Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
B-Laker, I myself had not seen a trade with 'Form T' listed before so I can not answer your question, however I did some research and found this article:
Incredible Penny Stocks: What is a Form T-Trade?
There is much confusion and rumor regarding “T Trades” in the penny stock market. Nasdaq Pink Sheet stocks often close at a certain price and, within 3-10 minutes after the closing bell, will show a large final trade that gets labeled as an “after hours” trade. Simply put, this is an inaccurate description of that trade.
To understand how this trade works, one must understand the role of the market maker. The most frustrating aspect of investing in the pennies, is market maker manipulation of the stock price. Anyone that claims this manipulation doesn’t happen truly does not understand the OTC Market. Market makers are in place to “control” the price of a stock and, theoretically, to ensure that the market reacts properly to supply and demand for a certain stock. Unfortunately, when large sums of money and a lack of regulation are involved, more often than not, there is manipulation that suits the needs of certain investors or the market makers themselves. After all, they are in business to make money as well. If the average investor is purchasing stocks in the OTC Market, that investor is truly at the mercy of the market makers involved in the purchase and sale of that security.
When researching this article, The response from the SEC defined a “Form T Trade” a “trade reporting form used by broker-dealer members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) to report equity trades executed either in the OTC market or during extended hours trading. Recent amendments to FINRA rules will expand the types of situations in which Form T is to be used, but they are not yet in effect.” The response also recommended contacting FINRA. Notice the first portion of the response. “either in the OTC Market or…” Once again, it is confirmed by the SEC that ”after hours” trades do not exist in the Pinks.
FINRA was much less transparent in their response and essentially spewed the same limited information regarding T Trades that is available on their website. None of which, accurately reflects why these trades occur in the OTC Markets. (http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@reg/@notice/documents/notices/p123750.pdf)( This site states effective Date was July 5, 2011)
Trying to decipher the meaning of these trades with the limited information that is available on the subject led down several dark paths. Clearly, the average investor is not meant to understand the concept or its rules. Even more disconcerting is the second part of the SEC message “Recent amendments to FINRA rules will expand the types of situations in which Form T is to be used, but they are not yet in effect.” That means there is even less transparency about this mysterious T Trade.
After months of due diligence, there are a few poorly publicized uses for a T Trade. The most important factor here is that the only requirement of market makers by FINRA is that they must report all trades in a day. They are not required to do so when the actual trade occurs.
To avoid creating “an unbalanced market”, market makers often do not report certain trades during the day to the public and then use a T Trade not to “scare” investors into thinking a market for that stock is going in one direction or the other at the spurring of one large investor.
If a market maker wants to accumulate a large amount of a stock in one trading day, that market maker may actually not report any of the trades that occurred until the trading day has ended so as not to alert the market to the collection. This practice is completely legal under the FINRA rules of the OTC Markets so long as the trade is reported at the end of the day.
To execute a Market on Close” order, a market maker may have an order to purchase the stock at a certain price at the end of the trading day. This is the most unlikely scenario because it needs to be assured that someone selling the stock and someone buying that stock are agreeing upon a price. Simply put, this is more likely with insider buying and selling.
The T Trade that the public sees is nothing more than one or all of the above scenarios. The T Trade reported at the end of the day can be from one market maker or many involved market makers. It can be a single purchase price but is usually an average of all of the previously unreported purchases from that business day.
Penny stocks are an exciting and lucrative business. As most everyone will tell you, it is not for the weak of heart. There is definite money to be made in the OTC Markets and more penny stock millionaires are made every day. But the best way to win the game is to know the rules!
One additional fact surfaced about market makers while researching T Trades. Did you know that market makers are not required to honor their offer price? That is correct, because the OTC market is essentially a “best offer” market. If a buyer meets the asking price for a security, the market maker can, and often does, decide to rescind the offer, not sell the security and adjust the selling price.
Happy Trading.
http://incrediblepennystocks.wordpress.com/2013/06/25/incredible-penny-stocks-what-is-a-form-t-trade/
Interesting Trade
If you look at the Trades today Num:126 Time:16:00.50 was a BUY @ 0.177 for $5000.00 and shows a Type: Form T
Trade Types:
'T' If reporting a single protected transaction.
