Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR 24 YEARS FOR MID MARCH
LEMMY AND CHEYNEW ALMOST AS LONG
President Obama has admitted to having a closed door meeting in the White House with Muslim leaders including Muslim Brotherhood members. Obama has appointed several Muslim Brotherhood members to key positions in this administration. CAIR was created by the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that supports Islamic terrorism and sanctions violence against civilians. At least 15 high-level CAIR staff members have been under federal investigation for ties to Islamic terror. CAIR board members have called for the overthrow of the United States and the imposition of Islamic law. CAIR has suggested applying Sharia punishment (ie. the death penalty) to users who criticize Islam on the Internet. CAIR has discouraged Muslim-Americans from cooperating with law enforcement and has spent more time and money advocating on behalf of convicted terrorists than for their victims. CAIR founders have praised terrorists to Muslim audiences and said that suicide bombers are acting on behalf of Islam. CAIR has raised funds for terrorists under the guise of helping 9/11 victims. Obama is defined as the enemy within
WELL SAID BOB.......
I'M 24 YEARS IN TOO ........
ANOTHER MONEY MAP PRESS DUD BY TOM GENTILE ...
AND I QUOTE THEM :My Rosetta Algorithm revealed that FDX has gained an average of $4.37 per share between November 16th and December 4th every single year but one... for the last decade.
Think about how incredible that is.
Think about the odds of one stock making the same move over the same small date range, despite all the crazy ups and downs the market has experienced over the last 10 years.
Now, ask yourself...
"If FDX gained $4.37 for nine of the last 10 years, what do you think is likely to happen THIS year?"
Here's the bottom line...
If you're one of the very few who can see this pattern – and know exactly how to capitalize on it – you can become, quite literally, rich.
Dear Reader,
If I were you, I'd circle your calendar for December 4th. And I'd keep a deposit slip handy too.
Because on or before that date, it's extremely likely that shares of FedEx (FDX) will increase at least $4.37, or 2.8%.
Only I wouldn't settle for a measly 2.8%. And neither will you.
In fact, in the next few minutes, I'm going to show you exactly how you could gain 100% or more on just a 6% move in FDX...
And deposit DOUBLE your money into your portfolio by December 4th.
And that's just the start of a run of plays that could easily add up to gains of 400% or more into your pocket between today and the end of THIS year...........WELL THAT TURNED OUT TO BE BULL $HIIIT..
IM IN AXP JAN 15 70 PUT OPTIONS FOR A FEW BUCKS .. SO FAR SO GOOD......
Subject: Re: CAN A MUSLIM BE A GOOD AMERICAN?
I HAVE ATTACHED A YOUTUBE LINK FOR YOU TO WATCH... I JUST GOT DONE READING THIS LADY'S BOOK ...I recommend that every American read it... and please pass this on because America really depends on it... check out this introduction video and you'll see why.... This president has been bringing Muslims into this country for the past 6 years by the THOUSANDS without anyone knowing!
What Happened to Government Transparency? All We See Is Illegal Stonewalling
By David Zeiler, Contributing Writer, Money Morning • December 3, 2015
In recent years, it's become easier for wrongdoers to get away with abusing their government-given power.
The Obama administration has made it increasingly difficult for federal watchdogs to obtain records.
Government scandals are getting harder to investigate as the Obama administration turns away from promises of government transparency. Here's what's going on.That's because it wants to prevent unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal information. But this contradicts the intent of a government oversight system in place for 37 years.
The current law was set up in 1978 following the Watergate scandal. The idea was to install inspectors general at the government agencies and give them the power to investigate any scandals within that agency. Each inspector general was authorized access to all agency records.
But in recent years, agencies have balked at turning over information they deemed confidential, such as grand jury reports, wiretaps, credit reports, and in some cases, emails.
This has disrupted at least 20 investigations of government scandals in the past five years.
Then, in July, the U.S. Department of Justice made things worse.
How the DOJ Made Government Scandal Investigations Harder
The ongoing disputes between the agencies and the watchdogs over access to records led to a series of Justice Department reviews.
On July 20, the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion that "all records" did not necessarily include the "confidential" categories, legitimizing what had been unofficial Obama administration policy.
"This is by far the most aggressive assault on the inspector general concept since the beginning…. They've become defanged."
"This is by far the most aggressive assault on the inspector general concept since the beginning," Paul Light, a New York University professor who has studied the IG system, told The New York Times. "It's the complete evisceration of the concept. You might as well fold them down. They've become defanged."
It's especially galling coming from the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama, who has consistently promised a more transparent government.
"Every agency and department should know that this administration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold information but those who seek to make it known," President Obama said in a 2009 welcoming message to his senior staff.
