Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
With soo much emphasis being placed on pictures why hasn't anyone produced a picture of the boat that is supposedly being loaded? I have not seen one picture of the boat being loaded with the ore that is supposedly being mined and trucked. Where is the pictue of the boat with the name on it so we can all really verify what is occuring? If peeps want to use pictures as meaningful evidence then provide us pictures of the boat with he name of the boat clearly displayed, should be easy enough if all is legit.
With all due respect, try taking pictures to a bank and asking for a loan, they would laugh you out of the office so asking for proper work legal finanical documentation is the correct way to address these concerns becasue no one accepts pictures as legitimate proof. Additionally, there has been talk of PR coming soon for the past several months, can't we even get at least this? Lastly, I have my cocnerns over how long this boat has supposedly been loading, if mining and loading is occuring every day and no boat has shipped in several months just how big is this boat? Something does not jive about all of the talk of mining becasue they would have mined soo much by now that there woudl be an overload and with China holding back materials there is a demnad so no one would be waiting to ship if they really could. And with all the picture happy peeps here why hasn't a picture of the boat appeared??Makes me say hmmmm.....
Well said T or S, well said.
With all due respect, let's see, if I have this right, peeps here think that a falling share price is good, as well as a lack of institutional following, and a dwindling amount of legitimate trading companies who will allow the buying and selling of this companies shares, Am I reading the recent posts correctly or have I missed something? Additionally, it is also good that the company has not provided any PR's, or guidance, becasue that keeps the hype and hysteria down? I guess Apple and Starbucks got it all wrong by being so out there for all to find and recognize and Bob Cotton has it right...I guess check out what Apples share price has done as compared to CWRN's answers thsi question.
Lastly, peeps are actually saying that no audited fins, no CE removal, and no legitimate confirmation of an exporting permit is a good thing and a news blackout is even better? Wow, all I can say is wow, what is going on??? And now there appears to be talk about potential financial problems, and selling to raise captial, I guess the band plays on like it did in that movie Leo Dicaprio movie about the big boat and ice cubes floating straight ahead of it.
With all due respect, this is exactly the problem. How can an investor not be concerned that a company, whose only source of income is the exporting of material, does not have an exporting permit, which by the way several people here have sworn that CWRN has? Additionally, how can people not be stoked about a lack of corporate reporting, audited financials, or any corporate guidance? How much more can this company be lacking before it gets legitmately scrutinized by the proper authorities? Trading on the pinks is one thing but not being a properly administered ongoing concern involved in the buying and selling of shares to the general public is a whole other and yes they can be investigated by the federalies if needed.
With all due respect, this article would be relevant if CWRN was actually mining and shipping but as of today’s date I don’t see any financial reports or financials advising they are so if they are not selling anything then the falling price means nothing, I liken this to those who say they are happy that the share price is falling for the CWRN share price because it means it is more of a hidden gem. Utilizing this logic, the price of ore is not really falling it is making all of the supposed ore to be mined just that much more of a hidden gem in much the same way the audited fins are a hidden gem, well at least hidden. Additionally, check old posts, a lot of posters said a good, hot, exciting, detailed, wonderful PR was coming soon, and this was back in last October, so where is this as well. If you can’t give us the fins can you at least give us a PR/ Throw us some sort of bone CWRN management team.
He is beinbg quiet about the quiet period so as not to disturb the quiet period he has decreed, geez, do your own dd on this board...Lol.....
With all due respect, why would anyone pay to have the ore sit at the dock when they could have CWRN store it on site for free? This does not make any sense, where did you come up with that idea? That would be like buying a car and leaving it parked on the dealers lot, it just doesn't happen in the real business world? If you truly heard this then please provide us a link to the story, or provide a factual document stating such, we all need proof of this...