A protected transaction occurs when a large order is going through the market. The buyer (or seller) may wish to keep the order anonymous from the rest of the market as the size of the order could greatly alter the price of the stock. With a protected transaction, the dealer will put the trade through in small quantities rather than knock the whole order out in one hit. The entire transaction is reported once the deal is completed. The LSE is notified at the start and at the end of the transaction. However, the market as a whole isn't told until the end, thus the order is protected.
Also Knobbe Martens Ranked Number One Patent Firm in 2011 Patent Scorecard
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP has once again been ranked as the number one law firm in the nation in the 2011 Law Firm Patent Scorecard™ published by Intellectual Property Today (IP Today). The firm was ranked number one overall and first in the Technology Strength™ and Current Impact™ categories.
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2011/04/01/5418525.htm
GOOGLE'S CHAIRMAN COMMENT ON VPLM PATENTS!
http://voip.biz-news.com/news/en_US/2014/01/09/0001/the-uspto-offers-an-issue-date-for-mobile-gateway-patent-for-voip-pal-com
Hardware and Technology
The USPTO Offers an Issue Date For Mobile Gateway Patent for VoIP-Pal.Com
Monday 13th January 2014 - 19:37
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have finally offered an issue notification to VoIP-Pal.com for its mobile gateway patent. The issue date is set for January 14th 2014.
The mobile gateway enables users to make long distance calls at the local rates through the use of the existing mobile telephone network. The users can also access the reserved telephone numbers extracted from the origination site of the call.
The Chairman as well as CEO of VoIP-Pal.com, Dr. Thomas E. Sawyer stated that with the worldwide extension of LTE, services such as LTE broadcast, LTE connected vehicles, and carrier grade WiFi makes the Voip-Pal’s patented mobile Gateway quite obvious. He also indicated that VoIP-Pal is well set for the future, being technologically savvy in terms of mobile internet.
Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Google indicated that the mobile trend has seen a significant increase and is poised to stand out in 2014. He also indicated that Voip-Pal has the patented technology that will see it emerge as the leading player in the rapidly growing roaming internet.
More about: mobile gateway , voip service , mobile gateway service
Agree, have had no issues myself.
All anyone has to do is research Voip technology and then these patents and they will have their answer!
Perhaps it may be the cost. imo, if there are interested companies to buy patents or perhaps a buy already being finalized, why send out anything at all? this PR may just be for shareholders benefit but only time will tell.
Hey Heney8th, thats the same info I posted a few days ago. See post #11011.
It is a very informative statement!
Thanks Henry8th, I agree having this site to be a source to share any information for all shareholders would be ideal as it would then become a starting point to conduct ones own due diligence.
"Voip-Pal is currently beta testing with several major VoIP industry providers in order to establish a monetary value for each patent"
You can find this statement at the end of
'About Voip-Pal/Digifonica Patent Applications section.'
http://www.voip-pal.com/ExecutiveSummary.asp
Just thought I would pass this on!
Discussions to acquire or license patents are currently ongoing
See December 4th 2013 article posted on UndiscoveredEquities.com
http://undiscoveredequities.com/category/featured-companies-news/
Voip-Pal.com Inc. Files a Continuation Application for its Fifth Allowed Patent with the USPTO: Company Continues Acquisition Discussions
December 4, 2013, Undiscovered Equities
Voip-Pal.com Inc. Files a Continuation Application for its Fifth Allowed Patent with the USPTO: Company Continues Acquisition Discussions
BELLEVUE, Wash.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Voip-Pal.com Inc. (“Voip-Pal”, Company”) (OTC Pink: VPLM) is pleased to announce that the Company has filed a continuation application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for its recently allowed patent, Uninterrupted Transmission of Internet Protocol Transmissions During Endpoint Changes. The continuation proposes additional claims to be added to the current patent.
“While these Company announcements may be seen as subtle, they are of substantial significance. We will provide updates to our shareholders as developments unfold.”
The Company also announced that they have received expressions of interest from well qualified entities to potentially license its suite of patents or acquire Voip-Pal.com. Discussions are currently ongoing.
Dr. Thomas Sawyer, Chairman and CEO of Voip-Pal stated, “While these Company announcements may be seen as subtle, they are of substantial significance. We will provide updates to our shareholders as developments unfold.”