But within a year something happened that left those words ringing hollow…
Obama Administration Stonewalling a Long-Standing Issue
That policy for openness started to go backwards as early as 2010, when Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine was looking into Federal Bureau of Investigation abuses in counterterrorism programs. The FBI told Fine that as some confidential records were legally protected, he would not be allowed to see them.
In the years that followed, more watchdogs encountered similar roadblocks as they sought to investigate various government scandals.
Last year, the Drug Enforcement Administration refused to hand over emails from senior officials regarding a raid in Honduras in which four unarmed villagers were killed and several private planes shot down.
In another government scandal at the Peace Corps, an investigation into alleged sexual assaults against overseas volunteers ran into trouble when the agency's lawyers balked at turning over abuse reports.
Many agencies have viewed the July DOJ opinion as a license to hold back even more information, including some not covered by the opinion.
But the ability of the Obama administration to stonewall investigations of government scandals may be coming to an end.
The Inspectors General Strike Back
In August, the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, which represents the watchdog agencies, sent a letter to Congress requesting that it step in with specific legislation to restore their right to full access to all government records.
And the Senate responded. In September, a bipartisan bill was introduced to amend the language in the Inspector General Act of 1978.
"The Justice Department opinion is contrary to the law and to the reason Congress created inspectors general – an independent overseer of the executive branch," bill cosponsor Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told Government Executive. "The action we're taking with this new legislation leaves no room for misinterpretation."
With strong bipartisan support, this bill is very likely to pass.
President Obama could always veto the bill, but that would expose his claims of having "the most transparent administration in history" as a fraud.
Of course, if the president was truly sincere about transparency in his administration, we wouldn't need legislation to compel his agencies to comply with government scandal investigations.
The Bottom Line: Agencies within the Obama administration increasingly have been stonewalling investigations into government scandals by withholding certain confidential records. Given that the president often brags about the transparency of his administration, it's absurd that the issue has gone this far. Now the inspectors general are fighting back and have convinced Congress to introduce a bill that will restore their access to all records.
My Civic Duty
While walking along the Boardwalk early this morning I noticed a character shouting "Allah be praised" and "Death to all infidels" then suddenly he tripped and fell into the water. He was struggling to stay afloat because of all the explosives he was carrying.
If he didn't get help soon he would surely drown. Being a responsible citizen, I informed the Police, the Volunteer Fire Brigade, the Volunteer Coast Guard, and even the Immigration Office.
It is now 11 a.m., the terrorist has drowned, and none of the authorities have responded.
I'm starting to think I wasted four stamps.
I HOPE NOT ....
A Huge Clinton Scam !
Now is the time to get this information out.
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing it.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it. 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations, and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest, and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.
A Huge Clinton Scam !
Now is the time to get this information out.
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing it.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it. 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations, and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest, and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.
Obama’s inaction plants doubt he can keep America safe
President Obama’s appallingly tepid response to the Paris slaughter makes him an outlier in a world suddenly determined to crush the Islamic State barbarians. In one of the worst appearances ever by an American president during a crisis, Obama, meeting in Turkey with other heads of state, called the atrocity a “setback” and urged patience.
Even after French President François Hollande gave a rousing speech to Parliament, declaring, “We are in a war against jihadist terrorism, which is threatening the whole world,” and urged Obama to join a coordinated effort, the president said no.
“It’s best that we don’t, you know, shoot first and aim later,” Obama said.
So much for solidarity with the French. Like Herman Melville’s character in “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” Obama would “prefer not to.” But passive resistance is not a viable strategy against medieval madmen.
Obama did show one streak of passion — while denouncing as “unAmerican” calls to block Syrian refugees from being resettled in the US. Thus, he got animated only to denounce other Americans, a strange thing for an American president to do on foreign soil.
http://nypost.com/2015/11/18/obamas-inaction-plants-doubt-he-can-keep-america-safe/
LOOKS LIKE THE VERMIN GOT YOU TONITE ALSO .........
THEY WILL NOT LET ANY NEGATIVE POSTS STAY .........IT'S A BIASED BOARD AND SHOULD BE CALLED OUT FOR IT ....
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE
http://nypost.com/2015/11/07/obama-held-hostage-how-irans-using-the-nuke-deal-as-license-to-go-wild/
Wedding ring is in for repair again this year...
Just passing this on with no comment, interesting observation though....
The Wedding ring is in for repair again this year. Since when does a plain wedding band need repairs, along with your watch, for a whole month? In a press conference last week Obama was not wearing his wedding ring nor was he wearing his watch. When noticed, his staff said his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch.
So it's just a coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during the month of Ramadan...
Can't possibly be that, because although he hasn't gone to a Christian church service since entering the White House, we know he's a committed Christian "cause he said so during his campaign"
This is the same president that spent the Christmas holidays in Hawaii to avoid religious obligations as president at the White House. His children do not receive Christmas presents. Let's just face the facts and quit trying to distort the truth, we have a Muslim for president in the White House, and he has no knowledge of American history.