I think you heard right Bali, but sadly for us stock hodlers it is shorty who has been averaging up, and down, and that is all the action you see here. Shorty makes the pop on the way up and covers low, that is the reason for the tight range lately, quick shorty pops. The stock was at .005 in 2008, 2009, 2010, not 2011 though, it popped up to a penny that year, but back to .005 again this year. Other than shorty popping in and out there have been no other stable holders for months and years to provide us with a real base. BTW, any news on when the audtited fins will be provided? I know they don't have to but don't you think they should? I also wonder when the CE will be officially removed, I read here a few months ago that this was in the works, I have also been hearing about a fantastic PR being constructed since last October, when will that be provoded?
Ooh, ok, because they don't have to report they don't, I see. I guess what all are saying here is CWRN has not reported audited fins becasue they do not have to but many other pinks do report and they don't have to, why is that? Could it be they are more on the up and up? Why do most pinkies report and CWRN does not? If you got nothing to hide then I say put it out there, don't hide behind the we don't have to excuse? To say they do not provide audtied fins because they don't have to is not acceptbale to me,it appears liek a cop out, or a cover up, they should do it because it is what legit businesses do and that is as plain as plain can get. If you want the share price to climb then release the information we all deserve, otherwise the legitimacy of this company will come into question for years from legitimat investors and this company will never see more than a few here and there small time investors, they will never get the whales we all need here.
With all due respect, a lottery ticket can be cashed and claimed, check out the volume today soo far, no one has bought which means no one can sell so in a sense this is valueless, if you can't get anything for it then what is it worth? If this is as hot as some are saying it is becoming then why the lack of volume lately?
Great, but with all due respect the .0045 is about half of where it was last year so what is the excitement all about? If this was .045 I would be excited but to see this at half the price it was at thsi time last year only frustrates me. think of where this was 12 and 18 months ago and we had promises then, what has been delivered and why should we settle for mediocricy, we exprect return on investment not slow losses, when will something be produced here?
With all due respect, How can we know anything was sold if we cannot see any official auditied financials? I would settle for even a balance sheet, a revenue she4et, or even a proift loss statement. Can nayone here tell me when we will be receiving any official financial reports or data? When will we receive any corporate guidance or direction? Does anyone know this if we will ever get this?
With all due respect, If the site is digging every day, the trucks are loading every day, and the boat is filling every day, and this has been occurring for the past several months, every day, then when will a shipment occur and revenue be recognized? If you leave your bath water running eventually the tub fills up, how long can digging and trucking occur before the boat is full? DD tells me that a boat usually fills within 5 to 7 days so if all of this is occurring then just where is all the ore going? Remember that digging and trucking are expenses and CWRN is losing money when this occurs, they only make money when shipping occurs and this has not to my knowledge so this begs the question, “How can daily expenses be occurring every day and no revenue source be generated to pay for these expenses?” I also want to know when the bath tub (boat) will be full and if it is then why are they still digging, it can’t be just for the sake of digging so what gives?
With all due respect, the numbers previously discussed as revenue are based on assumptions because we have no financials to ascertain if CWRN is making money, for all we know they have no idea how to ship and are actually losing money on their business process. Many have answered similar accusations by saying, “Who stays in business when losing money?” And to this I respond, see K-Mart, Farmer Jack, Blockbuster, even Kodak so to say that concern is not warranted is not responsible behavior. Additionally, it is pure speculation on what CWRN is getting for each ton of ore since this is negotiated and again no one can forecast what, if any, money is being made. Next, BAO has not officially stated anything in regards to business deals with CWRN so again, be careful offering speculation as fact because this is a dangerous way to proceed. Lastly, concern about the images is understandable, no one really knows here these are from, and who has provided them, but what we can do is ask the company to provide direction and I believe this has been done so for those who say to rely on the pictures because they are good Intel I ask you to provide us with Fin dates, CE removal date, shipping confirmation information and date(s), business guidance date, last known balance sheet date, and quarterly report date. I think these are fair and just questions and I await some useful answers.
