Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't think it's fluff. Intertape Polymer Group (ITPOF) has it on their website. Their PPS is at 17.27 as of this morning
Why are you trying to save us? Looked at your track record. Not really that good. Thanks though.
or if you're wrong :)
It is an opinion. Nobody knows what a stock will do because there are so many variables. How many stocks have you seen go flying up with no reason? How many stocks are trading way above what they really are worth? Haha "not an opinion" yeah right HAHAHA
Moment of silence for the recently departed. (cue the doves).
reasonably cheap? Hell any cheaper, I would swear I bought them stolen :)
It's called growing pains. They have a great product and one of the hottest alternatives to opiate based pain killers. The concern is the learning curve, I'm cautiously optimistic, and have a lot of confidence that they can find the sweet spot. CBD's are such a huge market right now that it allows for some wiggle room. If they can rein in the miscues, line up one major distributor, and show revenues, this is off to the races.
agree
Don't see this dropping to 6's much less 5's. To much solid DD with the CBD products to drop that far. I believe we should see this hover around here till news. Everybody that wanted out would take a huge loss, with the upside to much to ignore at the moment.
Damn, Good eye!!!
Did notice the same thing. There's something brewing!!
agree
DENIAL is not a river in Egypt. ELTZ has a captain at the helm that has proven time and time again he does bad business for traders. Not once, not twice, there is a list that keeps growing. I'm happy to help. The more I dig the more comes out into the light!!!!
Saying something happened in the past, should not mean it never happened.
Isn't the ceo leaving a trail warning people of how he conducts business enough?
https://chancerydata.shelbycountytn.gov/chweb/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=CH-09-0416&begin_date=&end_date=
06-MAY-2010
12:23 PM Granted (G)
Entry: WRIT OF INQUIRY/ JUDGMENT GRANTED FOR $183,117.00 AGAINST TERRANCE TECCO AND KPV HOLDINGS
Sorry, but that he put out a letter from "HIS" company saying it was resolved holds no weight against a filing from the SEC. If you were to say that the SEC put out a letter that they were mistaken. That would hold weight.
why, so people can lose money to people that don't care taking advantage???
I don't make up what is on the internet, SEC filings, or the company's own 10Q
I'm a trader that is actually doing DD. Please tell me that you did your own DD?
This was on the 10Q that was filed 2/21/2017
"The Company agreed to issue the Chief Executive Officer 20 million shares of common stock valued at $15,200,000 recorded as common stock payable at March 31, 2016 and issued the shares on August 2, 2016"
Who runs this company
That is one hell of a salary for TERRY TECCO
let me know if I have to keep digging?
Off the 10Q
filed 2/21/2017
"Furthermore, the Company agreed to issue the Chief Executive Officer 20 million shares of common stock valued at $15,200,000 recorded as common stock payable at March 31, 2016 and issued the shares on August 2, 2016"
What does this mean?
Isn't Tecco CEO?
WOW, the deeper I dig, the more proof comes up.
https://chancerydata.shelbycountytn.gov/chweb/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=CH-09-0416&begin_date=&end_date=
"JUDGMENT GRANTED FOR $183,117.00 AGAINST TERRANCE TECCO AND KPV HOLDINGS"
We shall see.
Thank You, if someone calls me on my DD, what am I supposed to say nothing? I'm tired of spending time on a stock I really could care less about.
somebody is getting rid of a lot of shares at other's expense. If you look at the past month's trades more have sold then bought. Don't get left holding the door.
where does it say that they have connected it to the grid?
Well let me pose a question that should help confirm trustworthiness or not. Can anyone confirm if ELTZ has placed ELITE SWD on the electrical grid or if they are still running a generator? Reason I ask is, right there on their website it talks about how much it's costing them $35,000 to run each month and they would start on it in March (they acquired this lease last year in August, I believe)
Somebody did not want that piece of information out there. I'll check when I get home. I believe that covered rental and fuel per month. If they are comnected to the grid, I will shut up and buy stock :)
Yes, here are the facts, pulled straight from an SEC filing.
