
institutional buying to selling ratio from July to September is 1,101,381 shares bought to 456,829 shares sold according to latest Morningstar info: http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-buying.html?t=LSTMF®ion=usa&culture=en-US&ownerCountry=USA
(click "institutions" tab
actually the number is 1,400,000 shares bought to 297,000 sold still looks like 5 to one ratio
according to Morningstar,the institutional buy to sell ratio for july thru September is 4,275,757 shares bought to 297,000 shares sold makes you wonder what is going on?
gas turbines direct drive give immediate power combined cycle takes time to heat water but probably more efficient probably combined cycles with direct drive for peak/back up power would be ideal
maybe KH got into trouble for letting it slip that in northern Iraq the per barrel royal fees being paid were only $1.25...probably he was talking about what the British/Turks are paying the kurds...but the kurds are happy to get that since they were getting NOTHING before not to mention they are not getting gassed anymore plus getting jobs in the industry...oh yes lets not forget autonomy if I were Kurdish I think I too would except that deal from the "lesser" devil....maybe he has to be careful on what he says
well the institutions are not selling at least not yet....only institutional transaction I can find for july is a buy for 15,000 shares from Charles Schwab guess I will hold on and ride the big boys coat tails they are not always right but they win more often than not
LOOKS LIKE 6:1 NOW according to latest Morningstar and 4:1 according to MSN
seems to be a 10:1 buy/sell ratio from institutions last 8 weeks anybody have any info that says different?...I do not have great institutional info from my paid service but going by free MSN/Morningstar info
I rembember ENERGY AND CAPITOL saying this was a "strong buy" at around 75 cents haw haw haw they are wrong 90% of the tme..of course when they send you email flyers they only tell you of their few (VERY few) winners like KOG they are EXTREMELY fraudulent
dilution eminent they reportedly have filed to double the share float according to seeking alpha I may try to buy back at under a dollar
hmm it goes from under 5 bucks to over 8 bucks and no one has anything to say???
I think I will wait for the inevitable further dilution and pick up a few shares on the chance they can come back
institutional buy to sell ratio since march 2014: 74,553,000 shares bought 0 sold according to msn money wow!
institutional buying to selling ratio last few months has been 488,000 bought 2,700 sold according to msn money
institutional buying to selling ratio since march 2014 reporting is 17,588,000 shares bought to 128,000 sold wow! according to msn money!
WELL I BOUGHT this before the reverse split my few measly shares cost me .95 cents.....bought on ENERGY AND CAPITOLS recommendation....what a joke...they are wrong 90@% of the time...but I do think this stock has potential in aerospace and nuclear especially
this stock was pumped by Energy and Capitol as a "strong buy" when it was like .40 cents....whenever they recommend a stock just do the exact opposite and you will be right about 85-90 % of the time...of course on their emails they only tell you about their few (VERY few) winners like KOG
looks like institutions have started to buy this beaten down horse
looks like institutions have started to buy this beaten down horse
I see institutions are buying so that's enough for me to hang on to my few measly shares
I wrote to the company asking why all the institutions bailed on this Titantic here is her reply:
Hi Jack. Thank you for your email.
NZEC has never had many institutional investors. This has always been mostly a retail stock, with investors mostly in Canada, some in the States, and also a bit in the UK and in Australia and New Zealand. JP Morgan did have the largest institutional holding and have been gradually selling over the last year. But we’ve never had more than perhaps 5% of our stock held by institutions, so there is nothing unusual in the current shareholder configuration.
We do have a number of broker institutions that hold considerable shares, through their clients and also personally through the main brokers. But of course those holdings don’t show up in public records.
We will be filing our year-end financials tomorrow night and press-releasing the results pre-market on Wednesday. There will be quite a bit of information included in the MD&A, and then we’ll have our next monthly production update on May 5. If you would like to discuss any of these results, once you’ve had a chance to review the documents, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Best regards,
Ms. Rhylin Bailie
Vice President, Communications & Investor Relations
New Zealand Energy Corp.
I remember ENERGY AND CAPITAL saying this was a "strong buy" when it was like 8 or 9 bucks...these guys are Wrong more often than not (like 80-90% of the time sadly)...but they always mention their very few winners like KODIAK
all the institutions have sold except a few left from JP Morgan...I remember ENERGY AND CAPITAL saying this was a great buy when it was like 50 to 75 cents...they are wrong 90% of the time but only talk about 5 or 6 winners they picked over the years (versus like 50 losers....like petro bakken (now lightstream) "strong buy" at over 20.00...gasfrac when it was over 8.00...
looks like the end hopefully not got a few shares I paid .30 for
I remember ENERGY AND CAPITAL saying this was a "strong buy" at over 20.00 when it was called Petro bakken....then continuing to say "strong buy" when it hit 15....haw ENERGY AND CAPITAL are WRONG 90% of the time from my experience they have had plenty of other flops like "strong buy" on gasfrac when it was 8 bucks...
however,it looks like now it may finally be a good buy I got a few
the company is called "atlantic fund services" with a 3% fee
does anyone know anything about the company that is putting out this fund?..never heard of them
more players (especially big players like shell) coming into somolia bodes well for horn....
they were saying only a 10% upswing on AOIFF have to read more not sure how many barrels they were considering in that estimation?