With all due respect, I will not be lighting up a Cuban yet on a little spike based on 11 thousand shares of a sub-penny, I want much more bang for my buck..............When will shareholders finally see what we want and get the run we deserve? When will management answer the questions we need answered so we can see a real run for shareholders? it's time to provide us the answers if this is for real, we all know it, put up or shut up CWRN management, I challenge you right here, right now, to provide us all with the proof we as stock traders deserve....
With all due respect Nhass, are you, and others, not persuaded by all of the pictures posted? Many here claim these as proof enough to invest hard earned dollars, is this not enough evidence for you and your ilk? Additionally, I have been hearing for the past three months that loading is occurring at a port in Mexico so imagine how big a boat load of ore it must be if it has been being loaded for over three months, I myself cannot imagine how gigantic this boat must be but three months of loading is really huge. Additionally, don’t ask for financials, some here have said that fins would only get in the way of some form of negotiations that people here say are occurring. I find it ironic that some here refer to a report (fins) that has not been produced in over three years in association with a so-called negotiation of which no one knows the substance of, and yet many here say this all ties together and is proof positive of something constructive. I myself have taken exception with the lack of safety equipment and procedures of the pictures in addition to the lack of dates and data but I have not really received any responses to my questions. I have asked when the fins will be provided, CE removed, shipment occurring, corporate guidance provided, or a revenue sheet provided but I have received no official response, or even a response from our fellow shareholders here. With all due respect, how do we even know this is officially CWRN equipment other than by word of mouth (posting)? I, like you, want to see more substance and official documents provided but in the lack of this can someone at least tell us the dates this information will be provided on?
I feel you Grajekk but I would settle for some released auditied financials or even the CE removal.It's hard for me to think of the things you mention when the CWRN house is in such disarray.
With all due respect, while all of the haggling is occurring over a permit or not my interest is peaked by the pictures. It appears that trucks are loading every day so if this is truly occurring, and not just some innocuous, unrelated pictures, then how many trucks does it take to load a boat? If five trucks a day, five days a week, four weeks a month, all truck ore, then this would be more than the boat could hold so this begs the question, “Where is the ore going if it is truly being mined like they say it is every day?” When are these trucks driving to and dumping? It would be cheaper to leave it there then to mine it, ship it, and store it somewhere else; this does not make business sense. Additionally, why would they need bigger rippers when they appear to be working past capacity? Let’s say for the sake of argument I said the pictures are authentic, the next logical step would be shipping and that has not occurred, period…So can someone tell me why they would be moving earth every day when they have already supposedly mined enough ore in one month to fill a transportation ship? Once you fill your bucket you usually stop until you have another bucket to fill so why would mining continue if they are not filling up any other buckets (boats)? These trucks and heavy equipment have apparently been in operation for a while and yet they have not filled up one boat to ship in the past three months, how can this be? And has anyone noticed the cost of fuel, how can these be run every day without shipping occurring? Additionally, it makes no sense to hold shipping even it there was a loaded boat, fuel costs are only going up and this would add to expenses and cut any profit if any ever existed. With all due respect, this just does not add up no matter how you look at it, but maybe somewhere here can enlighten us differently.
Hey all, can anyone provide me some important dates here for CWRN shareholders? I know may here are well versed in this companies goings on so a little help here for all could help clear things up immensely for any new, or potentially new, investors.
Please advise me of the following dates:
Date of last reported audited financials statement:
Date of CE removal:
Confirmed date of latest iron ore shipment leaving port:
Date of last company guidance provided to all shareholders of record:
Date of most recently provided quarterly shareholder update:
Date of last confirmed business transaction resulting in recognition of business revenue:
Date of last known company balance sheet statement:
Thanks in advance for your help and consideration.
With all due respect, hon can oyu forecast that much revenue? There has been no report of any revenue being generated i nthe past two years, I have not seen fins have you? What makes you think this stock will rport such a large amoutn of revenue when it has not reported any revenue for the past two years?