Although he has started using Terrance Tecco nowadays, instead of Terry Tecco. HMMM wonder why?
False and Misleading Press Releases
4. On May 23, 2001, the company announced that it had entered into an agreement to purchase the majority interest in a Guatemalan oil field development project. The press release stated that the project, when fully developed, would have the status of a "giant oil field" with over one billion barrels of oil. The press release omitted to state that the acquisition was contingent on financing, which the company had no reasonable expectation of obtaining.
5. On June 14, 2001, the company issued a press release announcing the purchase of 16 oil wells in west Texas. The release stated that these wells already had $7,500 cash flow per month with four wells partially in production. Strata claimed that it would immediately begin a re-working program on the field and that within 30 days it expected a net cash flow of $50,000 per month. On July 31, 2001, the company announced that production from the wells would be about 50 barrels per day and that it expected operations to begin in September 2001. Strata omitted to state that it had insufficient funds to operate the four partially producing wells following the purchase. Strata also omitted to state that it did not have the funds available to re-work any of the wells, that this re-working was contingent upon receiving outside financing, and that it had no reasonable basis to expect the necessary funding. The cash-flow and production projections were, therefore, unrealistic and misleading.
6. On July 30, 2001, Strata announced in a press release that funding for the purchase of an oil project in Texas had been placed in escrow and that the acquisition would add $162 million of proven reserves to Strata's assets. When the financing for this purchase fell through, however, Strata failed to correct or retract this press release and made no attempt to revise or delete the misleading information on the company's website.
7. Finally, on March 25, 2002, Strata announced in a press release a "letter of intent" to acquire a bio-waste processing plant in Pennsylvania with expected annual revenue of $5 million. The press release also announced the company's plan to develop a field adjacent to the plant that purportedly contained $20 million in natural gas reserves. Strata omitted to state that the acquisition of the plant and the development of the natural gas field were contingent upon financing and that the company had been unsuccessful in its attempts to obtain any financing. The annual revenue projection, therefore, was unrealistic and misleading.
8. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder prohibit, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
9. Respondents knew, or were reckless in not knowing, that the press releases described above were false and misleading at the time they were made.
10. Respondents committed or caused the violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by issuing the press releases described above.
IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose a cease-and-desist order as specified in Respondents' Offer.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Respondents shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary
This is an excerpt from the SEC filing, that is being said to be irrelevant.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-46993.htm
"On July 31, 2001, the company announced that production from the wells would be about 50 barrels per day and that it expected operations to begin in September 2001. Strata omitted to state that it had insufficient funds to operate the four partially producing wells following the purchase. Strata also omitted to state that it did not have the funds available to re-work any of the wells, that this re-working was contingent upon receiving outside financing, and that it had no reasonable basis to expect the necessary funding. The cash-flow and production projections were, therefore, unrealistic and misleading."
Sounds pretty relevant to me. Being they are talking about an acquisition.
Don't let them tell you it's old news.
I find it relevant and should not be swept under the rug. He did not just unknowingly post false information. He knew he did not have the funds and still put out a PR saying otherwise. That is bad enough to get the SEC involved. How does he even still run a public company??? That immediately should be a huge red flag!!!!!
A person posting false pr's knowing full well he did not have the funding for the acquisition never goes away, and never is ok. If the SEC saw to it to address this issue, IT'S PRETTY IMPORTANT!!!!
good to be back!!! Let's see if I hopefully can a warn people about this company. I did before, but obviously new investors need all the pertinent info. I'm happy to oblige.
Good to see you again too :)
ttps://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-46993.htm
He is using a different variation of his name now.
Did you read the SEC filing I posted, and you believe this guy???
looks like some people actually took the time to read that SEC filing.
I'm surprised this guy is allowed to run a company. But of course, people don't like losing money so they will deny it, will say it was in his past, etc. Sorry but this guy shows he does have it in him to do something illegal. Not buying that this is a legit company.