Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Luken201 said:
#33896
luken201 0 Share Wednesday, April 11, 2012 8:49:37 AM
Re: ctrumabll post# 33891 Post # 33896 of 34053 Had a good conversation with Steve Taylor, he is handling investor relations, I'm very excited about where this is headed. If you have any doubts about this company you may want to give him a call. I came away feeling pretty good about my holdings.
#34045 luken201 0 Share Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:29:45 PM
Re: Ferick post# 34044 Post # 34045 of 34053 Yes it was me that said it but I was only passing along information that I (was) told directly from Steven Taylor. I'm done playing in this sand box, not worth the time or effort. Let the thing do what it's going to do and we'll see what happens. This is my last post.
luken201 0 Share Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:15:13 AM
Re: sidestyle post# 33902 Post # 33907 of 34053 Not one but multiple mobile units will be coming on line.
Montana up and running producing not only oil but money.
He told me that the company has ac(q)uired some new technology but wouldn't say what it was only that some of Peter's customers encouraged him to look into this technology. High demand, high profit were his exact words. The customers are giving away the feedstock and Peter is processing and selling. Steve said bigger deal than the company's original process.
No need for any cash infusion, doing just fine with cash flow.
Audits will be completed by the end of April, they are having to go all the way back to 1998.
Next press release should come out in May and will involve information on the audits.
Webinar's each quarter starting in the 3rd quarter.
Peter has begun reaching out to investment houses but he wouldn't say anymore regarding the stock price other than it's seriously undervalued.
It is now past the end of April and if audits are completed they would be filed. They have not been filed, as of this time.: http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000914257&owner=exclude&count=40
Therefore, it is likely audits have also not been completed.
Therefore, someone's pants are on fire.
That means, Tuesday is Cavatelli night. I ate Cavatelli for supper Tuesday.
What did your question, "What's for Tuesday" mean?
Cavatelli.
I'm satisfied waiting until Tuesday.
http://www.sec.gov/edgar/quickedgar.htm
Latest Filings
Here you'll find the most recent filings our EDGAR system has received — from all SEC filers, including individuals and companies, paper filers and electronic filers. The list on this page features the most recent real-time filings from a broad range of companies and individuals for the current official filing date (including filings made after the 5:30 pm deadline on the previous filing day). Note: Filings may be made Monday through Friday (except for U.S. Federal Holidays).
The reason for this is to allow adequate time for retrieval, even if filings are made after the 5:30 PM (EDT) deadline for current day filings.
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000914257&owner=exclude&count=40
This is the CIK# 0000914257
This is the ticker: GRNO.PK
The current corporate name is vague: It's either Green Oasis Environmental (does not seem to generate a filing database), Global Enviro Solutions (does generate a filing database) or other.
As of the time of this post, there have been no new filings since 2/28/2011
If a new filing doesn't show up, on Tuesday, I will suspect someone's pants are on fire.
I hope any new technology that may have been acquired is something of greater significance than a tube to drain the water below a tube to drain the oil as displayed in the photo.
Audits will catch up over the weekend and they'll be filed by Monday's closing, I'm sure.
I'm not so sure it was "IR rep". I would encourage you to reference post #33903 and follow that thread. In #33907 it looks like it's you who is leading this charge. Then in 33911 it is asked, "who sent the mail?"
It's always a guessing game and prolonged delay in reporting is guaranteed to add to the uncertainty. With that, I understand the negativism. With the distribution of shares as payment for promotion, it could have been offered as an alternative to cash and the promoter thought it to be such a reasonably speculative upside risk that it looked to be the better deal.
The report of impending filings, p.r.s in the works and other optimistic events has not been varified and the preceding chain of that report has not been established even though that chain has been requested. The consequence of that omission creates doubt as to its authenticity. This would also understandably add to the negativism.
It's hard to regard such an agreement as a gift. It strikes me as more of a performance based compensation. It's started and progressed just as you described.
And, if you'll read the mission statement, you'll see that it has not changed.
Yes, there has been plenty of communication with and from the company. If you just go to the web site < greenoasisenvironmental.com/management >, you will be able to see who is listed and who is not. That is significant communication and without p.r.s
We also know that the mobile equipment ordered (not acquired) from a european manufacturer or distributor last spring has arrived (several months ago, as stated) and is in operation at the Wibaux facility (unless it has been moved to another location).