Is anyone else concerned that in the new pictures there appears to be work going on but no safety gear or measures being taken? Who is insuring or bonding this operation? I can't imagine the negligence this leaves them open to.
Hey, Is it me or does that picture of the ripper bucket look plastic? The closer I look the more plastic it looks, can I be right on this? Is it plastic? If it is, wow...............
With all due respect, I believe this is just another useless conspiracy theory and what makes you say this? There are no negotiations going on and this was only floated out by other posters, nothing has been noted by the company that any negotiations are officially occurring. Additionally, the third week of each month she’s a lot of short covering on numerous stocks and this occurred here last month as well, once Shorty dries up so will the volume, and any perceived momentum. This popped over five on Shorty volume last month and rumor and innuendo flooded the board and as soon as Shorty stopped buying the stock it began its plummet again. Check out last month’s posts, everyone said big things were coming on that Shorty pop as well, I say let’s see what gets released this week or early next because I believe nothing will and again my explanation of the Shorty pop will again rule the day…
With all due respect, I find an NDA a little ironic and almost redundant and unneeded. A Non disclosure seems to be the modus operandi for this companies operations, why worry about non disclosure agreements when nothing has been disclosed to us in the last two years. Are the financials and CE removal subject to NDA's? It appears so to us longs.......
With all due respect, while some may ask what this is I will offer that it is simple DD. Check out the stories, the comments, the posts, it is almost a mirror image from what has been said here the past year or two so when you ask the relevance I offer that the relevance is that what is going around now appears to be the same song and dance from 2008, 2009, 2010, and now current. Lot's of expectatiosn but no production. If you carefully read some of the posts you can see just how similar what was being said yearsa ago are now almost identical to posts here. I think most can see a correlation, I hope you can as well. The relevance is that people were buying 4 and 5 years ago o nthe same specualtion that is being bandied about here but none of the speculation ever produced any tangible results then and what tangible results ahve recently been provided. Now do you udnerstand? I hope so.
You can call this a hit but check out these and tell me this does not sound familiar:
Here are some quotes from investors from the sites I rpeviously provided and these comments occured when the prices were between .035 and .076
2009 - This is just the warm up, the real show won't start for a couple of weeks. Just remember to hop on board and fasten your seat belt.
2009 - who knows maybe back to mid range of 005
2009 - Can't believe this thing slipped like that today, kind of an anti climatic... but i like the optimism, I doubled my shares @ .005! LETS GO CWRN!
2009 - Now we are seeing a definite early morning sell off. Hmmm... I don't think it will dip much from here. Probably a good buying point. I'm going to buy some more when some funds I just dropped in this post, I think .0052 is a very solid buying point.
2009 - I got lucky and got 300,000 filled at .0036 This will look real good when this runs up again.
2009 -This stocks been all over the place the past month. If your looking for a stable stock look elsewhere. CWRN is one crazy ride.
I ain't selling now though... we are far too close to September for me to sell now. I've been holding this since the start of August so I intend to stay put awhile longer.
2009 - We are starting to see an increase here.. this is looking good.. It dropped down to less than 20 and now back up to 30 and going up.. More Details on the project should be out in the next month or two.. hopefully it will keep rising
2010 - 77% increase now and going up.. How high will it get?
CWRN: "Baja Iron Project MOU Executed With Fremery Mining, Ltd. HK"
9:02a ET March 8, 2010 (Market Wire)
Cotton & Western Mining, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: CWRN) -- Robert L. Cotton, President of Cotton & Western Mining, Inc. announced today; that the company has executed a Memorandum of Understanding with Fremery Mining, Ltd. Hong Kong for the off-take of the company's Baja Pacific Mexico Iron Mining Project which is scheduled for 2010 production. Management has made available to the public and our shareholders a copy of the executed signatory page of the agreement on the company's website; interested parties may view the document at the following link: http://www.cottonwestern.com/pdf/Sig...-Mining-HK.pdf
Related News: The Spot Price China Seaborne Trade remains strong at over CFR $130.00 per dry metric ton Port of Qingdao. Daily index prices may be viewed at the Metal Bulletin link below.