About Voip-Pal.com Inc.
Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. (“Voip-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTC Pink: VPLM) headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. The Company owns a portfolio of patents relating to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is currently looking to monetize.
Corporate Website: www.voip-pal.com
Filed Under: Featured Companies News, News
Home Ministry pushes for IB right to screen VoIP services offered by Skype, Yahoo, GTalk, RediffBol
By Kalyan Parbat, ET Bureau | 30 Dec, 2013, 04.00AM IST
KOLKATA: Home Secretary Anil Goswami has sought Telecom Secretary MF Farooqui's intervention to expedite clearance for the Intelligence Bureau (IB) to test an interception solution to monitor voice over internet protocol (VoIP) calls in India. If the trial is successful, it will be possible to screen VoIP services offered by the likes of Skype, Yahoo Messenger, GTalk, Fring and RediffBol, among others in India.
The IB plans to test the VoIP interception solution on Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd's networks in consultation with the department of electronics and IT. "A team of DeiTY and Intelligence Bureau officers may be permitted access to BSNL's networks to test a lawful interception solution on VoIP traffic," Goswami wrote to Farooqui. A copy of the letter was seen by ET.
The home secretary's letter also added that the IB would be the law enforcement agency...
Read more at:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/28117753.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Any chance you can explain the process on what happens on a buyout?
Will VPLM no longer exist?
What happens to everyone's shares?
I have never been involved with a stock during a buyout
In regards to Canadian taxes; when there is a potential for a large dollar payout,what options are there?
Any info you or anyone else could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Here are a list users of VLPM Patents
Taken from article: http://undiscoveredequities.com/featured-companies-news/white-paper-voippal-inventions-innovations-intellectual-property/
Current Users of Inventions:
Call Routing System Vendors – e.g.; Cisco, Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent, etc.
? Consumer VoIP Vendors – e.g.; Vonage, Skype (Microsoft), Comcast, etc.
? Commercial VoIP Vendors – e.g.; Ring Central, Jive, Vocalocity, Nextiva
? Mobile Carriers – e.g.; Verizon, Virgin, Vodaphone, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, etc.
? Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs and CLECs) – AT&T, Verizon, Telepacific, Mitel
? Messaging Service Providers – Twitter
LOVE THE VERY LAST LINE!
http://helpthesheeple.com/tag/vplm/
Posted by The Eye is Watching on August 1, 2013
Court Rules Cops Don’t Need Warrant to Track Cell Phones
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit delivered another blow to the Fourth Amendment this week when it ruled the police do not need a search warrant to track cell phones.
The court ruled that because cell phone records are owned by phone providers the user has no expectation of privacy and thus no search warrant is required to access data.
“The court did not address whether people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their movements and made clear its decision only concerned obtaining historical cell site records when a user makes or ends a phone call,” Hanni Fakhoury writes for the Electronic Frontier Foundation today.
According to the court, a location is voluntarily turned over when the “user makes a choice to get a phone, to select a particular service provider, and to make a call.”
The lower court was able to make this decision because the Supreme Court is reluctant to rule on the Fourth Amendment and new technologies.
The so-called “third party doctrine” — the premise that you have no expectation of privacy if information is turned over to third parties — “is dangerously eroding our Fourth Amendment protection at a time when cell phone companies and Internet service providers are stockpiling extensive personal information about all of us,” writes Fakhoury for the EFF.
Download and Read PDF
If you read here this company called VOIP-Pal.com seems to have the ability to race cell phones. Could be a smart investment???
Posted by The Eye is Watching on March 7, 2013
http://helpthesheeple.com/tag/vplm/
Posted in: Economy, Ramblings. Tagged: freedom of speach, is skype secure, lawful intercept, skype privacy, Voip-pal.com, VPLM. Leave a Comment
When this gets bought out, and it will, the stock will be worth a LOT of money; I have been looking at it as of lately.
Symbol being (VPLM). They will be able to tap into VoIP and Skype as well without people knowing it is being done. The last private frontier is being assaulted !!!