The comments I made regarding Ramm Venture Development and it's management person does not reflect on GRNO's management. According to the records available, that stock assignment to Ramm occurred prior to the stock assignment incident with PIPP and although it may be an embarrassment not directly related, it does not qualify as a GRNO management involvement situation. I'm throwing this in, just in case your comments are directed to what I have objectively shared with this board. As I have said before, this company will be prosperous and sustaining; it will be just fine.
Here is just one more article on this interesting investor in GRNO.
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/dominic-alessandro-fraud-c598501.html
Dominic Alessandro
Posted: 2012-04-02 by charles mont
Fraud
Complaint Rating:
Company information:
First Fi
United States
First Fidelity USA announced today that it has taken criminal action against Dominic Alessandro from Toronto, Canada.
In October of 2011, Dominic Alessandro entered into a stock subscription agreement with First Fidelity USA on behalf of its client, SIPP International Industries, Inc. Mr. Alessandro duped First Fidelity into sending him the shares before they received the funds for the purchase. Immediately thereafter, Mr. Alessandro took the shares to Nassau Bahamas where he deposited the shares and sold them off on the open market. His actions caused the share price of SIPP to drop from $2.75 per share down to today's low of $.02 per share. It is further believed that Mr. Alessandro funneled the proceeds into properties and other companies that he owns or has interests in; Toronto as well as in Miami, Florida. "Liens will be filed in Toronto as well as in Dade County against his properties, " states William Ray of First Fidelity. "This guy is nothing but a common thief and we are pursuing this matter until we recoup what has been stolen and until Mr. Alessandro is behind bars."
Besides filing the criminal complaints here in the U, S., they have filed criminal complaints with the Ontario Securities Commission as well as the local Crown in Toronto.
I don't have the info. in front of me. I think it's on my other computer. It has the address of Ramos and Ramos and as I recall, it is a Texas address and I think it's Austin but not certain. I'll look it up later. As for the Ramm address, the Ripoff Report web site
http://www.ripoffreport.com/investment-brokers/ramm-venture-develop/ramm-venture-developments-inc-d09c0.htm
It has the address, I think but is not clear and concise.:
RAMM Venture Developments, Inc.
2681 Eglinton Ave.
Etobicike Nevada 89102
United States of America
Phone: (800)524-2565
Web: Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada
Category: Investment Brokers
so I believe it is either in Nevada, either in the Las Vegas or Reno area or it is in Ontario, CA
You must mean this exact name.:
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK
Beneficial Owner
Amount of Stock Owned
% Ownership
Peter Margiotta
34,500,000
38.9%
Ramos and Ramos Investments, Ltd.
7,200,000
8.2%
Ramm Venture Development Inc. 8,700,000 9.8%
Percentages are based on 88,752,342 shares of stock issued and outstanding as of December 2010.
The financials of Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. have been filed through 1999; however, from 1999 to date, the Company was dormant. As President of the Company, Mr. Margiotta’s goal has been to bring the Company back to life. The unaudited financial statements from 2009 are attached here as an exhibit and financial statements from 2010 are in the process of being audited and will be filed as soon as possible.
Oh, man! This just gets better and better. GRNO mentioned.
http://dominic-alessandro.pissedconsumer.com/beware-of-dominic-alessandro-20120326307799.html
Could it be that, Dominic Alessandro is selling off his GRNO shares to pay for his sipp shares?
Or maybe he's selling to pay for his crackerjack defense team. Regardless the reason, if he's selling GRNO shares, it could explain the increase in float and/or outstanding shares. He could be selling to Peter and Peter is using revenues to cover.
This Ramm Venture Development, Inc.? This is not encouraging.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/investment-brokers/ramm-venture-develop/ramm-venture-developments-inc-d09c0.htm
There must be some mistake.
What I see first, with an increase in the number of outstanding and float shares of a stock is a dilution of capital value. Second is and increase in liquidity, though it is informative to see that report.
Kezzek, who or what is Ramm Venture? From what I was able to find, their concern, whatever it is now, was delisted in 1997 and formerly did business in California and British Columbia. An address is still available in Vancouver and the company CEO/president/CFO/etc is named A. Leonard Taylor. The only link with GRNO that I can find is that of the name, Taylor.
What other connections are there?