2010 - could see this break through to .005
How can this be disputed now?
This post inspired me to do some digging....Wow, check out this CWRN historic data from the links below. It appears this same story of future prospects and potential big mining shipments has been occurring as far back as 2008. Ironically, several of the stories I came across have the same information and comments when the stock was trading at that time around .0076 which is even higher than it is now. It appears the same cycle has occurred over and over with the same stories riding this stock from .003 to .01 and then back down and then back up and then back down again. Check out these two links and tell me if you don’t think these stories way back then are not comparable to the same postings here today because they are. Some of the names of commenter’s to the stories have changed but the ebb and flow are very similar, here are just two of the tens I found.
http://www.pinkinvesting.com/article/view/Sub-Penny-Stock-Cotton-Western-Mining-Inc.-CWRN.PK-Receives-The-Black-Sign_893
http://www.hotstockmarket.com/t/39767/cwrn-cotton-western-mining-inc/620
Here are some other links that may or may not be good reading but I’ll offer them just the same.
http://www.fraudguides.com/investment-mining-scams.asp
http://www.crushingplants.net/signs-of-a-junior-mining-stock-scam/
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/ore-mining-scam
With all of the discussion back and forth regarding shipping, revenue, etc.. I thought I would put it plainly out there and ask for considerate detailed provable documented proof to the following issues and concerns:
#1 – When will the CE be removed? I heard this was supposed to happen last November and has not, why hasn’t it?
#2 - When will audited financials be provided? Another business year just ended for the corporate world January 31st and this company was supposed to have been working on this since last August. Matter of fact they were supposedly working all last summer to get their 2011 fins in order to post those as a revision update and this never occurred and as much as I have heard they were coming soon they never did so when exactly can we expect them because most are provided in late Feb and early March for legit comps and this is a public company so it is owed to us.
#3 – When will we receive corporate guidance? Every company provides corporate guidance for its employees and shareholders and despite the reclusiveness of this company it is a publicly traded company and as such is responsible for providing this to us, when will we receive it?
#4 – I have heard that shipping and loading have been occurring but most loads are loaded and shipped within 48 hours, even the deadliest catch ships off-load within a day and they are not dealing with the loading machinery that I expect would be used for iron ore so why is it taking so long and in reality two shipments a year could not support this type of operation so just how many shipments are planned, if any?
#5 – Lastly, does anyone have any PR releases which are for public consumption by anyone other than PRNewswire? PrNewswire is about as credible a source as Wikipedia which means it is not credible. My college would not accept Wikipedia as a resource nor PRNewswire because anyone can say anything In these sources so does anyone have anything of relevance that is not an IMO, a so-called phone call, or e-mail, from Bob, or a Pr Newswire release? If so, can you provide it to us?
Please provide verifiable and provable facts and information and not the same old tired responses of it’s been said here a million times because in reality it has not and if it has been then these types of questions would not be soo prevalent here. Please also avoid IMO’s, speculation, and heresay, please only provide verifiable answers.
Thanks
With all due respect, the PR said they shipped but nothing official has ever been provided. Hollywood leaks all sort ofPR's for pumping purposes, just because it is a PR does nto make it legitimate. I challenge you to show may any documents stating revenue has been generated from these shipments. This is a publicly traded company so this information, if it is legitimate, has ot be made available to shareholders becasue what people forget is even though this is a pinkie it is still a public pinkie and sharehodlers ahve rights. Now some may say thats not how it works for pinkies and they are right when it comes ot pinkies that go out of business but supposedly this is an up and comer so I demand the proof. I can show by the falling share price the past several months that my views are supported what legitimate documentation can be provided to dispute my position?