yes I read in one paper they said completion in 2014 but it was an African newspaper they are overly optimistic sometimes with good news...hopefully they can iron out all the details and get started in 2014....2016 would be a reasonably optimistic completion date... (IMHO)
another article: http://ictville.com/2013/06/toyota-to-build-kenya-south-sudan-oil-pipeline/
I read somewhere completion in late 2014 but believe that is a tad optimistic
an answer to the production question raised by the dude who gave AOIFF a hold: http://www.2b1stconsulting.com/toyota-tsusho-to-build-south-sudan-kenya-3-billion-pipeline/
well their reports are not really stock based so they have no gain to paint a rosy picture of tullow EXCEPT if you take into account they are british based...you can sign up for a free one month trial and read their archives to see how accurate they have been in the past....they have a report somewhere on Somalia too trying to find it...from reports I have read (from other sources)American,British,Kenyan and perhaps Canadian forces have been having a lot of operations in Somalia
You noticed how fast western forces went in to lybia and how slow they have been to react to Syria (pooh poohed by british parliament).. and now Sudan...my guess is they WILL squash that....now look at a map of all these places and it paints a picture
british are also involved in an anglo/Turkish venture in khurdastan in northern iqaq that stock is alreasdy up to 18 dollars never heard a word about it any news here in the states...OR AOIFF for that matter
THE REST OF ARTICLE ON WINNERS AND LOSERS:
Tullow, the company exploiting the reserves in Uganda, and also the company planning to move forward with the tapping of the new discoveries in Kenya, is pushing to build a new refinery and power plant in Hoima, and a new pipeline starting there and running via Lira, Moroto, the Turkana basin and on to Port Lamu.
South Sudan, Ethiopia and Kenya have already agreed to partner in the developments of the Lapsset Corridor project. This will see a new port be constructed in Lamu that is purpose built for the transportation of hydrocarbons, a new oil refinery, and also a new highway and railway line through Ethiopia.
The details of the new deal between Toyota and South Sudan are still vague but it is believed to be worth about $4 billion, and the expectation is that it will focus primarily on the construction of a new pipeline from the country’s oil fields to the Turkana basin, where it can link with the rest of the network being built to export oil via Kenya.
The only remaining sticking point is security – at present the various difficult security situations in that part of the African continent leave open the possibility of banditry. However, this is a problem that can be managed with a little planning. If a sufficient amount of the benefits from the construction of these export routes is seen by local populations, such as construction jobs, and revenues from the oil sales, then the improvements in the local economies will make it ever more important to the locals to keep the project going. It may require the deployment of extra peace-keeping forces in the short term, but in the long run the projects have the potential to be stabilising factors.
Winners and losers, and learning the hard way
If these projects go ahead, and it seems almost certain that they will in some form or other, there will be some distinct winners and losers. The most obvious winner is South Sudan, which will no-longer be reliant on an export route through an intransigent neighbour that is happy to use oil exports as a bargaining chip. It will have increased Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the country and can look forward to not only higher but also more assured revenues from its oil, and all the benefits that go along with that.
Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda are also set to see significant benefits in the form of increased oil revenues, more jobs and improved infrastructure.
Japan can look forward to benefits as well, as its increased investment in Africa in general, and South Sudan specifically, will give it access to more of the resources it needs to keep growing its industry and economy (which it is trying to stimulate after two decades of flat-lining).
The biggest loser, in terms of its national wellbeing, is Sudan. Sudan relies heavily on the revenues from exporting oil (if no-longer from selling large quantities), and it will be ruing its lost opportunity to work with South Sudan. Without the oil revenues it is difficult to see from where it will generate wealth. Even China, its biggest investor, is likely to lose interest if there is no longer a tangible benefit to be gained by propping up Khartoum politically and financially.
Another loser is China, which is beginning to find that being a major player on the world stage requires more than just large coffers. Of course, the prospect of losing access on better than average terms to a large amount of oil is an annoyance to Beijing, but this is only a part of it.
In the past China has been able to play the benefactor of many developing countries by pouring in large amounts of cash in return for access to the nation’s natural resources, be they mineral or hydrocarbon. Its policy of non-interference and of ‘respecting national sovereignty’ has served it well to this end. However, Beijing is learning a lesson which has to be learnt by all mature global actors – sooner or later more difficult political balances have to be struck. Indecision over these political issues can have serious economic consequences, and lead to the loss of opportunities for further investment as other countries jump to fill the void as the government dithers.
Due to China’s global investments, particularly in volatile regions, it will find itself facing more and more of these difficult political decisions. Failure to learn the salient lessons from South Sudan’s secession could lead to a serious drop in its global political and investment status, and leave opportunities open for other major economies to seize in its place. Whether it has in fact learnt these lessons has yet to be seen, but it is likely to become obvious soon.
dreamwavrider..the bigger context was talking about winners and losers in northeast Africa...coursy's intelligence sees China as a loser because of their mis steps in sudan and Toyota and Tullow as winners for getting the oil/pipeline going the pipeline report came out in july and the water resource report came out in october
well ANOTHER hit with hundreds of meters of play and STILL at 9 bucks?....its dawned on me this stock is not going anywhere until it gets bought out by a major or they start production and/or the pipeline