Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BRZL is a shell, and therefore doesn't have any employees, products or revenue. Nobody has claimed BRZL has ever had any of those. BRZL has also never undergone a Reverse Split. As far as dilution is concerned the opposite has happened. The OS has gone from 888 million to 370 million with the retirement of shares.
Umm yes
I think an auto sales company would be juat fine for BRZL. makes me think it has a better chance to be legit
I'm sure she has them for a reason, but at this time nothing connects it to BRZL
I don't know. It is possible, Amanda Flores does have several MMJ site names registered to her, but this could simply be a coincidence.
This line in the current filing is interesting.
No oil here. You are three years behind
first financials submitted in over 3 years http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=BRZL&id=126402
anything above 2 would be great. Then hopefully we get some news on Monday to send BRZL back to a penny
Oh, that quote was from the latest filing. I didn't see it in there before. that is very interesting. Time to cross check Flores' connections in this space
BRZL is on the move with large bid support after first filing in 3 years
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=BRZL&id=126402
Renfro returned 408 million shares. Some other shares must have been returned as well because the TA has confirmed 370 OS.
370 million OS is correct. Float is no where near 88 million.
Still a great SS though
I don't recognize that statement from BRZL, but it is possible that it is buried somewhere in early filings.
That float is not correct. I could probably come up with 5-10 people that probably have close to 88 million shares. I'd put the float closer to 320 million
Not a problem. Companies will leave their history in their filings. it is often difficult to read through it and determine what it is they are doing. I only know because I've read through every BRZL filing multiple times
not sure. she brought in a food truck to ABBY. seems like she has other connections hopefully she brings more than a food truck to BRZL
Amanda Flores was also involved in ABBY which Lawson Kerster was involved in too.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/California/Chula-Vista/tulip-enterprise-inc/44968524.aspx
Amanda Flores is our new CFO
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=BRZL&id=126402
ABBY is dead, I think. I researched all this when Kerster came on board a month ago. I'm reviewing things now and will post a summary soon. I'm very surprised that Flores is on board here based on what happened at ABBY.
Per Tesla it is even better now.
Looks like this is a move to make sure that BRZL doesn't get halted due to lack of updated financials. My guess is that a reverse merger is coming our way.
It appears that Kerster has ties to Oil
http://www.4-traders.com/ABBY-INC-11719347/company/
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1478535/000109635013000072/afapptlkresig.htm
and ties to green, although not the fun kind of green
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/DisplayFilingInfo.aspx?Type=HTML&text=%2526lt%253bNEAR%252f4%2526gt%253b(%22LAWSON+M.%22%2c%22KERSTER%22)&FilingID=8832046&ppu=%2fPeopleFilingResults.aspx%3fPersonID%3d2696911%26PersonName%3dLAWSON%2520M.%2520KERSTER
wow, very interesting. I don't think I've ever seen an OS go down like this before. Who turns in shares??
Is it possible to find out who owns the 88 million restricted shares?
completely false again. No dilution. in fact all shares held by Renfro were returned to the treasury. With 480 million returned the OS is now 408 million. Per a previous post the TA has said there are 88 million restricted giving BRZL a float of 320 million. The pps tanked because of a bad business deal that fell through, no dilution, no RS.
BRZL has never done a reverse split. Only two forward splits - http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BRZL/profile
Yep, sent you something to make sure
OS was 888 with 408 held by Renfro which was returned to the treasury
AS appears to be the same to me.
Don't know yet. although it seems we have new management!
Ray, I was asleep at the wheel. Can you get me caught up? Is there anything real here?
You, may not have been able to trade UNGS for over a year, but that is not the case for me and likely everyone else. I have successfully bought and sold UNGS prior to the name change. I cannot sell my shares that I had at the time of the name change until Etrade fixes their issue. Please note this is Etrade's problem, not UNGS. I also can buy and sell shares of UNGS that I've purchased after the name change.
For reference I just purchased 21,000 shares just to prove it can be done. It shows up in my account separately from the previously purchased shares which are showing under the old cusip number. I can sell these shares and put the sell order at .003 to prove it. I cancelled that order, because I don't plan to sell that low.
Please stop with the misinformation about not being able to sell UNGS without giving the proper context.
my Etrade account is showing the old Cusip #90345C207 instead of UNGS. Not sure how many days it will take for them to get the new cusip # and allow trading, but this is Etrade taking their time to switch to the new cusip. UNGS is still trading, and very nicely at that.
Here is a link to the DTCC showing the name change, and the cusip # change
http://www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/pdf/2014/6/20/OTC-118.ashx
25 million bid @ .0003
10 million bid @ .0003. Very interesting
Why would you think the float was getting smaller? Of course a company with no product and no money was selling shares. They have to do this in order to get their business going. What matters is what the do with the money when they get it. If they invest in the business then it is good for the shareholders if they line their pockets and keep doing it, then we have a problem. Right now it looks like this company is trying to do the right thing, although time will tell
So what? why would someone pay full price for the shares for debt service?
Maxing out the AS would probably help the liquidity of the stock which would help stablize the pps. a float of 75 million would still support a nice pps. I can understand the concern about what the business is producing, but dilution is not an issue with the current share structure.
it doesn't represent the 4.5 million issued in January. It represents the 3.2 million shares issued in December of 2013
The float is 25 million shares. Until coming into CYBK I've never seen anyone complain about that. Now I've seen everything...
Honestly, CYBK's biggest problem might be liquidity. If they diluted to the full 200 million AS CYBK might trade a lot better.
It is unfortunate that CYBK didn't PR this information. This is the first revenue stream for the company and you would think they would want it to be known. Perhaps there is more to the story and they are not ready to fully disclose their intentions??