Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Re #35366:
sugar, you're on the mark. Hope most traders are listening.
Loyal
Fast,
We're on the same page. Mm's have certainly stuffed their mouths with shares. I just wish I knew what percentage of the float they have accumulated. I reckon it's alarmingly high.
Loyal
Looks like mm's are very hungry for shares. But fwiw, I rather believe they're about done dropping us at this juncture.
I never make predictions, but I'm leaning on the probability that we'll see something of an upswing. At least for now.
I'll eat crow this morning if I'm wrong, but for now I'll crunch some bran flakes.
Loyal
Bear,
In pinkyland one can place an order hours before the bell, but it can't go through till after 9:30. So, if this was finalized at 9:20, it's called . . . .
. . . can you say 'collusion.'
Loyal
porky,
Sessions is an old down home coot who probably won't get near confirmation.
And by the way for anyone:
What really puzzles me is that for the past week or so Dems have been clamoring for more say in The Donald's scheme of things. Trump is being told he has to reach across the aisle and include Barry's globalist policies in his admin come January. Basically, what I'm hearing is, "Donald, ya gotta do this and that. You gotta give ground here and here and here if you want us to stop bitchin'."
Excuse me? I must be in a fog. I thought the winners in wars and elections dictated the future, and the losers had to suck it up. You know, something like, "Elections have consequences. And you lost."
Help me, somebody. WTF here?
Loyal
This is really something. Let's see now.
We topped out on 10/21 at .15 or so. Since then:
1) We saw a nice $7.5 million deal secured out of state.
2) Rec mj then passed big time in its home state.
3) Revenues are up again this quarter, as they were the past quarter and the quarter before that and before that.
News all across the board couldn't have been better.
Yet here we sit. About 70% down from the high a month ago. Maybe someone has a handle on it I can't see. From here I can only conclude that outsiders (big pharma most likely) have been paying firms a nice piece of change to drive this thing and other mj's into an abyss. Back when there still was a measure of sanity they called that racketeering.
Anyone has an unbiased slant, lay it on me. It makes no sense whatsoever. I mean it; in my 16 years in the market I've never seen anything like it.
Loyal
Oh Porky, stop it. Just hush now. All the telltale signs are there. This is classic manipulation, and everyone knows it. And so do you.
You're frustrated, and we'll forgive you for you're occasional dullness of mind, bro.
Let's move on now.
Loyal
Just when I thought I'd seen it all.
A company showing nice, steady growth and true revenues.
Then I take a look at its slow stoch and fast stoch charts.
And they're both virtually zero.
Absolutely amazing. Ya gotta laugh.
Loyal
- - - What planet are we on?
Oligopoly. Yes, quite an appropriate word for this one-ring circus.
Loyal
This is what happens when old-fashioned rules and laws of trading are mothballed. Big business does well (have you seen the DOW?) and pays bird dogs to ruin small business. Specifically, at this level mm's are allowed to operate unbridled, the result being . . . . .
. . . . anarchy.
Loyal
Now that I see what some others are going through, I'm going to have to reassess my affiliation with Snottrade.
Never did like the smell of their merger with TD a couple months ago. The bigger these firms get, the more they work against the common man. Happens in all walks of life, not just brokerage houses.
Thanx to anyone who is alerting us to these stuffy, cue ball-headed hot shots.
Loyalhound (your loyal retailer watchdog)
sugar,
Go for it, bro. I'll stand with ya.
Loyal
shock,
Whether or not you can lock them up with a 'good for' to keep them from being borrowed is conjecture, but it isn't what bothers me most. And I'm not picking on Snottrade, because that's my broker, too.
It all just goes to prove that brokers are routinely in cahoots with shorts and investment firms to stifle the ability of retail investors to make an honest buck in an attempt to keep brokers and big shot firms at bay. What business is it of Snottrade or any other broker if someone wants to shoot a flare at the moon?
There was a time when the SEC possessed the balls to move on these shiny-headed, stuffed shirts and curtail their bullshit tactics. But those days are over.
Keep the faith, bro.
Loyal
vdb,
You're not quite right. Republicans do indeed know what people want. They just don't care about John Q. Public. Same as Democraps don't care.
Almost all in the House and Senate today are nothing more than civilian contractors who operate at the behest of the special interest lobbyists who financed their campaigns.
That's the swamp The Donald will have to drain. And it won't be easy, either. If he tries to do it full bore, it could very well cost him his life.