With all due respect Chase, what revenues? How can you, and others like you, keep saying this? There have been no financials rleased in years and yet you know that there is revenue, how? Seriously, how? People here keep talking about revenue, money making, tec... but how can this be? there are no recent financials, there has not even been guidance, how can anyoen say this? I have read here a thousand times about shipmetns occuring soon and financials coming soon, so give me proof, give me documented authentic proof. Everyone keeps throwing it out there now lets swee some backing. The battered share price and lack of volume supports my fears so what of substance suspoorts the idea that any revenue is being generated? I wnat proof, not I told you soo's or Imo's.
With all due respect Mister Jam, or Mjam ( pronounce Myamm), We do not know if this equipment is owned, rented, or even at the job site at all. How can anyone tell the difference between desert in Africa, India, or Latin America so how do we know where this equipment is located? Additionally, there is a cost of using and insuring equipment and since CWRN has not shipped in almost two years I would like to know how they are paying for any associated costs if this equipment truly is on site. Furthermore, I have seen a dog, some bespectacled Asian man, and several other oddities on site, or what we are told is the site, which begs the question, “What is going on here?” Honestly, how many construction sites, job sites, and mining sites let dogs run around, visitors romp around with no safety gear on, and leave machines open and accessible and not locked up. This raises my suspicions. In our area, and most likely yours, even generators are raised in the air by cranes when left over night, or for the weekend, the heavy equipment is also usually locked and sometimes covered, so what gives here? Why is this equipment always apparently in the open and exposed, ooh that’s right Mexico has no theft or erosion occurring, I guess all part of magic Bobs aura. Lastly, you mention Gilligan in a more recent post, and I wonder if we don’t have Gilligan running our little company here.
With all due respect, appearance is everything. No one does business with an idiot dressed like a clown. It is this type of irrepsonsible logic which allows everythign to slide and has caught other pinkie owners who beleived and later lost everything. It is the small things that trip up scammers and spammers and I am not saying this is the case here but what I am saying is it is the little things that are beign said and shown that concern me and to say that how an executive is dressed is nto important is not very intelligent, o it is very naive, no reflection on you but in general. What I am msot cocnerned about is all of the useless pictures floating about but no financials or relevant documents. Like a previous poster stated, take a picture of the audited financials rather than a dog or some Asian guy who we have no idea is.
With all due respect, this picture makes CWRN lose credibility so I do not see how soo many here see it as a harbinger for good things. To begin with, I have been on several construction sites and never does someone just walk into a work area without work boots, protective eyewear, and hard hats and anyone knowledgeable in Asian countries knows that their executives are well aware of this, there workers may not be protected but executives and most forms of mid-management are and they are always protected. Moreover, how can a so-called visiting executive be put in harm’s way if this is authentic, maybe OSHA does not have power in Latin America but insurance and bonding companies do and I am sure they would be concerned if this is authentic? Just imagine the liability; as far as I know most non-company work zone specific individuals are not allowed to just walk around on dig sites so how is this guy qualified to be there? Secondly, if this individual is a prominent professional in BAO then why would he wear such a cheesy looking outfit, Archie Bunker dressed more formally. Which also begs the question as to who would allow themselves to go out into such a dirty and dusty area wearing a business suit in the midst of negotiations, or at least initial negotiations? Furthermore, who provided this information (idiotic picture)? I have never seen a company take a picture of a professional from another company and then release it as some form of cheesy PR, this is definitely not professional and may be borderline illegal if I am correct.
With all due respect, trucking has become a non-issue because with all of the digging this company apparently has been doing prior to any documented shipment actually occuring it appears they will just dig directly to China, thus avoiding any future trucking or boating. They can apparently just pore the iron ore into the hole and wait for the world to spin and woolaahh, it will be in China immediately. Now lets see this stock run as I jsut pointed out the future business plan of this compoany as well as their enginuity and time saving manner of new product delivery.However, with all seriousness, anyoen can take pictures o nany day of any trucks anywhere and claim they are loading up but after two years of nothing occuring this is getting to be a tired story. Lastly, Even if I wanted to sell a few hundred thousand shares today I could not becasue there is no buyers out there, it's almost like being trapped in this stock. Does anyone else feel this way?