Please pass this on to believers of what is happening to our Great Nation and to those who are still in denial.
I love this country; it's the current government leadership I worry about!
The Clintons weren't so bad.................
If you're under 50 you really need to read this.
If you're over 50, you lived through it, so share it with those under 50.
Amazing to me how much I had forgotten!
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume
authority over a health care reform.
Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn't even get a vote in ademocratic controlled congress.
This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for
studies, promotion, and other efforts.
Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female
attorney general.
Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood - both were
forced to withdraw their names from consideration.
Next she chose Janet Reno - husband Bill described her selection as
"my worst mistake."
Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh
and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in
dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the
head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When
a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier's radical views, her
name had to be withdrawn from consideration.
Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some
more recommendations.
She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department,
Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the
Treasury Department.
Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably)
committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
Many younger votes will have no knowledge of "Travelgate." Hillary
wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry
Thompson - and the White House Travel Office refused to comply.
She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired.
This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a
thirty-six month investigation.
Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of
the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds.
A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.
Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend
a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of
Director of White House security.
When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900
FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of
drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied
even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use
in the White House.
Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office
after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual
harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the
"bimbo eruption" and scandal defense.
Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle was:
She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.
After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.
She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor
After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's
investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about
and later admitting his affairs.
Hillary's devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to
practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his
subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice
during the Starr investigation by repeating, "I do not recall," "I
have no recollection," and "I don't know" a total of 56 times while
under oath.
After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an
estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that
she had stolen.
What a swell party - ready for another four or eight year of this type
low-life mess?
Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails
while Hillary was Secretary of State and the "pay to play" schemes of
the Clinton Foundation - we have no idea what shoe will fall next.
But to her loyal fans - "what difference does it make?"
Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan
absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!
WE WILL GO DOWN TOMORROW ..IT'S CALLED THE CLAY TRADER EFFECT ....
Judge Andrew Napolitano explained on "Hannity" that in his view, there's no "conceivable" way that Hillary Clinton could have believed that there was no classified information in her private emails.
The judge pointed out that the travel plans of Amb. Chris Stevens in Libya were contained in the emails, along with the names of undercover CIA officers.
"How could she say those weren't classified?" he asked.
Clinton has insisted that she did not send or receive information on her private email server that was classified at that time.
The judge said he sees Clinton's legal position as being "somewhere between grave and worse than grave."
Hannity asked the judge what he thinks will happen if FBI Director James Comey wants to move forward with charges against Clinton, but Attorney General Loretta Lynch refuses to proceed.
Napolitano said if that happens, he believes senior FBI officials may resign in protest and possibly even leak information on the case.
"The case will be so damning, the political effect will be the same as if they had sought an indictment," said Napolitano.
MOTLEY FOOL
Peregrine Pharmaceuticals' Stock Sank in September: Is It Now a Buy?
Peregrine Pharmaceuticals' stock had a rough September. Should investors take advantage of this pullback to add this speculative biopharma to their portfolios?
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/10/17/peregrine-pharmaceuticals-stock-sank-in-september.aspx?source=eogyholnk0000001&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article
What: Peregrine Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:PPHM), a clinical-stage biopharma specializing in the development of monoclonal antibodies to treat cancer, saw its shares slip by almost 18% in September based on data from S&P Capital IQ. The good news is that this sell-off wasn't triggered by a specific negative regulatory or clinical catalyst.
Instead, I think this double-digit drop is best explained by the widespread drop across the healthcare sector that stung small-cap companies particularly hard. According to finviz.com, for instance, 74.6% of all small-cap healthcare stocks declined in September.
So what: My hunch is that the market soured on small-cap healthcare companies in general last month because they tend to be cash flow-negative and heavily dependent on stock sales to fund their ongoing operations. And Peregrine is no exception in this regard.
After all, Peregrine lost $15.1 million, or $0.08 per share, in the first quarter of its fiscal year 2016, which it reported last month. Complicating matters, the company ended the quarter with less than $60 million in cash and cash equivalents -- strongly hinting that another capital raise is coming down the pike.
Now what: While Peregrine's contract manufacturing subsidiary Avid Bioservices reportedly has a $42 million backlog in existing customers, Wall Street thinks the company's ongoing late-stage study for bavituximab, as a second-line non-small cell lung cancer treatment, will widen the company's net loss per share by another 23% next year.
As this event-driven pivotal trial may not produce top-line results until the end of 2016 or early 2017, Peregrine clearly has a long road ahead of it before reaching the promised land of an approved market. As such, investors may want to hold off on buying this small-cap drugmaker's shares for the time being.