Scary talk, folks, but that's just the way it is in today's America.
Loyal
Tina,
You're right. Some are like either prostitutes or playboys who think we'll fall for their phony come on traps.
Problem is, too often people do, and the famous words of P.T. Barnum remind us of that.
Loyal
Tina, as are others, I've been stranded in the same boat with you for years. I still own a few thousand digits on my brokerage page.
And as you stated too well, averaging down here would be just another crap shoot. Once burned twice shy. But then again, sometimes finding a way to break even makes for a sweet ride.
Loyal
Four days in a row in the books of steadily decreasing volume compared to the day before. The chart appears to show such hasn't happened at any time this year till now. From my desk that is not viewed as a good sign.
But with the games being played, can you blame investors who move from the playing field to the bleachers?
Loyal
Seems to me that if the numbers don't come out on time, it means they won't be so appealing to the eye. After all, winners want their shareholders to know they own a winner asap.
Besides, if you got a big cannon, you don't muzzle it; you shoot it.
Loyal
Tina,
I got ya. Follow up Q is: Are we still dealing with the same shysters? or did a legitimate o & g group take over this tub?
The wood-to-char fuel seemed like a good concept. Too bad the venture was left in the hands of share cultivators with no conscience.
And if there's no real product in the works. one would suppose this is just another p & d.
Caveat emptor.
Loyal
Re #34697:
porky,
I have an inkling you might be correct. While mm's could walk this back much further, at some point they will have to decide whether to keep fishing or cut bait. They've already made a bunch of money by frightening away many in the herd, and I don't know how much longer they want to go before jeopardizing their stash.
What I would really like to see is a valid p.r. or revs put out to the general public before anything is leaked a day or two or three ahead of time to the mm's. After all, on a daily basis the playing field is tilted heavily in favor of the mm's to start with, and we retailers could use a touch of class from GRNH insiders.
Loyal
The new 'intro' page says we're now an oil & gas company. Has anything been published that says anything about marijuana? If so, what and where? I've seen nothing nor have I heard anything about mj other than what is being said here.
I ask because --- like many others --- I've held this as a rail-ties-to-energy venture up in Edmonton, and a couple hacks named McKay and Pollack fed us all buffalo chips for months before absconding with everyone's investment dollars.
Loyalhound
stockzombie,
Nice little ditty there, guy. Keep it up. You've become one of our two campus clowns.
Loyal
P.S. - - - No need for you or the i.v. man to get upset. We've created a 'safe haven' for both of ya. You want some Play Dough and crayons with that?
Re #34571:
Rat, I agree with porky and dothers. Superb article that everyone should read. And GRNH didn't pay anyone to pump the write-up.
Loyal
P.S. - - - To all: It's not a long article and will help boost your spirit.
Re #34558:
Hi Rocks,
How ya doin', bro? Haven't been in touch since way back with GES$ and the Canadian rail ties mess. I still own that pos.
Yeah, this baby will fly as soon as the mm's stop gang banging it.
Hope you prosper.
Loyal
Re #34523:
Okay, Captain, I'll bite. What happens now? Without some number crunching from the inside, I'd say more of same.
Loyal
Re #34503:
picker,
As for me, it isn't today's red that has me perturbed; rather the [10-red 3-green] ratio in the run up to the passage of Prop 64 that irritates.
This company is a real player, and as such shouldn't be sucker punched by way of manipulation.
Loyal
Let me guess. Some are really digging this latest round of . . . um . . . cheapies. Am I right?
And better do it now, too, because GRNH will never be this low again.
Or something like that.
Loyal
---- They're playin' with us, fellas.
"Oh, the games people play now
Every night and every day now,
Never meanin' what they say now,
Never sayin' what they mean."
- - - Joe South (1968)
Games, games, and more games. And I think big pharma is paying them money to play these games over and over.
The flat out corruption. It's really sad to see a legitimate company treated like somebody's whore, isn't it?
Or, to put it more bluntly, this has become little more than a disgusting, market makers' economic gang bang.
Loyal
Re #34394,
crude, yep. Revenues are about the only thing the shorts respect and give ground to. Everything else is just noise to them.
Loyal
Raven,
Not necessarily, bro. An okay day today, but I'd have liked to have seen a little more oomph in shares out the buyers. Otherwise, with a slack in interest may come a slack in the pps.