BELLEVUE, Wash., March 7, 2013 /PRNewswire/ – Voip-Pal.Com Inc. (“Voip-Pal”,”Company”) (OTC Pink: VPLM) is pleased to announce that in January 2013, the Company has successfully demonstrated its Lawful or Legal Intercept Technology to prospective clients interested in the future licensing or purchase of the Company’s Lawful Intercept (“LI”) Technology.
The demonstration was performed using the Company’s proprietary VoIP platform, including http://www.platinumphone.com, their smartphone VoIP application for the Android, Voip-Pal’s Cloud servers and proprietary VoIP switch technology with wholesale termination being provided by Tata Communications. This demonstration shows how Voip-Pal’s LI Technology is used to intercept a VoIP conversation under absolute stealth mode.
The Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) was dated and mailed on January 18, 2013 to Voip-Pal’s wholly owned subsidiary Digifonica (International) Limited (“Digifonica”) on its patent application “INTERCEPTING VOICE OVER IP COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER DATA COMMUNICATIONS”, allowing for the issuance of the Lawful Intercept patent.
The Lawful Intercept patent application discloses the technology on how the Law Enforcement and Anti-Terrorist Agencies can monitor VoIP calls of persons of interest. Because of the rapid growth of Voice Over InternetProtocol (“VoIP”) services worldwide, the traditional wire tapping methods have become obsolete. VoIP is now the preferred choice of communication for criminals and terrorists because of the difficulty of intercepting encrypted messages across VoIP Service Providers (“VSPs”). Digifonica/Voip-Pal’s patented technology overcomes the problem with its ability to monitor VoIP calls right on the VSP’s equipment, independent of access methods (WiFi, DSL, Cable, Wimax etc) and under complete stealth mode.[1]
“This demonstration truly validates the authenticity and potential of the LI technology for law enforcement purposes,” states Dennis Chang, President and CEO of Voip-Pal. “We would like to invite other qualified VSP OEMs to contact us for a scheduled demonstration to test and see for themselves first hand. It’s no longer a matter of ‘if’ this technology works, but a matter of ‘when’ it will be implemented. Several countries worldwide, including the US, are now requesting VSPs to provide LI access to qualified law agencies. It is only a matter of time when it will become mandatory for all VSPs. There is growing political pressure for law enforcement agencies to fix the problem. Voip-Pal now has the solution to that problem and is offering it to the World.”[2]
About Voip-Pal’s wholly owned subsidiary, Digifonica (International) Limited
Digifonica (International) Limited (“Digifonica”) was originally incorporated as Digifonica International Inc. in 2004 and listed on the TSX stock exchange (DIL-H). The company raised more than $15M of investments into research and development of the most advanced VoIP technologies. It employed approximately 20 developers, some of them being well-known in VoIP industry, who built an integrated white-labelled VoIP system, which can be deployed for new Internet Telephony providers in matter of minutes. The goal was two-fold:
Provide scalable and the most cost-effective solution for partners, when prices for Internet calls go down to zero
Comply with government regulations of Internet communications against illegal activities
Soon after the first production-grade system was released for partners, it became clear that architectural solutions developed and operated by Digifonica, were highly advanced in the industry and required protection. Digifonica decided to dedicate sufficient resources, both human and financial, to work with the top Canadian firm practising in intellectual property – Smart & Biggar. That cooperation produced the results: Digifonica filed overall 5 patent applications, starting from 2007 (see “About Voip-Pal/Digifonica Patent Applications” below). The Patent Applications were all filed initially as PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applications, came through International phase, then entered National phases in many countries around the world, first of all in US Canada and Europe. They all are in different stages of prosecution.
About Voip-Pal/Digifonica Patent Applications
1. Lawful Intercept (“Intercepting VoIP communications and other data communications”) US Patent Application, Publication No. 20100150138, (Link to Digifonica Lawful Intercept USPTO filing): Lawful Intercept is a revolutionary technology that addresses the national and international demands by governments to enable law agencies the ability to perform scheduled and live intercepts on VoIP telephone conversations. Network Service providers such as Skype may soon want to be in compliance with government regulations regarding Lawful Intercept.
2. Routing, Billing and Rating engine (RBR): (“Producing routing messages for VoIP communications”) US Patent Publication No. 20100150328 (Link to RBR USPTO filing): RBR allows new Licensees to perform subscriber management from their own existing subscriber management and billing platforms. This series of patent application technologies allow Licensees to setup and deploy VoIP solutions virtually anywhere in the world in a matter of minutes, without fear of infringing on mainstream VoIP patents. (see Verizon/Vonage litigation[3]).