George Budwell
Fool Contributor
George Budwell has been writing about healthcare and biotechnology companies at the Motley Fool since 2013. His primary interests are novel small molecule drugs, next generation vaccines, and cell therapies.
The Saudi government, under increasing criticism over civilian casualties from its airstrikes in Yemen and a harsh crackdown on political dissidents at home, has just hired a powerhouse Washington, D.C., lobbying firm headed by a top Hillary Clinton fundraiser — an arrangement that critics charge raises fresh questions about the influence that foreign government lobbyists could have on her campaign.
The Saudi contract with the Podesta Group, owned by veteran Washington lobbyist and Clinton campaign bundler Tony Podesta, calls for the firm to provide “public relations” and other services on behalf of the royal court of King Salman.
It included an initial “project fee” payment of $200,000 last month and unspecified further sums over the course of the next year, according to documents recently filed with the Justice Department Foreign Agents Registration Act office.
The retention comes at a time when the Saudis are being condemned by United Nations officials over reports that their bombings against Houthi strongholds in Yemen’s civil war have resulted in the deaths and injuries of hundreds of innocent civilians, including children.
Adding to the international pressure, the Saudis are also facing criticism from human rights groups over their continued refusal to allow basic rights to women (e.g., the freedom to drive cars). They are also being criticized for their hard-line domestic suppression of political dissidents, with draconian punishments such as the sentence — by beheading — recently given to a 20-year-old Shiite political protester.
“They are very nervous about an American policy change, and so they are betting on the horse they think will win — Hillary Clinton,” said Ali Al-Ahmad, a Saudi analyst with the Institute for Gulf Affairs, and a frequent critic of the regime, about the hiring of the Podesta Group.
The Podesta Group is now on a roster of a half-dozen D.C. lobbying firms representing the Saudis, including the giant international law firm DLA Piper and the firm Hogan Lovells, whose principal on the Saudi account is former Minnesota Republican Sen. Norm Coleman, who chairs the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super-PAC that is a major source of House GOP campaign funds. (Former Texas congressman Tom Loeffler, a top bundler for Jeb Bush’s presidential campaign, for years represented the Saudis, but his current firm, Akin Gump, now lobbies for the United Arab Emirates, among other foreign clients.)
But the retention of the Podesta Group has gotten attention in Washington lobbying circles because of its unusually close ties to Hillary Clinton’s campaign: Tony Podesta is the brother and former business partner of Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta. He is also a prolific Democratic Party fundraiser who is among 43 Washington lobbyists (many of whom also represent foreign governments) listed as Clinton campaign bundlers in reports filed by the campaign with the Federal Election Commission.
The reports disclose that Podesta had raised $140,175 for the Clinton campaign through Sept. 30. Two weeks ago, just days after filing its Saudi contract with the Justice Department, Podesta held a Clinton campaign fundraiser at his home that offered fine Italian food cooked by five gourmet chefs, including himself and his brother, the campaign chairman.
The Podesta Group point man on the Saudi account is David Adams, who previously served as assistant secretary of state for legislative affairs in 2011 and 2012, making him Clinton’s chief Capitol Hill lobbyist for her last two years as secretary of state, according to Justice Department filings reviewed by Yahoo News.
But Tony Podesta, while calling himself “a proud Clinton bundler,” vigorously denied that the Saudi contract had anything to do with his efforts to elect her president. “I’ve never had a conversation with Hillary Clinton or anybody in the campaign about the work of the firm,” Podesta said when reached by Yahoo News on his cellphone while he was dining at a restaurant in Sicily. “We represent a dozen foreign governments around the world — we do good work for them. And it has nothing to do with the Hillary Clinton campaign.”
When Hillary Clinton Lies to Herself: What Does She Stand For?
By David Zeiler, Associate Editor, Money Morning • @DavidGZeiler • October 13, 2015
The list of Hillary Clinton lies is long, but most of those were told to protect her career or to burnish her image.
During the Election 2016 campaign, we've heard more of those, but we've also heard Hillary Clinton lies of a different sort.
I'm talking about her flip-flopping on issues. A lot of issues.
ElectionNow, with gay marriage and the Iraq war, Hillary Clinton has a lot of company. And she may genuinely have had a change of heart, as many politicians have.
But in other cases, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal, it's hard not to view her flip-flop as political opportunism.
Not that this is rare among politicians. But as rival Bernie Sanders, the socialist senator from Vermont, has gained on her in the polls, Hillary has flip-flopped much more than the average candidate. She's elevated it to an art.
For voters, that makes it hard to know what Hillary really believes. Which position is sincere and which taken for political expediency? Which are the Hillary Clinton lies, and which are her true opinions? And if she wins the White House, which positions will she take as president?
It's almost impossible to tell what she believes. And all the flip-flopping is a major reason that in a Quinnipiac poll taken last week, 61% of voters said Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
Even her liberal supporters are getting snarky about it.