I tried to look up the PCMS link but got a dead end. I didn't notice until after I posted my previous. I should have researched them before posting but failed to do so.
Here's one more thing. There is note of another acquisition in the works, both on the iHub GRNO Show Intro information but it's old news. I think this is what it's about. It may or may not be. If it is, it's a slow boat with a 2009 date on it.
http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd/WYPDES_Permitting/WYPDES_PNs_and_appr_permits/FinalPermits_Apps/FP_0035001-0037500/WY0035785-REN-2-17-09%20june.pdf
I agree, re: "snookered". What I meant was, I think he relied on the information he got from whomever was delegated the responsibility of the preparatory due diligence necessary to make an informed decision about the shell proposed and the appropriate shell model to fit the business model intended. With this, the name, Aldo Rotondi keeps popping up. With Aldo on board, it seems to me that Mr. Rotondi, with his past business experiences, should have been more alert to the pitfalls associated with a reverse merger shell/private company acquisition and would have been better able to advise than that which he managed to accomplish. The following several paragraphs is from iHub To: 1Coffeehound who wrote (12672)
3/29/2010 12:03:14 PM
From: sidestyle
1 Recommendation of 12687
http://www.airamcapital.com/home
http://www.pcms-team.com/about/
... In 1998 Mr. Rotondi left Royop Corporation; which was later acquired by a US REIT; to focus on his business ventures with Airam Capital Group, Inc., a company that Mr. Rotondi acts as president. Airam Capital is in the business of seeking out private business opportunities that may be better served as public companies. As principal for various public companies, he seeks out mergers with private companies and assists them in their business development as a new public company and enhancing shareholder value.
Airam Capital works together with Nevada Fund, GoPublicToday.com, Management Consulting Group assisting with strategic investment and acquisition services for early-stage companies in support of investment and M&A focus providing strategic consulting and business development services.
About had a stinkin' heart attack. I've got GOOG right above GRNO and juxtaposed the prices.
Yes, they do. http://www.tcc5.com/thetruth.php
However, there are consequences that have to be considered; which kind of RM is appropriate.
I think Peter got snookered and now he's trying to make up for it. I formed this opinion based on what I've learned from the GRNO web site and from the url above.
Also, this one.: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rtm.asp#axzz1sJIHmvhD
Some are auspicious, some are ominous.
I think the original legal consultant with the low level law degree was in denial when he assumed the responsibilities bestowed upon him; way over his head, didn't have the proper skills to sort it all out to make the right decision as to the appropriate shell model. It's nobody's fault and it's everyone's fault. I think Balallan is a big problem and I think Taylor is a big problem. Other than that, I think if this ship is guided in the right direction from here on, it will survive and prosper. Other than Balallan, I have know idea of what liabilities were inherited from Carraway so if anyone has a grasp on that part, I'd sure appreciate some help with painting the picture. Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in the fruit salad (P. Trump).
Comments re: reverse merger are very interesting. Understanding how simplified the maneuver can be to avoid the requirements of a private company going public, I have to consider that divesting of the shell corp to allowing the previously private entity to remain in prosperity but without the encumbrance of public investors may be just as advantageous. It's a shuddering thought, though I would not be surprised since further acquisitions has always been part of the business plan but there has been no mention of additionally inclusive plans and one acquisition doesn't fulfill the proposed model.
Not silly and not pointless. Plenty of evidence. No proof established. An impasse in opinion.
Similar to that of Iranian nuclear program; energy or weapons. Plenty of evidence but no proof.
Thanks for the post.
Well, all right, I can accept that. Someone explain this accounting, please.:
http://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=grno&submit=Short+Quote%99
Someone, it appears, is out to shock the world by falsely reporting over 29,000 short shares.
This isn't much by any standard but still, it does appear to be a reported short interest. This would have occurred within the last two weeks.
<I know that there is very little naked shorting and that there isn't $1.5 BILLION a day in Google alone.
First of all, on the OTC, trades are not computerized. They are reported by the MM. But if the sell occurs first, it is marked short because it IS short. FINRA isn't saying it's short at the end of the day, just that at the time the sell executed, it was short.