3. Mobile Gateway, US Patent Publication No. 20110122827, (Link to Digifonica Mobile Gateway USPTO filing): This patent application allows our subscriber, who has a Voip-Pal App on his smartphone, to connect to our VoIP system via any WiFi/WiMax/etc. network transparently for the user, and run calls via our system withoutincurring roaming charges.
4. Enhanced 911 (“Emergency Assistance calling for VoIP communications”) International Application No. PCT/CA2008/000545: This is a patent application technology which allows for Short Code/Emergency Dialing; in other words, the ability to enable true Emergency Calling solutions to VoIP subscribers.
5. Advanced Interoperability Solutions (“Uninterrupted Transmission of Internet Protocol Transmissions during Endpoint Changes”) International Application No. PCT/CA2009/001317: This patent application allows the transfer of in-session VoIP calls between disparate wireless technologies, enabling subscribers to roam seamlessly between different WiFi, WiMAX, 3G and 4G antenna technologies without losing a call.
White House defends NSA phone records collection as 'critical tool'
Obama administration says order is 'critical tool in protecting the nation from terrorist threats' as senior politicians condemn surveillance
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/obama-administration-nsa-verizon-records
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/u-s-secretly-collecting-citizen-phone-records-u-k-report-1.1313472
House passes Cispa cybersecurity bill!
The House of Representatives passed a controversial cybersecurity bill on Thursday April 18 2013 in the face of warnings that it undermined privacy and a threat from White House advisers warning they would recommend President Barack Obama veto the legislation.
The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (Cispa) passed by a 288-127 vote, receiving support from 92 Democrats. It will move to the Senate and then to the president's desk.
The bill allows private businesses to share customers' personal information with any government entity, including the National Security Agency.
Reintroduced in February after failing to pass Congress last year, the bill would afford legal protection to the government and businesses to share data with each other on cyber threats.
Its co-author, Mike Rogers, the intelligence committee chairman and a Republican from Michigan, argues that cyberattacks and espionage, particularly from China, where a number of high profile attacks have originated recently, are a number one threat to US economic security.
"We have a constitutional obligation to defend this nation," said Rogers, on the House floor. "This is the answer to empower cyber information sharing to protect this nation, to allow those companies to protect themselves and move on to economic prosperity. If you want to take a shot across China's bow, this is the answer."
Earlier this week, Rogers dismissed opponents of the bill as teenagers in their basements.
Dutch Ruppersberger, a Democrat of Maryland, the other co-author of the bill, said on Wednesday during debate on the issue that $400bn worth of American trade secrets are being stolen by US companies every year.
"If your house is being robbed, you call 911 and the police department comes. That's the same scenario we are looking at here," he said.
At one point, Mike McCaul, a Republican from Texas, attempted to draw a comparison between the terror attack in Boston on Monday and cyberterrorism, to draw support for the bill's aim to improve security. "Recent events in Boston demonstrate that we have to come together as Republicans and Democrats," he said, according to Reuters.
"In the case of Boston, there were real bombs," said McCaul. "In this case, they are digital bombs – and these digital bombs are on their way."
Nancy Pelosi, the House Minority leader, expressed the same concerns shared by the White House and civil liberty groups that the bill had failed to strike a "crucial balance between security and liberty".
"Im disappointed that we did not address some of the concerns mentioned by the White House about personal information," Pelosi said. "Unfortunately, it offers no policies and did not allow any amendments or real solution that upholds Americans' right to privacy."
Last year, global protests by a coalition of internet activists and web companies, including Google and Wikipedia and Twitter, scuppered a similar bill, the Hollywood-backed Stop Online Piracy Act. At the time they warned that future attempts to push through legislation that threatened digital freedoms would be met with a similar response.
Holmes Wilson, co-founder of online advocacy group Fight For the Future, said he and other critics would continue to lobby against Cispa. "It would have been so easy to fix this bill and require sites to strip out personal information before passing them to the government." he said.
He said amendments had been made in closed sessions and it was "not out of the question" that privacy protections had been left out intentionally at the behest of the intelligence agencies.