A headline last week on Slate read, "Hillary Clinton Comes Out Against TPP, at Least Until the Democratic Convention."
So what was the Hillary Clinton flip-flop on the TPP?
The Latest Hillary Clinton Flip-Flop
First, a little background.
This trade deal has been in mostly secret negotiations for about 10 years. The TPP breaks down trade barriers much as the North American Free Trade Agreement did. The 12 member nations all sit on the Pacific Rim and include Peru, Australia, Japan, and Vietnam.
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton worked with the U.S. Trade Representative in the crafting of the deal. And back then, she thought it was a good move. According to CNN, she has praised the TPP on no less than 45 separate occasions.
And often she was effusive. In November 2012, Hillary Clinton said this in her official remarks during a visit to Australia:
"This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40% of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment."
But in the spring and summer, Bernie Sanders made the TPP a campaign issue. He strongly opposes the deal, as do many in the Democratic Party.
In June, Hillary wavered, saying she would "probably not" vote to fast-track the TPP if she were still a senator.
By last week, the flip-flop was complete: "As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," she told PBS, saying it would "kill American jobs."
Odd how Hillary is just now learning about a deal that she helped create.
But the TPP flip-flop is just the one of many Hillary Clinton lies to herself.
Just look at this list…
The Hillary Clinton Lies Even Her Supporters Don't Believe
In the course of the Election 2016 campaign, we've seen Hillary Clinton flip-flop on these issues:
The Keystone XL pipeline: While she never said so publicly, Washington insiders believed Hillary supported Keystone as secretary of state because of her ties to its builder, TransCanada Corp. (NYSE: TRP). But Democrats are divided on the Keystone pipeline. Unions support it because it will bring jobs; environmentalists oppose it. So when the campaign began, Hillary tried to take no position, saying that since she oversaw part of the approval process as secretary of state, she couldn't. Until last month, when she suddenly could. Now Hillary opposes the Keystone XL pipeline.
Crime: When Bill Clinton was president, first lady Hillary Clinton had a strict "tough-on-crime" stance. "We need more and tougher prison sentences for repeat offenders," she said in 1994. "We need more prisons to keep violent offenders for as long as it takes to keep them off the streets." Following the Freddie Gray riots in Baltimore in April, Hillary called for an end to the "era of mass incarceration."
Undocumented immigrants: During her last presidential campaign in 2008, Hillary Clinton came out strongly against giving driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants. Then-Sen. Barack Obama supported it, and it helped him beat Hillary for the nomination. Hillary learned her lesson, and for the 2016 election campaign, has reversed her position.
Guns: Back in 2008, Hillary spoke fondly of the Second Amendment to win over working class Democrats in states like Indiana. She even reminisced about how her father "taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl." This time around, Hillary is pushing hard for tighter gun control.
And it's still early in the Election 2016 campaign. Hillary Clinton may flip flop on more issues as the political winds shift.
"This latest astonishing reversal is fresh confirmation that Hillary Clinton makes decisions solely to serve her immediate political interests," the New York Post editorialized in the wake of the TPP flip flop last week. "She has no core beliefs – other than her own naked ambition."
Follow me on Twitter @DavidGZeiler.
More on Hillary: Last week, Hillary Clinton announced that she planned to crack down on Wall Street if elected president. While not a flip-flop, this position strains credibility. Plenty of incidents in Hillary's past indicate that she's no foe of Wall Street – but a friend and ally…
LOL........
I HAVE NEW LIFE ...BEEN TRADING OPTIONS THE LAST MONTH AND DOING WELL.. P.O.S. IS THE FURTHEST THING FROM MY MIND ANYMORE AND THAT CRAZY LUNATIC BOARD I STAY AWAY FROM FOR THE MOST PART .......
I AGREE WITH YOU AND ALSO VOTED NO ..24 YEARS AND STILL HOLDING WHAT I DO NOT KNOW ANYMORE .
Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with
“‘Good morning, ma’am,” a member of the uniformed Secret Service once greeted Hillary Clinton.
“F— off,” she replied.
That exchange is one among many that active and retired Secret Service agents shared with Ronald Kessler, author of “First Family Detail,” a compelling look at the intrepid personnel who shield America’s presidents and their families — and those whom they guard.
Kessler writes flatteringly and critically about people in both parties. Regarding the Clintons, Kessler presents Chelsea as a model protectee who respected and appreciated her agents. He describes Bill as a difficult chief executive, but an easygoing ex-president. And Kessler exposes Hillary as an epically abusive Arctic monster.
“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler explains. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.”
He adds: “Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.”