So one more time, the numbers FINRA is reporting AREN'T bogus. They just don't mean what you think they mean (an open short position at the end of the day). FINRA was pressured into releasing these figures and now they're in compliance. Maybe they were smart enough to realize that some people would misinterpret them and buy pinkies that they otherwise would never touch in the hopes of a large short covering. Remember, FINRA is a SELF-REGULATORY group, funded by the MMs and broker-dealers. >
So, does that mean that if there is a short volume listed as 100,000, it doesn't really mean there were 100,000 shares short sold, it must mean that 100,000 shares sold that didn't find a buyer? Seems if they had, they would have been counted as completed trades.
Re: GOOG I know nothing of GOOG stock activity or its value. You tell me, undervalued or overvalued?
<LOL, so $1.5 billion of Google stock is being Naked shorted every day. Too funny. Makes you wonder why anyone would bother NSS GRNO's $1,500/day in average activity.>
It's because micro cap pinks with little volume and little sign of upward movement are easier to manipulate down than up. Easy to find out; Just ask.
<It is not inaccurate or meaningless. It just is not what you think it is. >
Aha! I see. So it's a bullshit stock market kabuki dance? At last, the stock market has real meaning.
<The proof in the pudding is looking at the FINRA file for ANY stock, especially an exchange traded large cap. They all show huge short positions. Do you really think there's that much naked shorting going on in every stock? Are there that many short sellers than cover before the semi-monthly reporting?>
I have no idea how much naked shorting there is. Do you? Give me a number on any one stock. Also a number of buy to cover transactions. I also have no idea of how many short sellers there are. Give me a number on that, too. With a stock like this one, for all I know, there could be only one and it could be you. I'm not saying you are the short seller. I'm just saying, it could be you.
<The MM doesn't want to go long on a stock that's moving down. He sells first and buys seconds or minutes later. That trade is marked "short" because when its executed, it's short.>
This makes perfect sense, doesn't it? And when the trade marked "short" is covered seconds or minutes later (why would it take minutes in a computerized system where the bid is shown, unless the bid is painting the tape which puts the mm in a disadvantaged bag holder position) the computerized tally will zero out the two trades and count them both in the day's volume. So, I ask again, what is the point of displaying bogus numbers without declaring the numbers are bogus?
If the data provided is inaccurate and meaningless, why post it? How can it possibly be interpreted in any other way but inaccurate and meaningless if that's what it is? How do you interpret it, since it's inaccurate and meaningless? The columns are labeled; Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|ShortExemptVolume|TotalVolume|Market
Date is accurate, short volume?, short exempt volume? (nothing but zeros), total volume is accurate (by comparison), market (always designated by the letter "O")
So, how do you people interpret the number in the column designated, "Short Volume"?
BTW, I've read and copied the info. posted from finra. I read it often, still trying to comprehend it in terms of interpreting the data. Could it be the computer they're using to compute the running total is just not fast enough to keep up?
loanranger
Saturday, December 03, 2011 5:36:58 PM
Re: Ferick post# 33448
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69572021
Post #33450 of 33450
?
Leisure time reading (borrowed material):
"SHORTS data explained by FINRA...phone call 3 minutes ago i spoke to FINRA regarding their daily SHO list which seems to show 30-70 % off all the volume in thousands of stocks as 'short sales'. they explained the 2 factors which tend to inflate the short sale data beyond what is normally considered a short sale, i.e. a person or firm borrowing shares which are then sold.
1. all marketmaker sells to buyers for which the MM doesnt at that moment possess the stock would go onto the list. the shorts data is sent to SEC at time of execution, so during the course of a day, a MM may trade 20M shares of company xyz, of which 10M of those shares were initiated as short sales and the other 10M were buys to cover those shorts. despite the fact that their net position at the end of the day is flat, the data would show 10M shares as having been short sales.
this applies even to grey sheet stocks. despite the fact there is no MM making bids and asks, MM's can and do call around to other MM's to find willing sellers to match buy orders and vice-versa.
2. the other factor that could affect the daily short figure is very interesting. if a sale is being initiated by the holder of restricted 144 stock, even though the owner of those shares is technically a long, the sale is listed as a short sale because the actual certificates are not yet "clean" via the transfer agent.
they confirmed that in order to ascertain the true "open short" position one should look at the bi-monthly short report. it was also stated that any of the daily shorts which were not delivered within the prescribed time would definitely end up on the FTD list."