To my knowledge we have seen a lot of promises but no performance. We have heard about a lot of things we were supposed to see way back last year and have yet to see. I understand true longs getting angry at what they perceive as bashing but in reality this company has not produced anything of substance in two years. In all hoensty, we have a CE in palce, no financials, no revenue source that is documented, no new prospects, no official press releases from the company, no guidance from CWRN management, and no timetable as to when any of this will be provided so while bashing is not really what we want to see I understand it becasue this is a publicly traded company and their are concerns and ,most legitimate companies come out and alleviate, or at least address, sharehodlers concerns but here we get nothing. Take the time and read my previosu post and I challenge anyone here, anyone, to produce any factual evidence at all. Heck, I wil lgo soo far as to callout CWRN management to make an official, accountable, statement of guidance to shareholders. There it is, now let's see someone, anyone, that matters in CWRN reply.
With all due respect, you are mistaken because you are not talking about something that is common; instead you are referring to a specialty item which is niobium, and this is why a consortium, not one company, did this. Major companies, and steel companies in particular, do not go after general minerals and metals but in regards to rare earth minerals and metals they do, and niobium is one such item and this is not the same as iron ore. To better understand, this is similar to what is occurring with certain companies buying up mining areas to procure unique, and limited, precious metals and rare materials utilized in making electric car vehicle batteries. In the case of specialized or limited materials, then yes companies will do this but in regards to generalized material like iron ore then no this does not happen. I know some of you want to make this leap of faith, and if you do go ahead at your own risk, but understand the reality of the situation and keep in mind that this is pure speculation and nothing factual has been released by either company to state otherwise. I respectfully challenge anyone to produce a legitimate doucment which is not second hand detailing any forward moving business opportunities or something detailing that this company is being considered as a takeover candidate by another.
With all due respect, to begin with, no steel company ever buys the mining company, it does not happen. They are in the steel industry and not the mining industry, this would be akin to McDonalds buying a farm or Red Lobster becoming Bearing Sea fishermen, it is not their core business and not what they do. No company gets into a business outside their core business just for some short term cheap consumable good. What would BAO do with this company once this mining patch dried up, are you telling me that this company is going to go into the mining business? Are you saying they will leave one of the most lucrative industries to go into one of the hardest to earn in industries, yeah, it makes sense, lots of sense. Lol…. This is just more rumor and speculation. And by the way, what CEO goes to a company to buy it and allows themselves to have pictures taken of themselves? Are you serious? If you really think this guy is some white knight corporate insider who is going to actually get involved in this company then I have some cheap shares of a bridge in Brooklyn I would like to sell you.
With all due respect rocket, and i do repsect yo uas you know, this is a publicly traded company which means we are the owners and as the owners we are privy to all relevant information so everything should be known. I get prospectus and reports several tiems a year from stock I own in othr companies and this is no different. Trust me, in their line of business there are no secrets and tthere should be none hee. if they want to stay privat e then they should buy back all of the shares and take it private but until then they owe us answers.....
With all due respct, I asked yesterday and got no response so I will ask again. The naysayers are supported by the CE in place, no exporting occuring, pink sheet status, lack of PR's, and lack of audited financicals, as well as no direction form CEO or any company officer so I ask, what do any positive peeps here have to support theri side? I don't want speculation, or IMo's, and not the smae tired' It's been said a thousand times" statement because all of those statements are jsut speculation and to point, none of hte specualtion has come to fruition. So I ask, what tangible, legitimate, public proof does anyone have that this company is still legit? I don';t wnat the you will see' or they are gonnas' I want hard provable facts. Give me documentation, PR's that re in a legitimate news source or peridoical. SOme form of financials. Give me anythign that can be proven. I await repsonses...