Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
With 15 trading days until release of Q4 2011, I was not impressed with the trading volume during the past trading sessions. Today closing price was one tick above the previous day Monday Jan 23 close, NOT very convincing for me. So, I locked in a +25% profit.
Based on the October 2011 run-up, trading volume was over 20 million for well over several days. Just don’t see the same repeating this time, but that is my opinion.
Oh, and, I believe I was very responsible in my transaction, after all, a market order would wreck havoc with the charts.
Not to digress, but, not certain who Dinvest as previously mentioned. Who is Dinvest?
I am not inclined to debate opinions of your interpretation of basic financial statements. Not to boast, but, I have a MBA from University of Chicago; graduated 1980.
Please share current sales inventory numbers as of January 13, and I might consider sharing my educated opinion of valuation of BRAV. Although, I doubt a educated MBA from U of C is welcome in this forum.
Thanks for your opinion and theory. Best of luck in pursuit of profits in pursuit of your goal of 5% of the float. In my opinion, too much risk to allocate personal capital to absorb 5% of the float, considering this is a unaudited company
Right, wrong, or indifferent, as of right now the actual value is the current value. Especially since Danny has a documented past history of exaggerating revenues with MuscleFlex (Beagle and pill Buddy) and his current projections for BRAV are both unproven and untested. Now, if his projections seem to be in line with actual revenues on a basis moving forward then the value could be increased and a forward looking value could be accurately determined. But as of this moment I highly doubt there is any rational person who would suggest that Danny's projections are realistic and attainable based on the past history of projections that never materialized at all. That is a undisputed fact!
Again, this is just pure independent honesty using history and what is factually known because Danny has not earned the right to be taken seriously when it comes to revenue guidance.
Noticed the pro and con debate. Given the current share structure and near term catalysts, any logical theory of a pre and post share price run-up to Q4 2011 and full year financials?