House intelligence committee leaders addressed some privacy concerns by endorsing an amendment that gave the job of clearing house for the exchange data to the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department, rather than a military agency.
The bill has attracted support from tech giants including IBM who are keen for liability protection from consumers whose information they have shared, said Wilson. "Right now if the government wants users' information, the company can say no because it opens them up to being sued," he said. "If Cispa passes, there will be no legal restraint."
Kurt Opsahl, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which had unsuccessfully urged the House to adopt an amendment that would have allowed companies to make a privacy contract with their customers, said it was a "poorly drafted" bill that would present a "gaping exception to bedrock privacy law".
The American Civil Liberties Union, one of 34 groups that wrote to lawmakers this week urging them to oppose the bill, said they would work with Congress to ensure the next version of information-sharing legislation resolves the privacy issue and protects personal information online.
"CISPA is an extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," said Michelle Richardson, legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office.
A Sunlight Foundation report recently revealed that interest groups in support of the bill spent $605m from 2011 to the third quarter of 2012 – 140 times as much lobbying Congress as those on the other side of the debate, who spent $4.3m.
The bill's opponents, which include digital rights organisations and Internet companies like Reddit and Craiglist, petitioned the White House and submitted more than 300,000 signatures to the House Intelligence Committee. Microsoft and Facebook also oppose the bill, according to Reuters.
Several influential industry groups had come out in support of the bill, including the wireless group CTIA, the US Chamber of Commerce and TechNet, which represents large internet and technology companies.
BARCHART 100% BUY! Go VPLM!
IMO,if anyone is still unsure about VPLM's potential stock value, check out this powerful statement
"The early days of VoIP are over, and running commercial VoIP without Lawful Intercept will be considered by governments as illegal"
http://money.ca/money/2013/01/28/voip-pal-com-inc-s-lawful-intercept-patent-application-receives-the-allowance-for-issuance-as-a-patent/
IMO..They may perhaps be holding back reporting per legal advise due to the pending acquisition talks. The request may even be on request from the company that's interested to suppress significant stock movement.
This Patent has been filed Worldwide!
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&at=7&locale=en_EP&FT=D&CC=EP&NR=2084868A1&KC=A1
Bibliographic data: EP2084868 (A1) ? 2009-08-05
PRODUCING ROUTING MESSAGES FOR VOICE OVER IP COMMUNICATIONS
Page bookmark EP2084868 (A1) - PRODUCING ROUTING MESSAGES FOR VOICE OVER IP COMMUNICATIONS
Inventor(s): PERREAULT CLAY [PA]; NICHOLSON STEVE [NZ]; THOMSON ROD [CA]; BJORSELL JOHAN EMIL VICTOR [CA]; ARAFA FUAD [CA] +
Applicant(s): DIGIFONICA INTERNATIONAL LTD [CA] +
Classification:
- international: H04L12/14; H04L12/66; H04M11/06; H04M15/00; H04Q3/64; H04Q3/66; H04Q3/70
- cooperative: H04L12/14; H04L12/1439; H04L12/1496; H04L12/66; H04L9/3226; H04Q3/66; H04Q3/70; H04Q2213/13091; H04Q2213/13141; H04Q2213/13196; H04Q2213/1322; H04Q2213/13384
Application number: EP20070816106 20071101
Priority number(s): WO2007CA01956 20071101 ; US20060856212P 20061102
Also published as: EP2084868 (A4) WO2008052340 (A1) WO2008052340 (A8) US2010150328 (A1) KR20090086428 (A) CN101584166 (A) CA2668025 (A1) less
Abstract not available for EP2084868 (A1)
Abstract of corresponding document: WO2008052340 (A1)
Rambler, do you have any updates?
Thanks for the info Rambler, great news! Some people just dontno that patience is a virtue!
Thanks Rambler!
Rambler - is there any new info, I have been following your posts
Thanks
Up (+ 22.50) in the aftermarket
Barchart has VPLM as a Strong Buy!!!!
Continue to receive prompt email replies from company!
They have advised they expect to be coming out with news sometime next week!
I emailed Voip-Pal three times in the last month to ask a few questions(not about law suit) and received email response within 24 hours each time.