Kessler was an investigative reporter with the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post and has penned 19 other books. Among much more in “First Family Detail,” he reports:
?“Hillary was very rude to agents, and she didn’t appear to like law enforcement or the military,” former Secret Service agent Lloyd Bulman recalls. “She wouldn’t go over and meet military people or police officers, as most protectees do. She was just really rude to almost everybody. She’d act like she didn’t want you around, like you were beneath her.”
“Hillary didn’t like the military aides wearing their uniforms around the White House,” one former agent remembers. “She asked if they would wear business suits instead. The uniform’s a sign of pride, and they’re proud to wear their uniform. I know that the military was actually really offended by it.”
Former agent Jeff Crane says, “Hillary would cuss at Secret Service drivers for going over bumps.”
Another former member of her detail recollects, “Hillary never talked to us .?.?. Most all members of first families would talk to us and smile. She never did that.”
“We spent years with her,” yet another Secret Service agent notes. “She never said thank you.”
Within the White House, Hillary had a “standing rule that no one spoke to her when she was going from one location to another,” says former FBI agent Coy Copeland. “In fact, anyone who would see her coming would just step into the first available office.”
One former Secret Service agent states, “If Hillary was walking down a hall, you were supposed to hide behind drapes used as partitions.”
Hillary one day ran into a White House electrician who was changing a lightbulb in the upstairs family quarters. She screamed at him, because she had demanded that all repairs be performed while the Clintons were outside the Executive Mansion.
“She caught the guy on a ladder doing the lightbulb,” says Franette McCulloch, who served at that time as assistant White House pastry chef. “He was a basket case.”
White House usher Christopher B. Emery unwisely called back Barbara Bush after she phoned him for computer troubleshooting. Emery helped the former first lady twice. Consequently, Kessler reports, Hillary sacked him. The father of four stayed jobless for a year.
While running for US Senate, Hillary stopped at an upstate New York 4-H Club. As one Secret Service agent says, Hillary saw farmers and cows and then erupted. “She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f?-?-?- did we come here for? There’s no money here.’?”
Secret Service “agents consider being assigned to her detail a form of punishment,” Kessler concludes. “In fact, agents say being on Hillary Clinton’s detail is the worst duty assignment in the Secret Service.”
After studying the Secret Service and its relationships with dozens of presidents, vice-presidents and their families, Ronald Kessler’s astonishment at Hillary Clinton’s inhumanity should reverberate in every American’s head.
As he told me: “No one would hire such a person to work at a McDonald’s, and yet she is being considered for president of the United States.”
http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/
WISH I WAS THERE WITH YOU KNOCKING DOWN A STEIN AND A PLATE OF SAUERBRATEN AND SPATZELS
DOUBLING DOWN ON OBAMANOMICS
Speaking of economic plans, a doozy just came out from Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who unveiled his policy should he obtain the Presidency. When Sanders says that he is a democratic socialist, it's relatively clear that he's extremely intent on "spending other people's money" and altering the economic contract to double down and create the world's largest welfare state.
His plan calls for an additional $18 trillion in government spending over the next decade. That includes a $15 trillion boost for single-payer healthcare (because Obamacare has been so successful), and would demand an additional $6.5 trillion each year in new taxes. There's a plan for universal college tuition (but no accountability for professors), another $1 trillion to spend on infrastructure (although shovel-ready jobs are being held up by a sea of bureaucracy).
His plan is basically the entire 2009 Obama stimulus package on steroids.
We've heard many liberal economists say that the $787 billion we spent in 2009 wasn't enough money. Should Sanders secure the nomination - and make a viable threat for the Oval office - we will see many of the same talking points that got the far left elected in Greece:
"More benefits, earlier retirement, free healthcare, free education, soak the rich."
Massive doses of centralized planning didn't work for Greece - nor anywhere in human history in the long run. It's hard to take this plan seriously, but it's apparent that many Americans do.
DISCONNECT...
The word “disconnect” is the appropriate way to describe the chasm between America’s government and its citizens. We all have our favorite examples, but none can match the events of last week.
On the eve of the 14th anniversary of the worst attack ever against our nation, President Obama celebrated a nuclear pact with Iran, an Islamic theocracy whose leader calls the United States “Satan” and joins crowds in chanting “Death to America.”
A mere 21 percent of the American public supports the deal and a bipartisan majority of the Senate opposes it. Yet the filibuster rule blocked the Senate from defeating it, allowing Obama to hail the “historic step forward.”
His “victory” is a disconnect that will live in infamy.
The deal is essentially a nonaggression pact with Iran, a form of appeasement that renders unfair any further comparisons to Neville Chamberlain. At least Hitler promised peace at the 1938 Munich conference after the British leader engineered a German annexation of parts of Czechoslovakia.
Iran’s supreme leader doesn’t bother to pretend he wants peace. On the contrary, he vows that the nuclear agreement will have zero impact on the policies of the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.