This oughtta been a roaring lion for the past week or two, not a meowing kitten.
Loyal
Don't mean to curtail the optimism, but last Friday was the first time in three weeks we didn't reach 10 mill in volume. Today looks like another below that threshold.
Granted, we took a bath during some of those high volume days, but a prolonged dip in volume is not a good sign. Wonder if we're headed for another round of stagnation.
Fishin' ain't no fun if the fish ain't bitin'.
Loyal
Re# 72700:
Rookie,
I think you're on the mark here. If memory serves me, MF tried to effect another r/s earlier this year, but FINRA nixed it. The man may have some good ideas and a vision for the future, but he is not to be fully trusted.
Loyal
surf,
May I amend your sentiment here. GRNH and the entire industry will really take off once people finally wake up to the fact that marijuana is not a weed at all. Never has been.
It's an herb, . . . . a subtle but powerful herb that should have been utilized to its fullness long ago.
Let's roll.
Loyal
Re# 33977:
porky, I just don't want you or anyone to play into what is not always, but often is a sucker's game. The temptation is strong to average down and 1) cut losses, and/or 2) increase to greater profits later.
But with what's going on, the mm's could theoretically take this all the way to double aughts. Seen it happen often and had it happen to me a couple times.
The best way to beat the mm's is for all to hold strong and wait it out, but because it's every man for himself, that almost never happens, and the mm's know this.
I want you and all retailers to make money, lots of it when GRNH begins to soar. When will that be? God only knows and He ain't sayin'. It should have happened with the passage of Prop 64. But it didn't, which tells me the mm's will continue to manipulate until they feel the time is right for them to release. Even this rise back to the 7's could be nothing more than a teaser.
Just be careful, bro. As for me, I bought so low that I'm still in the black, so I'm not writing this for me. We sure could use some news about revenues from the inside. That might be the best news of all, and perhaps give the mm's pause to reconsider their diabolical game here.
Loyal
I think the retail investor would do well to acknowledge that there's no such thing as a 'cheapie' anymore. Every day the market breakers re-define the meaning of the word.
Recently, mm's borrowed money to sell them as shorters when GRNH was at 12-14. Now they're buying them back as cheapies for 6-7. Which means the only ones making money on these cheapies are the market breakers.
One has to wonder how many of us aren't buying cheapies to make money at all. Rather, they're panic buying to average down so as to cut losses. It's a sucker's game I used to play also. But no more.
Loyal
Green,
As for me, I'm holding. After all, I'm retired. Per my motto: I've got nowhere to go and the rest of my life to get there.
Because I don't give counsel, I only suggest you take two mj capsules and call me in the morning.
Have a nice night.
Loyal
Whopper,
Should I be waiting with bells on and baited breath?
Loyal
P.S. --- Just in case anyone is unsure, the market does not close for Veteran's Day. But then, after after the blood bath of the past two days, a part of me kind o' wishes it would. That MACD is pathetic.
looking 4,
I added a couple weeks ago at .115 after it dropped from the 15's, so in that regard I'm no smarter than anyone else.
What really bites is that this tailspin took place after Prop 64 passed, so there's no legitimacy whatsoever to the nosedive.
And as to revenues coming out next week --- as one among us has stated --- we've seen that movie before. Like most pinks GRNH has a history of being late reporting fins. Often very late.
So, as far as numbers from the company is concerned, all I can say is, "Uh huh, we'll wait for that."
the disgusted Loyalhound
Fellow investors (true investors, that is), you got me wondering. I've been watching many of y'all buy cheapies for months now. You bought 'em at 13, 12, 11, 10, and so forth on down to now 06's.
Question is: At what point do y'all stop calling them cheapies? Were the 09's really cheap after all now that we're at 06?
What a crazy way to make money. Just sayin'.
Loyal (your cheap hound)
sun,
I can well understand your sentiments, bro. Moreover, this is one of those times when we find out who can look a godzilla in the face and stare it down.
I'm not one to tell you what to do, bro, since you're certainly not a rookie here. So, at this point I can only lay it out this way:
It's all a matter of faith. Where does yours lay at this time? You see, . . . . positive or negative, it's all up to you. You're the captain of your monetary investment. Mm's have temporarily commandeered the stock, but you still control your fate.
So, as I said above: Positive or negative; it's all up to you. What do you believe?
Hope you prosper.
Loyal