It really shouldn't matter which of these two listed possibilities is applied. If it can't publish the right number and transparency is an issue, shouldn't that point be included in the published page? This, then, takes me back to my first question; what is the point of publishing/posting these numbers if they're inaccurate and known to be inaccurate?
Then why post the numbers at all? What would be the point?
I can see several scenarios to explain the numbers in these finra columns; all transactions not included at the time of posting, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate that they mean nothing for short interest. If that were the case, what would be the point in posting them on a daily basis? In your statement on having 90%+ marked short and the stock go up 1000%, I would be inclined to disbelieve a 1000% stock price increase than I would a 50% short volume posting.
185,000 of total volume 270,000 (~1/2) showing on http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20120412.txt as short volume. How does that happen, in an up market and up oil with all of this enthusiasm? Must be Xena.
I don't know if this will be of benefit to anyone but it's something; At the GRNO web site,
www.greenoasisenvironmental.com open "investors" and slide the "detailed quote" pane to the left. At the right is labeled "Related items". Click on "monthly share volume. If you run through the various report dates listed, it indicates various brokers and rankings, volume, % of trading, etc. back to May, 2011. I think I'll put it on a spreadsheet. Call it, greedy investor activity time.
The desire for money and the things it can buy is often associated with Americans. But not all Americans are greedy, which implies an insatiable desire to possess or acquire something, beyond what one needs or deserves (: greedy for profits). Greedy is especially derogatory when the object of longing is itself evil or when it cannot be possessed without harm to oneself or others (: a reporter greedy for information).
Someone who is greedy for food might be called gluttonous, which emphasizes consumption as well as desire (: a gluttonous appetite for sweets).
A greedy child may grow up to be an avaricious adult, which implies a fanatical greediness for money or other valuables.
Rapacious is an even stronger term, with an emphasis on taking things by force (: so rapacious in his desire for land that he forced dozens of families from their homes).
Acquisitive, on the other hand, is a more neutral word suggesting a willingness to exert effort in acquiring things (: an acquisitive woman who filled her house with antiques and artwork), and not necessarily material things (: a probing, acquisitive mind).
Covetous, in contrast to acquisitive, implies an intense desire for something as opposed to the act of acquiring or possessing it. It is often associated with the Ten Commandments (: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife) and suggests a longing for something that rightfully belongs to another.
Rocker4
Share
Monday, April 02, 2012 9:44:20 AM
Re: None
Post # 33878 of 33884
GRNOs PR, IR, is putting out this information. Keep in mind this is not mngt."management is working on the audits with the audit firm..
That would be Stephen Taylor, Taylor Capital (formerly Taylor Capitol) The fellow must be an idiot: I don't doubt he didn't know there is a difference.
Isn't anyone curious as to the audit firm? Isn't that why Sharon D. Mitchell was brought aboard? So we have two lawyers, an in house lawyer (what's he do, anyway?)
This has been a long process but management anticipates it being completed
very soon. I've never heard that one before. 'Very soon' translates into, "before the next millennium."
They are currently consulting with their attorney regarding how to prepare to move to a higher exchange in the coming months. Good luck with that. Not a clue. How about filing a report for last year or even last quarter? Hey, Michel, where did you get that juris D?
We do appreciate your patience. Management is working hard to continue
running a solid, high growth, high return, annual record revenue setting
company. (into the ground.)
In the coming weeks, investors will receive more information regarding the
progress and direction of the company during the last 4 months." Also this"GRNO has accomplished A LOT during the last 4 months.
We are writing press releases in order to inform investors of what has taken place. These press releases will begin to hit the market in the coming weeks.
That would be Taylor, the spin doctor with a twist for the creative.
Management is very happy with the progress of the company and will be doing an audio
interview as well. This will give investors a better idea of what the
company has accomplished, are currently doing and what they are planning
to accomplish in 2012. I'm going to chase that carrot around the track one more time.
We currently have 9 press releases slated to hit the market." Tabula rasa.
Some of you may also have received these messages,and I dont mean to pump for them but thought I would share. flim flam
The surprise will be if there are any numbers.
I'm not expecting any fast past filing catchup. It would be reasonable to expect good, accurate and complete record keeping and reporting for the entire 2011 fiscal year. Too much to expect?
I don't know if it will be great or even if it will matter but I'm thinking 2011 Annual Report.
Just a guess, mind you.