Ayatollah Khamenei, who repeatedly declares that Israel will be “eliminated,” wrote just before the Senate vote that, “God willing, there will be no Zionist regime in 25 years.”
And he made it clear that Iran, which has militias and terror proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen, and supports Hamas and Hezbollah, would not be changing its stripes, writing: “During this period, the spirit of fighting, heroism and jihad will keep you worried every moment.”
Think of that: We are lifting punitive sanctions not in the aftermath of victory or as part of a comprehensive peace agreement. We, along with other so-called great powers, are unilaterally declaring peace while our adversary repeats its declaration of war against us and Israel.
Even Iranian “moderates” openly tell their allies that the $100 billion they will get from the deal will help them carry out Khamenei’s terrorist agenda.
They say these things without fear the truth will scare off Obama or turn Democrats against him.
The Iranians are honest about their plans. Our leaders are dishonest when they insist we can safely disregard the rhetoric. We’ve been down this road before, thinking it a joke when Osama bin Laden declared war on us in the 1990s.
And yet, as lower Manhattan was again given over to the solemn anniversary of 9/11, and as family members made the annual trek to hallowed ground, Democratic lawmakers, including some from New York, again failed to recognize evil. Their president said jump, and they didn’t ask how high. Although millions of refugees fleeing Islamists are spilling out of the Mideast and North Africa, their faith in Obama is not shaken.
Their willingness to take a risk for peace might be commendable if peace were the mutual goal. But trusting that Iran will drop its conquering ambitions and moderate its martyrdom culture is a foolish roll of the dice in a life-or-death casino.
Iran had no known role in 9/11, but shares with those who carried out the attack the goal of Islamic rule. Yet its world-wide aggressions were never part of the negotiations, with Obama soft-pedaling them as “nefarious activities.” That’s one way to describe military operations that killed upwards of 1,000 American soldiers in Iraq alone.
Equally appalling, the deal rewards Iran for promised nuclear concessions no one expects the mullahs to keep. Again, it’s almost as if 9/11 didn’t happen.
Long before the smoke had cleared from Ground Zero, ordinary Americans vowed to “never forget” the unbearable loss of innocent life. A united nation went to war, heroic young men and women volunteered to defend their country, and many made the ultimate sacrifice.
The world changed forever, it was often said. Certainly it did for those survivors who gather at the powerful memorial and museum, and for the millions of visitors from around the world who come to bear witness.
As it did Friday, the reading of the names and the playing of taps always lets loose the raw emotions of that awful day.
Yet the Iran deal says the world didn’t change, and that America, or at least its president and his party, are holding fast to a 9/10 mindset. They are wrong, and the country will surely pay a price for their folly.
JUST GOT HOME GWEN FROM VAC...I VOTED NO ON #3 ...
JUST GOT HOME........
SPENT 2 WEEKS IN PENNSY AND NJ VISITING .....
LEMMY.
I SEE YOU GOT OUT OF JAIL ON POS BOARD .......DID YOU HAVE TO PAY A FINE ?? .LOL
What's Happening Here?
Never have there been in our government, so many individuals who belong to a religion that you either join or you will be killed?
When you read this you will understand why Obama refuses to say the words "radical Islam."
Did you know that we now have a Muslim government?
John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.
Obama's top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.
Hillary Clinton's top advisor, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.
Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.
Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.
Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim.
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.
It's questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. He didn't repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution. Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private?
CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible.
Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur'an.
Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government.
Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East.
The more damage Obama does, the more arrogant he becomes!
Our nation and our government has been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us. It can only get worse!
AND THEY HAVE ENOUGH VOTES TO PASS EVERYTHING WITHOUT RETAIL
THEY ALWAYS DO ......
SEC FILING.......
AT LEAST NOW MOST OF THE NEWBIES WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT THE REAL LONGS HAVE BEEN PUTTING UP WITH FOR YEARS ......
P.O.S. CHART LOOKS LIKE IT'S READY TO FLY ........
I DUMPED 3/4 OF MY P.O.S. THIS WEEK ......
AND BOUGHT SOME GOOD STOCKS .......
And then there are the chumps on the POS board.
AKA.....COUCH
CHECK OUT TODAY .......LOL
$1.00 LOW SO FAR .......
ANOTHER BUYING OPPORTUNITY ..$1.00 LOD ..........
Reverse split on next proxy?
THE LAST ONE WORKED SO WELL ...0.22 PRE/SPLIT NOW
PLEASE TAKE TIME TO READ - MAY BE OUR ONLY CHANCE
Subject: Interesting Read
Donald Trump is a provocative candidate for President. I found this to be interesting, and think you will as well.
I have my favorite candidate, as you all probably do, and am not sure what kind of President Trump would make.
It does appear there is considerable backlash to his candidacy if the comments below are true.
Trump is bringing up several issues that I do wonder about, but does it go as deep as this article is saying?
I'll let you decide for yourself!
Why the Democrats Will Do and Say Anything To Stop Donald Trump
Wayne Root
Wayne is the author of the newly released national bestseller: "The Murder of the Middle Class". Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, successful entrepreneur, small business defender, business speaker, Capital Evangelist, and media personality- appearing on over 5000 interviews in the past 5 years. Wayne s web site: ROOTforAmerica.com < http://ROOTforAmerica.com > .
Someone is getting very nervous. President Barack Obama; Valerie Jarrett; Eric Holder; Hillary Clinton; Jon Corzine … to name jjustt a few. And I know why. I wrote a book entitled The Murder of the Middle Class about the unholy conspiracy between big government, big business and big media. They all benefit by the billions from this partnership and it s in all of their interests to protect one another. It s one for all, and all for one.
It s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich. Everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We're the patsies. But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. I ve never seen them this outraged, this vicious, this motivated, this coordinated NEVER in all my years in politics, have I seen anything like the way the mad dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
When white extremist David Duke ran for governor of Louisiana he wasn t treated with this kind of outrage, vitriol and disrespect. When a known fraud, scam artist and tax cheat like Al Sharpton ran for president, I never saw anything remotely close to this. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened like never before.
Why? Because David Duke was never going to win. Al Sharpton was never going to win. Ron Paul was never going to win. Ross Perot was never going to win as a third-party candidate.
None of those candidates had the billion dollars it takes to win the presidency. But Donald Trump can self-fund that amount tomorrow and still have another billion left over to pour into the last two-week stretch before election day.
No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business and political elite understand that Donald Trump is no joke and could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.
It s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy the Donald. No, this is a coordinated conspiracy led by President Obama himself. Obama is making the phone calls and giving the orders the ultimate intimidator who plays by the rules off Chicago thug politics. Why is this so important to Obama?
Because most of the other politicians are part of the old boys club. They talk big, but in the end they won t change a thing. Why? Because they are all beholden to big money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations, multi-national corporations like Big Pharma or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock stock and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama, or foreign governments own Hillary with their Clinton Foundation donations.
These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But one man and only one man isn t beholden to anyone. One man doesn t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the Teachers Union, or the SEIU, or the Bar Association to fund his campaign. Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn t need anyone s help.
That means he doesn t care what the media says. He doesn t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.
Don t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Don t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet they ve never tried to defund Obamacare or Obama s clearly illegal Executive Action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?
Well first, I d guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs or are secretly gay or are stealing taxpayer money; the NSA knows everything.
Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew Hastert was withdrawing large sums of his own money, from his own bank account. Trust me the NSA, SEC, IRS andd all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They know everything. Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called racists. So they are scared to ever criticize Obama, or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment.
Fourth, why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you re a good boy you ve got a $5 million dollar per year lobbying job waiting. The big money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose … they win.
But Donald Trump doesn t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice cozy relationship between big government, big media and big business. All the rules are out the window if Donald wins the presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides. But not Donald.
Remember Trump was the only politician who publicly questioned Obama s college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university. Now he s doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do question our relationship with Mexico; queestion why the border is wide open; question why no wall has been built across the border; question if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; question why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes yet are not deported; question why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.
Donald Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick? Good question. I m certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare web sites. (By the way that tab is now up to $5 billion.
Trump will ask if Obamacare s architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. He will ask if Obama himself committed fraud when he said, If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.
Trump will investigate Obama s widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama s college records. Trump will prosecute Hillary Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover-up Benghazi before the election. Trump will no doubt investigate if Obama s Labor Department committed fraud by making up job report numbers to steal the 2012 election.
Obama, the multi-national corporations and the media need to stop this. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Donald could wake a sleeping giant.
Trump s election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Donald would dare to prosecute. Donald Trump will not hesitate. Once Donald gets in and gets a look at the cooked books and Obama s records, the game is over. The gig is up. The goose is cooked. Eric Holder could wind up in prison. Valerie Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Jon Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money.
Hillary Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails; or accepting bribes from foreign governments while serving as secretary of State; or for misplacing $6 billion as head of State Department; or for the Benghazi cover-up.
The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison for targeting and persecuting critics of the president and then purposely destroying evidence. Obamacare will be defunded and dismantled. The Obama Crime Family will be prosecuted for crimes against the American people. And Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters.
Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved…just for fun. That will all happen on Trumpp s first day in the White House. Who knows what Donald will do on day two?
That s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump. That s why we must all support Donald. This may be our only shot at saving America, uncovering the crimes committed against our nation and prosecuting all of those involved.
Regards,
Gary Stone
stone_gary_l@sbcglobal.net
More is learned about a road by traveling on it than by consulting all the maps in the world.
-- Anonymous --
God Bless America